Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research
  Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login  
  Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Users Online: 2791       

   Table of Contents      
CORRESPONDENCE
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 151  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 479-482

Evaluation of the susceptibility of mice & hamsters to SARS-CoV-2 infection


1 Maximum Containment Laboratory, ICMR-National Institute of Virology, Pune 411 001, Maharashtra, India
2 Diagnostic Virology Group, ICMR-National Institute of Virology, Pune 411 001, Maharashtra, India
3 Animal House, ICMR-National Institute of Virology, Pune 411 001, Maharashtra, India
4 Division of Epidemiology & Communicable Diseases, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi 110 029, India
5 ICMR-National Institute of Virology, Pune 411 001, Maharashtra, India

Date of Web Publication20-Jun-2020

Correspondence Address:
Pragya D Yadav
Maximum Containment Laboratory, ICMR-National Institute of Virology, Pune 411 001, Maharashtra
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_2235_20

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Mohandas S, Jain R, Yadav PD, Shete-Aich A, Sarkale P, Kadam M, Kumar A, Deshpande G, Baradkar S, Patil S, Sapkal G, Mali D, Salve M, Patil D, Majumdar T, Suryawanshi A, Kaushal H, Lakra R, Dighe H, Gupta N, Abraham P, Gangakhedkar RR. Evaluation of the susceptibility of mice & hamsters to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Indian J Med Res 2020;151:479-82

How to cite this URL:
Mohandas S, Jain R, Yadav PD, Shete-Aich A, Sarkale P, Kadam M, Kumar A, Deshpande G, Baradkar S, Patil S, Sapkal G, Mali D, Salve M, Patil D, Majumdar T, Suryawanshi A, Kaushal H, Lakra R, Dighe H, Gupta N, Abraham P, Gangakhedkar RR. Evaluation of the susceptibility of mice & hamsters to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Indian J Med Res [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Jul 11];151:479-82. Available from: http://www.ijmr.org.in/text.asp?2020/151/5/479/286096

Sreelekshmy Mohandas & Rajlaxmi Jain contributed equally.




Sir,

Coronaviruses belong to the family Coronaviridae with a single-stranded, positive-sense RNA genome (26-32 kb), and are known to cause infections in humans and animals. Cases of pneumonia of unknown aetiology were reported in Wuhan, China, in early December 2019, and were identified to be caused by a novel coronavirus, named as severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2)[1]. As of May 27, 2020, more than 5.7 million cases were reported worldwide with above 3,52,000 deaths[2]. As efforts are being made worldwide for the development of vaccines and antiviral drugs against SARS-CoV-2, development of animal models to study the efficacy of such control and intervention measures is also important. To address this, we evaluated the susceptibility of a few laboratory rodents to SARS-CoV-2, at the Maximum Containment Laboratory, Indian Council of Medical Research - National Institute of Virology, Pune, India.

SARS-CoV-2 utilizes angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors to gain entry into epithelial cells, similar to SARS-CoV[3]. Considering this, the animal models were investigated for SARS-CoV-2 susceptibility. SARS-CoV replication without any clinical signs was demonstrated in inbred strains of mice such as BALB/c, C57BL6 and 129S[4]. The use of transgenic mice expressing the human ACE2 receptor, aged mice, knockout mice and use of mice adapted virus were found beneficial in recapitulating the clinical signs of SARS-CoV infection[4],[5],[6],[7]. Golden Syrian hamster is another rodent model that supports SARS-CoV replication[8]. A recent study showed that the SARS-CoV-2 virus replicated in the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts of golden Syrian hamsters and was transmitted efficiently to co-housed contact hamsters[9]. Non-rodent models such as ferrets and non-human primates have also been used to study SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 infection, but cost and limited availability make it difficult to conduct infection studies in these animals[10],[11].

Laboratory mice and hamsters are advantageous due to their low cost, small size and availability. They can also be manipulated at the genetic level, and immunological reagents are available to study viral pathogenesis. Currently, there are no studies on mice regarding the susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 except one on the transgenic mice with hACE2[12]. Therefore, we studied the susceptibility of rodent models such as BALB/c mice, C57BL/6 mice and golden Syrian hamsters to the SARS-CoV-2 infection. All the experiments were performed with the prior permission of the Institutional Animal Ethics Committee and Institutional Biosafety Committee, ICMR-NIV, Pune.

SARS-CoV-2 isolated from throat swab sample of a human patient having a tissue culture infective dose 50 (TCID50) titre of 106.57/ml was used in the study[13]. The experiments were performed in the Maximum Containment Laboratory, ICMR-NIV, Pune. Twenty adult (6-8 wk old) female BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice and 21 (two months old) Syrian hamsters were used for the study. The animals were housed in individual ventilated cages. Sixteen mice (BALB/c and C56BL/7) and 18 hamsters were inoculated by intranasal route with 5×104.5 and 1×105.5 TCID50 SARS-CoV-2, respectively, under brief isoflurane anaesthesia. The animals were monitored daily for any clinical signs. Body weight was also monitored every alternate day. Four mice each were sacrificed on days 1, 3, 5 and 21 post inoculation and three hamsters each were sacrificed on days 3, 5, 7, 10, 14 and 21. Blood, rectal swab, oropharyngeal swab, conjunctival swab, nasal wash, nasal turbinates, lungs, heart, liver, kidney, spleen and intestine were collected. The swab samples and weighed organ samples were collected in sterile tissue culture medium (Gibco Minimum Essential Media, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). The organ samples were lysed using a tissue homogenizer (Qiagen, Germany). Viral RNA was extracted from the samples using MagMax RNA Isolation Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Quantitative real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was performed[14]. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody response was assessed by in-house developed direct ELISA and neutralizing antibody levels by microneutralization test standardized at the laboratory.

No apparent clinical signs or mortality was observed in BALB/c mice, C57BL/6 mice and Syrian hamsters inoculated with the virus. The body weights of hamsters reduced post virus inoculation [Figure 1]. Progressive weight loss following SARS-CoV-2 infection in hamsters has been reported[7]. The weight loss ranged from 1.4 to 6.7 per cent on day 2 (n=18), which reached to a maximum on day 6 ranging from 5.1 to 13.4 per cent (n=12). Thereafter, a gradual weight gain was observed in hamsters on the subsequent days.
Figure 1: Percentage weight gain/loss (mean ± standard deviation) at day 2 (n=18), day 4 (n=15), day 6 (n= 12), day 8 (n=9), day 12 (n=6), day 16 (n=3), day 20 (n=3) of hamsters following intranasal SARS-CoV-2 virus inoculation and control hamsters (n=3).

Click here to view


Viraemia was absent in both mice and Syrian hamsters. Viral RNA could be detected only in the lung samples collected on day 1 post inoculation in BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice, and the lung samples collected on subsequent days and rest of the organ samples from mice were found negative. The viral RNA detected in the lungs could be the residual RNA from the virus inoculums. The BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice were found negative for anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies by direct ELISA on day 21, indicating that these adult inbred mice were not susceptible to SARS-CoV-2. The animal models studied showed the similar findings of absence of virus in blood samples as reported in COVID-19-positive patients[15].

In Syrian hamsters, the viral RNA could be detected in nasal turbinates, trachea, lungs, spleen and kidney on day 3 post inoculation. The highest viral load (mean viral RNA copy number) was detected in lungs (1.6×10[10]), followed by trachea (5.3×10[9]), nasal turbinates (4.6×10[9]), kidney (8.4×10[6]) and intestine (3.3×10[5]) on the third day [Figure 2]. This shows resemblance to the upper and lower respiratory tract affinity of SARS-CoV-2 in humans and the higher viral loads observed during the acute phase of infection[16]. The reduction in the viral load was observed in the organs in the subsequent days, and complete clearance was observed from the small intestine by day 5, kidney by day 7 and trachea by day 10). The viral RNA persisted in the lungs and nasal turbinates till days 14 and 21, respectively. This observation was in line with a recent study that reported viral shedding up to a median period of 20 days in COVID-19 survivors[15]. The high viral RNA load could be detected in nasal wash and oropharyngeal swab till day 7. In contrast to the human studies which showed viral RNA detection in anal swabs[17], the rectal swabs collected at various time points in hamsters were negative for viral RNA although intestine samples tested positive till day 5. The conjunctival swab samples were also negative.
Figure 2: SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA copy number (mean ± standard deviation, n=3) in the nasal turbinates, trachea, lungs, nasal wash and oropharyngeal swabs of hamsters.

Click here to view


To assess the risk of transmission, virus isolation was attempted from the lung and nasal turbinates samples collected from hamsters on days 3, 5, 7 and 14 post inoculations. The cytopathic effect in Vero CCL81cells could be observed only on days 3 and 5 for both lung and nasal turbinate samples. This finding supported a report on human COVID-19 cases which indicated that the transmission might occur early during the course of infection[14]. The serum samples of hamsters showed neutralizing antibody from day 5 onwards with rising titre till day 21. Serum IgG levels also showed a similar trend from day 7 [Figure 3].
Figure 3: Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels (Positive/Negative value in direct ELISA) and neutralizing antibody titre (mean ± standard deviation, n=3) in hamsters post virus inoculation.

Click here to view


In conclusion, our findings indicated the susceptibility of a readily available hamster model to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Golden Syrian hamsters showed high viral loads in the upper and lower respiratory tracts, virus shedding through the nasal cavity and mounting of humoral immune response by the first week, similar to human COVID-19 cases.

Acknowledgment: The authors acknowledge the technical support provided by Dimpal Nyayanit, Pranita Gawande, Kaumudi Kalele, Ashwini Waghmare, Shivshankar Gaikwad, C.P. Upadhyay, Yash Prakash Joshi, Ganesh Chopade, Sanjay Thorat, Madhav Acharya, Manjunath Holeppanavar, Sanjay Gopale and Sachin Daigude of ICMR-NIV, Pune.

Financial support & sponsorship: None.

Conflicts of Interest: None.



 
   References Top

1.
Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X, Qu J, Gong F, Han Y, et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: A descriptive study. Lancet 2020; 395: 507-13.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
World Health Organization. WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard. 2020. Available from: https://covid19.who.int/, accessed on May 27, 2020   Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Hoffmann M, Kleine-Weber H, Schroeder S, Krüger N, Herrler T, Erichsen S, et al. SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor. Cell 2020; 181 : 271-8.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Gretebeck LM, Subbarao K. Animal models for SARS and MERS coronaviruses. Curr Opin Virol 2015; 13 : 123-9.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Tseng CT, Huang C, Newman P, Wang N, Narayanan K, Watts DM, et al. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection of mice transgenic for the human Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 virus receptor. J Virol 2007; 81 : 1162-73.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Subbarao K, McAuliffe J, Vogel L, Fahle G, Fischer S, Tatti K, et al. Prior infection and passive transfer of neutralizing antibody prevent replication of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus in the respiratory tract of mice. J Virol 2004; 78 : 3572-7.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Day CW, Baric R, Cai SX, Frieman M, Kumaki Y, Morrey JD, et al. A new mouse-adapted strain of SARS-CoV as a lethal model for evaluating antiviral agents in vitro and in vivo. Virology 2009; 395 : 210-22.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Roberts A, Vogel L, Guarner J, Hayes N, Murphy B, Zaki S, et al. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection of golden Syrian hamsters. J Virol 2005; 79 : 503-11.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Chan JF, Zhang AJ, Yuan S, Poon VK, Chan CC, Lee AC, et al. Simulation of the clinical and pathological manifestations of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in golden Syrian hamster model: Implications for disease pathogenesis and transmissibility. Clin Infect Dis 2020. doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa325.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Martina BE, Haagmans BL, Kuiken T, Fouchier RA, Rimmelzwaan GF, Van Amerongen G, et al. Virology: SARS virus infection of cats and ferrets. Nature 2003; 425 : 915.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Rockx B, Kuiken T, Herfst S, Bestebroer T, Lamers MM, Oude Munnink BB, et al. Comparative pathogenesis of COVID-19, MERS, and SARS in a nonhuman primate model. Science 2020; 368 : 1012-5.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Bao L, Deng W, Huang B, Gao H, Liu J, Ren L, et al. The pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 in hACE2 transgenic mice. Nature 2020. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2312-y.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Sarkale P, Patil S, Yadav PD, Nyayanit DA, Sapkal G, Baradkar S, et al. First isolation of SARS-CoV-2 from clinical samples in India. Indian J Med Res 2020; 151 : 244-50.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Choudhary ML, Vipat V, Jadhav S, Basu A, Cherian S, Abraham P, et al. Development of in vitro transcribed RNA as positive control for laboratory diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 in India. Indian J Med Res 2020; 151 : 251-4.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Chang L, Yan Y, Wang L. Coronavirus disease 2019: Coronaviruses and blood safety. Transfus Med Rev 2020. doi.org/10.1016/j.tmrv.2020.02.003.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Zou L, Ruan F, Huang M, Liang L, Huang H, Hong Z, et al. SARS-CoV-2 viral load in upper respiratory specimens of infected patients. N Engl J Med 2020; 382 : 1177-9.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, Fan G, Liu Y, Liu Z, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: A retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2020; 395 : 1054-62.  Back to cited text no. 17
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed313    
    Printed213    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded166    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal