Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research
  Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login  
  Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Users Online: 1177       

   Table of Contents      
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 150  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 81-86

Safety & efficacy of an intravasal, one-time injectable & non-hormonal male contraceptive (RISUG): A clinical experience


1 Division of Reproductive Biology, Maternal Health and Child Health, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India
2 Male Family Planning Clinic, Lok Nayak Jai Parkash Narayan Hospital, Delhi, India
3 Department of Surgery, Deen Dayal Upadhyay Hospital, New Delhi, India
4 Department of Surgery, Rural Medicare Center Hospital, New Delhi, India
5 School of Medical Science & Technology, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, India

Date of Submission30-Mar-2018
Date of Web Publication30-Sep-2019

Correspondence Address:
Dr Radhey Shyam Sharma
Reproductive Biology & Maternal Health, Child Health, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi 110 029
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_635_18

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Background & objectives: For improved male contraception, a new polymeric drug molecule – Reversible Inhibition of Sperm under Guidance (RISUG) has been synthesized and has been found to be effective, safe and reversible in various animal species. Phase-I and phase-II clinical trials have confirmed its safety and contraceptive efficacy. The present study was undertaken as a multicentric-limited phase-III clinical trial to test the efficacy and safety of RISUG in human volunteers.
Methods: One hundred and thirty nine young males each having at least two children and living with wife were given 120 μl of RISUG as bilateral vas intraluminal injection. After the single-dose administration, the individuals were followed in respect of general health and semen parameters. Their wives were also followed particularly to determine onset of pregnancy.
Results: During the six month follow up, the health of male volunteers and their wives was normal with no significant adverse effects. Temporary scrotal enlargement and mild scrotal and inguinal region pain were manifested in most individuals and resolved within one month without any routine activity impairment. In six individuals, there was injection procedure failure and azoospermia was not achieved. The other 133 individuals had either severe oligozoospermia or azoospermia at the first semen examination one month following RISUG injection; 82.7 per cent individuals had continued azoospermia in the month following first semen examination onwards and the rest 17.3 per cent manifested azoospermia within three to six months.
Interpretation & conclusions: RISUG intravasal injection appears to be a safe clinical procedure with no significant adverse effects and has high sustained contraceptive efficacy. The localized intervention and continued contraceptive action on single-dose administration were significant features of the RISUG technology.

Keywords: Azoospermia - efficacy - intravasal male contraceptive - RISUG - safety - sperm


How to cite this article:
Sharma RS, Mathur AK, Singh R, Das HC, Singh GJ, Toor DP, Guha SK. Safety & efficacy of an intravasal, one-time injectable & non-hormonal male contraceptive (RISUG): A clinical experience. Indian J Med Res 2019;150:81-6

How to cite this URL:
Sharma RS, Mathur AK, Singh R, Das HC, Singh GJ, Toor DP, Guha SK. Safety & efficacy of an intravasal, one-time injectable & non-hormonal male contraceptive (RISUG): A clinical experience. Indian J Med Res [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Oct 17];150:81-6. Available from: http://www.ijmr.org.in/text.asp?2019/150/1/81/268221

Despite some scepticism regarding the potential demand for new male methods of contraception[1], data of population-based studies of male fertility and contraceptive preferences indicate that globally, a high percentage of men approve of family planning and use some form of contraception themselves[2],[3],[4],[5],[6]. During recent decades, the most important trends in family planning services have been improvement in the quality of care, reaching out to new population groups such as men and adolescents and integrating family planning services into other reproductive health services. Access to a wide range of effective methods of contraception is an important element of reproductive health. However, the contraceptive options available to men are limited. Vasectomy/non-scalpel vasectomy (NSV) and condom are the only contraceptive options for males. Vasectomy/NSV is a terminal method; therefore, the prevalence of vasectomy/ NSV is very low in the country. On the other hand, acceptability of condom use in our country is also very low inspite of its dual protection i.e., prevention of pregnancy and transmission of sexually transmitted diseases[7]. Hence, development of a new male contraceptive is the need of the hour.

Among all available male contraceptive methods, male hormonal method is at an advanced stage of clinical testing. However, these male hormonal contraceptive regimens have caused two main problems. First, the side effect, particularly in terms of proatherogenic, antiatherogenic action and their association with insulin resistance, obesity and haematopoietic action[8],[9],[10],[11], second, a fairly high non-responder rate. This is because of the fact that unlike therapeutic drugs that are used to treat life-threatening illnesses, the use of needle (or frequent injection) for delivering contraceptives has poor acceptance[12]. Therefore, there is a need to develop a safe, effective and acceptable male contraceptive so that men can use it for a long period without any side effect. Reversible Inhibition of Sperm under Guidance (RISUG®) is a non-hormonal one-time injectable intravasal male contraceptive[13]. After successful preclinical efficacy and safety studies on various species of animals including primates[14], RISUG has also been tested successfully in a limited number of human volunteers during phase-I[15], phase-II[16] and extended phase-II clinical trials[17]. In the present investigation, it was proposed to study the efficacy and safety of RISUG in human volunteers in a multicentric mode.


   Material & Methods Top


A clinical trial was conducted at Lok Nayak Jai Prakash Narayan Hospital, Delhi, Deen Dayal Upadhyay Hospital, and Rural Medicare Hospital, New Delhi, India, during 2000-2002. Ethical approval was obtained from the ethical committees of the three participating centres, and also the approval of the Drug Controller General of India.

Reversible Inhibition of Sperm under Guidance (RISUG ®):RISUG® is an injectable drug consisting of styrene maleic anhydride (SMA) copolymer chemically reacted with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)[18]. The basic component SMA was prepared as per the process described in the US patent number 5488075[18]. The dosage used was 60 mg of SMA in chemical complex with 120 μl of DMSO. Prefilled syringes with RISUG® were supplied to the participating centres.

Stability and shelf life of RISUG: The SMA dissolved and reacted with DMSO and loaded in specially prefilled syringes was stable for a period of two years. The shelf life for the prefilled syringes is two years. Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) procedures as applicable to low-volume parenteral drugs were followed in making RISUG. Quality Control Standards based on physicochemical characteristics and biological properties were established and used to assure consistency from batch to batch at the Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India-sponsored RISUG Unit, Foundation for Innovation and Technology Transfer (FITT), Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), New Delhi, India.

Study design:Volunteer individuals selected were adult men aged <40 yr, in good health and with the proven fertility record of at least two living children and no history of having failed to induce contraception despite unprotected intercourse. Only those volunteers were enrolled who had no history of any disease having associations with secondary infertility; diabetes and recurrent epididymitis. All volunteers had a normal reproductive system and semen parameters. Wives of the individuals were aged <30 yr, in good health having no pelvic inflammatory disease and no history of intrauterine device implantation or sterilization.

Fifty individuals/centre were to be enrolled in the study. However, in the absence of mandatory requirement imposed due to change in Drugs and Cosmetic Act in the country at that time, the Monitoring Committee of the trial deferred enrolment of new individuals in the end of 2002. Therefore, according to the above mentioned criteria, 141 individuals were recruited from the male family planning unit/urology/surgery outpatient departments of Lok Nayak Jai Prakash Narayan Hospital, Delhi (50), Deen Dayal Upadhyay Hospital (41), and Rural Medicare Center Hospital, New Delhi (50) where the volunteers visited for vasectomy/NSV method. Data from all the enrolled individuals (both husband and wife) were obtained on demographic, clinical and reproductive profile. Ultrasound of scrotum and vital organs in case of males and lower abdominal vital organs in case of females was done. Chest X-ray, blood and urine examination, haemogram, liver function tests (LFTs) and kidney function tests were performed in blood samples of all the enrolled individuals including their wives using standard routine methods. Two semen samples, after three days of abstinence each time, were collected from the enrolled individuals using WHO method manual[19]. Testicular size was measured and recorded using Prader orchidometer. Of the 141 individuals, two did not come for RISUG injection because of their personal reasons, and hence, only 139 individuals who received RISUG injection, were analysed.

After obtaining written informed consent from the individual volunteers as well as his partner and after clearing all the preparatory medical examinations, the individual was given RISUG® injection (120 μl as bilateral vas intraluminal injection)[16]. In six individuals, required dose of RISUG could not be injected because of injection procedure failure, that is, either because of leakage from the syringe or because of vas counter punctures. These individuals were advised to go for NSV. However, these individuals continued and were also followed along with other individuals for a period of six months post-injection. Therefore, in the present analysis, only 133 individuals who received complete dose of RISUG injection were considered. Individuals were asked to remain in the hospital under observation for three hours and were advised abstinence for one week after injection. The individuals were also advised to use condom for two months post-injection, and were followed after one week, one month and six months post-injection for all clinical examinations and after six months for laboratory examinations. Extent of post-operative scrotal swelling, if any, was recorded based on a ten-point visual analogue scale. Scrotal pain, if any, was recorded. Semen samples were obtained after one month, one and a half month, two, three, four, five and six months post-injection.

Statistical analysis:Sign test was used to test for significance. The post-injection data were compared with pretreatment values of the respective individual. Epi Info 5.0 (an epidemiology programme, developed by the Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA and the WHO Global Programme on AIDS, Geneva, Switzerland) and SPSS12.0 (South Asia Pvt. Ltd., Bengaluru) software packages were used for data management and analysis.


   Results Top


Post-injection clinical evaluation status: No serious side effects were noticed after RISUG injection in the individual volunteers and their partners. Mild scrotal enlargement, on account of diffuse scrotal tissue oedema, was noticed within first week post-injection in majority of individuals. Oedema disappeared within one month period without medication. In 36.2 per cent (n=48) individuals, slight scrotal pain of low grade was also noticed which disappeared within one month. In 23.4 per cent (n=31) individuals, scrotal nodule was noticed at the site of injection which also disappeared during six month period in majority of individuals. On ultrasound examination, after six months post-injection, no abnormality was noticed in any of the individuals, including their partners, except fluid collection around scrotum in two.

Post-injection blood biochemistry, haemogram and urine evaluation:All the parameters of haemogram carried out after six months post-injection were not significantly different than the pretreatment values and were in normal range. All blood biochemistry parameters [serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase, serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase, alkaline phosphatase, blood urea, serum creatinine and bilirubin, blood sugar (random) and Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL)] were within normal range, and values were not significantly different from pretreatment values in the male volunteers and their partners.

Routine urine examination did not show any variation from their pretreatment value. Traces of albumin were noticed in 14 male individuals in comparison to 11 male individuals where traces of albumin were noticed at the time of enrolment. Of these 11 male individuals, eight showed traces of albumin in urine six months post-injection. However, to rule out any sign of renal and hepatic toxicity in those individuals where traces of albumin were noticed after RISUG injection, renal function tests and LFTs were conducted monthly for the next six months duration, but no renal and hepatic abnormalities were observed.

Contraceptive efficacy:Except six individuals in whom required dose of RISUG could not be injected, azoospermia was achieved in all other individuals ranging from one month to six months post-injection period. At the first semen sampling one month after injection, the impact of RISUG was noticed in all individuals. In 82.7 per cent individuals, azoospermia was achieved within two months post-injection whereas in the remaining 17.3 per cent individuals, azoospermia was achieved during three to six months post-injection period [Table 1]. The time scale of getting to the contraceptive status is shown in the [Figure 1]. In those six individuals where complete dose of RISUG could not be injected, azoospermia could not be achieved even after six months post-injection. Of these six individuals, pregnancies were observed in the partners of two individuals.
Figure 1: Time scale of getting to the contraceptive status by achieving severe oligozoospermia or azoospermia.

Click here to view
Table 1: Month-wise distribution of individuals achieving azoospermia after RISUG (Reversible Inhibition of Sperm under Guidance) injection

Click here to view


No adverse effects on libido and on any physical activities of the individuals were reported.


   Discussion Top


The findings of the study indicated that 120 μl of RISUG was an effective and safe male contraceptive. The presence of mild scrotal enlargement, slight low-grade scrotal pain and presence of nodules at the site of injection, which disappeared within a few days and weeks, were similar to the observations made during phase-I and phase-II clinical trials[15],[16].

RISUG molecule has been designed to be non-tissue adherent and non-sclerosing for having reversal potential. To ensure retention even under strong vas peristalsis, by molecular design, a swelling of RISUG following intra vas injection has been incorporated[20]. The polymer volume increases within the vas lumen and leads to short-duration perivasal lymphatic compression. Lymphatic pressure presumably increases with consequent water transudate formation from the lymphatic channels leading to non-inflammatory scrotal enlargement. Painless nodule formation around the vas at the site of the injection is a form of vasitis nodosa observed in any form of vas intervention[21]. There is no nerve entrapment and vascular invasion and therefore, no pain. There was only a mild tenderness on firm pressure application.

Majority of the individuals, who received complete dose of RISUG injection, achieved either oligozoospermia or azoospermia within two months after injection. The remaining individuals achieved azoospermia within six months post-injection. Inspite of unprotected sexual relationship, no pregnancy was reported among the 133 individuals who received complete dose. The data indicated that RISUG was an effective male contraceptive. RISUG affects the sperm membrane including the acrosome which may have resulted in the sperm losing its fertilizing ability[22],[23],[24]. Successful reversal of RISUG injection has been observed in rat, rabbit and langur monkeys' studies without any side effects[25],[26],[27],[28],[29],[30],[31],[32]. However, reversibility of fertilizing ability of sperms was not attempted in this study.

Based on the present observations, it may be suggested that RISUG, which is non-hormonal and once injectable, is a safe, and effective male contraceptive. Small sample size and short duration of follow up were the major limitations of the study. Further studies need to be done with a large sample, long duration of follow up and including reversibility studies.

Acknowledgment: Authors acknowledge Shri Subhash Gautam for technical assistance.

Financial support & sponsorship: The financial support from Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi, is acknowledged.

Conflicts of Interest: None.



 
   References Top

1.
Potts M. The myth of a male pill. Nat Med 1996; 2 : 398-9.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Posner JK, Mbodji F. Men's attitudes about family planning in Dakar, Senegal. J Biosoc Sci 1989; 21 : 279-91.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Ezeh AC, Seroussi M, Raggers H. Men's Fertility, contraceptive use, and reproductive preferences. DHS comparative studies No. 18. Calverton, Maryland: Macro International Inc.; 1996.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Grady WR, Tanfer K, Billy JO, Lincoln-Hanson J. Men's perceptions of their roles and responsibilities regarding sex, contraception and childrearing. Fam Plann Perspect 1996; 28 : 221-6.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Ringheim K. Whither methods for men? Emerging gender issues in contraception. Reprod Health Matters 1996; 7 : 79-89.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Drennan M. Reproductive health. New perspectives on men's participation. Popul Rep J 1998; 46 : 1-35.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
International Institute of Population Sciences. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-2): 1998-99. Mumbai; 2000. Available from: http://rchiips.org/nfhs/data/india/indch5.pdf, accessed on January 10, 2018.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Büchter D, Behre HM, Kliesch S, Chirazi A, Nieschlag E, Assmann G, et al. Effects of testosterone suppression in young men by the gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonist cetrorelix on plasma lipids, lipolytic enzymes, lipid transfer proteins, insulin, and leptin. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 1999; 107 : 522-9.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Buchter D, Von Eckardstein S, Von Eckardstein A, Kamischke A, Simoni M, Behre HM, et al. Clinical trial of transdermal testosterone and oral levonorgestrel for male contraception. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006; 84 : 1244-9.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Wang C, Wang XH, Nelson AL, Lee KK, Cui YG, Tong JS, et al. Levonorgestrel implants enhanced the suppression of spermatogenesis by testosterone implants: Comparison between Chinese and non-Chinese men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006; 91 : 460-70.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Gu YQ, Wang XH, Xu D, Peng L, Cheng LF, Huang MK, et al. A multicenter contraceptive efficacy study of injectable testosterone undecanoate in healthy Chinese men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003; 88 : 562-8.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Wong Elissa WP, Mruk DD, Cheng CY. Delivery of contraceptives to men: Lesson from other therapeutic drugs. Immun Endoc Metab Agents Med Chem 2008; 8 : 91-4.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Guha SK. A process for the preparation of an injectable copolymer for use as a contraceptive by a male. Indian Patent No. 179093; 1991.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Guha SK, Ansari S, Anand S, Farooq A, Misro MM, Sharma DN, et al. Contraception in male monkeys by intra-vas deferens injection of a pH lowering polymer. Contraception 1985; 32 : 109-18.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Guha SK, Singh G, Anand S, Ansari S, Kumar S, Koul V, et al. Phase I clinical trial of an injectable contraceptive for the male. Contraception 1993; 48 : 367-75.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Guha SK, Singh G, Ansari S, Kumar S, Srivastava A, Koul V, et al. Phase II clinical trial of a vas deferens injectable contraceptive for the male. Contraception 1997; 56 : 245-50.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Guha SK, Singh G, Srivastava A, Das HC, Bhardwaj JC, Mathur V, et al. Two years clinical efficacy trial with dose variations of a vas deferens injectable contraceptive for the male. Contraception 1998; 58 : 165-74.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Guha SK. Contraceptive for use by a male. US Patent; 1996. p. 5488705.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
World Health Organization. WHO laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and sperm-cervical mucus interaction. 4thed. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1999.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Roy S, Ghosh D, Guha SK. Polyelectrolyte polymer properties in relation to male contraceptive RISUG action. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2009; 69 : 77-84.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Hirschowitz L, Rode J, Guillebaud J, Bounds W, Moss E. Vasitis nodosa and associated clinical findings. J Clin Pathol 1988; 41 : 419-23.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Chaudhury K, Bhattacharyya AK, Guha SK. Studies on the membrane integrity of human sperm treated with a new injectable male contraceptive. Hum Reprod 2004; 19 : 1826-30.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Kumar S, Chaudhury K, Sen P, Guha SK. Topological alterations in human spermatozoa associated with the polyelectrolytic effect of RISUG. Micron 2006; 37 : 526-32.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Guha SK. Biophysical mechanism-mediated time-dependent effect on sperm of human and monkey vas implanted polyelectrolyte contraceptive. Asian J Androl 2007; 9 : 221-7.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Lohiya NK, Manivannan B, Mishra PK, Pathak N, Balasubramanian SP. Intravasal contraception with styrene maleic anhydride and its noninvasive reversal in langur monkeys (Presbytis entellus entellus). Contraception 1998; 58 : 119-28.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Lohiya NK, Manivannan B, Mishra PK. Repeated vas occlusion and non-invasive reversal with styrene maleic anhydride for male contraception in langur monkeys. Int J Androl 2000; 23 : 36-42.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Lohiya NK, Manivannan B, Mishra PK, Sriram S, Bhande SS, Panneerdoss S, et al. Preclinical evaluation for noninvasive reversal following long-term vas occlusion with styrene maleic anhydride in langur monkeys. Contraception 2005; 71 : 214-26.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Lohiya NK, Suthar R, Khandelwal A, Goyal S, Ansari AS, Manivannan B, et al. Sperm characteristics and teratology in rats following vas deferens occlusion with RISUG and its reversal. Int J Androl 2010; 33 : e198-206.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Ansari AS, Hussain M, Khan SR, Lohiya NK. Relative suitability of DMSO and naHCO3 for reversal of RISUG® induced long-term contraception. Andrology 2016; 4 : 306-13.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Ansari AS, Badar A, Balasubramanian K, Lohiya NK. Contraception with RISUG® and functional reversal through DMSO and naHCO3 in male rabbits. Asian J Androl 2017; 19 : 389-95.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Ansari AS, Badar A, Lohiya NK. Safety evaluation through genotoxicity and apoptotic markers following RISUG® induced contraception and its reversal in male rabbits. Reprod Toxicol 2018; 81 : 84-92.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Ansari AS, Hussain M, Khan SR, Badar A, Lohiya NK. Toxicity and mutagenicity evaluation following RISUG contraception reversal in rats. Int J Toxicol 2018; 37 : 457-65.  Back to cited text no. 32
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
    Material & M...
   Results
   Discussion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed154    
    Printed2    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded61    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal