Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research
  Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login  
  Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Users Online: 1954       

   Table of Contents      
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 144  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 704-711

Prevalence & correlates of tobacco use among adolescents in Kerala, India


1 Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, Bengaluru, India
2 National Rural Health Mission, Thiruvananthapuram, India
3 Department of Health & Family Welfare, Thiruvananthapuram, India
4 Department of Biostatistics, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, Bengaluru, India

Date of Submission17-Dec-2014
Date of Web Publication30-Mar-2017

Correspondence Address:
T S Jaisoorya
Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health & Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru 560 029, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1873_14

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 


Background & objectives: Most tobacco users who initiate its use during adolescence are likely to continue the use into adulthood and contribute to the 90 per cent of premature deaths among tobacco users. In this context the prevalence, patterns and correlates of tobacco use were studied among adolescent school students in Kerala, India.
Methods: Total 7560 students from classes 8, 10 and 12, within the age group of 12-19 yr, across 73 schools in Ernakulam district, Kerala, India, selected by cluster random sampling, completed a self-administered questionnaire incorporating standardized instruments.
Results: Of the 7350 valid questionnaires, the overall lifetime prevalence of tobacco use was 6.9 per cent (12.5% males and 1.2% females). The prevalence of tobacco use increased from 3.1 per cent at 12-13 yr to 15.1 per cent at 18-19 yr. The mean age of onset of tobacco use was 14.0±2.2 yr. The prevalence was higher among students from urban backgrounds, lower socio-economic status and those with part-time jobs. Tobacco users had significantly higher rates of use of alcohol (67.8 vs. 11%) and illicit drugs (33 vs. 6.1%). They had poorer academic performance (24.7 vs. 9.1%), more severe psychological distress (10.8 vs. 4.5%), suicidal attempts (10.2 vs. 3.5%), higher scores of ratings of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (8.3 vs. 2.5%) and history of sexual abuse (12.5 vs. 3.8%).
Interpretation & conclusions: The prevalence of tobacco use in adolescents reported in this study was relatively lower than those reported from other Indian States. However, it correlates with multiple negative outcomes suggesting a need to promote specific interventions to prevent adolescent tobacco use.

Keywords: Adolescent - correlates - epidemiology - India - risk behaviour - tobacco use


How to cite this article:
Jaisoorya T S, Beena K V, Beena M, Jose DC, Ellangovan K, Thennarasu K, Benegal V. Prevalence & correlates of tobacco use among adolescents in Kerala, India. Indian J Med Res 2016;144:704-11

How to cite this URL:
Jaisoorya T S, Beena K V, Beena M, Jose DC, Ellangovan K, Thennarasu K, Benegal V. Prevalence & correlates of tobacco use among adolescents in Kerala, India. Indian J Med Res [serial online] 2016 [cited 2021 May 18];144:704-11. Available from: https://www.ijmr.org.in/text.asp?2016/144/5/704/203457



Tobacco is the most commonly abused drug in the world. The most susceptible time for initiation of tobacco use in India is during adolescence and early adulthood i.e., in the age group of 15-24 yr [1]. Worldwide, nearly, all (88%) initiation to smoking occurs before the age of 18 yr. Among every three young smokers, only one will quit and one of the remaining smokers will die of tobacco-related causes [2]. Data from the Monitoring the Future Study showed that 38 per cent of American school students of both genders were regularly smoking by 12th grade in 2013, in spite of the overall prevalence showing a declining trend since 1996[3]. In India, it is estimated that about five million children under the age of 15 are tobacco users [4]. The Global Youth Tobacco Survey (GYTS) (2000-2004), the first national survey of tobacco use among adolescents in India [5], reported the prevalence of ever use of tobacco in any form to be 25.1 per cent, with current cigarette smoking being 17.5 per cent and current use of smokeless tobacco (SMT) to be 14.6 per cent in the age group of 13-15 yr [5]. In replications of the GYTS in 2006 and 2009, about 14 per cent (13.7% in 2006 and 14.6% in 2009) of students aged 13-15 yr reported using tobacco (smoking and/or SMT)[5]. Two school surveys from Kerala, one an exclusive rural survey reported eight per cent prevalence and the second from northern Kerala reported the prevalence of tobacco smoking and chewing to be 9.8 and 2.2 per cent, respectively in students between 13 and 17 yr [6],[7].

In studies from India, the mean age of initiation to tobacco varied between eight and 15 years [6],[8],[9]. Across studies worldwide, using different measures of current smoking status, smoking has been found to increase with age. The prevalence of smoking increases in all countries, from around five per cent at 11 yr to 10-25 per cent at 15 yr [1],[9],[10]. Most studies from India report a male predominance (10-30 vs. 1-3%),[8],[9] in contrast to most Western studies [3],[11] and a few Indian studies [12],[13] which have reported a female predominance or equal prevalence.

Many family characteristics have been shown to influence adolescent tobacco use. Low family income, low parental education and living in single-parent families have been found to predict smoking in American adolescents [3]. Family factors such as high levels of connectedness, monitoring and parental punishment were protective against smoking [9],[12],[13],[14].

Nicotine use has been correlated with many adolescent problem behaviours including sexual risk behaviours, aggression, alcohol and illicit drug use [15],[16],[17],[18]. High levels of impulsivity have been reported in adolescents who initiate smoking early [19.0-46% vs. 10-24% for adolescents with and without attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), respectively][16],[19]. Adolescents who smoke are also reported to have higher rates of anxiety and mood disorders than non-smokers [17]. Smoking has been shown to be positively correlated with suicidal ideation and suicidal attempts [17]. An Indian study with a small sample size reported a positive correlation between sexual risk behaviour and nicotine use [15]. Though studies have reported prevalence and factors associated with initiation of adolescent tobacco use in India, there is little information available on the psychosocial correlates of tobacco use among adolescents in the community. The present study was undertaken to determine the prevalence of tobacco use among schoolgoing adolescents of age 12-19 years and to evaluate the pattern of use and psychosocial correlates among adolescents who have reported lifetime tobacco use in Kerala, India.


   Material & Methods Top


This single-stage cross-sectional epidemiological survey was conducted in January 2013 in a single random division of classes (year) 8, 10 and 12 of 73 schools. These schools were selected by cluster random sampling from the 168 high and higher secondary schools in the district of Ernakulam, Kerala, India. Each of the four educational subdistricts formed a cluster. In each of the cluster, 40 per cent of institutions were randomly selected. The initial sample size calculated to identify one per cent prevalence with 95 per cent confidence interval with a five per cent error and 50 per cent response distribution was 3520. Of the 73 schools surveyed, the number of schools in government sector was 45 and in the government-aided sector was 28. Further, 51 of the surveyed schools were situated in the panchayat area, 15 in the municipal areas and seven were situated within corporation limits.

In addition to tobacco use, other domains assessed included the use of other substances, psychological distress and ADHD. Standardized instruments or pertinent sections or questions from standardized instruments were identified. To assess suicidality and sexual abuse, checklists were constructed using questions from standardized instruments with items being determined by expert consensus. The time allocated for the survey was restricted to one school period (50 min). The questionnaire initially prepared in English was translated into Malayalam (the vernacular language) and then back translated to check for accuracy. In addition, a pilot study was conducted in four schools (not included in the data analyzed) to test for accuracy of translation and validity. No psychometric properties of specific instruments were tested for the purpose of this survey.

Assessment tools: Socio-demographic profile (age/sex/area of residence/economic indicators/religion/academic performance) was assessed using a checklist. For assessing socio-economic status, students were asked to indicate whether their family belonged to the 'below poverty line' or 'above poverty line'. No formal instruments were used for the assessment of socio-demographic profile and socio-economic status.

Tobacco & substance use: The Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST) developed by the WHO [18] was used to assess the use of alcohol, tobacco and other drugs. Tobacco use assessed in the questionnaire refers to 'lifetime use' (defined as having smoked/used SMT ever in their lifetime) and 'current use' (defined as having smoked/used SMT in the last one month). The ASSIST provides information about people who have used tobacco in their lifetime; the pattern of tobacco use in the past three months; craving; need to cut down; the level of others' concern about the person's tobacco use and problems related to use. An individual response to each of these questions has a standardized score and it is possible to calculate the tobacco involvement score by adding together the standardized scores of each of the questions. Three groups of people could be distinguished based on tobacco involvement score: those with tobacco involvement score of 0-3: abstainers or low risk users (means they may not be using or using tobacco occasionally, with no likely harm now or in the future if they continue the same pattern); those with tobacco involvement score of 4-26: indicates hazardous use (means the individual is of moderate risk of harm from their current pattern of use); and tobacco involvement score 27+ : indicates dependence (means a dependent pattern of use on tobacco with serious problems in multiple areas of life). The test-retest reliability coefficients of ASSIST ranged between 0.58 and 0.90. The internal consistency of the different domains ranged between 0.77 and 0.94. The sensitivity values were between 66 and 91 per cent while specificity values were between 80 and 91 per cent [18]. Use of alcohol and illicit drugs (cannabis, solvents and other substances grouped together) was reported only as lifetime use.

Psychological distress - Kessler's Psychological Distress Scale (K10): Psychological distress was assessed using Kessler's Psychological Distress Scale (K10)[20], a screening tool for non-specific psychological distress. This tool has been validated to screen common mental disorders in developing country settings including India. It consists of ten questions to elicit the frequency of depressive and anxiety symptoms over the past month on a 4-point Likert scale. Based on the total scores, psychological distress can be categorized into mild, moderate and severe [20]. K10 has been shown to have high internal consistency (Cronbach's α -0.8), high correlation with composite international diagnostic interview (0.84) and area under curve of 0.8.

Assessment of suicidality: A checklist constructed from items in the Suicidal Behaviour questionnaire (SDQ-14)[21] was used to assess lifetime suicidality. Two questions were asked to assess lifetime suicidality. 'Have you ever thought of killing yourself?' 'Have you ever made an attempt to kill yourself?'

Assessment of sexual abuse: Four questions taken from ISPCAN Child Abuse Screening Tool Children's Version (ICAST-C)[22], an instrument validated in India, were asked with regard to lifetime exposure to sexual abuse. These questions were: (i) has someone misbehaved with you sexually against your will; (ii) has someone forced you to look at pornographic materials against your will; (questions 1 & 2 – non-contact sexual abuse); (iii) has someone forced you to fondle or fondled you against your will; and (iv) has someone forced you to a sexual relationship against your will (questions 3 & 4 - contact sexual abuse).

Assessment of ADHD: Using Barkley Adult ADHD rating scale–IV (BAARS–IV) – Childhood Symptoms self-report [23], the students were asked to rate their behaviour for features of ADHD between the ages of 5-12 yr. The scale consists of 18 questions – nine for features of inattention and nine questions for hyperactivity-impulsivity. Each question was rated in the form of a Likert scale with four options ranging from 'never' to 'always'. Based on the total ADHD scores, it was possible to categorize the presence or absence of ADHD. Reliability of the scores was quite satisfactory as evidenced by high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha of 0.92 for current ADHD and 0.95 for childhood ADHD symptom scores); good interobserver agreement (0.67 to 0.70 across scales) and high test-retest reliability over a 2-3 wk interval (0.75 for current ADHD and 0.79 for childhood ADHD symptom scores).

Ethical considerations: Institutional ethical approval was received from Government Medical College, Ernakulam, and administrative approvals were received from the school authorities prior to the survey. Information about the nature of the survey was provided to the parent-teacher association, and parental consent was obtained. The questionnaires were administered only to consenting students. Students who did not wish to take part were given the option either to leave the classroom (none did) or return the questionnaire unanswered (2.7% questionnaires were unanswered).

Students were also told that if they required any help with regard to issues surveyed, they could approach the School Junior Public Health Nurses (JPHNs), who had received training in handling these issues.

Statistical analysis: Statistical Package for Social Studies (SPSS) version 15 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA) was used for the analysis. Life time prevalence of tobacco use was determined. The pattern of use was determined among tobacco users. The socio-demographic variables were compared between the tobacco and non-tobacco groups using Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests, as necessary. Academic performance, self-reported prevalence of psychological distress, suicidality and sexual abuse, and ADHD were compared between the tobacco and non-tobacco groups using logistic regression analysis. A multivariable binary logistic regression was done to identify factors related to tobacco lifetime use by controlling for socio-demographic variables which were significant. The forward step-wise Wald method [24] was used for variable selection. The Hosmer–Lemeshow test was used for the model fitting [24]. All tests were two-tailed.


   Results Top


A total of 7560 students (97.7%) of the total 7740 eligible students, from 73 schools took part in the survey. Of the total questionnaires, 210 (2.7%) were discarded as these were found unanswered and the rest (n=7350) were analyzed. The response rate was 97.3 per cent. Of the questionnaires analyzed, 3715 (50.6%) were boys and 3635 (49.4%) were girls with a mean age of 15.3±1.7 yr and range 12 -19 yr. The prevalence and pattern of tobacco usage among school students are described in [Table 1]. A total of 504 (6.9%) adolescents reported lifetime use of tobacco, of whom 462 (12.5%) were boys and 42 (1.2%) were girls. Gender differences between tobacco users were not analyzed as number of girls using tobacco was small. There was increasing use of tobacco with age with the proportion of students with lifetime alcohol use increasing from 3.1 per cent in age category 12-13 yr to 15.1 per cent at 18-19 yr. Current use was 29 per cent. Daily use was reported in 9.5 per cent of users. Among students who reported lifetime tobacco use (n=504), the frequency and severity of tobacco use (indicated by collated ASSIST scores) showed 37.5 per cent of users were at low risk and 61.7 per cent of users had hazardous level of use. Dependent use (0.8%) was only reported among boys. The mean age of onset of tobacco use was 14±2.2 yr [Table 1].
Table 1: Prevalence and patterns of tobacco use among lifetime users

Click here to view


The socio-demographic variables are shown in [Table 2]. Urban residence (P<0.004), lower socio-economic status (P<0.01) and having a part time job (P<0.01) were significantly correlated with lifetime tobacco use. There was no significant correlation with family structure or religion.
Table 2: Comparison of socio-demographic correlates between tobacco users and non-users [n=7350. (504 tobacco users; 6846 non-users)]

Click here to view


[Table 3] describes the academic and psychological correlates of tobacco use. In the bivariate analysis, use of tobacco was highly predictive of use of alcohol and illicit drugs. Further, students who used tobacco had significantly higher odds of poorer academic performance, psychological distress, suicidal thoughts, suicidal attempts, ADHD, contact and non-contact sexual abuse [Table 3]. In the multivariable binary logistic regression analysis, the variables that were significantly associated with tobacco lifetime use after controlling for socio-demographic variables were failure in a year and a subject, alcohol use, illicit drug use, psychological distress, suicidal ideas, suicidal attempts, ADHD and sexual abuse. The Hosmer–Lemeshow test indicated that the model had adequate fit. The overall percentage predicted was 94.1 per cent.
Table 3: Comparison of academic & psychological correlates between tobacco users and non-users. [n=7350. (504 tobacco users; 6846 non-users)]

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


The overall prevalence of lifetime tobacco use in our study among adolescents of age group 12-19 yr was 6.9 per cent, with 12.5 per cent of males and 1.2 per cent females reporting use. The prevalence found in our study was lower than the rates of the nationwide survey conducted in 2009 which reported prevalence of 9.5 per cent [5], and a Kerala study in 2011 reporting 9.8 per cent prevalence [7]. Further, the prevalence reported was much lower than findings from studies from Western countries which showed varying prevalence between 20 and 67 per cent [3],[11]. The unique and geographically varying social, economic, cultural characteristics and tobacco policies could account for the wide range of prevalence rates of tobacco use reported across different States/countries. The low prevalence of tobacco use reported in our study could also be due to public health measures taken in Kerala. Smoking in public places is banned in Kerala and there is a ban on the sale of tobacco products around educational institutions following implementation of the Cigarettes and other Tobacco products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Commerce, Production Supply and Distribution) Act, 2003 (COTPA)[25].

Though the age category comparative prevalence rates of our study was lower than the other studies [1],[2],[3],[4],[5],[10], the increasing prevalence with age has been reported prior, in multiple studies from India and other countries [1],[2],[3],[4],[5],[10]. Males were more likely to smoke than females in our sample. Most studies from India [1],[6] have reported male predominance suggesting that social norms against female tobacco use, especially smoking, continues to be strong. The exceptions have been reported from a few small States such as Goa and north-eastern States which have reported almost equal prevalence [12],[13], reflecting the gender distribution seen in studies from Western countries [3],[10]. Though our prevalence rates of tobacco use were relatively lower than many other studies, 61.7 per cent of adolescent users in our sample were hazardous users and 0.8 per cent dependent users as assessed by the ASSIST tobacco involvement scores. Daily use of tobacco was seen in 9.5 per cent of users and current use was 29 per cent. The higher proportion of users having hazardous use and current use in adolescence could be owing to tobacco being highly addictive [26].

The mean age of onset of tobacco use of 14 yr was comparable to another study from Kerala which reported an age of onset of around 13 yr [9]. Many Indian studies, particularly from States reporting higher prevalence, have observed a younger age of onset, for example, of 10 yr or less [1],[5], which is also similar to studies in countries with high baseline prevalence among adolescents [3],[10].

Tobacco use was higher among students belonging to the lower socio-economic status similar to previous findings [3],[4],[5]. Adolescents engaged in a part-time job had significantly increased risk of tobacco use. A higher proportion of students working part time belonged to the lower socio-economic class, thus having access to extra income. Thus students from lower socio-economic status in our sample had greater access to disposable income which is known to increase the risk of tobacco and substance use [8]. (This text was present in submission). This factor could have contributed in addition to already reported risk factors in families from lower socio-economic status which includes larger family size, lower parental education and less effective supervision [1],[5]. This study was cross-sectional in nature, and the data could not be used to support directionality or causality. Yet, the data appeared to suggest that students with tobacco use had significantly greater academic failures (similar to previous reports of association between substance use and lower academic achievement [6],[10]). Students who used tobacco in our study had a significantly higher risk of using alcohol and illicit drugs supporting to prior literature that use of one substance increases the risk of use of other substances [27].

Students with tobacco use had higher psychological distress, suicidal thoughts and suicidal attempts. Though there are no Indian studies looking at these links, previous studies from other countries have found that adolescents who smoke have higher rates of anxiety and mood disorders than non-smokers [19], and higher rates of smoking have been found in the group with severe psychological distress in comparison to people without distress [17]. Smoking has also been correlated with suicidal ideation and suicidal attempts [17]. This may suggest that tobacco use may be used as forms of 'self-medication' to manage psychological distress and suicidality [19],[28].

In our study, retrospective self-reported ADHD features in childhood were higher among tobacco users. Though the retrospective assessment of ADHD has its limitations with regard to accuracy of recall, it has been suggested that childhood ADHD symptoms predict onset as well as progression from experimental to daily and dependent smoking [16]. Studies have also shown ADHD to be associated with eventual development of tobacco and substance use disorders which have an earlier onset and greater severity [16],[17]. Our findings that contact sexual abuse and non-contact sexual abuse were correlated with tobacco use have added to the evidence that sexual abuse/risk behaviours and substance use form an important cluster in adolescent risk behaviours [19],[29]. While most studies have been in clinical samples, one community study also reported the same association [15].

The present study had some limitations. First, this study did not include out of school adolescents who tend to have higher risk for using tobacco and other drugs [30]. Second, the use of different forms of tobacco was not assessed separately. Third, all aspects were evaluated by using questionnaires and no evaluation was carried out by mental health professionals. For assessment of suicidality and sexual abuse questions in the form, checklists were used. Fourth, the cross-sectional design on some aspects of the questionnaire (psychological distress) provided information about the present state and did not allow inferences on lifetime psychopathology. Fifth, the information of the questionnaire was collected anonymously which precluded any individual specific intervention. Finally, many factors which are known to influence adolescent tobacco use including peer pressure and parental tobacco use were not assessed.

In conclusion, the overall lifetime prevalence of tobacco use in our study was 6.9 per cent which was lower in comparison to findings from previous studies in Kerala and other regions of India. The association of tobacco use with psychological distress, suicidality, sexual abuse and ADHD was observed among tobacco using adolescents from Kerala. Given the multiple negative correlates and clustering of risk behaviours among adolescents who use tobacco, there is a need to further promote specific public health policies and interventions to prevent tobacco use among adolescents.





The study was partly funded by the NRHM (Kerala). The authors thank the Junior Public Health Nurses (JPHNs) and Block PROs of NRHM (Ernakulam) who were involved in administering the questionnaire and Shri Ajayakumar and team who helped in the data entry.

Conflicts of Interest: None.



 
   References Top

1.
Reddy KS, Gupta PC, editors. Report of tobacco control in India. New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India; 2004.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Preventing tobacco use among youth and young adults: A report of the surgeon general. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2012. Available from: http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/reports/preventing-youth-tobacco-use/full-report.pdf, accessed on December 2, 2014.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Johnston LD, O'Malley PM, Miech RA, Bachman JG, Schulenberg JE. Monitoring the future national results on drug use: 1975-2013: Overview, key findings on adolescent drug use. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan; 2014.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Chaudhry K, Prabhakar AK, Prabhakaran PS, Prasad A, Singh K, Singh A. Prevalence of tobacco use in Karnataka and Uttar Pradesh In India. New Delhi: Indian Council of Medical Research; 2001.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Gajalakshmi V, Kanimozhi CV. A survey of 24,000 students aged 13-15 years in India: Global Youth Tobacco Survey 2006 and 2009. Tob Use Insights 2010; 3 : 23-31.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Jayakrishnan R, Geetha S, Binukumar B; Sreekumar, Lekshmi K. Self-reported tobacco use, knowledge on tobacco legislation and tobacco hazards among adolescents in rural Kerala State. Indian J Dent Res 2011; 22 : 195-9.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Philip PM, Neetu AP, Binukumar B, Satheesan B. Evaluation of a tobacco control programme to reduce tobacco use among school children in Kerala. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2013; 14 : 3455-9.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Bhojani UM, Chander SJ, Devadasan N. Tobacco use and related factors among pre-university students in a college in Bangalore, India. Natl Med J India 2009; 22 : 294-7.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Pradeepkumar AS, Mohan S, Gopalakrishnan P, Sarma PS, Thankappan KR, Nichter M. Tobacco use in Kerala: findings from three recent studies. Natl Med J India 2005; 18 : 148-53.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Kokkevi A, Richardson C, Florescu S, Kuzman M, Stergar E. Psychosocial correlates of substance use in adolescence: a cross-national study in six European countries. Drug Alcohol Depend 2007; 86 : 67-74.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Fielding JE. Smoking and women: tragedy of the majority. N Engl J Med 1987; 317 : 1343-5.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Sinha DN, Gupta PC, Pednekar MS. Tobacco use among students in the eight North-Eastern states of India. Indian J Cancer 2003; 40 : 43-59.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Pednekar MS, Gupta PC. Tobacco use among school students in Goa, India. Indian J Public Health 2004; 48 : 147-52.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Kandel DB, Kiros GE, Schaffran C, Hu MC. Racial/ethnic differences in cigarette smoking initiation and progression to daily smoking: a multilevel analysis. Am J Public Health 2004; 94 : 128-35.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Mohanan P, Swain S, Sanah N, Sharma V, Ghosh D. A study on the prevalence of alcohol consumption, tobacco use and sexual behaviour among adolescents in urban areas of the Udupi District, Karnataka, India. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J 2014; 14 : e104-12.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Fuemmeler BF, Kollins SH, McClernon FJ. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms predict nicotine dependence and progression to regular smoking from adolescence to young adulthood. J Pediatr Psychol 2007; 32 : 1203-13.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Couwenbergh C, van den Brink W, Zwart K, Vreugdenhil C, van Wijngaarden-Cremers P, van der Gaag RJ. Comorbid psychopathology in adolescents and young adults treated for substance use disorders: a review. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2006; 15 : 319-28.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
WHO ASSIST Working Group. The Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST): development, reliability and feasibility. Addiction 2002; 97 : 1183-94.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Zorick T. Psychiatric comorbidities in adolescent substance use disorders. In: Rosner R, editor. Clinical handbook of adolescent addiction. Oxford: John Wiley and Sons; 2013.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Andrews G, Slade T. Interpreting scores on the Kessler psychological distress scale (K10). Aust N Z J Public Health 2001; 25 : 494-7.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Linehan MM. Suicidal behaviour questionnaire (SBQ-14) – Pretreatment. Seattle: University of Washington; 1997.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Zolotor AJ, Runyan DK, Dunne MP, Jain D, Péturs HR, Ramirez C, et al. ISPCAN Child Abuse Screening Tool Children's Version (ICAST-C): instrument development and multi-national pilot testing. Child Abuse Negl 2009; 33 : 833-41.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Barkley RA. Childhood symptoms. Barkley adult ADHD rating scale-IV (BAARS-IV). New York: Guilford Press; 2011.   Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Agresti A. Building and applying logistic regression models. Categorical Data Analysis. New Jersey: Wiley Online Library; 2002. p. 211-66.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Cigarettes and other Tobacco products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Commerce, Production Supply and Distribution) Act, 2003 (COTPA) No. 34; 2003.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Lopez-Quintero C, Pérez de los Cobos J, Hasin DS, Okuda M, Wang S, Grant BF, et al. Probability and predictors of transition from first use to dependence on nicotine, alcohol, cannabis, and cocaine: results of the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC). Drug Alcohol Depend 2011; 115 : 120-30.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Lee CY, Winters KC, Wall MM. Trajectories of substance use disorders in youth: identifying and predicting group memberships. J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse 2010; 19 : 135-57.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Hughes JR. Smoking and suicide: a brief overview. Drug Alcohol Depend 2008; 98 : 169-78.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Pahl K, Brook DW, Morojele NK, Brook JS. Nicotine dependence and problem behaviors among urban South African adolescents. J Behav Med 2010; 33 : 101-9.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Benegal V, Kulbhusan, Seshadri S, Karott M. Drug abuse among street children in Bangalore. A project in collaboration between NIMHANS, Bangalore and the Bangalore Forum for street and working children, Monograph funded by CRY; Bengaluru: NIMHANS; 1998.  Back to cited text no. 30
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]


This article has been cited by
1 How can today’s substance-using youth be helped to quit? Perspectives of college students from Bangalore, India
Padmavathy Doraiswamy,Prasanthi Nattala,Pratima Murthy
International Journal of Social Psychiatry. 2020; 66(5): 469
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
    Material & M...
   Results
   Discussion
   Acknowledgment
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2434    
    Printed17    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded501    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal