Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research
  Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login  
  Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Users Online: 8691       

   Table of Contents      
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 136  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 997-1003

Non-albicans Candida species in blood stream infections in a tertiary care hospital at New Delhi, India

Department of Clinical Microbiology & Immunology, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India

Date of Submission18-Oct-2010
Date of Web Publication4-Feb-2013

Correspondence Address:
Chand Wattal
Senior Consultant & Chairman, Department of Clinical Microbiology & Immunology, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Rajinder Nagar, New Delhi 110 060
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

PMID: 23391796

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

Background & objectives : During recent decades, there has been a change in the epidemiology of Candida infections, characterized by a progressive shift from a predominance of Candida albicans to non-albicans Candida species. This study was undertaken to analyze the change in the epidemiology of candidaemia and antifungal use at tertiary care hospital in New Delhi, India, over a period of 10 years.
Methods: A retrospective review of candidaemia between 1999 and 2008 and antifungal use from 2000 to 2008 was performed at Sir Ganga Ram Hosptial, New Delhi. Initially (1999-2005), isolates were differentiated as C. albicans and non- albicans Candida species. Between 2006-2008, these were identified to the species level and antifungal susceptibility was performed.
Results: The occurrence of candidaemia and total antifungal use increased significantly. Candidaemia due to non-albicans species increased and this was correlated with an increasing use of fluconazole. There was emergence and increased isolation of a novel species C. haemulonii with decreased susceptibility to both amphotericin B and azoles. Overall, sensitivities of 89.6, 90.9, 88.6, 68.8 and 54.3 per cent to amphotericin B, 5 flucytosine, voriconazole, fluconazole and itraconazole, respectively were observed. Cross-resistance or reduced susceptibility to both fluconazole (MIC >16 μg/ml) and voriconazole was observed in 11.3 per cent isolates.
Interpretation & conclusions : The study demonstrates a shift to non-albicans Candida species causing fungaemia and the emergence of amphotericin B and azole resistant novel species, C. haemulonii. Decreased susceptibility to fluconazole, as well as the threat of emergence of cross-resistance to voriconazole in the background of high azole consumption may limit the use of these agents as a presumptive therapy for Candida blood stream infections (BSI).

Keywords: Antifungal use - Candida haemulonii - candidaemia - fluconazole - non-albicans Candida species

How to cite this article:
Oberoi JK, Wattal C, Goel N, Raveendran R, Datta S, Prasad K. Non-albicans Candida species in blood stream infections in a tertiary care hospital at New Delhi, India. Indian J Med Res 2012;136:997-1003

How to cite this URL:
Oberoi JK, Wattal C, Goel N, Raveendran R, Datta S, Prasad K. Non-albicans Candida species in blood stream infections in a tertiary care hospital at New Delhi, India. Indian J Med Res [serial online] 2012 [cited 2021 Apr 19];136:997-1003. Available from:

Nosocomial candidiasis is gaining significance worldwide. Among the causes of bloodstream infection, Candida ranks fourth in the United States and seventh in Europe [1],[2] . Candida blood stream infections (BSI) are associated with a very high crude mortality of over 60 per cent, while the attributable mortality may be as high as 49 per cent [3],[4] .

Until recently, C. albicans was by far the predominant species in most countries, causing up to two thirds of all cases of invasive candidiasis. However, during recent decades, several countries around the world have witnessed a change in the epidemiology of Candida infections, characterized by a progressive shift from a predominance of Candida albicans to non-albicans Candida species (including C. glabrata and C. krusei) [5] . There is growing evidence suggesting a role for increasing use of azole agents in this epidemiological shift. Several of these non-albicans Candida species (e.g., C. glabrata and C. krusei) exhibit resistance to traditional triazole antifungals like fluconazole, and may also demonstrate cross-resistance to newer triazoles [6] . This makes it imperative to perform both speciation and antifungal susceptibility testing of all yeast fungi isolated from bloodstream or otherwise.

Because of considerable regional variability, local epidemiological knowledge is critical in the effective management of invasive candidiasis. Only a few studies from India have reported candidaemia rates of 6-18 per cent [6],[7] and an increase in isolation of non-albicans Candida species from blood samples [9],[10] . But speciation and susceptibility testing of Candida is still not routinely being done at most of the centres. Further, no data are available from India regarding the estimation of antifungal use in hospitals. The aim of this study was to describe the change in the epidemiology of candidaemia and antifungal use at a tertiary care centre in New Delhi, India over a decade.

   Material & Methods Top

This retrospective study was conducted at the Clinical Microbiology & Immunology Department of Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi. Cases of candidaemia seen between 1999 and 2008 and antifungal use from 2000 to 2008 were included. Patient's consent had been taken for investigation by the hospital at the time of admission. All Candida species isolated from blood specimens submitted for culture from patients of all age groups and either sex clinically suspected to have septicaemia were included in the study. Positive blood cultures were considered as part of a single episode if they were of the same species and sensitivity and occurred less than two weeks apart.

Isolation and identification of yeast fungi: Clinical isolates of yeast obtained from blood culture using automated blood culture system BacT/ALERT 3D (bioMerieux, France) were included. Between 1999-2005, the isolates (n=583) were differentiated as C. albicans and non- albicans Candida species using classical methods, i.e. germ tube test (rabbit serum, BD, USA), colony morphology on cornmeal agar (HiMedia, India). From 2006 onwards, the isolates (n=623) were identified to the species level using Vitek 2 YST identification card (bioMerieux, France).

Antifungal susceptibility testing: Antifungal susceptibility testing was initiated in 2006. Between 2006 and 2008, antifungal sensitivity was performed against amphotericin B (AMB), 5 flucytosine (5FC), fluconazole (FLU) and itraconazole (ITR) and voriconazole (VOR) by broth microdilution using API system [ATB FUNGUS 2 (173 isolates) and ATB FUNGUS 3 (259 isolates), bioMerieux, France]. For isolates wherein API system was not recommended by the manufacturer, sensitivity was done using E test (40 isolates) (AB Biodisk, Sweden) against AMB, FLU and VOR. Results were interpreted as per the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI; formerly NCCLS) M27-A2 document [11] . Isolates with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of <8 μg/ml for fluconazole, <0.12 μg/ml for itraconazole and <4 μg/ml for flucytosine were taken as sensitive. Isolates with MIC of <1 μg/ml for amphotericin B were considered susceptible as has been done by other authors [12] . Nguyen et al[12] in a study to demonstrate a correlation between results of in vitro susceptibility testing to amphotericin B using the standard method proposed by CLSI and microbiologic outcome for patients with Candida fungemia observed that a breakpoint MIC of >1.0 mg/ml had a 100 per cent specificity and a 100 per cent positive predictive value for identifying microbiologic failure. A resistant breakpoint for amphotericin B of >1 μg/ml for MLC (minimal lethal concentration) and >μg/ml for MIC could be inferred from the study. As per CLSI [14] a Candida isolate with an MIC of >1 μg/ml for amphotericin B is likely to be resistant. In case of voriconazole, MICs of <1 μg/ml were taken as sensitive [15] .

C . parapsilosis ATCC 22019 and C. krusei ATCC 6258 were included as the control organisms for antifungal susceptibility test.

Antifungal use: The annual consumption of antifungal drugs from 2000- 2008 was determined from pharmacy data using Hospital Information System (Intersystems, USA), Speedminer (Malaysia). The antifungal drugs used for either prophylaxis or curative treatment of candidaemia were amphotericin B deoxycholate (AMBD), amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC), liposomal amphotericin B (LAMB), fluconazole (FCZ) voriconazole (VCZ) and caspofungin (CAS). The consensus definition of prescribed daily doses (PDD in adults defined according to locally used doses)was used [16] . These differ from the daily defined doses (DDD) as per WHO/ATC [17] definition which defines lower doses for amphotericin B and fluconazole (35mg & 200 mg, respectively). Antifungal drug use density was calculated as yearly PDD/100 patient-days or occupied bed days. The PDDs for the different drugs were: 70 mg for AMBD, 350 mg for ABLC, 210 mg for LAMB, 400 mg for FCZ, 400 mg for VCZ and 50 mg for CAS [18] .

Statistical analysis: Trend analysis of incidence of candidaemia and antifungal use was done by using regression analysis of time trends for time series data. This analysis provided the rate of increase or decrease in the parameter/outcome of interest along with its standard error. The test of significance was applied for testing its relevance. Time trend analysis was done by fitting the time trend function Y=ae bt . In this b was the percentage growth rate per year. The growth rate was tested for its significance using t-test. The results were presented providing the goodness of fit of time trend along with P value for its significance. Pearson correlation coefficients (r) were calculated to assess the relationship between fluconazole consumption and isolation of non-albicans Candida species over time (2000-2008) using SPSS software version 17 (Chicago IL software).

   Results Top

Distribution of candidaemia cases: A total of 69,010 blood cultures were analyzed. Among these, (1206; 1.74%) were found positive for Candida species. The average number of cases with candidaemia was 6.84 episodes /10,000 patient-days/ year (range 2.46-11 episodes) [Figure 1] (inset). Overall rate of change of candidaemia from 1998 to 2008 was 17.7 per cent (r [2] =0.743; P=0.001). From 1999-2008, the value increased from 1.61 to 2.75 and 1.03 to 8.29 episodes/ 10, 000 patient-days in the wards and ICU settings, respectively [Figure 1]. The rate of change in candidaemia in the ICU over the study period was 29.5 per cent which was significant (r [2] =0.823; P<0.001).
Figure 1. Candidaemia cases in ward and ICU settings. Inset: Annual incidence of candidaemia.

Click here to view

Distribution of Candida spp.: The percentage of C. albicans which was isolated in about 76 per cent of the episodes in 1999, progressively dropped to 15.2 per cent in 2008, the absolute number and the incidence of C. albicans, however, did not significantly vary during the years observed (2.01-1.67 episodes/ 10,000 patient-days). On the other hand, isolation of non-Candida species increased from 0.633 in 1999 to 9.38 episodes/ 10,000 patient days in 2008 [Figure 2] with the rate of change over time being 28.9 per cent, which was significant (r [2] =0.834; P<0.001).
Figure 2. Incidence of candidaemia due to C. albicans and non-C. albicans Candida species. No. of episodes/10000 patient - days.

Click here to view

Between 2006 and 2008, C. tropicalis was the most common species (182 cases; 29.2%), followed by C. albicans (105 cases; 16.8%) and C. haemulonii (97 cases; 15.5%). C. parapsilosis and C. glabrata were isolated in 78 (12.5%) and 53 (8.5%) cases, respectively. These five species constituted 82.6 per cent of the isolates. C. krusei was isolated in only 11 cases, C. pelliculosa 23 cases, Pichia ohmeri 10 cases, C. rugosa 9 cases and Trichosporon spp. 7 cases. Twenty one cases were due to unusual isolates with <5 isolates each (C. guilliermondi, C. utilis, C. famata, C. lusitaniae, Yerwonia spp., Stephanos ciferii and Saccchromyces cerevisiae). Twenty seven Candida isolates could not be speciated. C. haemulonii was first isolated in 2006 and its isolation increased from 5.45 per cent in 2006 to 18.2 per cent in 2008.

Antifungal drug use: The annual usage of antifungal drugs between 2000-2008 is illustrated in [Figure 3]. Total antifungal use increased between 2000 and 2008 from 0.627 to 8.77 PDD/ 100 patient-days with the rate of change over time being 32 per cent which was statistically significant (r [2] =0.99, P<0.001). Fluconazole was the most frequently prescribed antifungal drug and rate of change of increase in its usage over time between 2000-2008 was 25.1 per cent (r [2] =0.971, P<0.001). There was also a significant increase in amphotericin B (conventional and lipid formulations) usage from 0.007 to 1.92 PDDs/ 100 patient days with a rate of change of 56.2 per cent over the study period (r [2] =0.74, p=0.006). Voriconazole and caspofungin usage started in 2006 and 2008, respectively. Between 2006-2008, voriconazole usage almost doubled from 0.71 to 1.22 PDDs/ 100 patient days, though it was not statistically significant. There was a statistically significant correlation between yearly fluconazole use and increase in isolation of non- albicans Candida species (P=0.006).
Figure 3. Yearly antifungal use (2000-2008) in term of prescribed daily dose (PDD)/100 bed-days.

Click here to view

Antifungal susceptibility: The sensitivity profiles of all Candida isolates are shown in the [Table 1]. Between 2006 to 2008, data on amphotericin B, 5 flucytosine, fluconazole and itraconazole susceptibility were available for 472, 432, 472 and 432 isolates, respectively. Voriconazole susceptibility testing was performed from 2007 thus results were available for 299 isolates. The susceptibility profile of all Candida isolates showed that 90.9 per cent were sensitive to 5 flucytosine, 88.6 per cent to voriconazole, 68.8 per cent to fluconazole and 54.3 per cent to itraconazole.
Table 1. MIC profile of Candida isolates to amphotericin B and % sensitivity to other antifungals tested

Click here to view

Nearly all the isolates (89.6%) had an MIC of <1 μg/ml for amphotericin B, the notable exception being C. haemulonii where only 27.6 per cent isolates demonstrated an MIC of <1 μg/ml. C. haemulonii was also completely resistant to both fluconazole and itraconazole whereas it showed 63.8 per cent sensitivity to voriconazole. In addition, 11 isolates were tested against caspofungin by E test and all were sensitive (MIC <2 μg/ml) [14] .

C. tropicalis , the most common species isolated, was 90.5 per cent susceptible to fluconazole, whereas C. parapsilosis and C. glabrata showed lower sensitivity rates of 66.1 and 60.8 per cent, respectively. Of the 299 isolates for which, both fluconazole and voriconazole susceptibility data were available, 112 were resistant or showed reduced susceptibilities to fluconazole (MIC >16 μg/ml) and 34 of these were resistant or showed reduced susceptibilities to voriconazole (MIC >2 μg/ml). These included C. haemulonii (17 isolates), C. tropicalis, C. glabrata and C. parapsilosis (3 isolates each), C. famata (2 isolates) and unidentified Candida species (6 isolates).

   Discussion Top

The current retrospective analysis of candidaemia over a 10-yr period revealed a five-fold increase in candidaemia cases at our centre. Data from the NNIS system on nosocomial BSIs has also shown up to five-fold increase in incidence between 1980 and 1989 in the United States [19] . However, Chakarbarti et al[20] in a retrospective evaluation of candidaemia in an Indian teaching hospital over a 10-year period have observed even higher rates of increase ranging from eleven-fold in the second half of 1980s and a further 18-fold in 1995 compared to 1991 [21] . These studies suggested wide variations in the prevalence of candidaemia in different hospitals in India.

The observed increase in candidaemia cases in our study was probably due to the greater use of invasive devices, broad-spectrum antibacterial agents, more extensive surgical procedures and use of advance life support on various transplant patients. Between 2000 and 2008, there was an increase in the number of blood cultures (4380 to 8608) alongwith total number of surgeries (17768 to 23874) and organ transplants (71 to 294) performed representing an increase in number of cases at a higher risk for candidaemia. During the same time period, in a separate analysis, we observed a significant increase in rate of antibacterial drug consumption in our institution which has doubled from 157.8 to 318.5 DDDs/100 bed days [22] (available from: http// The observed increase in candidaemia was significant in ICU settings.

There has been a major increase in the prescription of antifungal drugs over the last two decades. In the present study, the overall antifungal use increased 13- fold between 2000 and 2008. As reported by others [16],[23] , fluconazole was the most frequently prescribed antifungal agent. Our hospital has high output liver, renal and bone marrow transplant units with 20,000 surgeries performed annually and as a result high fluconazole consumption as either presumptive/ prophylactic agent is observed.

The role of the widespread use of azoles in the shift to non-albicans Candida species has been largely debated and remains controversial. In the present study, there was a statistically significant correlation between yearly fluconazole use and increase in isolation of non- albicans Candida species, even though the antifungal susceptibility patterns revealed that the most common species C. tropicalis showed high sensitivity to fluconazole.

The new species C. haemulonii, previously known to cause an epidemic disease afflicting laboratory animals and onychomycosis in humans, has emerged as an opportunistic fungal pathogen that is capable of causing an outbreak of fungaemia [24] . C. haemulonii has shown increased MICs and resistance to both amphotericin B and fluconazole and also exhibited clinical failure [25] . Kim et al[26] reported the emergence of C. haemulonii from five Korean hospitals between 2004 and 2006, with genotyping results suggesting intra- and inter-hospital transmission of a clonal strain. Emergence of amphotericin B resistant C. haemulonii isolates is a matter of concern. This species was first isolated at our hospital in 2006 and its isolation increased significantly so that it became the third most common species isolated from 2006-2008.

Our susceptibility data showed that reduced susceptibility to fluconazole was common in C. glabrata and C. parapsilosis. Reduced susceptibility to fluconazole in C. glabrata was consistent with previously reported data [27],[28] . In contrast, C. parapsilosis has usually been reported to be sensitive to azoles. However, Sarvikivi et al[29] have reported that the use of fluconazole prophylaxis contributed to the emergence of subclones of C. parapsilosis with decreased susceptibility among isolates responsible for BSI in neonatal ICU. Similar findings were reported in an animal model [30] . Also, C. parapsilosis is known to form extensive biofilms on bioprosthetic materials such as central venous catheters (CVCs), which can confer relative resistance to antifungal agents.

Cross-resistance between fluconazole and voriconazole has been frequently reported in many species [31] and development of voriconazole resistance after fluconazole exposure without any known prior exposure to voriconazole has also been documented [6] . In our study, cross-resistance or reduced susceptibility to both fluconazole (MIC >16 μg/ml) and voriconazole was observed in 11.3 per cent isolates. These findings coupled with high azole consumption at our hospital may preclude the use of voriconazole as initial therapy in unstable patients with invasive candidiasis.

The present study has not addressed specific risk factors, which play a role in the selection of species causing fungaemia as well as variable susceptibility patterns. Moreover, this being a retrospective study, genotypic analysis of the isolates was not done, which could have ascertained clonality and epidemiology of spread of the various species especially C. haemulonii. This would have also helped in definitive identification of Pichia ohmeri isolates which are infrequently reported in literature. Also, species identification and antifungal susceptibility data were available only from 2006 and susceptibility testing was performed by recommended assays making exact comparisons difficult.

In conclusion, there has been a rise in the occurrence of candidaemia cases in our tertiary care hospital over the last decade. A significant epidemiological shift to higher isolation of non-albicans Candida species was noticed. The high usage of fluconazole appeared to have played a role in this shift, however, it may be recognised that other events like patient specific risk factors might have also contributed in selection of different species. Despite C. tropicalis being the commonest isolate, the emergence and increased isolation of amphotericin B and azole resistant C. haemulonii and the documentation of decreased susceptibility to fluconazole in C. parapsilosis, a species generally reported to be fluconazole sensitive, are a matter of concern. Decreased susceptibility to fluconazole with the threat of emergence of cross-resistance to voriconazole in the background of high azole consumption may limit the use of these agents as empirical therapy for Candida BSI before species identification and results of antifungal susceptibility testing are known.

   Acknowledgment Top

Authors thank Dr Arunaloke Chakrabarti, Incharge Mycology Division, Department of Medical Microbiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India for molecular characterization of C. haemulonii isolates, and thank Shrimati Parul Takkar for the statistical analysis of the data.

   References Top

1.Wisplinghoff H, Bischoff T, Tallent SM, Seifert H, Wenzel RP, Edmond MB. Nosocomial bloodstream infections in US hospitals: Analysis of 24,179 cases from a prospective nationwide surveillance study. Clin Infect Dis 2004; 39 : 309-17.  Back to cited text no. 1
2.Marchetti O, Bille J, Fluckiger U, Eggimann P, Ruef C, Garbino J, et al. Epidemiology of candidaemia in Swiss tertiary care hospitals: Secular trends, 1991-2000. Clin Infect Dis 2004; 38 : 311-20.  Back to cited text no. 2
3.Lark RL, Chenoweth C, Saint S, Zemencuk JK, Lipsky BA, Plorde JJ. Four year prospective evaluation of nosocomial bacteremia: epidemiology, microbiology, and patient outcome. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2000; 38 : 131-40.  Back to cited text no. 3
4.Gudlaugsson O, Gillespie S, Lee K, Vande Berg J, Hu J, Messer S, et al. Attributable mortality of nosocomial candidaemia, revisited. Clin Infect Dis 2003; 37 : 1172-7.   Back to cited text no. 4
5.Krcmery V, Barnes AJ. Non-albicans Candida spp. causing fungaemia: pathogenicity and antifungal resistance. J Hosp Infect 2002; 50 : 243-60.  Back to cited text no. 5
6.Magill SS, Shields C, Sears CL, Choti M, Merz WG. Triazole cross-resistance among Candida spp.: case report, occurrence among bloodstream isolates, and implications for antifungal therapy. J Clin Microbiol 2006; 44 : 529-35.  Back to cited text no. 6
7.Xess I, Jain N, Hasan F, Mandal P, Banerjee U. Epidemiology of candidemia in a tertiary care centre of north India: 5-year study. Infection 2007; 35 : 256-9.  Back to cited text no. 7
8.Kothari A, Sagar V. Epidemiology of candida bloodstream infections in a tertiary care institute in India. Indian J Med Microbiol 2009; 27 : 171-2.  Back to cited text no. 8
9.Shivaprakasha S, Radhakrishnan K, Karim PM. Candida spp. other than Candida albicans: a major cause of fungaemia in a tertiary care centre. Indian J Med Microbiol 2007; 25 : 405-7.  Back to cited text no. 9
10.Chakrabarti A, Chatterjee SS, Rao KL, Zameer MM, Shivaprakash MR, Singhi S, et al. Recent experience with fungaemia: change in species distribution and azole resistance. Scand J Infect Dis 2009; 41 : 275-84.  Back to cited text no. 10
11.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts. Approved standard M27-A2, 2 nd ed. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, PA; 2002.  Back to cited text no. 11
12.González GM, Elizondo M, Ayala J. Trends in species distribution and susceptibility of bloodstream isolates of Candida collected in Monterrey, Mexico, to seven antifungal agents: results of a 3-year (2004 to 2007) surveillance study. J Clin Microbiol 2008; 46 : 2902-5.   Back to cited text no. 12
13.Nguyen MH, Clancy CJ, Yu VL, Yu YC, Morris AJ, Snydman DR, et al. Do in vitro susceptibility data predict the microbiologic response to amphotericin B? Results of a prospective study of patients with Candida fungemia. J Infect Dis 1998; 177 : 425-30.  Back to cited text no. 13
14.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts. Approved standard M27-A3, 3 rd ed. Wayne, PA: CLSI; 2008.  Back to cited text no. 14
15.Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ, Rex JH, Espinel-Ingroff A, Johnson EM, Andes D, et al. Correlation of MIC with outcome for Candida species tested against voriconazole: analysis and proposal for interpretive breakpoints. J Clin Microbiol 2006; 44 : 819-26.  Back to cited text no. 15 With K, Steib-Bauert MS, Knoth H, Dorje F, Strehl E, Rothe U, et al. Hospital use of antifungal drugs. BMC Clin Pharmacol 2005; 10 : 1.  Back to cited text no. 16
17.World Health Organization. The anatomical therapeutic chemical classification system with defined daily doses (ATC/DDD). Norway: WHO, 2004. Available from:, accessed on February 16, 2009.  Back to cited text no. 17
18.Sendid B, Cotteau A, François N, D'Haveloose A, Standaert A, Camus D, et al. Candidaemia and antifungal therapy in a French University Hospital: rough trends over a decade and possible links. BMC Infect Dis 2006; 6 : 80.  Back to cited text no. 18
19.Banerjee SN, Emori TG, Culver DH, Gaynes RP, Jarvis WR, Horan T, et al. Secular trends in nosocomial primary bloodstream infections in the United States. Am J Med 1991; 91 : 86S-89S.  Back to cited text no. 19
20.Chakrabarti A, Chander J, Kasturi P, Panigrahi D. Candidemia: a 10-year study in an Indian teaching hospital. Mycoses 1992; 35 : 47-51.  Back to cited text no. 20
21.Chakrabarti A, Ghosh A, Batra R, Kaushal A, Roy P, Singh H. antifungal susceptibility pattern of non-albicans candida species and distribution of species isolated from candidaemia cases over a 5-year period. Indian J Med Res 1996; 104 : 171-6.   Back to cited text no. 21
22.Goel N, Wattal C, Oberoi JK, Raveendran R, Datta S, Prasad KJ. Trend analysis of antimicrobial consumption and development of resistance in non- fermenters in a tertiary care hospital in Delhi, India. J Antimicrob Chemother 2011; 66 : 1625-30.   Back to cited text no. 22
23.Presterl E, Daxböck F, Graninger W, Willinger B. Changing pattern of candidaemia 2001-2006 and use of antifungal therapy at the University Hospital of Vienna, Austria. Clin Microbiol Infect 2007; 13 : 1072-6.   Back to cited text no. 23
24.Khan ZU, Al-Sweih NA, Ahmad S, Al-Kazemi N, Khan S, Joseph L, et al. An outbreak of fungaemia among neonates caused by Candida haemulonii resistant to Amphotericin B, Itraconazole and Fluconazole. J Clin Microbiol 2007; 45 : 2025-7.  Back to cited text no. 24
25.Ruan SY, Kuo YW, Huang CT, Hsiue HC, Hsueh PR. Infections due to Candida haemulonii: species identification, antifungal susceptibility and outcomes. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2010; 35 : 85-8.  Back to cited text no. 25
26.Kim MN, Shin JH, Sung H, Lee K, Kim EC, Ryoo N, et al. Candida haemulonii and closely related species at 5 university hospitals in Korea: identification, antifungal susceptibility, and clinical features. Clin Infect Dis 2009; 48 : e57-61.  Back to cited text no. 26
27.Odds FC, Hanson MF, Davidson AD, Jacobsen MD, Wright P, Whyte JA, et al. One year prospective survey of Candida bloodstream infections in Scotland. J Med Microbiol 2007; 56 : 1066-75.  Back to cited text no. 27
28.Tan TY, Tan AL, Tee NW, Ng LS. A retrospective analysis of antifungal susceptibilities of Candida bloodstream isolates from Singapore hospitals. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2008; 37 : 835-40.  Back to cited text no. 28
29.Sarvikivi E, Lyytikäinen O, Soll DR, Pujol C, Pfaller MA, Richardson M, et al. Emergence of fluconazole resistance in a Candida parapsilosis strain that caused infections in a neonatal intensive care unit. J Clin Microbiol 2005; 43 : 2729-35.  Back to cited text no. 29
30.Yoder BA, Sutton DA, Winter V, Coalson JJ. Resistant Candida parapsilosis associated with long term fluconazole prophylaxis in an animal model. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2004; 23 : 687-8.  Back to cited text no. 30
31.Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ, Gibbs DL, Newell VA, Ellis D, Tullio V, et al. Results from the ARTEMIS DISK Global Antifungal Surveillance Study, 1997 to 2007: a 10.5-Year analysis of susceptibilities of Candida species to fluconazole and voriconazole determined by CLSI Standardized Disk Diffusion. J Clin Microbiol 2010; 48 : 1366-77.  Back to cited text no. 31


  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]

  [Table 1]


    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

  In this article
    Material & M...
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded639    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal