Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research
  Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login  
  Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Users Online: 657       

   Table of Contents      
PERSPECTIVE
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 153  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 273-279

Enabling One Health solutions through genomics


1 Institute for Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Justus-Liebig University Giessen, Schubertstraße 81, 35392 Giessen, Germany
2 Department of Meat Safety, ICAR-National Research Centre on Meat, Chengicherla, Boduppal P.O., Hyderabad 500 092, Telangana, India

Date of Submission25-Feb-2021
Date of Web Publication23-Apr-2021

Correspondence Address:
Trinad Chakraborty
Institute for Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Justus-Liebig University Giessen, Schubertstraße 81, 35392 Giessen
Germany
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_576_21

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Chakraborty T, Barbuddhe SB. Enabling One Health solutions through genomics. Indian J Med Res 2021;153:273-9

How to cite this URL:
Chakraborty T, Barbuddhe SB. Enabling One Health solutions through genomics. Indian J Med Res [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Jun 15];153:273-9. Available from: https://www.ijmr.org.in/text.asp?2021/153/3/273/314494

Ecological interactions between different domains of life impact the balance of ecosystems and human health. This point is made with destructive clarity by the current coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak, caused by SARS-CoV-2. The pandemic has its origin as a zoonotic pathogen but its transmission pathway to humans is presently unknown[1]. As the pandemic progressed, it became clear that many other animals and in particular mammals, were secondary targets of the disease. Also, the presence of virus in sewage and waste water, and probably also in packaged frozen food, represents enormous reservoirs of virus loads and a potential for increased infections through evolution of more transmissable virus variants[2]. This will invariably affect the efficacies of both detection methods as well as the vaccines currently in use. Thus, to respond to the current challenges the world is facing, an integrated vision that humans, animals, the environment and climate are intricably linked is more important than ever[3].

The implementation of genomic sequencing and molecular epidemiology in public health has been largely driven by the detection of viruses during the outbreaks and pandemics[4]. In 2009, genome sequencing of virus during the outbreak of A(H1N1)pdm 09 suggested that the pandemic had begun almost two months earlier before the first reported case[5]. Sequencing of outbreak isolates of the Middle-East respiratory syndrome (MERS) virus identified presence of the virus in camels and allowed the documentation of independent cases of transmission from camels to humans[6]. Wide scale genome sequencing introduced during the 2013-2016 Ebola virus outbreak enabled identification of the sentinel case in the outbreak and phylodynamic insights from large sequencing efforts demonstrated that the outbreak was maintained by human-to-human transmission rather than repeated zoonotic introduction[7]. In the current pandemic, as SARS-CoV-2 continues to acquire genetic changes, accelerated determination of genome sequences provides the tool vital to monitor and validate the expected sensitivity of various diagnostic assays even within a locality[8].

The need to determine origins and transmission routes for an assessment of the emergence and expansion of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) worldwide is an urgent problem. Between 2010 and 2015, the total aggregated consumption of antibiotics in 76 countries increased by 65 per cent from 21.1. to 34.8 billion defined daily doses (DDD), with the greatest increases reported in rapidly emerging economies[9]. This constitutes a major cause for the emergence of AMR worldwide. The increase in AMR in human health settings is associated with the overuse, misuse as well as an unwarranted use of antimicrobials, either through self-diagnosed medication or over-prescription by medical practioners. This is facilitated through easy and/or illegal access to antimicrobial medication without a prescription[10]. However, this is dwarfed by the mass usage of antibiotics in livestock farming and aquaculture[10]. The soaring global demand for meat in low- and middle income countries has led to the growth in meat production levels of 68, 64, and 40 per cent in Africa, Asia and South America, respectively[11]. The use of antimicrobials in livestock production is enormous comprising 73 per cent of the entire global consumption[12]. Currently, global consumption of antibiotics is estimated to be 131,000 tons annually. This is predicted to rise by over 60 per cent to around 200,000 tons by 2030[11]. This contributes to the rise in contamination of water bodies and environments by large-scale pharmaceutical production facilities as well as discharge from communities dedicated to healthcare and livestock with antimicrobials. Environmental contamination with pharmaceutical waste provides selection for antimicrobial resistance and promotes transfer of AMR genes among bacterial communities in the environment[13].

To deal with the rise in AMR and emerging infectious diseases, a One Health approach needs to be considered. The protection of human life cannot be a sole concern. Our well-being as a species requires environmental sustainability, and various disciplines are required to interact with one another to provide new tools and methods for research and implementation of effective services to inform policy decisions and regulations to the benefit of health in animals and humans, the environment and climate for future generations. Collaboration among multiple disciplines is necessary and this approach is fundamental to understand the concept of One Health[14].

A transdisciplinary approach to One Health considers animals, humans and their shared settings together with their linked environments [Figure 1]. To promote the well-being of the animal-human-ecosystem interface, increased efforts to improve understanding of health and disease processes is needed[14]. To be effective it should be able to predict, detect, prevent and control infectious hazards and other issues affecting health and well being[15]. These efforts contribute to sustainable development goals and to improve equity in urban and rural populations.
Figure 1: Ecosystems involved in the transfer and spread of antimicrobial resistance emphasizing a One Health approach (created with tools from: https://biorender.com/).

Click here to view



   Global threat posed by antibiotic-resistant bacteria Top


In the European Union (EU) and the European Economic Area, about 670,000 infections and 33,110 deaths were attributed to antibiotic-resistant bacteria in 2015[16]. By the year 2050, antibiotic-resistant bacteria may, on a global scale, lead to the death of up to ten million people at a cost of 94 trillion Euros[17],[18]. However, the increasing prevalence of antibiotic resistance is also a problem in numerous other areas, such as with farm animals, plants, food and the environment[19]. In 2018, the World Health Organization (WHO) published a priority list for the development of new antibiotics against pathogenic bacteria. Carbapenem-resistant, Gram-negative bacteria (Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, referred to as ESKAPE pathogens) were of highest concern. These multi-resistant bacteria have become increasingly more frequent in recent years[20].

The concern is that we are reaching a post-antibiotic era, in which bacterial infections will become virtually impossible to treat with antibiotics. Counteracting this threat, by developing new antibiotics, for example, requires precise knowledge of the bacteria involved. For this purpose, their characteristics must be analysed as accurately as possible and for as many bacteria as feasible. Among the important tools advanced to promote the fight against AMR is the development of balanced and comprehensive epidemiological and ecological surveillance networks at the regional, national and international scales[21].


   Use of genome sequencing in antibiotic resistance research Top


The cost of curbing local and regional outbreaks and particularly that of a global pandemic has enormous consequences in social, economic and ecological dimensions[22]. A more rational approach, far less costly and with probably more societal support, would be the development of surveillance and interception systems based on detailed knowledge of emerging pathogens and their environmental interactions. When linked to strategies for advanced diagnostics, therapeutics and vaccine development, these are anticipatory and can be preemptive in consequence.

The ecological and pathological consequences of animal, human and enivronmental interactions with and among viruses and other microorganisms have remained poorly understood because of their invisible scales[23]. The scope of characterizing these interactions appeared to be an impossible task a few years ago, but an exponential rise in the output capacities of DNA sequencing platforms coupled together with steep decrease in sequencing costs provided the technical and economic breakthroughs needed to address these challenges[24].

Early containment of antibiotic-resistant pathogens to prevent and stop spread of emerging or highly prevalent resistance genes requires different scales of surveillance programmes and epidemiological analysis[21]. The increase in recently sequenced genomes of antibiotic-resistant bacteria has revealed the overall diversity of antibiotic resistance mechanisms involving innate and adaptive components[25]. Innate antibiotic resistance is the intrinsic resistance imparted by the chromosomally encoded genes and/or naturally occurring variants that modify efflux pumps, etc., and is disseminated vertically as clones[26]. On the other hand, adaptive antibiotic resistance is often acquired on segments of highly mobile genetic elements (MGEs) that encode enzymes which can detoxify or modify antibiotics and their cellular targets. The MGEs are often transferred horizontally, very frequently by extrachromosomal entities called plasmids that can in very short evolutionary time scale, lead to very large reservoirs of multi-resistant bacteria comprising many different clones and even species[27].


   Genome-based surveillance systems Top


The increased recognition that whole genome-based sequencing (WGS) has an important role in improving public health is being applied to national surveillance of infectious diseases[4]. In the EU and the United States the widespread adoption of WGS has improved the accuracy and effectiveness of disease surveillance as well as outbreak investigation[28]. For real impact of this strategy on public health policies such as through enhanced assessment of disease or changes in drug resistance transmission dynamics, it requires the communication of actionable and timely results. This requires fostering of a multidisciplinary approach to interprete information derived. from epidemiological data and pathogen sequence analysis as key competencies to guide public health action[29]. Trained staff to coordinate exchange of data between public health institutions, together with those overseeing the monitoring of livestock, food chains and environmental laboratory network partners will be needed. Multidisciplinary expertise is needed, between scientists, statisticians, clinicians, veterinarians, public health experts and policymakers, to prioritize and identify high impact diseases or drug resistance emergence, to establish where genome sequence information is truly useful for public health interventions[30].

It is clear that the public health emergencies of the current pandemic has fuelled the rise of WGS-based typing methods. This has enabled rapid identification of pathogens and is now being used to understand their reservoirs and origins, the paths and modes of transmission, derive and map genetic diversity, and describe outbreak dynamics[31]. The genome analysis can estimate aspects of disease dynamics in the absence of epidemiological data and unanalysed samples. For AMR, the in silico prediction of phenotype, innate and acquired antimicrobial resistance mechanisms, colonization and virulence determinants and correlates of epidemiological/ecological fitness associated with transmission, for so-called high-risk clones, can be determined[32]. Finally, the generation of AMR-based epidemiological landscapes across space and time will enable prediction of emergence and inform on policy measures in One Health.

During surveillance, both high-quality genomic information and the resolution of genetic relatedness is required to address disease-specific objectives. For example, enhanced resolution strategies and precision enable detection and common source tracing during cross-community infection outbreaks. Also, the monitoring of vaccine antigen expression among circulating pathogens and changes in antigen diversity in large populations are highly relevant[33].


   Challenges in microbial bioinformatics Top


The decrease in the costs of DNA sequencing has accelerated sequence generation. It has been estimated that the annual acquisition of raw data worldwide would excede one zetta byte to one trillion Gb in 2025[34]. This increases the demand for local data processing as well as the need of scalable, federated and nearby computing infrastructures for large scale computations as primarily manifested in the rise of cloud computing[35]. By sharing the physical computational backbone between numerous users, synergistic effects such as limiting the overprovisioning for peak loads and shared spare resources has reduced costs and increased literacy and know-how to use large IT infrastructures[36].

This huge increase in data opens new scientific questions and constantly requires new algorithms and bioinformatic approaches. This has contributed to the genesis of a large set of bioinformatics software tools and databases[37]. Robust implementations of analysis workflows need to produce reproducible results on different machines among multiple iterations. A central role of these workflows is to enable scalability and modern analysis workflows must be able to cover broad ranges of data sizes. Smaller numbers of cases need to return rapid results while production of real-time data might scale to very large datasets. This often requires either vertical or horizontal distribution workflows to compute clusters of different types and sizes.

In order to achieve a focused and comprehensive analysis of genome sequence data, we developed the analytical software ASA3P (Automatic Bacterial Isolate Assembly, Annotation and Analyses Pipeline)[38]. ASA3P has been optimized to process sequence data obtained by applying leading sequencing technologies. Initially, the analysis software subjects the genome sequence data to a quality control procedure and removes faulty data. The remaining data are then used to derive the genetic information of the individual bacteria (genetic fingerprint). The genetic fingerprints of several bacteria can subsequently be directly compared. ASA3P creates high-resolution genetic fingerprints of hundreds of bacteria within hours, a task that would have taken several weeks or even months to complete in the days of manual approaches[38]. This was accomplished using technical adjustments, allowing the optimal exploitation of the enormous capacities of a cloud-based computing infrastructure.


   A proposal for implementing a genome-based One Health initiative in india Top


At the UN in September 2016, the world leaders highlighted an unprecedented level of attention to control the spread of infections resistant to antimicrobials[39]. A broad, coordinated approach was mooted to address the primary causes of AMR across human and animal health and agriculture. Since then, the World Health Organization (WHO), Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), and World Organization of Animal Health (OIE) working in conjunction with other key organizations are developing policy frameworks for global action[40]. It is anticipated that these global policy frameworks will translate into national action plans in many participating countries. A key tenet is the collection of state-of-the art-information from regional and national databases and interdisciplinary research incorporating multiple sectors, domains and disciplines including health, natural, social and economic sciences. Research into implementation represents a key area of practice as only a good understanding of contextual and real-world factors will create the necessary impact required.

Here, we propose the creation of a Centre for Interdisciplinary Research and Solutions on AMR (CIRS-AMR) within the One Health Initiative for the purposes outlined above [Figure 2]. As AMR poses an urgent threat, the aim is to safeguard the use of antimicrobials to support the achievement of Sustainable Development Goals particularly regarding human and animal health, welfare, equity and economic growth. As outlined in JimO´Neill's report on AMR, investment in AMR containment is expected to give a high economic rate of return and should be of the highest priority among public sector investments[18].
Figure 2: The Million Vaibhav Proposal to promote consciousness and to foster a One Health approach to antimicrobial resistance (created with tools from: https://biorender.com/). This figure was generated exclusively for the purpose of this article.

Click here to view


A proposal of high impact and visibilty would be the implementation of a national, transsectoral proposal examining the genetic context of one million microorganisms in a One Health Context (The Million Vaibhav Project). This would be in keeping with the WHO recommendations on the use of genomic surveillance for AMR[40] and be part of a global strategy for infectious disease and foodborne outbreak control, for case definition as well as enabling source attribution.Genomic surveillance would also enhance elimination strategies. It would monitor vaccine effectiveness by assessing the increase, decline or replacement of specific lineages. It would identify failures in control efforts, reveal potential reservoirs, promote outbreak investigation and detect new emerging strains.

Such an initiative would require harnessing and improving sequencing infrastructure, promoting computational infrastructure and bioinformatic tools for automated platforms to process and analyze genome data with readily interpretation formats and actionable information[41]. As detailed above, combinations involving on-site and cloud-based computing infrastructure could be developed. To support genomic surveillance service statisticians, bioinformaticians and molecular epidemiologists would be needed for data analysis and interpretation.Field epidemiologists and disease specialists would interpret the data generated and public health experts would use these findings for de/refining policy and communication[42]. This would generate high standards in the collection, storage and distribution of specimens, genome archiving as well as biorepository storage and sharing. The overaching benefits of rapid data sharing, which is to be developed would realize disease control and pandemic prevention[43].

Ensuring efficiency and effectiveness of the use of genome-based data in routine surveillance systems is crucial. This includes assessing completeness of data, timely data collection and the use of data for policy decisions. A sustainability framework would also need to be established and would best be integrated into national disease control programmes. Finally, developing genome-based surveillance will need guidance, leadership and coordination that would be mandated within the One Health Initiative of India.

Acknowledgment: The first author (TC) acknowledges the assistance of Dr Luigi La-Pietra with the Figures.

Financial support & sponsorship: None.

Conflicts of Interest: None.

 
   References Top

1.
Banerjee A, Doxey AC, Mossman K, Irving AT. Unraveling the Zoonotic Origin and Transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Trends Ecol Evol 2021; 36 : 180-4.   Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Xu Y, Kang L, Shen Z, Li X, Wu W, Ma W, et al. Dynamics of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 genome variants in the feces during convalescence. Genet Genomics 2020; 47: 610 -7.   Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Morand S, Lajaunie C. Biodiversity and Health: Linking life, ecosystems and societies. London: Elsevier, ISTE Press; 2017.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Kwong JC, McCallum N, Sintchenko V, Howden BP. Whole genome sequencing in clinical and public health microbiology. Pathology 2015; 47 : 199-210.   Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Dawood FS, Jain S, Finelli L, Shaw MW, Lindstrom S, Garten RJ, et al. Emergence of a novel swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) virus in humans. N Engl J Med 2009; 360 : 2605-15.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Al-Shomrani BM, Manee MM, Alharbi SN, Altammami MA, Alshehri MA, Nassar MS, et al. Genomic sequencing and analysis of eight camel-derived Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) isolates in Saudi Arabia. Viruses 2020; 12 : 611.   Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Dudas G, Carvalho LM, Bedford T, Tatem AJ, Baele G, Faria NR, et al. Virus genomes reveal factors that spread and sustained the Ebola epidemic. Nature 2017; 544 : 309-15.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
World Health Organization. Genomic sequencing of SARS-CoV-2: a guide to implementation for maximum impact on public health. Geneva: WHO; 2021.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Klein EY, Van Boeckel TP, Martinez EM, Pant S, Gandra S, Levin SA, et al. Global increase and geographic convergence in antibiotic consumption between 2000 and 2015. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2018; 115 : E3463-70.   Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Van Boeckel TP, Brower C, Gilbert M, Grenfell BT, Levin SA, Robinson TP, et al. Global trends in antimicrobial use in food animals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015; 112 : 5649-54.   Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Van Boeckel TP, Pires J, Silvester R, Zhao C, Song J, Criscuolo NG, et al. Global trends in antimicrobial resistance in animals in low- and middle-income countries. Science 2019; 365 : eaaw1944, doi: 10.1126/science.aaw1944.   Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Van Boeckel TP, Glennon EE, Chen D, Gilbert M, Robinson TP, Grenfell BT, et al. Reducing antimicrobial use in food animals. Science 2017; 357 : 1350-2.   Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Kraemer SA, Ramachandran A, Perron GG. Antibiotic pollution in the environment: From microbial ecology to public policy. Microorganisms 2019; 7 : 180.   Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
The Lancet. Zoonoses: beyond the human-animal-environment interface. Lancet 2020;396: 1, doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31486-0.   Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Li AM. Ecological determinants of health: food and environment on human health. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2017; 24 : 9002-15.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Sciworthy. The impact of antibiotic resistant infections in Europe. Available from: https://sciworthy.com/the-impact-of-antibiotic-resistant-infections-in-europe/, assessed on March 9, 2021.   Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Cassini A, Högberg LD, Plachouras D, Quattrocchi A, Hoxha A, Simonsen GS, et al. Attributable deaths and disability-adjusted life-years caused by infections with antibiotic-resistant bacteria in the EU and the European Economic Area in 2015: a population-level modelling analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 2019; 19 : 56–66.   Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Review on Antimicrobial Resistance. Antimicrobial resistance: Tackling a crisis for the health and wealth of nations. Available from: https://amr-review.org/sites/default/files/AMR%20Review%20Paper%20-%20Tackling%20a%20crisis%20for%20the%20health%20and%20wealth%20of%20nations_1.pdf.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Van TTH, Yidana Z, Smooker PM, Coloe PJ. Antibiotic use in food animals worldwide, with a focus on Africa: Pluses and minuses. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 2020; 20 : 170- 7.   Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Tacconelli E, Carrara E, Savoldi A, Harbarth S, Mendelson M, Monnet DL, et al. Discovery, research, and development of new antibiotics: the WHO priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and tuberculosis. Lancet Infect Dis 2018; 18 : 318-27.   Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Prestinaci F, Pezzotti P, Pantosti A. Antimicrobial resistance: a global multifaceted phenomenon. Pathog Glob Health 2015; 109 : 309-18.   Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Martin A, Markhvida M, Hallegatte S, Brian W. Socio-economic impacts of COVID-19 on household consumption and poverty. Econ Dis Cli Cha 2020; 4 : 453-79.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Bass D, Stentiford GD, Wang HC, Koskella B, Tyler CR. The pathobiome in animal and plant diseases. Trends Ecol Evol 2019; 34 : 996-1008.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Goodwin S, McPherson JD, McCombie WR. Coming of age: ten years of next-generation sequencing technologies. Nat Rev Genet 2016; 17 : 333-51.   Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Munita JM, Arias CA. Mechanisms of Antibiotic Resistance. Microbiol Spectr 2016; 4. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.VMBF-0016-2015.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Alcock BP, Raphenya AR, Lau TTY, Tsang KK, Bouchard M, Edalatmand A, et al. CARD 2020: antibiotic resistome surveillance with the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res 2020; 48 : D517–25.   Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Partridge SR, Kwong SM, Firth N, Jensen SO. Mobile genetic elements associated with antimicrobial resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev 2018; 31 : e00088-17.   Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Jagadeesan B, Gerner-Smidt P, Allard MW, Leuillet S, Winkler A, Xiao Y, et al. The use of next generation sequencing for improving food safety: Translation into practice. Food Microbiol 2019; 79 : 96-115.   Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Gardy JL, Loman NJ. Towards a genomics-informed, real-time, global pathogen surveillance system. Nat Rev Genet 2018; 19 : 9-20.   Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Gerner-Smidt P, Besser J, Concepción-Acevedo J, Folster JP, Huffman J, Joseph LA, et al. Whole genome sequencing: Bridging One-Health surveillance of foodborne diseases. Front Public Health 2019; 1 : 172.   Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Rife BD, Mavian C, Chen X, Ciccozzi M, Salemi M, Min J, et al. Phylodynamic applications in 21st century global infectious disease research. Glob Health Res Policy 2017; 2 : 13-22.   Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Lehtinen S, Blanquart F, Croucher NJ, Turner P, Lipsitch M, Fraser C. Evolution of antibiotic resistance is linked to any genetic mechanism affecting bacterial duration of carriage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2017; 114 : 1075-80.   Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Collignon PJ, McEwen SA. One Health-Its importance in helping to better control antimicrobial resistance. Trop Med Infect Dis 2019; 4 : 22.   Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Stephens ZD, Lee SY, Faghri F, Campbell RH, Zhai C, Efron MJ, et al. Big Data: Astronomical or genomical? PLoS Biol 2015; 13 :e1002195.   Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
eInfochips. Importance of cloud computing for large scale IoT solutions. Available from: https://www.einfochips.com/blog/importance-of-cloud-computing-for-large-scale-iot-solutions/ , assessed on March 9, 2021.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Tso FP, Jouet S, Pezaros DP. Network and server resource management strategies for data centre infrastructures: A survey. Computer Networks 2016; 106 : 209-25.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Ison J, Rapacki K, Ménager H, Kalaš M, Rydza E, Chmura P, et al. Tools and data services registry: a community effort to document bioinformatics resources. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44 : D38-47.   Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Schwengers O, Hoek A, Fritzenwanker M, Falgenhauer L, Hain T, Chakraborty T, et al. An automatic and scalable pipeline for the assembly, annotation and higher-level analysis of closely related bacterial isolates. PLoS Comput Biol 2020; 16 :e1007134 ASA3P.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Political Declaration of the high-level meeting of the general assembly on antimicrobial resistance : draft resolution. Available from: https://sdg.iisd.org/news/unga-adopts-political-declaration-on-antimicrobial-resistance-discusses-links-with-sdgs/, accessed on March 9, 2021.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Global Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System (GLASS). Available from: https://www.who.int/glass/resources/publications/molecular-methods-for-amr-diagnostics/en/, accessed on March 9, 2021.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
World Health Organization. Whole genome sequencing for foodborne disease surveillance. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/whole-genome-sequencing-for-foodborne-disease-surveillance, accessed on March 9, 2021.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Inzaule SC, Tessema SK, Kebede Y, Ogwell Ouma AE, Nkengasong JN. Genomic-informed pathogen surveillance in Africa: opportunities and challenges. Lancet Infect Dis 2021: S1473-3099.30939-7.   Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Maljkovic Berry I, Melendrez MC, Bishop-Lilly KA, Rutvisuttinunt W, Pollett S, Talundzic E, et al. Next generation sequencing and bioinformatics methodologies for infectious disease research and public health: Approaches, applications, and considerations for development of laboratory capacity. J Infect Dis 2020; 221 (Suppl 3): S292-307.  Back to cited text no. 43
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Global threat po...
    Use of genome se...
    Genome-based sur...
    Challenges in mi...
    A proposal for i...
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed344    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded98    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal