Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research
  Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login  
  Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Users Online: 3835       

   Table of Contents      
CORRESPONDENCE
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 151  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 244-250

First isolation of SARS-CoV-2 from clinical samples in India


1 Maximum Containment Laboratory, ICMR-National Institute of Virology, Pune 411 001, Maharashtra, India
2 Diagnostic Virology Group, ICMR-National Institute of Virology, Pune 411 001, Maharashtra, India
3 Electron Microscopy & Histopathology Group, ICMR-National Institute of Virology, Pune 411 001, Maharashtra, India
4 Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110 029, India
5 Influenza Group, ICMR-National Institute of Virology, Pune 411 001, Maharashtra, India
6 Division of Epidemiology & Communicable Diseases, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi 110 029, India
7 King George's Medical University, Lucknow 226 003, Uttar Pradesh &, India
8 Department of Microbiology, SMS Medical College, Jaipur 302 004, Rajasthan, India
9 Bioinformatics & Data Management Group, ICMR-National Institute of Virology, Pune 411 001, Maharashtra, India
10 ICMR-National Institute of Virology, Pune 411 001, Maharashtra, India

Date of Web Publication28-Apr-2020

Correspondence Address:
Pragya D Yadav
Maximum Containment Laboratory, ICMR-National Institute of Virology, Pune 411 001, Maharashtra
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1029_20

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Sarkale P, Patil S, Yadav PD, Nyayanit DA, Sapkal G, Baradkar S, Lakra R, Shete-Aich A, Prasad S, Basu A, Dar L, Vipat V, Giri S, Potdar V, Choudhary ML, Praharaj I, Jain A, Malhotra B, Gawande P, Kalele K, Gupta N, Cherian SS, Abraham P. First isolation of SARS-CoV-2 from clinical samples in India. Indian J Med Res 2020;151:244-50

How to cite this URL:
Sarkale P, Patil S, Yadav PD, Nyayanit DA, Sapkal G, Baradkar S, Lakra R, Shete-Aich A, Prasad S, Basu A, Dar L, Vipat V, Giri S, Potdar V, Choudhary ML, Praharaj I, Jain A, Malhotra B, Gawande P, Kalele K, Gupta N, Cherian SS, Abraham P. First isolation of SARS-CoV-2 from clinical samples in India. Indian J Med Res [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Jul 5];151:244-50. Available from: http://www.ijmr.org.in/text.asp?2020/151/2/244/282559

Sir,

The outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has, as on March 31, 2020, spread to over 207 countries around the world[1],[2], with a total of 896,475 confirmed cases and 45,525 deaths[2]. The number of reported SARS-CoV-2 cases in India is also on an increase with 1,636 cases and 38 deaths[2]. In the current pandemic situation, the isolation of SARS-CoV-2 is important for developing and evaluating diagnostic reagents, for antiviral studies and for screening of vaccine candidates. Earlier studies showed that SARS-CoV-2 could not replicate in several cell lines, which are routinely used for isolation of respiratory viruses[3]. Human and animal cell lines that were found to support SARS-CoV-1 replication during the first outbreak of SARS in China, 2002[4], are currently being studied. The virus was first isolated in the human airway epithelial cells from clinical specimens as part of early attempts to identify the aetiologic agent of infection[5]. We describe here the successful isolation and characterization of SARS-CoV-2 from clinical samples in India using Vero CCL-81 cells by observing cytopathic effects (CPEs) and cycle threshold (Ct) values in real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), electron microscopy and next-generation sequencing (NGS).

The first three SARS-CoV-2 cases were reported from Kerala during January 27-31, 2020. Later during March 2020, cases were also reported from a group of Italian tourists (n=15) and their contacts in New Delhi, India. Simultaneously, cases were reported in Agra, Uttar Pradesh, which was the outcome of close contact of an infected Delhi-based individual who returned from Italy. The designated COVID-19 testing laboratories of Virus Research Diagnostic Laboratory network (All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi; Sawai Man Singh Medical College, Jaipur; and King George's Medical University, Lucknow) referred the specimens (throat swab/nasal swab, oropharyngeal swab/sputum) to the Indian Council of Medical Research-National Institute of Virology (ICMR-NIV), Pune, after screening for envelope (E) gene by real-time RT-PCR was done[6]. A total of 12 SARS-CoV-2 positive specimens having a Ct <30 for the E gene were included in the study. Of these, eight samples were from positive cases of Italian tourists and their contacts in New Delhi. The rest of the specimens were from four positive cases at Agra, Uttar Pradesh, and the close contact cases of an infected Delhi-based individual who returned from Italy.

The clinical specimens of the 12 cases were used for infecting Vero CCL-81 which was maintained in Eagle's minimum essential medium (MEM; Gibco, UK) supplemented with 10 per cent foetal bovine serum (FBS) (HiMedia, Mumbai), penicillin (100 U/ml) and streptomycin (100 mg/ml). Likewise, 100 μl was inoculated onto 24-well cell culture monolayers of Vero CCL-81, before growth medium was decanted. The cells were incubated for one hour at 37°C to allow virus adsorption, with rocking every 10 min for uniform virus distribution. After the incubation, the inoculum specimen was removed and the cells were washed with 1X phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The MEM supplemented with two per cent FBS was added to each well. The cultures were incubated further in five per cent CO2 incubator at 37°C and observed daily for CPEs under an inverted microscope (Nikon, Eclipse Ti, Japan). Cellular morphological changes were recorded using a camera (Nikon, Japan). From each well of cell culture plate, on the third post-infection day (PID-3) of passage-1 (P-1), 50 μl of supernatant was taken and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time RT-PCR for E and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) (2) genes as described earlier[7],[8]. Similar testing was repeated on the cell supernatant of passage-2(P-2) at PID-4 for observing viral copy number. Cultures that showed CPE on PID-4 were centrifuged at 4815 × g for 10 min at 4°C; the supernatants were processed immediately or stored at −86°C. Further, those that showed CPE were grown in T-25 cm[2] flasks at P-2 and titration was done after serial dilution. Tissue culture infective dose 50 per cent (TCID50) values were calculated by the Reed and Muench method[9]. CPEs were observed in 9 of 12 cultures in the P-1. The TCID50 values ranged from 105.5 to 106.4/ml for the different clinical specimens passaged in Vero CCL-81 at P-2. The cells were examined microscopically for cellular morphological changes following inoculation.

Vero CCL-81 cells infected with SARS-CoV-2 strain NIV-2020-770 and uninfected cells (CC) were transferred onto microcavity slides and fixed with acetone. Serum samples (1:25 dilution) from the confirmed COVID-19 cases (POD nCOV-S11, nCOV-S13 and nCOV-S7) and negative serum samples were added followed by incubation at 37°C for 1.5 h[10]. Antibody reactivity was visualized using anti-human immunoglobulin fluorescein-isothiocynate. In immunofluorescence assay of COVID-19 positive patients, three serum samples exhibited specific reactivity against SARS-CoV-2 virus isolate [Figure 1].
Figure 1: Immunofluorescence images (red panel) showing uninfected Vero CCL-81 cells probed by positive patient serum samples after post infection day of 13th (left), 11th (middle) and seventh (right) and with SARS-CoV-2 strain NIV-2020-770 infected Vero CCL-81 cells probed by positive patients serum (green panel) showing the reactivity of virus and antibody.

Click here to view


Vero CCL-81 cells that were inoculated with the samples showed evidence of cell rounding and detachment from 9 of 12 clinical samples in P-1 at PID-4. Syncytial cells formed large cell masses that increased in size and number as the infection progressed. Enhanced CPE was noted in P-2 at PID-2. The cells were detached from the tissue culture plate surfaces by PID-3. Similar cellular morphological changes were observed after passaging of the above nine samples up to P-2. No cellular changes were observed in the cell control during both passages. [Figure 2] depicts the day-wise changes during the passage of a representative clinical isolate (NIV-2020-770). Virus replication was confirmed using real-time RT-PCR with RNA extracted from the cell culture medium on PID-3. The Ct values ranged from 9.79 to 15.41 (in Vero CCL-81 cells) for the isolates at P-2, which were lower than the Ct values of 16-25.1 in the clinical samples [Table 1]. The number of virus copies in the isolates at P-1 in Vero CCL-81 cells ranged from 5.18×10[7] to 8.12×10[8] copy/ml and increased 1-26 fold to a range of 1.69×10[8] to 6.77×10[9] in the cell culture supernatants at P-2 [Table 1].
Figure 2: Cytopathic effect of the SARS-CoV-2 isolate (NIV-2020-770) demonstrated in Vero CCL-81 cells on different post-infection days (PID).

Click here to view
Table 1: Cycle threshold (Ct) of SARS-CoV-2 positive clinical specimens and respective viral copy number in isolates in different passages for two different cell culture types using real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). E gene was targeted in all

Click here to view


On PID-4, enhanced CPE was observed. The P-1 material was reinoculated in a new batch of cells, and it showed progressive enhancement of CPE as observed day-wise. Further, an aliquot of cell culture supernatant was harvested from infected Vero CCL-81 showing CPE and the supernatant used for negative staining as described elsewhere[11],[12]. Distinct CoV particles with an average size of 95±10 nm having a distinct envelope fringe could be detected in the fields scanned [Figure 3], as observed earlier[13].
Figure 3: Transmission electron microscopy imaging of SARS-CoV-2. A negative-stained SARS-CoV-2 viral particle, demonstrating spike morphology of glycoprotein along with peplomeric projections, a feature typical to the family Coronaviridae, is seen.

Click here to view


Next-generation sequencing was performed on SARS-CoV-2 positive clinical samples (100 μl) included in the study and the tissue culture fluid (50 μl) of virus isolates at PID-3 as described earlier[14],[15]. Reference-based mapping as implemented in the CLC genomics workbench 11.0 (CLC, Qiagen) was used to retrieve the sequence of the SARS-CoV-2. BLAST (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) identification of the viral genome sequences retrieved from the clinical samples and their isolates had 99.98 per cent identity with the SARS-CoV-2 isolate Wuhan-Hu-1 (Accession No. NC_045512). Details of the sequences obtained including the per cent of the reads mapped, total reads and the per cent of genome coverage recovered for the clinical samples and the isolates are provided in [Table 2]. Partial sequences were retrieved from the clinical samples (nCoV-C 132 and nCoV-C 31) and were not included in the analysis.
Table 2: Per cent of the reads mapped, total reads and the per cent of genome coverage recovered for the clinical samples and the isolates

Click here to view


MEGA software version 7.0.11[16] was used for the multiple alignments of the sequences retrieved in this study and the sequences from the Global Initiative on Sharing All Influenza Data (GISAID) database (https://www.gisaid.org/)[Supplementary Table [Additional file 1]]. A neighbour-joining tree was generated using the best substitution model (Kimura 2-parameter model) with a bootstrap of 1000 replicates. As per Tang et al[17], the circulating SARS-CoV-2 can be grouped into two types (S and L type) based on the two different single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at positions 8782 and 28144 in the genome. The S type possesses TC SNPs while the L type possesses CT SNPs at positions 8782 and 28144, respectively. In the present study, it was observed that two sequences from clinical samples (nCoV-763 and nCoV-770) had TT SNPs, while the other sequences had CT as the SNP (L type) [Table 2]. The TT SNPs have been observed in few of the GISAID sequences, including one of the Kerala genome sequences (nCoV-19/India/31 January 2020) submitted by us earlier. All the isolates of the clinical samples were of L type. Specific amino acid mutations in the nsp3 region, spike protein and ORF8, in general, lead to the formation of V, G and S genetic variants/clades, respectively, as per the recent classification followed by GISAID. It was observed that the clinical samples, as well as the isolates, had the mutation D614G in the spike protein, classifying the study samples and isolates into the G clade [Table 2] and [Figure 4]. No specific substitutions were observed in any of the isolate sequences with respect to the corresponding clinical sample sequences, as these were sequences from a low passage. The sequences of the clinical samples and the isolate from the contact of the infected Delhi-based individual, who returned from Italy, further showed two mutations, R203K and G204R in the nucleocapsid protein (N). Although all strains demonstrated 99.6 per cent identity with the original Wuhan Hu-1 sequence, the role of unique SNPs and mutations in identifying the source of infection needs to be explored.
Figure 4: Neighbour-joining tree of SARS-CoV-2. The phylogenetic tree is generated using the best substitution model. A bootstrap of 1000 replicates was used to assess the statistical robustness of the tree. Same colours are used for sequences derived from a clinical sample and the respective isolate. Clinical samples are labelled with initials as nCoV while the isolates are labelled with initials as NIV. The clades are represented by different colours in the core region (S - yellow, V - pink, G - blue and unclassified - not coloured).

Click here to view


After the first isolation of the virus in the human airway epithelial cells reported by China[5], countries such as Australia[18], Korea[19], Germany[20] and the USA[21] have also isolated the SARS-CoV-2 strain. In India, initial attempts to isolate the virus from the first three cases did not succeed due to low titres in the clinical specimens. This is the first successful virus isolation of SARS-CoV-2 in the Vero CCL-81 cells in India from nasal and throat swabs of persons with a travel history from Italy and their contacts. Isolation of SARS-CoV-2 from clinical samples will be helpful to address key questions of correlating the differential cell line susceptibility and viral replication efficiency, especially important for clinical samples with low viral titres. Isolation of the virus in such a pandemic situation would help to develop indigenously designed reagents such as positive controls, virus antigen and antibodies, which could lead to the indigenous development of sero-diagnostic assays. These assays would be critical for conducting population-based serosurveys. Propagation in culture will also facilitate antiviral susceptibility studies and vaccine efforts in India.

Financial support & sponsorship: Financial support was provided by the Department of Health Research, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, New Delhi, at ICMR-National Institute of Virology, Pune.

Conflicts of Interest: None.



 
   References Top

1.
Worldometer. COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic. Available from: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/?, accessed on March 29, 2020.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
World Health Organization. Coronavirus disease (COVID-2019) situation reports. WHO; 2020. Available from: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/situation-reports, accessed on March 29, 2020.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Kaye M, Druce J, Tran T, Kostecki R, Chibo D, Morris J, et al. SARS-associated coronavirus replication in cell lines. Emerg Infect Dis 2006; 12 : 128-33.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Gillim-Ross L, Taylor J, Scholl DR, Ridenour J, Masters PS, Wentworth DE. Discovery of novel human and animal cells infected by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus by replication-specific multiplex reverse transcription-PCR. J Clin Microbiol 2004; 42 : 3196-206.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, Li X, Yang B, Song J, et al. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med 2020; 382 : 727-33.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
World Health Organization. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) technical guidance: Laboratory testing for 2019-nCoV in humans. WHO; 2020. Available from: https://www.who.int/eme gencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/technical-guidance/laboratory-guidance, accessed on February 9, 2020.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Yadav PD, Potdar VA, Choudhary ML, Nyayanit DA, Agrawal M, Jadhav SM, et al. Full-genome sequences of the first two SARS-CoV-2 viruses from India. Indian J Med Res 2020. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_663_20.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Choudhary ML, Vipat V, Jadhav S, Basu A, Cherian S, Abraham P, et al. Development of in vitro transcribed RNA as positive control for laboratory diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 in India. Indian J Med Res 2020. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_671_20.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Reed LJ, Muench H. A simple method of estimating fifty per cent endpoints. Am J Epi emiol 1938; 27 : 493-7.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Haveri A, Smura T, Kuivanen S, Österlund P, Hepojoki J, Ikonen N, et al. Serological and molecular findings during SARS-CoV-2 infection: The first case study in Finland, January to February 2020. Euro Surveill 2020;25: 2000266.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Gangodkar S, Jain P, Dixit N, Ghosh K, Basu A. Dengue virus-induced autophagosomes and changes in endomembrane ultrastructure imaged by electron tomography and whole-mount grid-cell culture techniques. J Electron Microsc (Tokyo) 2010; 59 : 503-11.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Brenner S, Horne RW. A negative staining method for high resolution electron microscopy of viruses. Biochim Biophys Acta 1959; 34 : 103-10.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Prasad S, Potdar V, Cherian S, Abraham P, Basu A. Transmission electron microscopy imaging of SARS-CoV-2. Indian J Med Res 2020. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_577_20.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Yadav PD, Albariño CG, Nyayanit DA, Guerrero L, Jenks MH, Sarkale P, et al. Equine encephalosis virus in India, 2008. Emerg Infect Dis 2018; 24 : 898-901.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Yadav PD, Nyayanit DA, Shete AM, Jain S, Majumdar TP, Chaubal GY, et al. Complete genome sequencing of Kaisodi virus isolated from ticks in India belonging to Phlebovirus genus, family Phenuiviridae. Ticks Tick Borne Dis 2019; 10 : 23-33.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016; 33 : 1870-4.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Tang X, Wu C, Li X, Song Y, Yao X, Wu X, et al. On the origin and continuing evolution of SARS-CoV-2. Natl Sci Rev 2020 : nwaa036.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Caly L, Druce J, Roberts J, Bond K, Tran T, Kostecki R, et al. Isolation and rapid sharing of the 2019 novel coronavirus (SAR-CoV-2) from the first diagnosis of COVID-19 in Australia. Med J Aust 2020. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50569.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Kim JM, Chung YS, Jo HJ, Lee NJ, Kim MS, Woo SH, et al. Identification of coronavirus isolated from a patient in Korea with COVID-19. Osong Public Health Res Perspect 2020; 11 : 3-7.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Hoehl S, Rabenau H, Berger A, Kortenbusch M, Cinatl J, Bojkova D, et al. Evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in returning travelers from Wuhan, China. N Engl J Med 2020; 382 : 1278-80.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Harcourt J, Tamin A, Lu X, Kamili S, Sakthivel SK, Murray J, et al. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 from patient with 2019 novel coronavirus disease, United States. Emerg Infect Dis 2020; 26. doi: 10.3201/eid2606.200516.  Back to cited text no. 21
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]


This article has been cited by
1 Laboratory diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 - A review of current methods
Jitendra Prasad Mathuria,Ramakant Yadav,Ramakant Rajkumar
Journal of Infection and Public Health. 2020;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1683    
    Printed121    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded449    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal