Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research
  Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login  
  Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Users Online: 152    

   Table of Contents      
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 135  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 731-736

Current tuberculosis diagnostic tools & role of urease breath test

Center for Tuberculosis Research, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Maryland, USA

Date of Acceptance01-Mar-2011
Date of Web Publication29-Jun-2012

Correspondence Address:
William R Bishai
Co-director Center for Tuberculosis Research, Department of Medicine/Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 1550 Orleans Street Suite 103, Baltimore, MD 21231-1001
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

Tuberculosis (TB) remains a significant public health issue worldwide especially in developing countries, where the disease is endemic, and effective TB diagnostic as well as treatment-monitoring tools are serious barriers to defeating the disease. Detection of pathogen-specific metabolic pathways offers a potential alternative to current methods, which focus on bacterial growth, bacterial nucleic acid amplification, or detection of host immune response to the pathogen. Metabolic pathway detection may provide rapid and effective new tools for TB that can improve TB diagnostics for children and HIV infected patients. Metabolic breath tests are attractive because these are safe, and provide an opportunity for rapid point of care diagnostics and tool for drug efficacy evaluation during clinical trials. Our group has developed a rabbit urease breath test model to evaluate the sensitivity and the specificity of urease based detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. TB infected rabbits were given stable isotopically labelled urea as the substrate. The urea tracer was metabolized to 13 C-CO 2 and detected in exhaled breaths using portable infrared spectrometers. The signal correlated with bacterial load both for primary diagnostics and treatment monitoring. Clinical trials are currently ongoing to evaluate the value of the test in clinical management settings. Urea breath testing may provide a useful diagnostic and biomarker assay for tuberculosis and treatment response.

Keywords: Biomarker - TB diagnostic and treatment monitoring - UBT

How to cite this article:
Maiga M, Abaza A, Bishai WR. Current tuberculosis diagnostic tools & role of urease breath test. Indian J Med Res 2012;135:731-6

How to cite this URL:
Maiga M, Abaza A, Bishai WR. Current tuberculosis diagnostic tools & role of urease breath test. Indian J Med Res [serial online] 2012 [cited 2021 Sep 25];135:731-6. Available from:

   Introduction Top

About two billion people (one-third of the world's population) carry latent tuberculosis (TB) infection and more than nine million of them become sick each year with active TB, which can be spread to others. It disproportionately affects people in resource-poor settings, particularly those in Asia and Africa [1],[2] . More than 90 per cent of new TB cases and deaths occur in those parts of the world, posing significant challenges to the livelihood of individuals and developing economies, as TB primarily affects people during their most productive years [1],[2] . Poor health systems, limited laboratory capacity for case detection, treatment barriers and complications (unreliable drug supply, patients not completing treatment, or prescribing errors), TB and HIV co-infection, and the emergence of drug-resistance [3],[4] make TB a major challenge facing public health programmes, particularly in the 22 countries with the highest TB burden [Figure 1]. In addition, TB is difficult to diagnose and its diagnosis is more difficult in individuals with TB/HIV co-infection. The current diagnostic techniques are either inadequate to detect TB cases with precision, or are time consuming, expensive, and require highly equipped laboratories which are not available in developing countries, where the disease is endemic. In this paper, we reviewed the current available diagnostic tools for TB and the potential role of urease breath test (UBT) to both diagnose TB and monitor treatment response.
Figure 1: The 22 high burden TB countries in the word (Source: Kaiser Family Foundation,, based on WHO, Global tuberculosis control 2010, Slide Date: March 04, 2011; reprinted with permission from the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, California, USA).

Click here to view

Current TB diagnostic tools

Sputum smear is used to detect acid fast bacilli (AFB) in clinical specimens by Ziehl-Neelsen (Z-N) or fluorescent staining. It is a cost-effective tool for diagnosing patients with TB and to monitor the progress of treatment especially in developing countries. However, there are many drawbacks such as the difficulty of obtaining the sputum sample especially in children and the low sensitivity especially in HIV-infected individuals with AFB smear positivity ranging from 31 to 90 per cent [5] .

Sputum culture is the gold standard for TB diagnosis with an excellent sensitivity and specificity. The traditional method of inoculating solid medium such as Lowerstein-Jensen (L-J) or 7H10/7H11 media is slow and takes 6-8 wk of incubation to diagnose the infection and further more time to determine the susceptibility patterns. That results in delay in initiation of appropriate therapy.

The introduction of the BACTEC? TB 460 radiometric system (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD, USA) in the 1980s allowed the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a few days as compared with the conventional culture media. The introduction of these rapid and automated systems have increased the sensitivity of isolation of Mycobacterium from clinical samples and has brought down the time required for positive culture substantially (9-10 days). Faster culture results in M. tuberculosis infected patients can result in evidence-based therapy and faster implementation of the planned treatment [6] . Although a combination of traditional solid and liquid media is recommended and helpful for the primary isolation of Mycobacterium, the process still requires several days and expensive infrastructure.

The microscopic observation drug susceptibility (MODS) assay relies on light microscopy to visualize the characteristic cording morphology of M. tuberculosis in liquid culture. MODS has shorter time to culture positivity (average 8 days) compared with LJ medium (average ~26 days). The cost-effectiveness of MODS (~US $2/`102/- per sample) is favourable compared with L-J culture (~ US $6/`307/- per sample) [7] . Hence, MODS appears to be a promising, novel and inexpensive tool that can rapidly detect TB and drug resistance directly from sputum samples. However, the effectiveness of MODS in HIV/TB case detection, which is a very common co-infection in developing countries, is not yet clearly established. Also the test is only validated for isoniazid and rifampicin susceptibility testing, excluding the other first lines and second lines TB therapy.

The Gen-Probe assay specific for M. tuberculosis complex is a rapid detection, nucleic acid amplification (NAA) test, where results can be obtained as fast as in two hours (provided if a positive culture is present); it also has a high sensitivity of 99 per cent and specificity of 99.2 per cent [8] . It holds the disadvantage of needing of positive culture that can take several days.

Spoligotyping is a technique for concurrent detection and typing of M. tuberculosis complex bacteria [9] . This method relies upon amplification of a highly polymorphic direct repeat locus in the M. tuberculosis genome and results can be obtained within one day. Thus, the clinical usefulness of spoligotyping is determined by its rapidity, both in identifying causative bacteria and in providing molecular epidemiologic information on strains. Spoligotyping holds drawbacks of being expensive, and requiring well-equipped laboratory and skilled laboratory personnel, which are not always available in endemic areas.

Line-probe assays (INNO-LiPA? Rif. TB and HAIN Genotype MTBDR plus) and the microfluidic PCR device (GenExpert?/Cepheid) allow both rapid detection of TB and also drugs resistance patterns [10],[11] . The INNO-LiPA? Rif. TB can simultaneously detect M. tuberculosis and the presence of a mutation in the rpoB gene, which confers resistance to rifampicin with a sensitivity of 95 per cent and specificity nearly 100 per cent when isolates from culture were used [12],[13] . However, INNO-LiPA? Rif. TB is less accurate when directly applied on clinical sputum specimens [12] . The new Hain "GenoType? MTBDR plus" test can be used both on culture-based isolates and directly on smear positive sputum samples from patients with pulmonary TB. The MTBDR assay has the advantage of identifying mutations in the rpoB gene (rifampicin resistance) as well as mutations in the katG gene (high-level of isoniazid resistance) and inhA gene (low-level of isoniazid resistance). The MTBDR assay can detect at least 90 per cent of MDR-TB cases in a few hours [13] . GeneXpert® MTB/ RIF uses heminested real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay to amplify M. tuberculosis specific sequence of the rpoB gene, which is probed with molecular beacons for mutations within the rifampin-resistance determining region [14],[15] . The sensitivity of a single direct MTB/RIF test for culture-confirmed tuberculosis was 92.2 per cent and rose to 96.0 per cent with the additional testing of a pelleted sample [16] . The MTB/RIF test provided sensitive detection of tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance directly from untreated sputum in less than 2 h with minimal hands-on time [16] .

Such novel technologies have been criticized for being expensive and excluding many drugs for the resistance patterns profile.

Urease activity of M. tuberculosis and applications

The M. tuberculosis urease enzyme encoded by ureA, ureB and ureC (Rv1848, Rv1849 and Rv1850) hydrolyzes urea into carbon dioxide and ammonia [17] . The M. tuberculosis urease is a likely bacterial virulence factor, which may subvert the host acidification of the phagosome microenvironment. Urease activity has been used in the past as a key test in the identification of microorganisms [18] . Sohngen reported urease activity in mycobacteria in 1913 (as noted by Urabe and Saito) [19] . With the classification of mycobacteria in the 1950s by Timpe [20] and Runyon [21] , medical and taxonomic interest in mycobacteriology increased. During the following decade, biochemical and morphological findings established mycobacteriology as a distinct area for development [22],[23],[24] and tests based on urease activity have been consistently utilized for the identification of mycobacterial species [25],[26],[27],[28] . Despite the role of urease testing for mycobacterial species identification, little has been done to employ urease-based tests as point-of-care primary TB diagnostics until 2009, when our group studied the usefulness of rabbit urease breath test for TB diagnosis and treatment monitoring [29] . An attractive aspect of urease-based diagnostics is that humans lack urease enzymes. Hence, the detection of urease enzyme activity in humans signifies the presence of microbial pathogen or commensal which is urease positive.

Metabolomic application of Helicobacter pylori urease activity

As M. tuberculosis, H. pylori also possesses urease activity to promote its survival. Gastric urease detection has been classically utilized for rapid and non-invasive diagnostics of H. pylori infection [30] . This assay introduced during 1980s, uses an oral dose of labelled 13 C-urea with sampling of the ratio of 13 CO 2 to 12 CO 2 in exhaled air after the urea is hydrolyzed in the stomach by the H. pylori urease [Figure 2]. This ratio is readily measured using small portable infrared spectrometers, and the entire procedure can be completed within 30 min [31] . The test called H. pylori urease breath test (UBT-HP) received United States FDA approval in 1993 and is currently popular for point-of-care diagnosis of H. pylori active infection and its post-treatment eradication. This success of the H. pylori urease breath test comprises the basis of developing a similar breath test for TB.
Figure 2: Labelled urea is degraded by H. pylori in the stomach whereby the labelled CO2 produced is then exhaled and detected in the lungs. The detection of the labelled CO2 implies infection with H. pylori.

Click here to view

Rabbit model of TB-urease breath test (UBT-TB)

Our approach has been to develop a breath test for use in TB similar to the rapid diagnostic for H. pylori infection and as a biomarker of its eradication by drug treatment [30] . We delivered 13 C-urea into lungs of rabbits infected with M. bovis or M. tuberculosis (both of which are urease producing mycobacteria) via bronchoscopic infection, and estimated lung burdens of disease and response to therapy by comparing the UBT results over time [29] . These rabbits converted 13 C-labelled urea into 13 CO 2 in a matter of minutes [Figure 3]. The 13 CO 2 in exhaled breath was rapidly detectable with an isotopic ratio mass spectrometer or a small infrared absorbance spectrometer. The UBT signal in rabbits declines as the rabbits are treated with antimicrobial and increases again after therapy is halted [29] . In contrast to oral UBT-HP, our experiments with rabbit UBT implemented direct instillation of 13 C-urea substrate into the lungs or by intravenous injection to increase the specificity for M. tuberculosis. The rabbit UBT model has been limited by the fact that exhaled air is difficult to obtain and animals need to be anesthetized [Figure 4].
Figure 3: UBT signal increased in rabbits infected by M. tuberculosis and declined significantly in response to partial TB therapy. Source: Ref 29 (Reprinted with permission).

Click here to view
Figure 4: Materials to get exhaled air breath from anaesthetized rabbits and transfer into BreathekTM air bag.

Click here to view

Potential utilities of UBT-TB for patient management

UBT provides the possibility of using exhaled breath samples to diagnose TB. It is attractive because it offers a path towards a novel point-of-care diagnostic for TB and TB treatment response. Point-of-care diagnostics are needed for TB especially in high-burden settings in order to reduce the disease impact by providing the possibility to quickly prescribe the appropriate treatment. Thus the UBT may be able to serve as a rapid indicator of treatment failure as occurs in patients with MDR-TB. Resistance to TB drugs is genotypic and new nucleic acid amplification tests (such as GeneXpert?) offer significant steps forward in rapidly detecting certain forms of resistant clinical isolates. However, a proportion of resistant infections will not be identified molecularly and some molecular resistant genotypes may not follow the phenotype expected [32] . UBT will have the advantage to follow the in vivo real time impact of the treatment on bacterial death. Furthermore, the conversion rate per minute showed that the test may rapidly and reliably detect pulmonary tuberculosis associated with a variety of pathologic presentations [29] .

Isotopic gas ratio analysis can be conducted with compact infrared spectrophotometers such as POCone TM or UBiT? (Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The exhaled breath sample is easily obtained through one-way valve bags and analyzed by such devices. These devices can be modified and filters incorporated for use for TB infected patients (to avoid contaminations).

The UBT-TB test may also provide a novel biomarker for TB drug therapy trials to improve therapeutic strategies and validate novel TB drug and vaccine candidates. If validated, it may provide valuable early information on whether bacterial burdens are responding to antimicrobial therapy. As opposed to currently utilized sputum microbiology analyses being used for drug susceptibility, urea breath testing for M. tuberculosis may allow a rapid assessment of treatment efficacy and the need for treatment modifications for drug resistant TB [33],[34] .

UBT, as a metabolomic based test, works on live bacteria. A large cell population of M. tuberculosis during the disease and even during TB treatment is non-replicating and non culturable in normal conditions [35] . However, UBT has the potential to detect this population and monitor its response to chemotherapy, although the relative expression of urease activity by dormant cells requires investigations.

Specificity of UBT-TB

UBT-TB specificity may be limited by other urease-producing microbial species, such as H. pylori, which is common in high TB incidence areas reaching 70 to 90 per cent of the population [36] . Interestingly, the specificity may be ameliorated by oral non-absorbable urease inhibitors such as bismuth subsalicylate (commonly used to treat dyspepsia) or proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) by allowing selective suppression of gastrointestinal H. pylori[37] . TB therapy known to have the potential to suppress H. pylori in the first two weeks also increases the specificity for TB treatment monitoring [38] .

In addition, specificity may be gained by introducing the 13 C-urea tracer via the respiratory tract or intravenously, thereby avoid gastric Helicobacter species.

An additional approach would be to co-administer an unlabelled urea drink not enriched with 13 C, but rather has this at normal abundance. This approach would saturate gut urease producers with "cold" tracer and, therefore, any CO 2 produced by gut organisms would not be enriched in 13 CO 2 and thus not confound the signal from the lungs.

Ongoing clinical trials on UBT-TB

In collaboration with partners, our group is investigating the sensitivity and the specificity of oral UBT both for TB diagnostic and treatment response in Mali and South Africa [39] . Pranactin® -Citric (Breathtek TM ), an oral granulated powder of 13 C-urea approved by United States Food and Drug administration (FDA) for UBT-HP will be used with different time points to assess the best moment to test for pulmonary TB. While the test may be confounded by co-existing gastric H. pylori infection, bismuth subsalicylate will be also evaluated in certain arms of the studies to specifically reduce false-positive signal from H. pylori. The studies will compare UBT-TB to TB standard tests and will include both HIV co-infected and non-HIV TB patients. Tolerability studies upon the nebulized delivery of 13 C-urea solution directly to the lungs are also in planning stages.

   Conclusion Top

Despite progress in the last decade in TB diagnostic tool discovery, effort is still needed to have impact on the time and the accuracy of the results. The urea breath test may fulfill the criteria for service as an effective point-of-care diagnostic which requires an easily instituted, cost-effective and rapidly applied technology. UBT may also be valuable for response to therapy and thereby offer early information on the possibility of drugs resistant infections monitoring. Further clinical studies are needed to evaluate the benefits of metabolic breath tests compared to the currently available ones.

   Acknowledgment Top

Authors acknowledge the financial support of Howard Hughes Medical Institute grant (80026555) and US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases grants (AI30036, AI37856 and AI36973).

   References Top

1.WHO. Tuberculosis Facts, 2009 Update; December 2009. Available from:, accessed on March 23, 2012.  Back to cited text no. 1
2.WHO. Global Tuberculosis Control 2009, Epidemiology, Strategy, Financing; March 2009; Global Tuberculosis Control 2009, A Short Update to the 2009 report; December 2009. Available from:, accessed on March 23, 2012.  Back to cited text no. 2
3.WHO. Tuberculosis, Global Laboratory Initiative - fact sheet No. 104; March 2010. Available from:, accessed on March 23, 2012.  Back to cited text no. 3
4.WHO. Multidrug and extensively drug-resistant TB (M/XDR-TB): 2010 Global Report on Surveillance and Response; March 2010. Available from:, accessed on March 23, 2012.  Back to cited text no. 4
5.Elliott AM, Namaambo K, Allen BW, Luo N, Hayes RJ, Pobee JO, et al. Negative sputum smear results in HIV-positive patients with pulmonary tuberculosis in Lusaka, Zambia. Tuber Lung Dis 1993; 74 : 191-4.  Back to cited text no. 5
6.Chaudhary M, Gupta S, Khare S, Lal S. Diagnosis of tuberculosis in an era of HIV pandemic: a review of current status and future prospects. Indian J Med Microbiol 2010; 28 : 281-9.  Back to cited text no. 6
7.Caviedes L, Lee TS, Gilman RH, Sheen P, Spellman E, Lee EH, et al. Rapid, efficient detection and drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum by microscopic observation of broth cultures. The Tuberculosis Working Group in Paru. J Clin Microbiol 2000; 38 : 1203-8.  Back to cited text no. 7
8.Musial CE, Tice LS, Stockman L, Roberts GD. Identification of mycobacteria from culture by using the Gen-Probe Rapid Diagnostic System for Mycobacterium avium complex and Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. J Clin Microbiol 1988; 26 : 2120-3.  Back to cited text no. 8
9.Kamerbeek J, Schouls L, Kolk A, van Agterveld M, van Soolingen D, Kuijper S, et al. Simultaneous detection and strain differentiation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis for diagnosis and epidemiology. J Clin Microbiol 1997; 35 : 907-14.  Back to cited text no. 9
10.Moore DA, Evans CA, Gilman RH, Caviedes L, Coronel J, Vivar A, et al. Microscopic-observation drug-susceptibility assay for the diagnosis of TB. N Engl J Med 2006; 355 : 1539-50.  Back to cited text no. 10
11.Jones M, Alland D, Marras S, El-Hajj H, Taylor MT, McMillan W. Rapid and sensitive detection of Mycobacterium DNA using Cepheid SmartCycler® and Tube Lysis System. Clin Chem 2001; 47 : 1917-8.  Back to cited text no. 11
12.Morgan M, Kalantri S, Flores L, Pai M. A commercial line probe assay for the rapid detection of rifampicin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis 2005; 5 : 62.  Back to cited text no. 12
13.Ling DI, Zwerling AA, Pai M. GenoType MTBDR assays for the diagnosis of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a meta-analysis. Eur Respir J 2008; 32 : 1165-74.  Back to cited text no. 13
14.El-Hajj HH, Marras SA, Tyagi S, Kramer FR, Alland D. Detection of rifampin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a single tube with molecular beacons. J Clin Microbiol 2001; 39 : 4131-7.  Back to cited text no. 14
15.Piatek AS, Tyagi S, Pol AC, Telenti A, Miller LP, Kramer FR, et al. Molecular beacon sequence analysis for detecting drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nat Biotechnol 1998; 16 : 359-63.  Back to cited text no. 15
16.Boehme CC, Nabeta P, Hillemann D, Nicol MP, Shenai S, Krapp F, et al. Rapid molecular detection of tuberculosis and rifampin resistance. N Engl J Med 2010; 363 : 1005-15.  Back to cited text no. 16
17.Habel JE, Bursey EH, Rho BS, Kim CY, Segelke BW, Rupp B, et al. Structure of Rv1848 (UreA), the Mycobacterium tuberculosis urease gamma subunit. Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun 2010; 66 : 781-6.  Back to cited text no. 17
18.Steadham JE. Reliable urease test for identification of mycobacteria. J Clin Microbiol 1979; 10 : 134-7.  Back to cited text no. 18
19.Urabe K, Saito H. The urease activity of mycobacteria. Am Rev Respir Dis 1964; 90 : 266-7.  Back to cited text no. 19
20.Timpe A, Runyon EH. The relationship of "atypical" acid-fast bacteria to human disease: a preliminary report. J Lab Clin Med 1954; 44 : 202-9.  Back to cited text no. 20
21.Runyon EH. Anonymous mycobacteria in pulmonary disease. Med Clin North Am 1959; 43 : 273-90.  Back to cited text no. 21
22.Kubica GP, Jones WD Jr, Abbott VD, Beam RE, Kilburn JO, Cater JC Jr. Differential identification of mycobacteria. I. Tests on catalase activity. Am Rev Respir Dis 1966; 94 : 400-5.  Back to cited text no. 22
23.Virtanen S. A study of nitrate reduction by mycobacteria. The use of the nitratereduction test in the identification of mycobacateria. Acta Tuberc Scand 1960; 48 (Suppl): 1-119.  Back to cited text no. 23
24.Wayne LG, Doubek JR, Russell RL. Classification and identification of mycobacteria. I. Tests employing Tween 80 as substrate. Am Rev Respir Dis 1964; 90 : 588-97.  Back to cited text no. 24
25.Bonicke R. Identification of mycobacteria by biochemical methods. Bull Int Union Tuberc 1962; 32 : 13-68.  Back to cited text no. 25
26.Toda T, Hagihara Y, Takeya K. A simple urease test for the classification of mycobacteria. Am Rev Resp Dis 1961; 83 : 757-61.  Back to cited text no. 26
27.Urabe K, Saito H. The urease activity of mycobacteria. Am Rev Resp Dis 1964; 90 : 266-7.  Back to cited text no. 27
28.Wayne LG. Simple pyrazinamidase and urease tests for routine identification of mycobacteria. Am Rev Respir Dis 1974; 109 : 147-51.  Back to cited text no. 28
29.Jassal M, Nedeltchev G, Lee JH, Choi SW, Timmins GS, Bishai WR, et al. 13 C-urea breath test as a novel point-of-care biomarker for tuberculosis treatment and diagnosis. PLoS One 2010; 5 : e12451.  Back to cited text no. 29
30.Bell GD, Weil J, Harrison G, Morden A, Jones PH, Gant PW, et al. 14 C-urea breath analysis, a non-invasive test for Campylobacter pylori in the stomach. Lancet 1987; 1 : 1367-8.  Back to cited text no. 30
31.Meretek POCone Infrared Spectrophotometer. Available from:, accessed on March 23, 2012.  Back to cited text no. 31
32.Bishai W. The in vivo-in vitro paradox in pneumococcal respiratory tract infections. J Antimicrob Chemother 2002; 49 : 433-6.  Back to cited text no. 32
33.Grandjean L, Moore DA. Tuberculosis in the developing world: recent advances in diagnosis with special consideration of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2008; 21 : 454-61.  Back to cited text no. 33
34.Helb D, Jones M, Story E, Boehme C, Wallace E, Ho K, et al. Rapid detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and rifampin resistance by use of on-demand, near-patient technology. J Clin Microbiol 2010; 48 : 229-37.  Back to cited text no. 34
35.Mukamolova GV, Turapov O, Malkin J, Woltmann G, Barer MR. Resuscitation-promoting factors reveal an occult population of tubercle bacilli in sputum. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2010; 181 : 174-80.  Back to cited text no. 35
36.Fritz EL, Slavik T, Delport W, Olivier B, Van der Merwe SW. Incidence of Helicobacter felis and the effect of coinfection with Helicobacter pylori on the gastric mucosa in the African population. J Clin Microbiol 2006; 44 : 1692-6.  Back to cited text no. 36
37.Zhang L, Mulrooney SB, Leung AF, Zeng Y, Ko BBC, Hausinger RP, et al. Inhibition of urease by bismuth (III): Implications for the mechanism of action of bismuth drugs. Biometals 2006; 19 : 503-11.  Back to cited text no. 37
38.Mirbagheri SA, Sohrabpour AA, Hasibi M, Moghimi B, Mohamadnejad M. 14 C-urea breath test in patients undergoing anti-tuberculosis therapy. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11 : 1712-4.  Back to cited text no. 38, Oral urea breath testing for diagnosis and treatment response in pulmonary tuberculosis. Available from:, accessed on March 24, 2012.  Back to cited text no. 39


  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]


    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

  In this article
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded709    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal