Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research
  Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login  
  Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Users Online: 1694       

   Table of Contents      
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 149  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 232-239

Phenotypic & genotypic study of antimicrobial profile of bacteria isolates from environmental samples


1 Division of Infectious Diseases, Nitte University Centre for Science Education and Research, Mangaluru, India
2 Department of Fisheries Microbiology, College of Fisheries, Mangaluru, India
3 Nitte University Centre for Science Education and Research, Mangaluru, India

Date of Submission31-Dec-2017
Date of Web Publication3-Jun-2019

Correspondence Address:
Dr Indrani Karunasagar
UNESCO MIRCEN for Medical & Marine Biotechnology, Center for Science Education & Research, Nitte (Deemed to be University), University Enclave, Medical Sciences Complex, Deralakatte, Mangaluru 575 018, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_2097_17

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Background & objectives: The resistance to antibiotics in pathogenic bacteria has increased at an alarming rate in recent years due to the indiscriminate use of antibiotics in healthcare, livestock and aquaculture. In this context, it is necessary to monitor the antibiotic resistance patterns of bacteria isolated from the environmental samples. This study was conducted to determine the phenotypic and genotypic profile of antimicrobial resistance in Gram-negative bacteria isolated from environmental samples.
Methods: Two hundred and fifty samples were collected from different sources, viz. fish and fishery products (99), livestock wastes (81) and aquaculture systems (70), in and around Mangaluru, India. Isolation, identification and antimicrobial profiling were carried out as per standard protocols. The isolates were screened for the presence of resistance genes using PCR.
Results: A total of 519 Gram-negative bacteria comprising Escherichia coli (116), Salmonella spp. (14), Vibrio spp. (258), Pseudomonas spp. (56), Citrobacter spp. (26) and Proteus spp. (49) were isolated and characterized from 250 samples obtained from different sources. A total of 12 antibiotics were checked for their effectiveness against the isolates. While 31.6 per cent of the isolates were sensitive to all the antibiotics used, 68.4 per cent of the isolates showed resistance to at least one of the antibiotics used. One-third of the isolates showed multidrug resistance. Maximum resistance was observed for ampicillin (43.4%), followed by nitrofurantoin (20.8%). Least resistance was seen for carbapenems and chloramphenicol. PCR profiling of the resistant isolates confirmed the presence of resistance genes corresponding to their antibiotic profile.
Interpretation & conclusions: This study results showed high rate of occurrence of antimicrobial resistance and their determinants in Gram-negative bacteria isolated from different environmental sources.

Keywords: Antimicrobial resistance - environmental samples - genotypic characterization - multidrug resistance


How to cite this article:
Shivakumaraswamy SK, Deekshit VK, Vittal R, Akhila DS, Mundanda DM, Mohan Raj JR, Chakraborty A, Karunasagar I. Phenotypic & genotypic study of antimicrobial profile of bacteria isolates from environmental samples. Indian J Med Res 2019;149:232-9

How to cite this URL:
Shivakumaraswamy SK, Deekshit VK, Vittal R, Akhila DS, Mundanda DM, Mohan Raj JR, Chakraborty A, Karunasagar I. Phenotypic & genotypic study of antimicrobial profile of bacteria isolates from environmental samples. Indian J Med Res [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Sep 16];149:232-9. Available from: http://www.ijmr.org.in/text.asp?2019/149/2/232/259590

The development and spread of antibiotic resistance among bacteria affecting human health are most challenging problems of the modern world. The genetic determinants responsible for conferring resistance are often carried in self-transmissible mobile elements such as conjugative plasmids, gene cassettes in integrons and transposons, which are transferred between bacterial species, resulting in transmission of resistance to other species [1].

The development of resistance to a specific antimicrobial compound is influenced by several environmental factors and it has been reported that the organisms isolated from environment with high faecal contamination can easily acquire resistance to the common antimicrobial drugs [2]. In addition, the non-therapeutic use of antimicrobials in animal husbandry, aquaculture, agriculture, poultry and piggery has increased the incidence of multidrug resistance forms in the environment [3],[4]. The presence of antibiotic resistance in Gram-negative bacteria has been well documented including their occurrence in aquaculture [5] and livestock [6]. Among the Gram-negative bacteria, the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance has been reported to be high in  Escherichia More Details coli[7],  Salmonella More Details spp.[8], Vibrio spp.[9], Pseudomonas spp.[10], Citrobacter spp.[11] and Proteus spp.[12]. It is important to understand and monitor the antibiotic resistance patterns of human pathogenic bacteria persisting in the environment. Hence, the main objective of this study was to investigate the phenotypic and genotypic profile of antimicrobial resistance in Gram-negative bacteria isolated from environmental samples.


   Material & Methods Top


A total of 250 samples from different sources, viz. 99 from fish and fishery products comprising 61 of fish/shellfish and 38 of oyster/clam/molluscs; 81 from livestock wastes comprising poultry (23), piggery (14) and cattle wastes (44) samples and 70 from aquaculture systems comprising fish farm water (40) and pond sediment (30), in and around Mangaluru, India, were aseptically collected fortnightly during the study period (2011-2014). The samples were subjected to isolation of associated bacteria by culture-based conventional methods [13]. Typical colonies from the selective plates were sub-cultured onto Luria Bertani (L-B) agar (HiMedia Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai) and identified using standard biochemical tests, viz. Gram staining, motility, cytochrome oxidase, catalase, oxidation fermentation test, urease and triple sugar iron agar [14],[15]. E. coli, Salmonella spp. and Vibrio spp. were further confirmed by single-step PCR using species-specific primers [Table 1][16],[17],[18]. Identified isolates were preserved in 30 per cent glycerol L-B broth and stored at −80°C for further studies.
Table 1: Primers used for the confirmation of suspected Escherichia coli, Salmonella enterica and Vibrio spp. isolates

Click here to view


Antibiotic susceptibility test: Antibiotic susceptibility tests were performed for all the isolates using the disc diffusion method described by Bauer et al[19] as per the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines [20]. Twelve common antibiotics (in μg) namely nalidixic acid (30), tetracycline (30), co-trimoxazole (25), ciprofloxacin (5), chloramphenicol (30), ampicillin (10), gentamicin (10), nitrofurantoin (300), imipenem (10), meropenem (10mc), cefotaxime (30) and piperacillin-tazobactam (100/10) (HiMedia) were used for antibiotic profiling. ATCC 25922 E. coli culture was used as a standard quality control strain for AST for Enterobacteriaceae groups.

Detection of antibiotic resistance determinants by PCR: The isolates showing resistance to particular antibiotics were selected and screened for the presence of antibiotic resistance determinants by PCR using the primers listed in [Table 2] [21],[22],[23],[24]. Genomic DNA was extracted from the bacterial culture by cetyl-trimethyl ammonium bromide method [25]. Using genomic DNA as a template, PCR was carried out in 30 μl reaction mixture containing 10× buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl, p H 8.3, 20 mM MgCl2, 500 mM KCl, 0.1% gelatin), 200 mM of dNTPs (dATP, dTTP, dGTP and dCTP), 10 pmol each of forward and reverse primers and 1.0 unit of Taq DNA polymerase enzyme (HiMedia) in a MJ-Research Thermo Cycler (PTC-200, Bio-Rad, USA). The PCR conditions included initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles with each cycle consisting of denaturation at 94°C for 60 sec, annealing for 60 sec at an optimized temperature depending on the primer set used and extension at 72°C for 30 sec. The final extension was set at 72°C for 10 min.
Table 2: Primers used for detection of different antibiotic resistance genes

Click here to view


Sequencing of antibiotic-resistant determinants: The amplified PCR products (antibiotic-resistant determinants) were purified using PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer's protocol and were outsourced for capillary sequencing. The obtained sequences were analyzed by BLAST (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) and antibiotic resistance genes database for their homology with the database sequences and the confirmed sequences were submitted to the GenBank.


   Results Top


Five hundred and nineteen bacterial strains were isolated and identified to the genus level by conventional methods using a battery of biochemical tests. The details of the isolates identified from the different sources are given in [Table 3]. Molecular confirmation of E. coli, Vibrio spp. and Salmonella spp. was done by PCR using primers namely uidA for E. coli, invA and hns for Salmonella and 16S rRNA for Vibrio [Figure 1].
Table 3: Total number of Gram-negative bacterial strains isolated from different non-human sources

Click here to view
Figure 1: Gel-electrophoresis of PCR amplified products of Escherichia coli and Salmonella isolates. Lane1: 100 bp DNA ladder; lane 2: uidA gene-positive control (E. coli); lane 3: uidA gene-negative control (E. coli); lanes 4 & 5: uidA gene-positive E. coli isolates; lane 6: positive control for invA gene (Salmonella); lane 7: negative control for invA; lanes 8 & 9: invA gene-positive Salmonella isolates; lane 10: positive control for hns gene (Salmonella); lane 11: negative control for hns gene; lanes 12-13: hns gene-positive Salmonella spp. isolates.

Click here to view


Antimicrobial susceptibility test: Among the 519 isolates tested for antimicrobial susceptibility, only 31.6 per cent (164 isolates) showed susceptibility to all the antibiotics tested. While 68.4 per cent (355 isolates) were resistant to at least one of the antibiotics, 33.7 per cent (175 isolates) displayed multidrug resistance (resistance to more than one antibiotic). As shown in [Figure 2], maximum resistance was observed for ampicillin (225 isolates, 43.4%) followed by nitrofurantoin (108 isolates, 20.8%), nalidixic acid (71 isolates, 13.7%), cefotaxime (62 isolates, 11.9%), tetracycline (58 isolates, 11.2%), co-trimoxazole (38 isolates, 7.3%), ciprofloxacin (30 isolates, 5.8%), gentamicin and piperacillin/tazobactam (28 isolates, 5.4%), imipenem (18 isolates, 3.5%), meropenem (16 isolates, 3.1%) and chloramphenicol (15 isolates, 2.9%).
Figure 2: Antibiotic resistance pattern of all isolates against 12 different antibiotics used in the study. NA, nalidixic acid; TE, tetracycline; COT, co-trimoxazole; CIP, ciprofloxacin; C, chloramphenicol; AMP, ampicillin; GEN, gentamicin; NIT, nitrofurantoin; MRP, meropenem; CTX, cefotaxime; PIT, piperacillin/tazobactum.

Click here to view


The drug resistance patterns of the isolates according to the source of collection are presented in [Figure 3]. Among isolates obtained from fishery products and environment samples, 47.5 per cent showed resistance to ampicillin and 18 per cent to nitrofurantoin, suggesting maximum resistance to these two antibiotics. Among isolates from livestock wastes, maximum resistance was observed for nitrofurantoin (33.6% of the isolates) followed by ampicillin (28.6% of the isolates) and tetracycline (22.7% of the isolates).
Figure 3: Source-wise representation of antibiotic resistance pattern of the isolates to 12 antibiotics. Abbreviations are as given in Fig. 2.

Click here to view


Detection of antibiotic resistance genes: The antibiotic-resistant determinants associated with resistance were detected by PCR. Of the 58 isolates showing resistance to tetracycline, 45 (77.6%) harboured one or more than one tetracycline-resistant genes (tetA, tetB, tetC, tetD, tetE, tetG, tetM and tetS). Remaining 13 isolates did not carry any of the tet genes tested even though these were phenotypically resistant. Among 38 isolates resistant to co-trimoxazole, 12 (31.6%) harboured at least one of the sul genes (sul1, sul2, sul3) and the 26 isolates did not harbour any of the tested genes [Figure 4]. Two hundred and twenty five ampicillin-resistant isolates were tested for the presence of blaTEM, the gene responsible for the resistance. However, only eight isolates (3.6%) showed the presence of this gene. Of the 62 cefotaxime-resistant isolates, only five (8%) had the blaCTX-M gene conferring the resistance trait. Among the 15 isolates resistant to chloramphenicol, five (33.3%) carried one of the resistance genes (cat1, cat2 and cmlA), but none of these showed the presence of cat3, cmlB and floR [Figure 5]. Of the 71 nalidixic acid-resistant isolates, nine (12.7%) carried either qnrA, qnrB or qnrS.
Figure 4: Detection of PCR amplified products of antibiotic resistance genes. Lane 1: 100 bp DNA ladder; lane 2: tetA (492 bp); lane 4: tetB (571 bp); lane 6: tetE (544 bp); lane 8: sul1 (425 bp); lane 10: sul2 (435 bp); lane 12: sul3 (792 bp); lane 14: 500 bp DNA ladder and lanes 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13: negative controls.

Click here to view
Figure 5: Gel-electrophoresis of PCR amplified products of chloramphenicol-resistant isolates. Lane 1: 100 bp DNA ladder; lane 2: cat1 gene-positive control; lane 3: cat1 gene-negative control; lanes 4-5: cat1 gene-positive isolates; lane 6: positive control for cat2 gene; lane 7: negative control for cat2 gene; lanes 8-9: cat2 gene-positive isolates; lane 10: positive control for cmlA gene; lane 11: negative control for cmlA gene; lane 12-13: cmlA gene-positive isolates.

Click here to view


Further, sequencing of the PCR products of antibiotic resistance genes from representative isolates revealed 98 per cent identity with the existing antibiotic resistance gene sequences in the database. The GenBank accession numbers of these sequences are given in [Table 4].
Table 4: List of antibiotic resistant gene sequences submitted to GenBank with accession number

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


The results of antibiotic susceptibility test revealed that the number of isolates showing resistance to one or more antibiotics was on the rise, suggesting the high occurrence of antibiotic resistance in animal, wastewater, soil and other natural environments. Regardless of their source of isolation, resistance to three antibiotics, namely ampicillin, nitrofurantoin and tetracycline, was most frequently observed. Although ampicillin resistance was highest among all the antibiotics used.

It has been shown that isolates from fish and shrimp farms have widespread resistance to nitrofurantoin [26]. In this study, approximately 20 per cent of the isolates showed resistance to nitrofurantoin. Similarly, 18 per cent of the isolates obtained from fish farms and related products showed resistance to this antibiotic, and the results were in agreement with that of an earlier study [27]. The resistance to nitrofurantoin could be either due to the inhibition of nitrofurantoin reductase or due to the nucleotide changes (mutation) in nfs A and nfs B encoding oxygen-insensitive nitro reductase. Nitrofurantoin and its metabolites have zero tolerance in fishery products, and yet the high occurrence of resistance to nitrofurantoin observed in the study indicating the use of this antibiotic in aquaculture and other environments.

Resistance to tetracycline has been reported frequently from environmental samples [28]. In the present study, 11.2 per cent of the isolates exhibited phenotypic resistance to tetracycline, which was consistent with earlier studies that reported tetracycline resistance in 15-56 per cent of the isolates [28]. Resistance to tetracycline is more frequently observed in poultry isolates because it is widely used as growth promoters in poultry production [29]. More than 60 per cent of poultry isolates showed resistance to tetracycline in this study.

Skockova et al[30] had earlier reported that tetA and tetB were the most common genes responsible for resistance to tetracycline. In our study, 77 per cent of the phenotypically resistant isolates showed the presence of one or more tet genes. Although the remaining 23 per cent did not carry any of the tet genes tested in the study despite being phenotypically resistant, the resistance in such isolates could be due to other mechanisms such as enzymatic inactivation or target modification [31].

In this study, 7.3 per cent of the total isolates showed moderate resistance to co-trimoxazole. The sulphonamide resistance genes (sul1, sul2 and sul3) are known to be associated with class 1 integrons responsible for capturing and excision of genes during site-specific recombination events [32], which further facilitates the emergence of multidrug resistance among bacterial pathogens. Similar to the pattern seen for other antibiotics, the phenotypic and genotypic association was inconsistent for co-trimoxazole with only 31.6 per cent of the phenotypically confirmed isolates showing the presence of one of the three sul genes. The absence of sul in the remaining isolates suggests the possibility of some new genes or resistance mechanism to confer resistance to co-trimoxazole.

The antibiotic resistance pattern obtained for chloramphenicol in this study was low profile i.e.,2.9 per cent. The results of genotypic characterization showed inconsistency with 20 per cent carrying both type 1 and type 2 cat genes and 13.3 per cent harbouring cmlA. However, none of the isolates were positive for type 3 cat, cmlB and floR. The absence of resistance genes was observed in 33.3 per cent of the phenotypically resistant isolates, suggesting the possibility of other mechanism(s) such as overexpression of efflux pumps, mutations or modifications in the target sites or decreased outer membrane permeability contributing to chloramphenicol resistance [33],[34].

The resistance to β-lactam group of antibiotics such as ampicillin, cefotaxime, imipenem, meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactam was also analyzed in this study. Except for ampicillin, which showed maximum resistance, the percentage of resistance was relatively less with 3.5 and 3.1 per cent of isolates showing resistance to imipenem and meropenem, respectively. In our study, 20 per cent of the isolates showed resistance to nalidixic acid and five per cent towards ciprofloxacin. The usual cause of resistance to quinolones is due to point mutation/mutations in the quinolone resistance determining regions (QRDR) or due to presence of active efflux or outer membrane permeability. In addition, the plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance (PMQR) has also been reported. In the present study, nalidixic acid- and ciprofloxacin-resistant isolates carried qnrA, qnrB and qnrS indicating that quinolone resistance was acquired through plasmid-mediated determinant. Although point mutations in the QRDR are the main reason for resistance to quinolone/fluoroquinolones, the occurrence of PMQR genes cannot be neglected since these play a major role in the transmission of resistance among bacterial isolates [35]. The bacterial isolates showed similar pattern of resistance to cell wall synthesis inhibitors such as meropenem and imipenem. Although the susceptibility of the majority of the isolates to carbapenems was encouraging, the small percentage of resistance observed should be viewed seriously.

In conclusion, the results of this study on the pattern of resistance to antimicrobials in environmental samples highlighted the importance of continuous vigilance on the distribution of multidrug-resistant human pathogens in the environment. High rate of multidrug resistance among bacterial isolates from environmental samples suggested the indiscriminate use of antimicrobials in various sectors of animal husbandry. Judicious use of antibiotics, use of alternative bio-control approaches or development of pathogen-specific antimicrobial agents could help in combating antimicrobial resistance.

Financial support & sponsorship: Financial support received by the last author (IK) from the Indian Council of Medical Research (Grant no. AMR/37/2011-ECD-I), New Delhi, towards this study and the research fellowship to the first author (SKS) is acknowledged.

Conflicts of Interest: None.



 
   References Top

1.
Richardson LA. Understanding and overcoming antibiotic resistance. PLoS Biol 2017; 15 : e2003775.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Xi C, Zhang Y, Marrs CF, Ye W, Simon C, Foxman B, et al. Prevalence of antibiotic resistance in drinking water treatment and distribution systems. Appl Environ Microbiol 2009; 75 : 5714-8.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Collignon P, Wegener HC, Braam P, Butler CD. The routine use of antibiotics to promote animal growth does little to benefit protein undernutrition in the developing world. Clin Infect Dis 2005; 41 : 1007-13.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Dibner JJ, Richards JD. Antibiotic growth promoters in agriculture: History and mode of action. Poult Sci 2005; 84 : 634-43.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Sarter S, Nguyen HN, Hung LT, Lazard J, Montet D. Antibiotic resistance in Gram-negative bacteria isolated from farmed catfish. Food Control 2007; 18 : 1391-6.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Srisanga S, Angkititrakul S, Sringam P, Le Ho PT, Vo AT, Chuanchuen R, et al. Phenotypic and genotypic antimicrobial resistance and virulence genes of Salmonella enterica isolated from pet dogs and cats. J Vet Sci 2017; 18 : 273-81.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Sukhumungoon P, Nakaguchi Y, Ingviya N, Pradutkanchana J, Iwade Y, Seto K, et al. Investigation of stx 2+ eae+ Escherichiacoli O157: H7 in beef imported from Malaysia to Thailand. Int Food Res J 2011; 18 : 381-6.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Chen S, Zhao S, White DG, Schroeder CM, Lu R, Yang H, et al. Characterization of multiple-antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella serovars isolated from retail meats. Appl Environ Microbiol 2004; 70 : 1-7.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Akond MA, Alam S, Hasan SM, Uddin SN, Shirin M. Antibiotic resistance of Vibrio cholerae from poultry sources of Dhaka, Bangladesh. Adv Biol Res 2008; 2 : 60-7.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Yayan J, Ghebremedhin B, Rasche K. Antibiotic resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in pneumonia at a Single University Hospital Center in Germany over a 10-year period. PLoS One 2015; 10 : e0139836.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Khanna A, Singh N, Aggarwal A, Khanna M. The antibiotic resistance pattern in Citrobacter species: An emerging nosocomial pathogen in a tertiary care hospital. J Clin Diagn Res 2012; 6 : 642-4.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Feglo PK, Gbedema SY, Quay SN, Adu-Sarkodie Y, Opoku-Okrah C. Occurrence, species distribution and antibiotic resistance of Proteus isolates: A case study at the Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital (KATH) in Ghana. Int J Pharm Sci Res 2010; 1 : 347-52.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Andrews WH, Wang H, Jacobson A, Hammack TS. Salmonella. In: Bacteriological analytical manual. Gaithersburg, MD: Federal Drug Administration; 2011.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Khuntia BK. Basic microbiology: A illustrated laboratory manual. New Delhi, India: Daya Publishing House; 2011.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Mac Faddin JF. Biochemical tests for identification of medical bacteria. Philadelphia: Williams & Wilkins Co.; 1976.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Bej AK, DiCesare JL, Haff L, Atlas RM. Detection of Escherichiacoli and Shigella spp. in water by using the polymerase chain reaction and gene probes for uid. Appl Environ Microbiol 1991; 57 : 1013-7.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Rahn K, De Grandis SA, Clarke RC, McEwen SA, Galán JE, Ginocchio C, et al. Amplification of an InvA gene sequence of Salmonella typhimurium by polymerase chain reaction as a specific method of detection of Salmonella. Mol Cell Probes 1992; 6 : 271-9.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Jones DD, Law R, Bej AK. Detection of Salmonella spp. in oysters using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and gene probes. J Food Sci 1993; 58 : 1191-7.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Bauer AW, Kirby WM, Sherris JC, Turck M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am J Clin Pathol 1966; 45 : 493-6.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests. 28th ed. CLSI Document M100. Wayne, PA: CLSI; 2018.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Ma M, Wang H, Yu Y, Zhang D, Liu S. Detection of antimicrobial resistance genes of pathogenic Salmonella from swine with DNA microarray. J Vet Diagn Invest 2007; 19 : 161-7.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Aarestrup FM, Agerso Y, Gerner-Smidt P, Madsen M, Jensen LB. Comparison of antimicrobial resistance phenotypes and resistance genes in Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium from humans in the community, broilers, and pigs in Denmark. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2000; 37 : 127-37.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Robicsek A, Strahilevitz J, Sahm DF, Jacoby GA, Hooper DC. Qnr prevalence in ceftazidime-resistant Enterobacteriaceae isolates from the United States. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2006; 50 : 2872-4.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Colomer-Lluch M, Jofre J, Muniesa M. Antibiotic resistance genes in the bacteriophage DNA fraction of environmental samples. PLoS One 2011; 6 : e17549.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Ausubel FM, editor. Current protocols in molecular biology. 4th ed. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 1995.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Kumar R, Surendran PK. Plasmid-mediated antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas (Burkholderia) cepacia from brackish water aquaculture farms. Indian J Fish 2006; 53: 263-9.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Arredondo-García JL, Amábile-Cuevas CF. High resistance prevalence towards ampicillin, co-trimoxazole and ciprofloxacin, among uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolates in Mexico city. J Infect Dev Ctries 2008; 2 : 350-3.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Chikwendu CI, Ibe SN, Okpokwasili GC. Multiple antimicrobial resistance in Vibrio spp. isolated from river and aquaculture water sources in Imo state, Nigeria. J Br Microbiol Res 2014; 4 : 560-9.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Kolar M, Pantucek R, Bardon J, Vagnerova I, Typovska H, Valka I, et al. Occurrence of antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains isolated in poultry. Vet Med Czech 2002; 47 : 52-9.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Skockova A, Cupakova S, Karpískova R, Janstova B. Detection of tetracycline resistance genes in Escherichia coli from raw cow's milk. J Microbiol Biotechnol Food Sci 2012; 1 : 777.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Chopra I, Roberts M. Tetracycline antibiotics: Mode of action, applications, molecular biology, and epidemiology of bacterial resistance. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2001; 65 : 232-60.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Deekshit VK, Kumar BK, Rai P, Srikumar S, Karunasagar I, Karunasagar I, et al. Detection of class 1 integrons in Salmonella weltevreden and silent antibiotic resistance genes in some seafood-associated nontyphoidal isolates of salmonella in South-West coast of India. J Appl Microbiol 2012; 112 : 1113-22.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Daniels C, Ramos JL. Adaptive drug resistance mediated by root-nodulation-cell division efflux pumps. Clin Microbiol Infect 2009; 15 (Suppl 1) : 32-6.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Montero CI, Johnson MR, Chou CJ, Conners SB, Geouge SG, Tachdjian S, et al. Responses of wild-type and resistant strains of the hyperthermophilic bacterium Thermotoga maritima to chloramphenicol challenge. Appl Environ Microbiol 2007; 73 : 5058-65.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Santhosh KS, Deekshit VK, Venugopal MN, Karunasagar I, Karunasagar I. Multiple antimicrobial resistance and novel point mutation in fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichiacoli isolates from Mangalore, India. Microb Drug Resist 2017; 23 : 994-1001.  Back to cited text no. 35
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
    Material & M...
   Results
   Discussion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed278    
    Printed1    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded103    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal