Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research
  Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login  
  Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Users Online: 1449    
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2011  |  Volume : 133  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 64-69

Field test results of the motherhood method to measure maternal mortality


1 Nepal Public Health Foundation, Kathmandu,India
2 Patan Academy of Health Sciences,India
3 CTEVT, Bharatpur, India
4 Plan Nepal, Nepal
5 Watson Institute for International Studies, Brown University, Providence RI, USA
6 RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC & Boston University School of Public Health, USA

Correspondence Address:
Mahesh K Maskey
Nepal Public Health Foundation, Thirbam Malla Road, Post Box: 19624, Kathamandu-3, Nepal

Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 21321421

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

Background & objectives : Measuring maternal mortality in developing countries poses a major challenge. In Nepal, vital registration is extremely deficient. Currently available methods to measure maternal mortality, such as the sisterhood method, pose problems with respect to validity, precision, cost and time. We conducted this field study to test a community-based method (the motherhood method), to measure maternal and child mortality in a developing country setting. Methods : Motherhood method was field tested to derive measures of maternal and child mortality at the district and sub-regional levels in Bara district, Nepal. Information on birth, death, risk factors and health outcomes was collected within a geographic area as in an unbiased census, but without visiting every household. The sources of information were a vaccination registry, focus group discussions with local health workers, and most importantly, interview in group setting with women who share social bonds formed by motherhood and aided by their peer memory. Such groups included all women who have given birth, including those whose babies died during the measurement period. Results : A total of 15161 births were elicited in the study period of two years. In the same period 49 maternal deaths, 713 infant deaths, 493 neonatal deaths and 679 perinatal deaths were also recorded. The maternal mortality ratio was 329 (95%CI:243-434)/100000 live birth, infant mortality rate was 48(44-51)/1000LB, neonatal mortality rate was 33(30-36)/1000LB, and perinatal mortality rate was 45(42-48)/1000 total birth. Interpretation & conclusions : The motherhood method estimated maternal, perinatal, neonatal and infant mortality rates and ratios. It has been field tested and validated against census data, and found to be efficient in terms of time and cost. Motherhood method can be applied in a time and cost-efficient manner to measure and monitor the progress in the reduction of maternal and child deaths. It can give current estimates of mortalities as well as averages over the past few years. It appears to be particularly well-suited to measuring and monitoring programmes in community and districts levels.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1353    
    Printed75    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded286    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal