|Year : 2017 | Volume
| Issue : 4 | Page : 488-491
Red cell alloimmunization & role of advanced immunohaematological support in liver transplantation
Raj Nath Makroo, Soma Agrawal, Mohit Chowdhry, Aakanksha Bhatia, Uday Kumar Thakur
Department of Transfusion Medicine, Molecular Biology & Transplant Immunology, Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals, New Delhi, India
|Date of Submission||19-Dec-2015|
|Date of Web Publication||28-Aug-2017|
Raj Nath Makroo
Department of Transfusion Medicine, Molecular Biology & Transplant Immunology, Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals, Sarita Vihar, New Delhi 110 076
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Background & objectives: Transfusion support forms an integral part of liver transplantation programme. Advanced immunohaematology services are required to deal with complex serological problems that can complicate transfusion therapy in these patients. Here, we report on red cell alloimmunization and presence of alloimmunization in donors and patients undergoing liver transplantation in a tertiary care hospital in north India.
Methods: Records of 1433 liver transplants performed from January 2009 to March 2015 were retrieved and reviewed. Antibody screening was performed both for liver donors, and recipients and antibody identification was performed for the screen-positive patients.
Results: Of the 1433 liver recipients, 32 (2.3%) developed antibodies. Seventeen patients had one or more alloantibodies, five had autoantibodies with an underlying alloantibody and 10 had only autoantibodies in their plasma. The overall alloimmunization rate was 1.5 per cent with 25 alloantibodies identified in 22 patients. Anti-E was the most common specificity identified.
Interpretation & conclusions: The presence of alloantibodies can complicate transfusion therapy in patients undergoing liver transplantation, who are already at a high risk of being heavily transfused owing to the nature of surgery and the haemostatic dysfunction from chronic liver disease. Therefore, screening for irregular red cell alloantibodies combined with a rational blood transfusion policy may be essential for these patients.
Keywords: Alloantibodies - alloimmunization - liver transplant - red blood cell antigens- serological problems - transfusion support
|How to cite this article:|
Makroo RN, Agrawal S, Chowdhry M, Bhatia A, Thakur UK. Red cell alloimmunization & role of advanced immunohaematological support in liver transplantation. Indian J Med Res 2017;145:488-91
|How to cite this URL:|
Makroo RN, Agrawal S, Chowdhry M, Bhatia A, Thakur UK. Red cell alloimmunization & role of advanced immunohaematological support in liver transplantation. Indian J Med Res [serial online] 2017 [cited 2021 Jun 13];145:488-91. Available from: https://www.ijmr.org.in/text.asp?2017/145/4/488/213726
Orthotopic liver transplantation is a life-saving procedure for patients with end-stage liver disease of various aetiologies starting from alcoholic cirrhosis to hepatitis B or C induced liver failures. Transfusion support forms an integral part of this programme by not only providing quantitative support in terms of blood and blood components but also qualitatively by addressing the complex serological problems and immunological effects of transfusion that act as a challenge. A well-equipped and advanced immunohaematology laboratory is a cornerstone for the success of solid organ transplants,.
Alloimmunization to red blood cell (RBC) antigens is a complication arising out of transfusion of red cells and in turn complicates further transfusion therapy. Patients awaiting liver transplant are likely to be transfused blood and blood components and are therefore, at a risk of alloimmunization. Alloantibodies, if left unidentified, may lead to delayed haemolytic transfusion reactions which can further raise the bilirubin levels and also worsen the pre-existing anaemia and liver function in the already compromised patients. From the transfusion service perspective, difficulty in finding cross-match compatible blood and delays in blood arrangement are inevitable, if immunohaematological workup is not performed beforehand. Finding appropriate antigen negative blood may be a time-consuming task and compatible units may not be available in emergent situations.
Centres performing solid organ transplants should be equipped with advanced immunohaematology laboratory and trained personnel for handling complex red cell serological problems. However, there is a paucity of literature on immunohaematological and transfusion support for liver transplants from this region. We present an overview of our experience as transfusion and immunohaematology support service in a tertiary care hospital on red cell alloimmunization and presence of alloimmunization in donors and patients undergoing liver transplantation.
| Material & Methods|| |
Records of 1433 consecutive liver transplants performed at Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, New Delhi, India, from January 2009 to March 2015 were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed from the departmental records. For the margin of error at three per cent, confidence level of study at 95 per cent and power at 80 per cent, a minimum of 21 patients were required to evaluate the red cell alloimmunization and the role of advanced immunohaematological support in liver transplantation. Demographic details such as age and gender were retrieved from the hospital records. Irrespective of the ethnicity, all adult patients undergoing the transplant were included. Except for the patients under 18 yr of age and those undergoing combined liver and kidney transplants, all other patients undergoing liver transplantation were included and analyzed. With the group and screen policy in place for all patients, blood grouping and antibody screening were performed for all donors and recipients on the fully automated immunohematology analyser (Galileo, Immucor Inc., USA) in the department of Transfusion Medicine, Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, New Delhi. Antibody identification was performed for the screen-positive patients using cell panels by the SPRCA technology (Capture-R Ready-ID, Immucor Inc., Norcross, USA). For blood grouping, antibody screening and identification, samples were collected in ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA) vials. Once, the alloantibody specificity was determined, corresponding antigen negative, anti-human globulin compatible units were reserved for the patients.
In patients where, alloantibodies against Rh (C, c, E, e) or Kell (K) antigen system were detected, appropriate antigen negative units were directly picked up from the inventory for cross-matching. For antibodies against other minor red cell antigen systems, ABO group specific units were typed serologically to find antigen negative units. The immunized cases were discussed with the transplant team beforehand so that transfusion requirements could be anticipated in advance and adequate blood units reserved.
| Results|| |
Of the 1433 liver recipients, 32 (2.3%) developed antibodies. These included 18 males and 14 females, with a mean age of 48.7 yr, ranging between 31 and 66 yr.
Of the 32 recipients, 17 (53.1%) had one or more alloantibody, five (15.6%) had autoantibodies with an underlying alloantibody and 10 (31.3%) had only autoantibodies in their plasma. The overall alloimmunization rate was 1.5 per cent with 25 alloantibodies identified in 22 patients. All the alloantibodies identified were clinically significant. Alloantibodies against the five major Rh antigens namely D, E, e, C, c, were the most frequent (81.8%) with anti-E being the most common specificity identified (13 patients, 72.2%) [Table 1].
|Table 1: Specificity and frequency of red cell alloantibodies in liver transplant recipients (n=1433)|
Click here to view
Fifteen of the 18 males and 12 of the 14 females had a history of prior red cell transfusions. Significant obstetric events which could have sensitized the females were reported in 13 cases.
Packed red cell usage: A total of 289 packed red cell units were arranged for the 22 alloimmunized liver recipients, with a mean of 13.1 units per patient, while 197 units were issued during the transplant, with a mean of 8.9 units per patient (range: 2-22 units).
Ten Fyb antigen negative units were arranged after typing 68 units for the patient with anti-Fyb, while 92 units were crossmatched to reserve 10 M antigen negative units for the patient with anti-M. In all, 32 units were reserved for the four patients with anti-Jka antibody after typing 145 units. The other antigen negative units were picked up for crossmatch from the inventory of Rh and Kell typed donor units. Patients with warm autoantibodies with an underlying alloantibody were issued corresponding antigen negative blood crossmatched with the adsorbed plasma.
Alloimmunization in liver donors: Ten of the 1433 liver transplants performed were from cadaveric donors. Among the 1423 living donors, nine (0.6%) were immunized (6 males & 3 females) with a mean age of 28.5 yr (range 19-41 yr). Of these nine donors, only two (0.14%) had alloantibodies. One was sensitized by previous transfusion forming anti-E while the other was an Rh (D) negative female with no history of transfusion but possibly sensitized during a previous obstetric event with anti-D. In the remaining seven, only autoantibodies were found.
A total of four red cell units (2 each) were arranged for both alloimmunized liver donors while none were issued.
| Discussion|| |
Alloimmunization to RBC antigens can significantly impact transfusion support of patients undergoing solid organ transplantation. There is a need for universal antibody screening in all such patients as part of pre-transfusion testing, which helps to identify atypical antibodies and plan for appropriate transfusion support well in time.
We have previously reported alloimmunization rates in general patient population at our centre as 0.49 per cent, while the average red cell transfusion requirement in liver transplant surgeries at our centre have been reported as 8.48 units per patient. Globally, alloimmunization in general patient population has been reported between 0.46 and 3 per cent, whereas the rates among liver transplant patients have been reported from 5.75 to 23 per cent,,. In this analysis alloimmunization rate of 1.5 per cent was observed in liver transplant recipients which was relatively lower than that reported globally. Luzo et al reported a higher incidence of alloimmunization and attributed this to ethnic heterogeneity in their population. Shariatmadar et al followed up liver transplant recipients postoperatively for the development of alloimmunization which was attributed to a higher alloimmunization rate as compared to ours.
In our study two liver donors were found to be alloimmunized due to previous sensitizing events. There is always a possibility that the recipients of these alloimmunized donors might face delayed serological transfusion reaction if positive for the corresponding antigen via the passenger lymphocyte syndrome. It is advisable to transfuse recipients of such alloimmunized donors with corresponding antigen negative units,,. Antibodies against Rh and Kell blood group antigens have been reported as most common in general patient population as well as in liver transplant recipients,. Our findings were similar to these results with 81.8 per cent (18 out of 22) of the antibodies in alloimmunized patients, and 100 per cent of the antibodies in alloimmunized donors were against the Rh system. Among the alloantibodies directed against the Rh system antigens, anti-E was the most common.
Antigens M, Fyb, and Jka were all relatively more prevalent in our donor population with frequencies of 88.7, 57.6 and 81.5 per cent respectively, as reported in a previous study from our centre. The availability of this antigen frequency data guided us in estimating the number of red cell units needed to be typed to get an antigen negative unit for the six patients who were immunized against these antigens.
The presence of alloantibodies can complicate transfusion therapy in patients undergoing liver transplants, who are already at a higher risk of being heavily transfused owing to the nature of surgery and the haemostatic dysfunction from chronic liver disease. Furthermore, there are reports documenting issue of antigen positive units to alloimmunized liver transplant patients leading to mortality in three patient. Alloantibodies may also affect liver transplant outcomes and can contribute to higher incidences of early death,,. Therefore, screening for irregular red cell alloantibodies combined with a rational blood transfusion policy is essential in these patients.
RBC alloimmunization can present a special challenge to solid-organ transplantation. Early serologic testing of the recipient pre-transplant as well as pre-transfusion and prompt communication between the transfusion service and transplant team may facilitate successful transfusion management of these patients.
| Acknowledgment|| |
Authors acknowledge all technical staff of Department of Transfusion Medicine, Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals, New Delhi, who were involved in the immunohaematological workup of the cases.
Conflicts of Interest: None.
| References|| |
Simon TL, Snyder EL, Solheim BG, Stowell PC, Strauss RG, Petrides M. Rossi's principles of transfusion medicine
ed. West Sussex: Blackwell Publishing; 2009.
Triulzi DJ. Specialized transfusion support for solid organ transplantation. Curr Opin Hematol
Roback JD. Technical manual
ed. Bethesda: AABB Press; 2011.
Schonewille H. Red blood cell alloantibodies after transfusion
. Leiden: Leiden University Press; 2008.
Murthy TV. Transfusion support in liver transplantation. Indian J Anaesth
Yazdanbakhsh K, Ware RE, Noizat-Pirenne F. Red blood cell alloimmunization in sickle cell disease: Pathophysiology, risk factors, and transfusion management. Blood
Luzo AC, Pereira FB, de Oliveira RC, Azevedo PR, Cunha RD, Leonardi MI, et al.
Red blood cell antigen alloimmunization in liver transplant recipients. Transplant Proc
Makroo RN, Bhatia A, Hegde V, Chowdhry M, Thakur UK, Rosamma NL. Antibody screening & identification in the general patient population at a tertiary care hospital in New Delhi, India. Indian J Med Res
Makroo RN, Walia RS, Aneja S, Bhatia A, Chowdhry M. Preoperative predictors of blood component transfusion in living donor liver transplantation. Asian J Transfus Sci
Ko KH, Yoo BH, Kim KM, Lee WY, Yon JH, Hong KH, et al.
Frequency of unexpected antibody and consideration during transfusion. Korean J Anesthesiol
Tormey CA, Fisk J, Stack G. Red blood cell alloantibody frequency, specificity, and properties in a population of male military veterans. Transfusion
Shariatmadar S, Pyrsopoulos NT, Vincek V, Noto TA, Tzakis AG. Alloimmunization to red cell antigens in liver and multivisceral transplant patients. Transplantation
Mushkbar M, Watkins E, Doughty H. A UK single-centre survey of red cell antibodies in adult patients undergoing liver transplantation. Vox Sang
Ramsey G. Red cell antibodies arising from solid organ transplants. Transfusion
Yazer MH, Triulzi DJ. Immune hemolysis following ABO-mismatched stem cell or solid organ transplantation. Curr Opin Hematol
Ramsey G, Cornell FW, Hahn LF, Larson P, Issitt LB, Starzl TE. Red cell antibody problems in 1000 liver transplants. Transfusion
Makroo RN, Bhatia A, Gupta R, Phillip J. Prevalence of Rh, Duffy, Kell, Kidd & MNSs blood group antigens in the Indian blood donor population. Indian J Med Res
Au WY, Liu CL, Lo CM, Fan ST, Lam MF, Lam CK. Red blood cell alloantibodies and liver transplantation in Chinese patients. Transplantation
Boyd SD, Stenard F, Lee DK, Goodnough LT, Esquivel CO, Fontaine MJ. Alloimmunization to red blood cell antigens affects clinical outcomes in liver transplant patients. Liver Transpl