ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
|
Year : 2016 | Volume
: 143
| Issue : 6 | Page : 809-820 |
|
Impact of community-based health insurance in rural India on self-medication & financial protection of the insured
David M Dror1, Arpita Chakraborty2, Atanu Majumdar1, Pradeep Panda1, Ruth Koren3
1 Micro Insurance Academy, New Delhi, India and Institute of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands 2 Micro Insurance Academy, New Delhi, India and Institute of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Public Health Foundation of India, Gurgaon, India 3 Tel Aviv University, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel
Correspondence Address:
David M Dror Micro Insurance Academy, 86, 1st floor, Okhla Industrial Estate, Phase III, New Delhi 110 020 The Netherlands
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/0971-5916.192075
|
|
Background & objectives: The evidence-base of the impact of community-based health insurance (CBHI) on access to healthcare and financial protection in India is weak. We investigated the impact of CBHI in rural Uttar Pradesh and Bihar s0 tates of India on insured households' self-medication and financial position.
Methods: Data originated from (i) household surveys, and (ii) the Management Information System of each CBHI. Study design was "staggered implementation" cluster randomized controlled trial with enrollment of one-third of the treatment group in each of the years 2011, 2012 and 2013. Around 40-50 per cent of the households that were offered to enroll joined. The benefits-packages covered outpatient care in all three locations and in-patient care in two locations. To overcome self-selection enrollment bias, we constructed comparable control and treatment groups using Kernel Propensity Score Matching (K-PSM). To quantify impact, both difference-in-difference (DiD), and conditional-DiD (combined K-PSM with DiD) were used to assess robustness of results.
Results: Post-intervention (2013), self-medication was less practiced by insured HHs. Fewer insured households than uninsured households reported borrowing to finance care for non-hospitalization events. Being insured for two years also improved the HH's location along the income distribution, namely insured HHs were more likely to experience income quintile-upgrade in one location, and less likely to experience a quintile-downgrade in two locations.
Interpretation & conclusions: The realized benefits of insurance included better access to healthcare, reduced financial risks and improved economic mobility, suggesting that in our context health insurance creates welfare gains. These findings have implications for theoretical, ethical, policy and practice considerations. |
|
|
|
[FULL TEXT] [PDF]* |
|
 |
|