Year : 2018 | Volume
: 148 | Issue : 4 | Page : 396--410
Smokeless tobacco cessation interventions: A systematic review
Suzanne Tanya Nethan1, Dhirendra Narain Sinha2, Kumar Chandan3, Ravi Mehrotra3
1 Division of Clinical Oncology, ICMR-National Institute of Cancer Prevention & Research, Noida, India
2 School of Preventive Oncology, Patna, India
3 WHO FCTC Global Knowledge Hub on Smokeless Tobacco, ICMR-National Institute of Cancer Prevention & Research, Noida, India
Background & objectives: Smokeless tobacco (SLT) consumption is a global health issue with about 350 million users and numerous adverse health consequences like oral cancer and myocardial disorders. Hence, cessation of SLT use is as essential as smoking cessation. An update on the available literature on SLT cessation intervention studies is provided here.
Methods: Through an extensive literature search on SLT cessation intervention studies, using keywords such as smokeless tobacco, cessation, interventions, quitlines, brief advice, nicotine replacement therapy, nicotine gum, nicotine lozenge, nicotine patch, bupropion, varenicline, mHealth, etc., 59 eligible studies were selected. Furthermore, efficacy of the interventions was assessed from the reported risk ratios (RRs) [confidence intervals (CIs)] and quit rates.
Results: Studies were conducted in Scandinavia, India, United Kingdom, Pakistan and the United States of America, with variable follow up periods of one month to 10 years. Behavioural interventions alone showed high efficacy in SLT cessation; most studies were conducted among adults and showed positive effects, i.e. RR [CI] 0.87 [0.7, 1.09] to 3.84 [2.33, 6.33], quit rate between 9-51.5 per cent, at six months. Regular telephone support/quitlines also proved beneficial. Among pharmacological modalities, nicotine lozenges and varenicline proved efficacious in SLT cessation.
Interpretation & conclusions: Globally, there is limited information available on SLT cessation intervention trials, research on which must be encouraged, especially in the low-resource, high SLT burden countries; behavioural interventions are most suitable for such settings. Appropriate training/sensitization of healthcare professionals, and school-based SLT use prevention and cessation programmes need to be encouraged.
Dr Ravi Mehrotra
ICMR-National Institute of Cancer Prevention & Research, Plot I-7, Sector 39, Noida 201 301, Uttar Pradesh
|How to cite this article:|
Nethan ST, Sinha DN, Chandan K, Mehrotra R. Smokeless tobacco cessation interventions: A systematic review.Indian J Med Res 2018;148:396-410
|How to cite this URL:|
Nethan ST, Sinha DN, Chandan K, Mehrotra R. Smokeless tobacco cessation interventions: A systematic review. Indian J Med Res [serial online] 2018 [cited 2021 Sep 26 ];148:396-410
Available from: https://www.ijmr.org.in/article.asp?issn=0971-5916;year=2018;volume=148;issue=4;spage=396;epage=410;aulast=Nethan;type=0