Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research
  Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login  
  Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Users Online: 1542       

   Table of Contents      
REVIEW ARTICLE
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 153  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 17-25

An overview of preclinical animal models for SARS-CoV-2 pathogenicity


1 Department of Primate Biology, ICMR-National Institute for Research in Reproductive Health, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
2 Department of Structural Biology, ICMR-National Institute for Research in Reproductive Health, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Date of Submission27-Jul-2020
Date of Web Publication26-Mar-2021

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Uddhav K Chaudhari
Division of Primate Biology, ICMR-National Institute for Research in Reproductive Health, Jehangir Merwanji Street, Parel, Mumbai 400 012, Maharashtra
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_3215_20

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV)-2 has caused millions of fatalities globally since its origin in November 2019. The SARS-CoV-2 shares 79 and 50 per cent genome similarity with its predecessors, severe SARS-CoV and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) coronavirus, all belonging to the same genus, Betacoronavirus. This relatively new virus has stymied the effective control of COVID-19 pandemic and caused huge social and economic impact worldwide. The FDA-approved drugs were re-purposed to reduce the number of fatalities caused by SARS-CoV-2. However, controversy surrounds about the efficacy of these re-purposed antiviral drugs against SARS-CoV-2.This necessitates the identification of new drug targets for SARS-CoV-2. Hence, the development of pre-clinical animal model is warranted. Such animal models may help us gain better understanding of the pathophysiology of SARS-CoV-2 infection and will be effective tools for the evaluation and licensure of therapeutic strategies against SARS-CoV-2. This review provides a summary of the attempts made till to develop a suitable animal model to understand pathophysiology and effectiveness of therapeutic agents against SARS-CoV-2.

Keywords: Animal models - COVID-19 - pathogenesis - preclinical - SARS-CoV-2 - therapy - vaccine


How to cite this article:
Munshi I, Khandvilkar A, Chavan SM, Sachdeva G, Mahale SD, Chaudhari UK. An overview of preclinical animal models for SARS-CoV-2 pathogenicity. Indian J Med Res 2021;153:17-25

How to cite this URL:
Munshi I, Khandvilkar A, Chavan SM, Sachdeva G, Mahale SD, Chaudhari UK. An overview of preclinical animal models for SARS-CoV-2 pathogenicity. Indian J Med Res [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Jun 13];153:17-25. Available from: https://www.ijmr.org.in/text.asp?2021/153/1/17/311941

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV)-2 is an enveloped positive-sense single-stranded RNA virus, belonging to the genus Betacoronavirus[1].Though not as big scale as SARS-CoV-2, the members of the same genus, i.e. SARS-CoV and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), have caused epidemic in 2002 and 2012, respectively[2],[3]. SARS-CoV-2 shares 79 and 50 per cent genome similarity with SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, respectively[1]. Further, SARS-CoV-2 genome shares 96.2 and 87 per cent similarity with genomes of bat coronavirus, bat CoV RatG13 and bat SL CoVZXC21, respectively[4],[5]. Thus, SARS-CoV-2 is believed to have a zoonotic origin[1],[4],[5].

The transmission of COVID-19 occurs through respiratory droplets. Incubation period of COVID-19 lasts for 14 days. However, the median duration for the onset of symptoms after exposure is around 4-5 days[6],[7]. The severity of clinical signs and symptoms of COVID-19 illness varies among patients. Individuals afflicted with COVID-19 may experience fever, chills, dry cough, shortness of breath, fatigue, body pain, headache, loss of smell and taste, sore throat, runny nose, vomiting and diarrhoea over the course of disease[8],[9],[10],[11]. A few individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 may remain asymptomatic[12],[13],[14].

Major reason underlying alarming COVID-19 pandemic in a short span is the lack of an effective therapeutic/prophylactic drug against SARS-CoV-2.

About 450 COVID-19 therapeutics are in pre-clinical trials[15]. These include viral, RNA, DNA, protein and nanoparticle-based vaccines as well as re-purposed therapeutics including vasodilator, immune modulator, steroids, anti-inflammatory agents, anti-coagulatory molecules, anti-parasitic and antiviral drugs. Antiviral drugs target viral replication, cellular entry and viral trafficking[16]. Availability of ideal animal models would help in assessment of the efficacy of vaccines before their entry into the clinical trials. Animal models are also essential to assess the efficacy of drugs in vivo, since in vitro evaluation of drugs may not suffice for clinical use. For instance, hydroxychloroquine showed promising results against COVID-19 in vitro but failed to show any remedial effect in Cynomolgus macaques exposed to SARS-CoV-2[17].

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of any therapeutic agent requires its efficacy to be proven in at least two animal models. An ideal animal model should imitate the clinical symptoms of a disease as observed in humans. Here, we present a comparative report on the replication and transmission capability of SARS-CoV-2 in various animal models.


   Non-primate models Top


Non-primate models popularly utilized for therapeutic screening include rabbits, ferrets, golden Syrian hamsters and mice.

Rabbits

SARS-CoV-2 uses angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE-2) and transmembrane serine protease 2 receptor to enter the cell[18]. The spike protein receptor binding domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV-2 interacts strongly with rabbit ACE-2 compared with its human homologue hACE-2[19]. Rabbits are susceptible to MERS-CoV infection but show no significant histopathological changes or clinical symptoms. In a recent study, New Zealand white rabbits exposed to SARS-CoV-2 virus at a dose of 10[6] tissue culture infectious dose 50 (TCID50) showed viral shedding from nose, throat and rectum after 15, 11 and 5 days post-infection (d.p.i.), respectively. The infected rabbits remained asymptomatic throughout the study with severe bronchus-associated lymphoid tissue proliferation and macrophage infiltration in the alveoli[20]. More studies are needed to explain the absence of symptoms in rabbit and to conclusively determine the utility of rabbit as animal model to study SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Ferrets

Ferrets are susceptible to many human respiratory viruses such as influenza virus, syncytial virus, para influenza virus and coronavirus[21],[22],[23]. Ferrets reproduce the clinical symptoms of viral diseases due to the presence of viral receptors and the similarity of their respiratory tract anatomy with that of humans[24]. ACE-2 is mainly expressed in type II pneumocytes and serous epithelial cells of tracheobronchial sub-mucosal glands in ferrets[25]. The domain in ferret ACE-2 that binds the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 differs by only two amino acids from its human homologue domain. Ferrets infected intra-nasally (IN) at 10[5] TCID50 with SARS-CoV-2 virus, isolated from Korean patients, recapitulated clinical pattern observed in humans[26] [Table 1]. Infected animals exhibited lethargy, cough at 2-6 d.p.i. and elevated body temperature at 2-8 d.p.i. Viral RNA copies were detected from 4 to 8 d.p.i. in nasal and saliva swabs[26]. In a study conducted by Shi et al[32], ferrets were exposed at a dose of 10[5] plaque-forming units (pfu) with human SARS-CoV-2 isolates and environment isolates from wet market in Wuhan. The ferrets exposed to human SARS-CoV-2 isolates showed an increase in body temperature and loss of appetite at 10 d.p.i., whereas those exposed to environment isolates showed similar symptoms at 12 d.p.i. The viral replication in ferrets exposed to either of these isolates was observed in the nasal turbinate, soft palate and tonsils[32]. The delay in appearance of overt symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection in this study32 compared with the study by Kim et al[26] could be due to different viral strains or sub-species of the ferrets used in the study. These investigations revealed that ferrets were susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection, and hence, they could be used to screen re-purposed drugs for the efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 infection. The ferrets have been used to screen lopinavir, ritonavir, hydroxychloroquine sulphate and emtricitabine-tenofovir for their efficacy against SARS-CoV-2[33][Table 2].
Table 1: Symptoms observed after SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans and various animal models

Click here to view
Table 2: Animal model used to exhibit the effectiveness of repurposed drugs against SARS-CoV-2infection

Click here to view


Liu et al[38] reported gene signatures of SARS-CoV-2 infection in ferrets for both short-term (three days) and long-term (21 days) infection. The genes involved in the immune response showed higher expression during long-term SARS-CoV-2 infection in ferrets. Further network analysis revealed that metabolic, glucocorticoid and reactive oxygen species-associated genes were enriched in both short- and long-term infection models[38]. These studies suggest that ferrets are good model to study SARS-CoV-2 disease pathogenesis and potential targets for therapy.

Hamsters

Golden Syrian hamsters are susceptible to SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 infection39,40 but not to MERS-CoV41. Both SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 use ACE-2 to enter the cell. Comparison of hamster ACE-2 to its human homologue shows that 29 amino acid residues are conserved between the human and hamster. The spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 interacts strongly with ACE-2 receptor of hamsters due to the presence of asparagine at 82nd position in the ACE-2 receptor27,42. High-affinity interaction between hamster ACE-2 with SARS-CoV-2 RBD makes lung epithelial cells permissive to the virus.

Syrian hamsters exposed to 1×105.5 TCID50 SARS-CoV-2 showed progressive weight loss till six d.p.i, after which animals started gaining weight[43]. Viral RNA was detected in respiratory tract, kidney and intestine with serum neutralizing antibodies from 3 to 5 d.p.i.[43]. Chan et al27 challenged golden Syrian hamsters IN with SARS-CoV-2, isolated from a patient in Hong Kong, at a dose of 10[5] pfu. The hamster tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 on four d.p.i. and lung histopathology showed inflammation with alveolar haemorrhage and necrosis. The signs of lethargy, increased respiratory rate and weight loss were observed 2-4 d.p.i. In addition, infected hamsters exhibited extra-pulmonary manifestations such as myocardial degenerative changes, intestinal mucosal inflammation and lymphoid necrosis, similar to the clinical manifestations such as heart failure, diarrhoea and lymphopaenia seen in humans [Table 1]. In female hamsters exposed to 2×10[6] TCID50, viral replication was observed in lungs on one d.p.i. whereas in ileum and stools on 2-3 d.p.i. Clinical symptoms included slight weight loss, bronchopneumonia and peri-bronchial inflammation[34]. Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 through direct contact was established and faecal-oral route was debunked[34]. Young and mature hamster model exposed to a dose of 105.6 pfu through IN and ocular routes developed pneumonia, pulmonary oedema, alveolar haemorrhage and a dose-dependent change in body weight[44]. Unlike observations made by Chan et al[27], viral titre was similar in lung and nasal turbinate. Administration of convalescent plasma in infected hamsters reduced the viral replication in the respiratory tract[44]. Further, an aged hamster model has been developed by Osterrieder et al[45]. Aged hamsters exposed IN to SARS-CoV-2 at a dose of 1×10[5] pfu presented more weight loss compared to younger hamsters. However, no difference in body temperature was noted between the two groups. Although the viral titres at initial time points were higher in young hamsters, rapid clearance of virus was seen in younger hamsters. Faster recovery was associated with a higher level of neutralizing antibody titres and a higher influx of immune cells in the lungs in aged hamsters[45].

The passive immunization of hamsters on one d.p.i. with convalescent serum, from SARS-CoV-2 infected hamsters, resulted in reduced viral load[27]. This suggests that hamsters recapitulate clinical symptoms of human COVID-19 and can be useful for research on convalescent plasma therapy[27]. Syrian hamsters have also been employed as an infection model to test favipiravir and hydroxychloroquine against SARS-CoV-2[34] [Table 2].

Transgenic mice

Wild mice are not susceptible to SARS-CoV-2. The Asn31 and Ser82 amino acids in mice ACE-2 prevent the interaction of ACE-2 with spike protein RBD due to electrostatic or hydrophilic repulsion. Due to the presence of ACE-2, His353 in mice cannot form salt bridge with RBD. This poor interaction between mice ACE-2 and SARS-CoV-2 makes wild-type mice an unsuitable model[46].

However, genetic manipulation in standard inbred mouse strains (C57BL6, BALB/c or 129S) to express human receptor ACE-2 and DPP4 has been used as an alternate strategy to develop SARS-CoV-2 permissive mouse model[47]. Transgenic mice strain HB-01–expressing hACE2 receptor developed by Bao et al[28] showed high susceptibility to IN inoculation of SARS-CoV-2 at a dosage of 10[5] TCID50. These mice showed marked weight loss, virus replication, infiltration of lymphocytes and monocytes in alveolar interstitium and accumulation of macrophages in alveolar cavities at 3-5 d.p.i.[28]. Similarly, another transgenic mouse (HFH4-hACE2 mice) expressing the human ACE-2 protein created by Jiang et al[48] developed interstitial pneumonia upon IN inoculation of 3×10[4] TCID50 virus. The lung lesions were similar to the lesions observed in COVID-19–infected humans. The tissue tropism of SARS-CoV-2 infection and viral quantification revealed lungs as the major site of infection. SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA was also detected in the eye, heart and brain in some infected mice[48]. Another transgenic mice developed using adenovirus vector also successfully imitated the manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 infection[49]. Sun et al[50] utilized CRISPR/Cas9 knock in technology to express hACE2 receptor in C57BL6 mice. Aged hACE2-expressing mice lost 10 per cent body weight, while no symptoms were observed in young mice after inoculation with 4×10[5] pfu SARS-CoV-2 infection. Viral replication was observed in lung, trachea and brain tissue (~7-8 log10 RNA copies/g). Infection via intragastric route was also established in these mice[50]. Thus, transgenic mice can be useful tool to study the pathophysiology of the SARS-CoV-2 infection.


   Primate models Top


Non-human primates (NHPs) models are phylogenetically closest to humans, with 93.54 per cent genome similarity[51]. Akin to humans, NHPs models also tested positive after exposure to the SARS-CoV-2 and showed clinical symptoms such as mild-to-severe pneumonia, elevated body temperature, viral shedding, chest radiographic abnormality, inflammation and immune cell infiltration within lungs[51],[52],[53].

Despite significant homology in ACE-2 receptors between human and NHPs, differences were observed in the viral latency and clinical features of COVID-19. These differences could be attributed to subtle immunological variations and expression levels of ACE-2 between the two species. NHP models are believed to be more approximate to human in terms of recapitulating human SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Some of the COVID-19–associated conditions such as effects of SARS-CoV-2 in aged individuals can be studied using NHPs. Yu et al[54] developed an aged NHPs infected with SARS-CoV-2. Old NHPs developed more severe interstitial pneumonia compared with young monkeys. Such models can provide insight into the various causes of high mortality in aged individuals[54].

African Green monkey (Chlorocebuss abaeus) challenged with viral isolates, obtained from Italy, through intratracheal (IT) and IN routes showed elevated body temperature and acute systemic inflammation on two d.p.i. and multifocal pulmonary lesions on five d.p.i. Viral RNA was detected in the mucosal swabs and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid29 [Table 1]. In another study, cynomolgus macaques (Macaca fascicularis) were inoculated with SARS-CoV-2 isolates, through IT and IN routes[30]. The Cynomolgus macaques were susceptible to infection without any overt clinical symptoms. However, viral shedding and replication were observed in respiratory tract, ileum, colon and tonsil. All these macaques inoculated with SARS-CoV-2 showed seropositivity and lung lesions on 14 d.p.i. Viral RNA was detected in nasal swabs with the highest titre in older macaques on four d.p.i30 [Table 1]. Chandrashekar et al[31], inoculated rhesus macaques (Macacamulatta) with SARS-CoV-2 through IN and IT routes at a dose of 10[4] pfu. The viral RNA was detected on two d.p.i. and symptoms such as loss of appetite and interstitial pneumonia were observed. These macaques were also protected from re-infection with SARS-CoV-2 after 35 d.p.i. indicating neutralizing antibodies generated in the primary infection, could protect macaques against secondary infection[31] [Table 1]. These findings were replicated by Shan et al[53] where rhesus macaques infected with SARS-CoV-2 developed pneumonia, and the virus could be detected in the respiratory tract tissues including trachea, bronchus and lungs. The symptoms exhibited by rhesus macaque were similar to those of mild cases of COVID-19 in humans. In addition, the infected rhesus macaques were protected from re-infection[53]. Rhesus macaques that are protected from re-infection of SARS-CoV-2 is further substantiated by a study, conducted by Deng et al[55].

Among the new world monkeys, marmosets have been used to study the viral infection. However, compared with marmosets, old world monkeys seem to be a better animal model as reported in the comparative study conducted by Lu et al[51]. Rhesus macaques, Cynomolgus macaques and marmosets were exposed to SARS-CoV-2 with 10[6] pfu dose. Among the three, the old-world monkeys were reported to support viral replication with clinical symptoms similar to humans. Clinical manifestations of viral infection included a rise in body temperature, abnormal computed tomography scans, lymphopaenia, esoinopenia, inflammation in liver and heart, viral shedding. Moreover, viral RNA copies were detected in nasal and oral swabs in old world monkeys[51].

In addition to investigating viral pathogenesis, some drugs have been tested for their efficacy against coronaviruses in NHPs. Remdesivir and lopinavir/ritonavir have been tested against SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV in the marmoset model, respectively[56].

A DNA vaccine candidate expressing various spike protein immunogens has been tested on rhesus macaques[57]. The vaccine protected against SARS-CoV-2 as evident by substantial reductions in viral loads in BAL and nasal swabs, in immunized animals57 [Table 3]. An intramuscular dose of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (adenovirus vector) vaccine candidate in rhesus macaques protected against the challenge from SARS-CoV-2 in both upper and lower respiratory tract. Vaccination resulted in the absence of any lesion from pneumonia and the absence of viral RNA in the lung tissue[58]. The utility of NHPs in testing of vaccine is further corroborated by a study conducted by Yadav et al[59], which tested three different whole virion-inactivated vaccines including BBV152 vaccine, in rhesus macaques. In the study[59], 20 macaques were divided into four groups consisting of five each. One group received placebo while other three groups were vaccinated with three different vaccine using two-dose vaccine regimen. All the macaques were challenged with SARS-CoV-2 14 days after the administration of second dose of the vaccine. Three weeks after immunization, significantly increased levels of neutralizing antibody (IgG) titre were detected from the vaccinated group. Histopathological examination revealed the absence of pneumonia in vaccinated group compared with placebo group which exhibited interstitial pneumonia, presence of antigen in alveolar epithelium and macrophages[59].Similarly, other vaccine candidates such as RNA vaccine and inactivated vaccine [Table 3] have been tested on rhesus macaques to understand the vaccine-mediated immune response and to evaluate the efficacy of vaccine[60],[62].
Table 3: Animal model used to exhibit the effectiveness of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 infection

Click here to view



   Conclusion Top


Although the clinical presentations of COVID-19 are now being better understood, the pathophysiology and long-term sequelae of disease are yet to be completely known in humans. Animal models could play an important role in bridging gap between SARS-CoV-2 infection and disease progression of COVID-19. Significant progress has been made in the development of small and large animal models for understanding pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. NHPs are phylogenetically closest to humans and show natural susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection. The comparable susceptibility has been attributed to homologue hACE2 receptor present in NHPs. However, the severity of COVID-19 progression and the development of symptoms in the NHPs are relatively milder as compared to severe cytokine storm and fatality seen in humans. Limited numbers of NHPs have been used to develop comorbid and aged model mimicking the human conditions; however, NHPs pose substantial limitations on their use in high-throughput studies involving large number of animals.

Genetically engineered transgenic mice expressing hACE-2 receptor are permissive to SARS-CoV-2 infection and can recapitulate the clinical features of COVID-19 including lung histology, pulmonary inflammation and pneumonia. The limitations with transgenic mice are aberrant expression of receptor on all cells types which may change tissue or cellular tropism of virus. Golden Syrian hamsters have also exhibited symptoms as seen humans such as weight loss, viral replication in the upper respiratory tract and presence of antibody in the plasma. However, caveat with hamster model is limited availability of research reagents compared with mice.

Animal models can be utilized to identify novel targets, host cell-virus interactions, to study immunological response at different stages of the disease and to invent antiviral drugs or vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. However, continuous refinement is needed to develop suitable animal model recapitulating COVID-19 pathogenesis and its sequelae in human.

Acknowledgment: The first author (IM) acknowledges the Lady Tata Memorial Trust for fellowship. The second author (AK) acknowledges the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi, for fellowship. The third author (SMC) thanks Science and Engineering Research Board for providing fellowship.

Financial support & sponsorship: Authors acknowledge the Indian Council of Medical Research, Department of Health Research, Government of India, for financial support.

Conflicts of Interest: None.



[64]

 
   References Top

1.
Lu R, Zhao X, Li J, Niu P, Yang B, Wu H, et al. Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: Implications for virus origins and receptor binding. Lancet 2020; 395 : 565-74.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
World Health Organization. WHO SARS (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome). Available from: https://www.who.int/ith/diseases/sars/en/, accessed on October 15, 2020.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
World Health Organization. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV). Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/middle-east-respiratory-syndrome-coronavirus-(mers-cov), accessed on October 15, 2020.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Lau SK, Luk HK, Wong AC, Li KS, Zhu L, He Z, et al. Possible bat origin of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Emerg Infect Dis 2020; 26 : 1542-7.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Chan JF, Kok K. Correction to: Genomic characterization of the 2019 novel human-pathogenic coronavirus isolated from a patient with atypical pneumonia after visiting Wuhan. Emerg Microbes Infect 2020; 9 : 540.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Lauer SA, Grantz KH, Bi Q, Jones FK, Zheng Q, Meredith HR, et al. The incubation period of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) from publicly reported confirmed cases: Estimation and application. Ann Intern Med 2020; 172 : 577-82.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Li Q, Guan X, Wu P, Wang X, Zhou L, Tong Y, et al. Early transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China, of novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia. N Engl J Med 2020; 382 : 1199-207.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Guan W, Ni Z, Hu Y, Liang W, Ou C, He J, et al. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med 2020; 382 : 1708-20.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X, Qu J, Gong F, Han Y, et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: A descriptive study. Lancet 2020; 395 : 507-13.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 2020; 395 : 497-506.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Wang D, Hu B, Hu C, Zhu F, Liu X, Zhang J, et al. Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia in Wuhan, China. J Am Med Assoc 2020; 323 : 1061-9.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Pan X, Chen D, Xia Y, Wi S, Li T, Ou X, et al. Asymptomatic cases in a family cluster with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Lancet Infect Dis 2020; 20 : 410-1.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Hu Z, Song C, Xu C, Jin G, Chen Y, Xu X, et al. Clinical characteristics of 24 asymptomatic infections with COVID-19 screened among close contacts in Nanjing, China. Sci China Life Sci 2020; 63 : 706-11.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Wang Y, Liu Y, Liu L, Wang X, Luo N, Li L. Clinical outcomes in 55 patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 who were asymptomatic at hospital admission in Shenzhen, China. J Infect Dis 2020; 221 : 1770-4.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
BIO. COVID-19 Therapeutic Development Tracker. Available from: https://www.bio.org/policy/human-health/vaccines-biodefense/coronavirus/pipeline-tracker, accessed on December 8, 2020.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Mckee DL, Sternberg A, Stange U, Laufer S, Naujokat C. Candidate drugs against SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19. Pharmacol Res 2020; 157 : 104859.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Maisonnasse P, Guedj J, Contreras V, Behillil S, Solas C, Marlin R, et al. Hydroxychloroquine use against SARS-CoV-2 infection in non-human primates. Nature 2020; 585 : 584-7.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Hoffmann M, Kleine-Weber H, Schroeder S, Krüger N, Herrler T, Erichsen S, et al. SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor. Cell 2020; 181 : 271-280.e8.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Zhao X, Chen D, Szabla R, Zheng M, Li G, Du P, et al. Broad and differential animal ACE2 receptor usage by SARS-CoV-2. J Virol 2020; 94 : e00940-20.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Mykytyn AZ, Lamers MM, Okba NM, Breugem TI, van den Doel PB, van Run P, et al. Susceptibility of rabbits to SARS-CoV-2. Emerg Microbes Infect 2021; 10 : 1-7.   Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Capraro GA, Johnson JB, Kock ND, Parks GD. Virus growth and antibody responses following respiratory tract infection of ferrets and mice with WT and P/V mutants of the paramyxovirus Simian Virus 5. Virology 2008; 376 : 416-28.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Chan KF, Carolan LA, Korenkov D, Druce J, Mccaw J, Reading PC, et al. Investigating viral interference between influenza a virus and human respiratory syncytial virus in a ferret model of infection. J Infect Dis 2018; 218 : 406-17.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Park SJ, Kim EH, Kwon HI, Song MS, Kim SM, Kim YI, et al. Altered virulence of highly pathogenic avian influenza (Hpai) h5n8 reassortant viruses in mammalian models. Virulence 2018; 9 : 133-48.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Enkirch T, von Messling V. Ferret models of viral pathogenesis. Virology 2015; 479-80 : 259-70.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Martina BE, Haagmans BL, Kuiken T, Fouchier RA, Rimmelzwaan GF, van Amerongen G, et al. SARS virus infection of cats and ferrets. Nature 2003; 425 : 915.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Kim Y Il, Kim SG, Kim SM, Kim EH, Park SJ, Yu KM, et al. Infection and rapid transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in ferrets. Cell Host Microbe 2020; 27 : 704-9.e2.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Chan JF, Zhang AJ, Yuan S, Poon VK, Chan CC, Lee AC, et al. Simulation of the clinical and pathological manifestations of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in golden Syrian hamster model: Implications for disease pathogenesis and transmissibility. Clin Infect Dis 2020; 71 : 2428-46.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Bao L, Deng W, Huang B, Gao H, Liu J, Ren L, et al. The pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 in hACE2 transgenic mice. Nature 2020; 583 : 830-3.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Woolsey CB, Borisevich V, Prasad AN, Agans KN, Deer DJ, Dobias NS, et al. Establishment of an African green monkey model for COVID-19 and protection against re-infection. Nat Immunol 2020; 22 : 86-98.   Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Rockx B, Kuiken T, Herfst S, Bestebroer T, Lamers MM, Munnink BB, et al. Comparative pathogenesis of COVID-19, MERS, and SARS in a nonhuman primate model. Science 2020; 368 : 1012-5.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Chandrashekar A, Liu J, Martino AJ, McMahan K, Mercad NB, Peter L, et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection protects against rechallenge in rhesus macaques. Science 2020; 369 : 812-7.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Shi J, Wen Z, Zhong G, Yang H, Wang C, Huang B, et al. Susceptibility of ferrets, cats, dogs, and other domesticated animals to SARS-coronavirus 2. Science 2020; 368 : 1016-20.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Park SJ, Yu KM, Kim Y I, Kim SM, Kim EH, Kim SG, et al. Antiviral efficacies of FDA-approved drugs against SARS-COV-2 infection in ferrets. MBio 2020; 11 : e01114-20  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Kaptein SJ, Jacobs S, Langendries L, Seldeslachts L, ter Horst S, Liesenborghs L, et al. Antiviral treatment of SARS-CoV-2-infected hamsters reveals a weak effect of favipiravir and a complete lack of effect for hydroxychloroquine. Available from: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.06.19.159053v1, accessed on February 24,2021.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Williamson BN, Feldmann F, Schwarz B, Meade-White K, Porter DP, Schulz J, et al. Clinical benefit of remdesivir in rhesus macaques infected with SARS-CoV-2. Nature 2020; 585 : 273-6.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Maisonnasse P, Guedj J, Contreras V, Behillil S, Solas C, Marlin R, et al. Hydroxychloroquine in the treatment and prophylaxis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in non-Human primates. Nature 2020; 585 : 584-7.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Rosenke K, Jarvis M, Feldmann F, Schwarz B, Okumura A, Lovaglio J, et al. Hydroxychloroquine proves ineffective in hamsters and macaques infected with SARS-CoV-2. JCI Insight 2020; 5 : e143174.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Liu HL, Yeh IJ, Phan NN, Wu YH, Yen MC, Hung JH, et al. Gene signatures of SARS-CoV/SARS-CoV-2-infected ferret lungs in short- and long-term models. Infect Genet Evol 2020; 85 : 104438.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Roberts A, Lamirande EW, Vogel L, Jackson JP, Paddock CD, Guarner J, et al. Animal models and vaccines for SARS-CoV infection. Virus Res 2008; 133 : 20-32.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Lamirande EW, DeDiego ML, Roberts A, Jackson JP, Alvarez E, Sheahan T, et al. A live attenuated severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus is immunogenic and efficacious in golden syrian hamsters. J Virol 2008; 82 : 7721-4.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
de Wit E, Prescott J, Baseler L, Bushmaker T, Thomas T, Lackemeyer MG, et al. The Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) does not replicate in syrian hamsters. PLoS One 2013; 8 : 3-8.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Luan J, Lu Y, Jin X, Zhang L. Spike protein recognition of mammalian ACE2 predicts the host range and an optimized ACE2 for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2020; 526 : 165-9.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Mohandas S, Jain R, Yadav P, Shete-Aich A, Sarkale P, Kadam M, et al. Evaluation of the susceptibility of mice & hamsters to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Indian J Med Res 2020; 151 : 479-82.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Imai M, Iwatsuki-Horimoto K, Hatta M, Loeber S, Halfmann PJ, Nakajima N, et al. Syrian hamsters as a small animal model for SARS-CoV-2 infection and countermeasure development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2020; 117 : 16587-95.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.
Osterrieder N, Bertzbach LD, Dietert K, Abdelgawad A, Vladimirova D, Kunec D, et al. Age-dependent progression of SARS-CoV-2 infection in syrian hamsters. Viruses 2020; 12 : 779.  Back to cited text no. 45
    
46.
Wan Y, Shang J, Graham R, Baric RS, Li F. Receptor recognition by the novel coronavirus from Wuhan: An analysis based on decade-long structural studies of SARS coronavirus. J Virol 2020; 94 : 1-9.  Back to cited text no. 46
    
47.
Sun J, Zhuang Z, Zheng J, Li K, Wong RLY, Liu D, et al. Generation of a broadly useful model for COVID-19 pathogenesis, vaccination, and treatment. Cell 2020; 182 : 734-43.e5.  Back to cited text no. 47
    
48.
Jiang RD, Liu MQ, Chen Y, Shan C, Zhou YW, Shen XR, et al. Pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 in transgenic mice expressing human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2. Cell 2020; 182 : 50-8.e8.  Back to cited text no. 48
    
49.
Hassan AO, Case JB, Winkler ES, Thackray LB, Kafai NM, Bailey AL, et al. A SARS-CoV-2 infection model in mice demonstrates protection by neutralizing antibodies. Cell 2020; 182 : 744-53.e4.  Back to cited text no. 49
    
50.
Sun SH, Chen Q, Gu HJ, Yang G, Wang YX, Huang XY, et al. A mouse model of SARS-CoV-2 infection and pathogenesis. Cell Host Microbe 2020; 28 : 124-33.e4.  Back to cited text no. 50
    
51.
Gibbs RA, Rogers J, Katze MG, Bumgarner R, Weinstock GM, Mardis ER, et al. Evolutionary and biomedical insights from the rhesus macaque genome. Science 2007; 316 : 222-34.  Back to cited text no. 51
    
52.
Lu S, Zhao Y, Yu W, Yang Y, Gao J, Wang J, et al. Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 infections among 3 species of non-human primates. Signal Transduct Target Ther 2020; 5 : 157.  Back to cited text no. 52
    
53.
Munster VJ, Feldmann F, Williamson BN, van Doremalen N, Pérez-Pérez L, Schulz J, et al. Respiratory disease in rhesus macaques inoculated with SARS-CoV-2. Nature 2020; 585 : 268-72.  Back to cited text no. 53
    
54.
Shan C, Yao YF, Yang X Lou, Zhou YW, Gao G, Peng Y, et al. Infection with novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) causes pneumonia in Rhesus macaques.Cell Res 2020; 30 : 670-7.  Back to cited text no. 54
    
55.
Yu P, Qi F, Xu Y, Li F, Liu P, Liu J, et al. Age-related rhesus macaque models of COVID-19. Anim Model Exp Med 2020; 3 : 93-7.  Back to cited text no. 55
    
56.
Deng W, Bao L, Liu J, Xiao C, Liu J, Xue J, et al. Primary exposure to SARS-CoV-2 protects against reinfection in Rhesus macaques. Science 2020; 369 : 818-23.  Back to cited text no. 56
    
57.
Sheahan TP, Sims AC, Graham RL, Menachery VD, Gralinski LE, Case JB, et al. Broad-spectrum antiviral GS-5734 inhibits both epidemic and zoonotic coronaviruses. Sci Transl Med 2017; 9 : eaal3653.  Back to cited text no. 57
    
58.
Yu J, Tostanosk LH, Peter L, Mercad NB, McMahan K, Mahrokhia SH, et al. DNA vaccine protection against SARS-CoV-2 in rhesus macaques. Science (80- ) 2020; 369 : 806-11.  Back to cited text no. 58
    
59.
van Doremalen N, Lambe T, Spencer A, Belij-Rammerstorfer S, Purushotham J, Port J, et al. ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination prevents SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in rhesus macaques. Nature 2020; 586 : 578-82.  Back to cited text no. 59
    
60.
Yadav P, Kumar S, Patil D, Mohandas S, Shete A, Bhati G, et al. Remarkable immunogenicity and protective efficacy of BBV152, an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in rhesus macaques. Nat Commun 2021; 12 : 1386.  Back to cited text no. 60
    
61.
Callaway E. Coronavirus vaccine trials have delivered their first results - But their promise is still unclear. Nature 2020; 581 : 363-4.  Back to cited text no. 61
    
62.
McKay PF, Hu K, Blakney AK, Samnuan K, Brown JC, Penn R, et al. Self-amplifying RNA SARS-CoV-2 lipid nanoparticle vaccine candidate induces high neutralizing antibody titers in mice. Nat Commun 2020; 11 : 3523.  Back to cited text no. 62
    
63.
Gao Q, Bao L, Mao H, Wang L, Xu K, Yang M, et al. Development of an inactivated vaccine candidate for SARS-CoV-2. Science 2020; 369 : 77-81.  Back to cited text no. 63
    
64.
Smith TR, Patel A, Ramos S, Elwood D, Zhu X, Yan J, et al. Immunogenicity of a DNA vaccine candidate for COVID-19. Nat Commun 2020; 11 : 2601.  Back to cited text no. 64
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Non-primate models
   Primate models
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1341    
    Printed4    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded260    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal