Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research
  Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login  
  Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Users Online: 1445       

   Table of Contents      
EDITORIAL
Year : 2011  |  Volume : 133  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 127

Dr Sambhu Nath De: Unsung hero


1 National Institute of Cholera & Enteric Diseases, Beliaghata, Kolkata 700 010, India
2 Collaborative Research Center of Okayama University for Infectious Diseases in India, Beliaghata, Kolkata 700 010, India

Date of Web Publication6-Apr-2011

Correspondence Address:
G Balakrish Nair
National Institute of Cholera & Enteric Diseases, Beliaghata, Kolkata 700 010
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 21415484

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Nair G B, Takeda Y. Dr Sambhu Nath De: Unsung hero. Indian J Med Res 2011;133:127

How to cite this URL:
Nair G B, Takeda Y. Dr Sambhu Nath De: Unsung hero. Indian J Med Res [serial online] 2011 [cited 2020 Oct 22];133:127. Available from: https://www.ijmr.org.in/text.asp?2011/133/2/127/78109

His work sang but he was unsung. That is perhaps the best way to describe the discovery of cholera toxin by Dr Sambhu Nath De in Calcutta (now known as Kolkata). In a pioneering series of research spanning less than a decade starting from 1952 and culminating in the Nature paper of 1959 [1] , De worked relentlessly in search of the elusive toxin that caused the epidemic responsible for the killer disease cholera. De's discovery of cholera toxin was almost three quarters of a century after Robert Koch first cultured Vibrio cholerae (known as comma bacillus at that time) in Calcutta and 105 years after the microscopic observation of the causative agent of cholera by an Italian anatomist Filippo Pacini and the classic epidemiologic studies of John Snow, a British physician describing the waterborne nature of the disease. Prior to this, it was widely believed that the disease was caused by 'miasma' or unpleasant or unhealthy vapours emanating from sewers.

De's method to understand the pathogenesis of cholera was distinctly different from all previous approaches. At that time, researchers believed that the pathogenesis of cholera was related to endotoxin and therefore used a multiplicity of methods and routes to replicate the disease which included introducing cholera stools into a variety of animals with little success. Following the course of the disease, De contended that the causative agent affects the permeability of the intestinal epithelium leading him to perform work at that interface using the now famous rabbit ileal loop model [2] . Not only was De able to replicate the disease with the causative organism introduced in the ileal loops of the rabbit but also was able to replicate the disease with bacteria-free culture filtrate of V. cholerae clearly showing that the exotoxin nature of cholera toxin. He also went on to perform experiments which led to the birth of the concept of enterotoxin producing  Escherichia More Details coli which today is firmly entrenched as enterotoxigenic E. coli[3] .

De's discovery of cholera toxin introduced a new paradigm in research on cholera. A recent search done on November 19, 2009 in the PubMed database using the keyword "cholera toxin" yielded a phenomenal 11, 168 publications that the work of De spawned [4] . De's work on cholera toxin has impinged into diverse areas such as cellular physiology, biochemistry and immunology. His work was clearly far ahead of his times. He did receive International recognition for this work including the nomination for the Nobel Prize by none other than Nobelist Professor Joshua Lederberg (Eugene Garfield, personal communication). But back home in India, his work remained unsung and unnoticed. The reasons for this oversight are described elsewhere [5] .

We usually end our lectures on cholera in India with two questions, who discovered the causative agent of the disease cholera and the other question is who discovered cholera toxin. Invariably there is an answer for question 1 but rarely do participants know the answer to question 2. We hope our efforts to extol the work of Dr Sambhu Nath De including this special edition of the Indian Journal of Medical Research would lead to a spontaneous answer on the person who devoted his research to understand the pathogenesis of cholera.

 
   References Top

1.De SN. Enterotoxicity of bacteria-free culture filtrate of Vibrio cholerae. Nature 1959; 183 : 1533-4.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.De SN, Chatterje DN. An experimental study of the mechanism of action of Vibrio cholerae on the intestinal mucous membrane. J Pathol Bacteriol 1953; 66 : 559-62.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.De SN, Bhattacharya K, Sarkar JK. A study of the pathogenicity of strains of Bacterium coli from acute and chronic enteritis. J Pathol Bacteriol 1956; 71 : 201-9.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.Nair GB, Narain JP. From endotoxin to exotoxin: De's rich legacy to cholera. Bull World Health Organ 2010; 88 : 237-40.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Garfield E. Mapping cholera research and the impact of Sambhu Nath De of Calcutta. Curr Contents 1986; 14 : 3-11.  Back to cited text no. 5
    




 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed934    
    Printed43    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded174    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal