|Year : 2016 | Volume
| Issue : 3 | Page : 477-481
Role of Anopheles subpictus Grassi in Japanese encephalitis virus transmission in Tirunelveli, South India
Velayutham Thenmozhi, Thiruppathi Balaji, Kasiviswanathan Venkatasubramani, Kutty Jagadeeswaran Dhananjeyan, Alagarsamy Selvam, Veeramanoharan Rajamannar, Brij Kishore Tyagi
Centre for Research in Medical Entomology (Indian Council of Medical Research), Madurai 625 002, Tamil Nadu, India
|Date of Submission||30-Apr-2015|
|Date of Web Publication||20-Jan-2017|
Centre for Research in Medical Entomology (Indian Council of Medical Research), Madurai 625 002, Tamil Nadu
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
|How to cite this article:|
Thenmozhi V, Balaji T, Venkatasubramani K, Dhananjeyan KJ, Selvam A, Rajamannar V, Tyagi BK. Role of Anopheles subpictus Grassi in Japanese encephalitis virus transmission in Tirunelveli, South India. Indian J Med Res 2016;144:477-81
|How to cite this URL:|
Thenmozhi V, Balaji T, Venkatasubramani K, Dhananjeyan KJ, Selvam A, Rajamannar V, Tyagi BK. Role of Anopheles subpictus Grassi in Japanese encephalitis virus transmission in Tirunelveli, South India. Indian J Med Res [serial online] 2016 [cited 2020 Nov 28];144:477-81. Available from: https://www.ijmr.org.in/text.asp?2016/144/3/477/198684
Japanese encephalitis (JE) distribution is significantly linked to irrigated rice production combined with pig rearing. The Culex vishnui subgroup of mosquitoes consisting of Culex tritaeniorhynchus Giles, Cx. vishnui Theobald and Cx. pseudovishnui Colless have been implicated as major vectors of JE virus (JEV). In India, however, JEV has been isolated from 17 species of mosquitoes; 10 species of Culex, three species each of Anopheles and Mansonioides, and one species of Armigeres.
In the genus Anopheles, the three species that carry JEV are An. peditaeniatus Leicester, An. barbirostris Van der Walp and An. subpictus Grassi. JEV has been isolated from An. peditaeniatus in Mandya, Karnataka . It has been isolated from An. subpictus in Karnataka , Kerala  and Tamil Nadu . JEV was isolated from An. barbirostris in Asansol, West Bengal . Anopheles subpictus was first described by an Italian scientist, Grassi in 1899. Thisis the most abundant anopheline species in most parts of India which can breed in a variety of habitats such as flowing or stagnant waters, clear or turbid waters, water with or without vegetation, unshaded or slightly shaded water bodies, wells, burrow pits, channels, ponds, tanks, ground pools, fallow and freshly flooded rice fields, cement cisterns, tree holes, lake margins and fresh or brackish waters, and the adult has a flight range of 1.5-6 km . Here we report results of a longitudinal study carried out in Tirunelveli district, Tamil Nadu, India, on the role of An. subpictus in JEV transmission.
A longitudinal study of vector abundance and infection frequency was conducted during 2011-2013 in four villages of Tirunelveli district. The study villages, namely, Senthimangalam in Rajavallipuram Primary Health Centre (PHC), Ariyanayagipuram in Mukkudal PHC, Kuthalaperi in Manur PHC and one control village Magiladi in Thirukurungudi PHC of Tirunelveli Zone (based on no JE case incidence reported during the past 10 yr), were selected with the guidance of Tamil Nadu State Health Department, Zonal Entomological Team, located at Tirunelveli. The census data of the index villages were collected from the respective villages. Numerous Little Egret birds in the paddy fields and amplifying host pigs were observed.
Mosquito collection: Mosquitoes were sampled from the selected villages at bimonthly intervals during 2011 to 2013. Adult mosquitoes were collected resting on bushes and thatched roofs of cattle sheds during dusk hours and from human dwellings (indoor resting) and outdoor resting places during day time 0800-1000 h. Mosquito samples were transported to the field laboratory of Centre for Research in Medical Entomology (CRME), Madurai, India, lightly anaesthetized with ether, species identified  and sorted on ice into pools of <50 specimens/pool. Unfed mosquitoes were pooled on the same day of collection, whereas engorged female mosquitoes were held for 48 h for digestion of blood meals before pooling. Mosquito (only females) abundance was calculated as density (number collected per man-hour). Mosquito pools were stored at −80°C until processed for virus detection and isolation as described . Two systems were used.
Antigen capture ELISA: Monoclonal antibody 6B4A-10 (reactive against all viruses in JE/WN/SLE/MVE complex) was used as capture antibody and monoclonal antibody peroxidase conjugate SLE MAB 6B6C-1 (reactive against all flaviviruses) as detector antibodies (supplied by Dr. T.F. Tsai, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins Co., USA). A mosquito pool was considered ELISA positive if its optical density value was ≥ mean + 4 standard deviation of the six normal pools.
Insect bioassay: Toxorhynchites splendens mosquito larvae were inoculated with ELISA positive pools intracerebrally and incubated for 7-10 days at 29°C and then tested by the indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) on head squeeze preparations (Toxo-IFA). Smears were tested with JEV-specific monoclonal antibody, MAB 112 (supplied by Dr. Kimura Kuroda, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Neurosciences, Japan) and detected by Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) conjugated anti-mouse immunoglobulin (Dakoppats, Denmark).
Vector density was calculated as the number of mosquitoes collected per man hour . Virus infection rate in mosquitoes was expressed as minimum infection rate (MIR) per 1000 females tested .
MIR = Number of positive pools/Total number of mosquitoes tested × 1000.
The density of Cx. tritaeniorhynchus was compared with that of An. subpictus using independent t test with SPSS version 16.0 (Chicago, USA). The virus infection rates of Cx. tritaeniorhynchus and An. subpictus were compared by Fisher's exact test using Epi Info 3.5.3. (CDC software, Atlanta).
Seven species of Anopheles – An. barbirostris, An. culicifacies, An. pallidus, An. peditaeniatus, An. subpictus, An. tessellatus and An. vagus were prevalent in the study area whereas An. subpictus was predominant almost round the year. Cx. tritaeniorhynchus was found dominant in all the study villages, followed by An. subpictus. A total of 13,343 adult mosquitoes were collected, belonging to 24 species of mosquitoes of five genera: Anopheles (7 species), Armigeres (1 species), Culex (9 species), Mansonia (2 species) and Aedes (5 species) from the four villages. Greater numbers of JE vector Cx. tritaeniorhynchus, (9937), An. subpictus (1432), Cx. gelidus (992) and Cx. vishnui (337) were collected from the study villages [Table 1]. There was only one Cx. pseudovishnui collected from the study villages. Species compositions of mosquitoes are shown in [Figure 1]. The density of An. subpictus ranged from 0 to 62 and the density of Cx. tritaeniorhynchus ranged between 0 and 313. The difference between the density of Cx. tritaeniorhynchus and An. subpictus was significant in Ariyanayagipuram and Senthimangalam (P<0.001, [Table 2]). All the 527 pools were processed for JEV detection by antigen capture ELISA and 28 pools were found positive. JEV was detected from ten species of mosquitoes and 28 positive pools, namely, Cx. tritaeniorhynchus (10), An. subpictus (7), Cx. infula (2), Mansonia annulifera (2), Ma. uniformis (2), Cx. bitaeniorhynchus (1), Cx. quinquefasciatus (1), An. pallidus (1), An. barbirostris (1) and Armigeres subalbatus (1). JEV infection was high in Ariyanayagipuram (13), followed by Senthimangalam (8), Kuthalaperi (4) and Magiladi (3). Month-wise JEV infection in Cx. tritaeniorhynchus and An. subpictus in the study villages are given in [Figure 2]. Among ten pools of Cx. tritaeniorhynchus and seven pools of An. subpictus positive in ELISA, seven and four pools were further confirmed as JEV by Toxo-IFA, respectively.
|Table 1: Japanese encephalitis virus infection in mosquitoes in Tirunelveli district (2011-2013)|
Click here to view
|Table 2: Statistical analysis on mosquito density (number of mosquitoes collected per man hour)|
Click here to view
|Figure 2: Mosquito density and Japanese encephalities virus infection (village-wise).|
Click here to view
Night-time human biting collection studies in Rajasthan, India, showed two feeding peaks for An. subpictus, one early in the night and the other just before dawn . Anopheles subpictus is strongly zoophagic feeding mostly on bovines (83%) and rarely on pigs (0.6%) and humans (0.4%), and has quite often been suspected to be involved in the epidemiology of JE transmission as predicted in Gorakhpur district, Uttar Pradesh, in North India . Anopheles subpictus was reported as a vector of JEV in Cuddalore, an area of Tamil Nadu, India, endemic for the disease . In Vellore district, An. subpictus was the most dominant species after Cx. vishnui group and was collected throughout the year .
Blood meal analyses of An. subpictus were collected from different places of India such as Assam, Poona (Pune), Jaypore hills, South-East India and Delhi with anthropophilic index of 2.3, 0.4, 0.0, 3.1, 0.0 and 2.4 per cent, respectively . In the present study, the anthropophilic index was calculated to be 25 per cent. The duration of gonotrophic cycle was 98, 102 and 88 h in rainy, winter and summer seasons, respectively, and the average being 96 h. Proportion parous, daily survival rate and daily mortality rate were 0.51, 84 and 16 per cent, respectively. Among the female population, 14.5 per cent passed three or more gonotrophic cycles in natural conditions. Both An. subpictus and An. hyrcanus were suspected as secondary vectors for JE as they prevailed in high density . During JE season, substantial densities of An. subpictus and An. peditaeniatus suggest the supportive role of these species . In the present study seven of the 28 positive pools (25%) were from An. subpictus and also next to the JE primary vector Cx. tritaeniorhynchus (10/28, 36%).
Anopheles subpictus has a great adaptability to survive with many other mosquito species in almost all types of breeding habitats. Its man-hour density was higher than other anophelines in most part of its distribution. Although the cattle blood is the first choice, its moderate anthropophilic index and high survival rate in all seasons are indicative for its role as disease transmitters.
With the isolation of JEV from An. subpictus in this study, it was demonstrated that this species acquired the infection in nature and might transmit this infection and act as a secondary or bridge vector in JEV transmission in Tirunelveli as they prevailed in high density.
Conflicts of Interest: None.
| References|| |
Reuben R, Kaul HN, Soman RS. Mosquitoes of arboviral importance in India. Mosq Borne Dis Bull
Tyagi BK, Thenmozhi V, Karthigai Selvi S. Transmission dynamics of Japanese encephalitis with emphasis on gaps in understanding and priority areas for research on Japanese encephalitis and other acute encephalitis syndrome in India. J Commun Dis
Mourya DT, Ilkal MA, Mishra AC, Jacob PG, Pant U, Ramanujam S, et al
. Isolation of Japanese encephalitis virus from mosquitoes collected in Karnataka state, India from 1985 to 1987. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg
George S, Jacob PG, Rao JA. Isolation of Japanese encephalitis & West Nile viruses from mosquitoes collected in Kolar district of Karnataka state during 1977-79. Indian J Med Res
Dhanda V, Thenmozhi V, Kumar NP, Hiriyan J, Arunachalam N, Balasubramanian A, et al
. Virus isolation from wild-caught mosquitoes during a Japanese encephalitis outbreak in Kerala in 1996. Indian J Med Res
Thenmozhi V, Rajendran R, Ayanar K, Manavalan R, Tyagi BK. Long-term study of Japanese encephalitis virus infection in Anopheles subpictus
in Cuddalore district, Tamil Nadu, South India. Trop Med Int Health
Chakravarty SK, Sarkar JK, Chakravarty MS, Mukherjee MK, Mukherjee KK, Das BC, et al
. The first epidemic of Japanese encephalitis studied in India – Virological studies. Indian J Med Res
Rao TR. The Anophelines of India (Revised edition)
. New Delhi: Malaria Research Centre (ICMR); 1984.
Nagpal BN, Sharma VP. Indian Anophelines
. New Delhi: Oxford and IBH Pub. Co. Pvt. Ltd.; 1995. p. 189-90.
Barraud PJ. The fauna of British India including Ceylon and Burma: Diptera Volume V family culicidae tribes megarhinini and culicini
. London: Taylor and Francis; 1934.
Gajanana A, Rajendran R, Samuel PP, Thenmozhi V, Tsai TF, Kimura-Kuroda J, et al
. Japanese encephalitis in South Arcot district, Tamil Nadu, India: a three-year longitudinal study of vector abundance and infection frequency. J Med Entomol
Tyagi BK, Yadav SP. Bionomics of malaria vectors in two physiographically different areas of the epidemic-prone Thar Desert, North-Western Rajasthan (India). J Arid Environ
Reuben R. Studies on the mosquitoes of North Arcot district, Madras State, India 3. Host preferences for pigs, birds and some small mammals. J Med Entomol
Kanojia PC, Shetty PS, Geevarghese G. A long-term study on vector abundance & seasonal prevalence in relation to the occurrence of Japanese encephalitis in Gorakhpur district, Uttar Pradesh. Indian J Med Res
Chandra G, Bhattacharjee I, Chatterjee S. A review on Anopheles subpictus
Grassi – A biological vector. Acta Trop
Sharma RS, Sharma SN, Kumar A. Susceptibility status of Japanese encephalitis vectors in Kurnool and Mehboobnagar districts of Andhra Pradesh, India. J Commun Dis
Kanojia PC. Ecological study on mosquito vectors of Japanese encephalitis virus in Bellary district, Karnataka. Indian J Med Res
[Figure 1], [Figure 2]
[Table 1], [Table 2]
|This article has been cited by|
||Entomofaunal survey and larvicidal activity of greener silver nanoparticles: A perspective for novel eco-friendly mosquito control
| ||Kuppusamy Elumalai,Shahid Mahboob,Khalid A. Al-Ghanim,Fahad Al-Misned,Jeganathan Pandiyan,Putta Muralidharan Kousik Baabu,Kaliyamoorthy Krishnappa,Marimuthu Govindarajan |
| ||Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 2020; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Japanese encephalitis: the vectors, ecology and potential for expansion
| ||James C Pearce,Tristan P Learoyd,Benjamin J Langendorf,James G Logan |
| ||Journal of Travel Medicine. 2018; 25(suppl_1): S16 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|