Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research
  Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login  
  Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Users Online: 9738       

   Table of Contents      
REVIEW ARTICLE
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 148  |  Issue : 7  |  Page : 92-99

Effect of radiofrequency radiation on reproductive health


1 Department of Environmental Studies, Satyawati College, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
2 Division of Reproductive Biology & Maternal Health, Child Health, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India

Date of Submission06-Jun-2018
Date of Web Publication3-Apr-2019

Correspondence Address:
Dr Radhey Shyam Sharma
Division of Reproductive Biology & Maternal Health, Child Health, Indian Council of Medical Research, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi 110 029
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1056_18

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

The development of cellular phone system has greatly increased the extent and magnitude of radiofrequency radiation (RFR) exposure. The RFR emitted from mobile phone and mobile phone base stations exerts thermal and non-thermal effects. The short-term and long-term exposure to RFR may have adverse effect on humans as well as animals. Most laboratory studies have indicated a direct link between exposure to RFR and adverse biological effects. Several in vitro studies have reported that RFR induces various types of cancer and DNA or chromosomal damage. On the other hand, some animal studies have not reported adverse effects of this radiation. The present review summarizes information available on the possible effects of RFR on the reproductive health.

Keywords: Biological effect - electromagnetic field - mobile phone - mobile phone base station - radiofrequency radiation - thermal and non-thermal effects


How to cite this article:
Singh R, Nath R, Mathur AK, Sharma RS. Effect of radiofrequency radiation on reproductive health. Indian J Med Res 2018;148, Suppl S1:92-9

How to cite this URL:
Singh R, Nath R, Mathur AK, Sharma RS. Effect of radiofrequency radiation on reproductive health. Indian J Med Res [serial online] 2018 [cited 2019 Apr 23];148, Suppl S1:92-9. Available from: http://www.ijmr.org.in/text.asp?2018/148/7/92/255398


   Introduction Top


The radiofrequency radiation (RFR) is a component of electromagnetic energy covering the frequency range of 3 KHz-300 GHz [1]. Cellular phones were introduced during the 1990s, and today there are more than millions of cell phone users in the country [2]. The explosive expansion of cell phone system has greatly enhanced the level and magnitude of RFR exposure. There is potential exposure in the surrounding areas of the fixed broadcast facilities situated in residential areas, schools, etc. With the increased use of cell phones, the levels of radiations and exposure of the population have consequently amplified drastically [2].

The RFR is of short term and repeated nature at a comparatively high intensity when emitted from cell phones, whereas RFR of cell phone base stations is of long duration but with a very low intensity. The biological effects of low-frequency (<100 Hz) radiations are well recognized and reported to cause adverse effect on health via either thermal or non-thermal effect. Thermal effects occur due to holding cell phones near to the body, whereas non-thermal effects are from both cell phones and cell phone base station [2].

RFRs have adequate energy to create thermal effect in living cells and tissues. RFR may be absorbed at the molecular level producing an alteration of dielectric properties of molecules [2]. Molecular dielectric properties are responsible for the magnitude of heat. Therefore, electromagnetic field (EMF) can generate heat. A thermal response can be altering many biochemical and physiological pathways in living organisms. It has been reported that a specific absorption rate (SAR) of more than 4 W/kg may enhance temperature around 1°C, under moderate condition, and the SAR of RFR is a time-dependent factor [2].

Biological effects from RFR exposure also occur where thermal mechanism may not be possible or inadequate to account for these effects. These are referred to as non-thermal (athermal) effects. RFR could be absorbed at the surface of tissue at molecular level producing various molecular transformations and alterations [1]. Long-term exposure to RFR-EMF could induce a variety of effects in the cellular response [2]. A possible mechanism of non-thermal effects of RFR-EMF on living organisms is by producing reactive oxygen species (ROS) and activation of ion channels of membrane. The ROS and ions can activate cell receptors and cell signalling cascade, which induces secondary messenger system [3]. Any alteration in cell receptor and signalling mechanism can upregulate and downregulate the gene expression, peptide synthesis, protein formation and enzyme activity (protein function). Cleary et al[4],[5] have reported that continuous exposure of RFR increases cell proliferation including human peripheral lymphocytes. RFR downregulates gap-junctional intracellular signalling which plays an important role in cell growth and cell differentiation [6]. Furthermore, RFR has also been reported to decrease the rates of channel protein formation and frequency of single-channel opening and enhance the rates of rapid burst [7]. Paulraj and Behari [8] observed an increase in calcium-dependent protein kinase C in rat brain, suggesting that it could affect membrane-bound enzymes linked with cell proliferation and signalling.

The main difficulty to understand the biological effects of low-frequency radiation is due to different exposure parameters and complex interactions as well as the variation in body structure and environment. Environmental factors such as temperature, air velocity, humidity and body insulation may also play an important role in biological effects. Therefore, safety of humans from EMF exposure both at home and workplace has become an important issue. Many scientific bodies conducted researches on this issue and developed guidelines for safe EMF exposure levels [2]. The International Commission on Non Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP), Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) and Federal Communications Commission (FCC) have developed safety guidelines for RFR-EMF exposure and decided maximum permissible limits in terms of power density, electric field and SAR at both general- and occupational-level exposure [1]. In addition to these exposure limits, many developed countries have their own health-based precautionary guidelines for RFR-EMF exposure [1]. As the usage of cell phones has increased, there is an urgent need to pay attention to the impact of RFR on human health. The maximum permissible exposure limits may vary widely. The existing data on the effects of cell phone radiation are inconclusive, currently under debate and still are a controversial issue [2]. However, the existing literature on the effect of non-ionizing radiation-EMF indicates the biological effects and adverse health effects [2]. In the present review, we summarize the available evidences and critically assess the investigations as to their ability to support or dismiss a potential effect of RFR exposure on reproductive health that might be helpful for the creation of new precautionary guidelines for the exposure limit.


   Radiofrequency Radiation and Reproductive Health: In Vitro Studies Top


Several in vitro studies have been conducted to find out the impact of RFR-EMF on the parameters of reproductive health. The semen sample of a healthy person was exposed to 850 MHz frequency with controlled maximum power <1 W and SAR 1.46 W/kg for 60 min at a distance of 2.5 cm of antenna from the sample. The obtained data showed that sperm motility and sperm viability were significantly lower in the exposed group. The level of ROS was markedly higher in the exposed group as compared to that of the unexposed group [9],[10]. This was also supported by Yan et al[11] who reported that 900 MHz frequency from mobile phone at 2 W/kg for one hour decreased sperm-fertilizing ability. Exposure to 2.45 GHz radiation led to decline in progressive sperm-fertilizing ability and enhanced DNA fragmentation in human sperm in an in vitro study [12]. Exposure of cell lines of neuroblastoma cells, fibroblasts, rat granulosa cells and spermatogenic cells to 900-2400 MHz at SAR ≤2 W/kg caused significant DNA damage, changes in protein folding, increased level of stress protein (hsp 70) and induced apoptosis [13],[14],[15],[16],[17],[18],[19]. Others also reported DNA breakage in cauda epididymal spermatozoa and embryonic stem cells in mice when exposed to RF EMF of 900 MHz and 1.7 GHz [9],[20]. Bernabò et al[21] reported that 1 mT EMF decreased sperm function. A 50 Hz super low frequency (SLF)-EMF has been reported to change sperm motility and decrease their viability in rabbits [22].


   Radiofrequency Radiation and Reproductive Health: In Vivo Studies on Animals Top


To find out the link between RFR and reproductive health, different animal models as well as different parameters have been studied.

Effect of RFR on the morphology and function of reproductive organs

The RFR-EMF has shown adverse effect on the morphology and functions of reproductive organs. Exposure to RF-EMF is shown to increase testicular proteins in Sprague-Dawley rats, which is related to carcinogenic risk including reproductive damage [23]. Exposure of 2.4 GHz RF emitted from Wi-Fi also affects reproductive parameters of male rats [24]. In another study, Sprague-Dawley male rats (adults) were exposed to 900 MHz EMF for 30 min/day, 5 days/week for five weeks. The effect of EMF was investigated on testes weight, testicular biopsy score count and percentage of interstitial tissue out of the entire testicular tissue, sperm count and apoptosis. No significant change was found in testes weight and testicular biopsy score count. However, seminiferous tubule diameter, mean height of germinal epithelium and serum total testosterone levels were reduced in the EMF-exposed group [25],[26]. The acute EMF exposure also showed an increase in testicular temperature[14],[27],[28]. Mice exposed to 2.45 and 1.7 GHz EMF showed changes in the histology of seminiferous tubular epithelium and deranged parameters of semen [29]. A significant alteration in seminiferous tubules and increase in the death rate of germ cells in testes were also found when mice were exposed to 60 Hz EMF at 0.5 mT [30]. Similarly, in mice, 60 Hz EMFs of 14 and 200 μT stimulated spermatogenic cell apoptosis [16]. In Wistar rats, 2.45 GHz stimulated a decrease in Leydig cell number and an increase in apoptosis-positive cell number in the seminiferous tubules [31]. In contrast, Imai et al[32] reported significant increase in sperm count, without abnormalities of sperm motility or morphology at similar exposure level. Other published data showed a decrease in the diameter of seminiferous tubules and epithelial thickness [14],[25],[33],[34],[35]. In some studies, no histological changes were found in the animal testicular tissues after exposure to radiation emitted from cell phones [34],[36],[37]. Guney et al[38] reported that enhanced oxidative stress (OS) by a 900 MHz EMF led to endometrial histopathology impairment in rats. Oxidative endometrial damage plays an important role in endometrial impairment at biochemical and histological levels, leading to endometrial histopathologic impairment in rats [39],[40]. A decrease in the number of seminiferous tubules, Leydig cells and height of seminiferous epithelium was reported after exposure of rats to 60 Hz, 1 mT SLF-EMF from gestation day 13 to post-natal day 21[41].

Effect of radiofrequency radiation on hormonal profile

Reproductive endocrinology plays a vital role in controlling the following two important functions of testes: spermatogenesis and steroidogenesis. In the hypothalamus, melatonin regulates the pulse of luteinizing hormone (LH)-releasing hormone, influencing follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and LH secretion. This alters the gonadal sex steroid production and changes in reproductive cycle [42]. The circulating level of melatonin was decreased in rats and hamsters exposed to 50 Hz EMF for six weeks [43],[44]. In another experiment, mice were exposed to electromagnetic pulse irradiation five times within two minutes and it was observed that serum testosterone level was significantly dropped and there was no difference in serum LH and oestradiol (E2) level as compared to that in sham-operated animals. The decrease in the level of testosterone shows the effect of EMF on Leydig cells and susceptibility to EMP irradiation, which causes injury in the structure and function of Leydig cells in mice [45],[46]. The mRNA expression for P450 cholesterol side chain lyase in Leydig cells was also altered after EMF exposure [47]. In another study, the level of seminal plasma fructose declined significantly in rabbits exposed to radiation emitted from cell phones for 10 weeks; however, there was no change in serum testosterone levels between the study groups [33]. Oyewopo et al[48] reported that the levels of FSH, LH and testosterone significantly decreased in adult male Wistar rats when exposed to radiation emitted by cell phones in comparison with that in control group.

Effect of radiofrequency radiation on oestorus cycle

Female mice after weaning exposed to electromagnetic radiation for six weeks showed extended oestrous cycle [49]. Similarly, dairy cows exposed to 60 Hz 30 μT EMF for 16 h/day showed extended oestrous cycle [50]. Extended oestrous cycle can slow down ovulation in females during the fertile period of their life and hence decreases the probability of fecundity. Follicle cultures of mouse exposed to 33 Hz SLF-EMF at five-day intervals showed defects in follicle growth, whereas mouse exposed to 50 Hz EMF did not show any effect on growth. SLF-EMF exposure to 33 or 50 Hz for three days has been reported to inhibit the formation of antrum in cultured follicles in vitro[17]. The data suggested that ovarian steroid-regulated oestrous cycle could be more sensitive when exposed to EMF as compared to foetal development and foeto-maternal interaction. However, 10 kHz, 0.2 mT sine wave EMF in female rats did not show any effect on oestrous cycles [51], suggesting that EMFs' effect on oestrous cycle might depend on frequency, energy and animal species. In a study on adult Wistar female rats, continuous exposure to 50 Hz SLF-EMF for three months resulted in significant decrease in plasma catalase activities, but there was no effect on progesterone level, oestrous cycle and weight of uterus and ovaries [52]. On the contrary, EMF exposure to ovariectomized female Sprague-Dawley rats for four hours per day for three days at 1439 MHz showed no differences in uterine wet mass or serum E2 level [53]. Oral et al[54] reported that OS and endometrial apoptosis increased in female rats exposed to 900 MHz EMF for 30 min/day for 30 days.

Effect of radiofrequency radiation on oxidative stress

Several studies have reported that exposure to RFR enhances the formation of ROS. Extremely low-frequency RFR exposure resulted in an increase in testicular tissue malondialdehyde and nitric oxide levels and caused a decrease in glutathione (antioxidant) levels in male Wistar rats [55]. Kesari and Behari [56] used male Wistar rats, aged 60-70 days old, exposed to 2.45 GHz microwave radiation and cell phone radiation, at SAR 0.9 W/kg in a Plexiglas ® cage for 2 hours/day for 35 days. They found that cell phone exposure led to a build-up of free radicals and ROS levels in sperm which in turn resulted in the generation of OS in the testicular tissue. They also reported an enhanced ROS level in the semen when rats were exposed to mobile phone radiation as compared with sham-operated animals [57],[58]. The same group also reported that exposure to electromagnetic radiation directly from cell phone 2 h/day ×35 days at 0.9 W/kg SAR showed decreased total sperm count and an increased mean percentage of apoptotic cells in rats [59].

Radiofrequency radiation-induced DNA damage and micronuclei formation

The effects of RFR-EMF on DNA damage have been investigated and demonstrated in several studies carried out in different tissues [60],[61],[62],[63],[64]. A DNA segment rearrangement and breakage is reported in mouse testis when exposed to RF-EMF of 2450 MHz [63]. Furthermore, exposure to RF-EMF of 900 MHz and 1.7 GHz has been reported to induce DNA damage in cauda epididymal spermatozoa and embryonic stem cells in mice [64],[65]. De Iuliis et al[66] found that exposure to RF-EM wave significantly damaged sperm DNA. In mice, exposure to RF-EMW at 900 MHz for 12 h/day×7 days significantly damaged mitochondrial and nuclear genome in epididymal spermatozoa [64]. Gollapudi and McFadden [67] reported harmful effects of SAR of 0.9 W/kg emitted from cell phone on DNA and chromatin. Kesari et al[58] reported a significant increase in micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes (PCEs) in mobile phone-exposed Wistar rats, whereas a decrease in the ratio of PCE and normochromatic erythrocyte in blood cells exposed by radiation emitted from mobile phone. The micronuclei levels in bone marrow cultures increased when exposed to mobile phone frequency for 35 days at 0.9 W/kg SAR [58].

Effect of radiofrequency radiation on embryo development

Ovulated and mated female mice exposed to 50 Hz EMF for four hours per day, six days a week, for two weeks, showed decreased number of blastocysts with increase in DNA fragmentation [68]. These findings indicated that EMF exposure in the pre-implantation stage may have negative effects on embryonic development [68]. Furthermore, SLF-EMFs of 50 Hz, 0.75 mT EMF exposure for four hours before ovulation delayed the cleavage of fertilized eggs in swine, suggesting a negative effect of SLF radiation on early embryonic development [21]. Exposure of pregnant mice to a 50 Hz, 20 mT EMF during gestation days 0 to 17 did not show any remarkable changes in embryonic survival, sex ratio and embryonic malformation; however, significant increase in the height and body weight of offspring was reported [28]. In contrast, exposure to a 50 Hz sine wave EMF at 5.0 mT for nine and two weeks, respectively, before copulation was not able to exert any changes in the fertility of both gamete and foetal development [69]. During pregnancy, mice exposed to a 20 kHz sawtooth EMF at 6.5 μT for eight hours per day showed increased abnormalities in foetus [16].


   Epidemiological Studies Top


Several researchers reported a link between cell phone usage and changes in sperm count, motility, normal morphology and viability [70]. A study on foetal and neonatal cardiac output (COP) and heart rate (HR) following acute maternal exposure to radiation emitted by cell phone reported significant changes in HR and COP [71]. An increase in the HR of foetus and neonates and decrease in stroke volume and COP were found prior to and later than mobile phone use [71]. A retrospective study on 371 men of reproductive age reported negative effects of prolonged use of mobile phone on sperm motility [72]. Wdowiak et al[73] also conducted a retrospective study on 304 men of reproductive age and found a correlation between time-dependent cell phone use and decreased normal forward progressive motility of sperm. Wdowiak et al[73] also observed that decrease in normal sperm morphology and count was linked with the duration of exposure to radiation emitted by GSM cell. An observational study by Agarwal et al[74] on 361 men showed marked variation in the normal morphology of sperm between low- and high-usage groups. Moreover, the author also found significant difference in sperm motility and viability between the groups [74]. Another observational study on 231 men showed low sperm count in heavy cell phone users [72]. Andersen et al[75] studied 708 men and obtained data of semen quality, testicle size and reproductive hormones. They reported that sperm count was positively correlated with testicular size and minor difference in FSH, while there was no difference in the concentration of reproductive hormones.


   Conclusion Top


Available data indicate that exposure to EMF can cause adverse health effects. It is also reported that biological effects may occur at very low levels of exposure. The RFR effect can be more intensified based on the range and duration of the exposure. The RFR can also exert adverse effects in the first few minutes. Persistent exposures of EMF radiation can result in health hazards because these radiations interfere with normal physiological and biological function of the body. EMF works as an environmental pollutant and has undesirable health effects on animals and humans. Several developed countries have already established health-based guidelines for exposure level for their countries. India has also developed health-based guidelines for exposure level of RFR from cell phones and cell phone base stations, but given the difference in environmental conditions, and lower muscle contents, bone mineral density, fat content, etc., of Indians than the people of developed nations, there is a need to have a mid-course correction in the existing exposure limit of RFR in the country.

Financial support & sponsorship: None.

Conflicts of Interest: None.



 
   References Top

1.
Vermont Department of Health. Radio Frequency Radiation and Health: Smart Meters. Available from: http://www.healthvermont.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2016/11/PHA_radio_frequency_radiation_and_health_smart_meters.pdf, accessed on June 7, 2018.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Behari J. Biological responses of mobile phone frequency exposure. Indian J Exp Biol 2010; 48 : 959-81.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Yakymenko I, Tsybulin O, Sidorik E, Henshel D, Kyrylenko O, Kyrylenko S, et al. Oxidative mechanisms of biological activity of low-intensity radiofrequency radiation. Electromagn Biol Med 2016; 35 : 186-202.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Cleary SF, Liu LM, Merchant RE. Glioma proliferation modulated in vitro by isothermal radiofrequency radiation exposure. Radiat Res 1990; 121 : 38-45.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Cleary SF, Liu LM, Merchant RE. In vitro lymphocyte proliferation induced by radio-frequency electromagnetic radiation under isothermal conditions. Bioelectromagnetics 1990; 11 : 47-56.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Chiang H. Microwave and ELE Electromagnetic Field Effects on Intracellular Communication. Vol. 20. Proceeding of 20th Annual International Conference of IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Hong Kong; 1998. p. 2798-801.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Repacholi MH. Low-level exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields: Health effects and research needs. Bioelectromagnetics 1998; 19 : 1-19.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Paulraj R, Behari J. Radio frequency radiation effects on protein kinase C activity in rats' brain. Mutat Res 2004; 545 : 127-30.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Aitken RJ, Bennetts LE, Sawyer D, Wiklendt AM, King BV. Impact of radio frequency electromagnetic radiation on DNA integrity in the male germline. Int J Androl 2005; 28 : 171-9.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Erogul O, Oztas E, Yildirim I, Kir T, Aydur E, Komesli G, et al. Effects of electromagnetic radiation from a cellular phone on human sperm motility: An in vitro study. Arch Med Res 2006; 37 : 840-3.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Yan JG, Agresti M, Bruce T, Yan YH, Granlund A, Matloub HS. Effects of cellular phone emissions on sperm motility in rats. Fertil Steril 2007; 88 : 957-64.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Avendaño C, Mata A, Sanchez Sarmiento CA, Doncel GF. Use of laptop computers connected to internet through Wi-Fi decreases human sperm motility and increases sperm DNA fragmentation. Fertil Steril 2012; 97 : 39-45.e2.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Zhang DY, Xu ZP, Chiang H, Lu DQ, Zeng QL. Effects of GSM 1800 MHz radiofrequency electromagnetic fields on DNA damage in Chinese hamster lung cells. Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2006; 40 : 149-52.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Saunders RD, Kowalczuk CI. Effects of 2.45 GHz microwave radiation and heat on mouse spermatogenic epithelium. Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med 1981; 40 : 623-32.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Diem E, Schwarz C, Adlkofer F, Jahn O, Rüdiger H. Non-thermal DNA breakage by mobile-phone radiation (1800 MHz) in human fibroblasts and in transformed GFSH-R17 rat granulosa cells in vitro. Mutat Res 2005; 583 : 178-83.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Kim YW, Kim HS, Lee JS, Kim YJ, Lee SK, Seo JN, et al. Effects of 60 Hz 14 MicroT magnetic field on the apoptosis of testicular germ cell in mice. Bioelectromagnetics 2009; 30 : 66-72.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Cecconi S, Gualtieri G, Di Bartolomeo A, Troiani G, Cifone MG, Canipari R. Evaluation of the effects of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields on mammalian follicle development. Hum Reprod 2000; 15 : 2319-25.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Gul A, Celebi H, Uǧraş S. The effects of microwave emitted by cellular phones on ovarian follicles in rats. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2009; 280 : 729-33.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Lin H, Blank M, Rossol-Haseroth K, Goodman R. Regulating genes with electromagnetic response elements. J Cell Biochem 2001; 81 : 143-8.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Ogawa K, Nabae K, Wang J, Wake K, Watanabe S, Kawabe M, et al. Effects of gestational exposure to 1.95-GHz W-CDMA signals for IMT-2000 cellular phones: Lack of embryotoxicity and teratogenicity in rats. Bioelectromagnetics 2009; 30 : 205-12.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Bernabò N, Tettamanti E, Pistilli MG, Nardinocchi D, Berardinelli P, Mattioli M, et al. Effects of 50 Hz extremely low frequency magnetic field on the morphology and function of boar spermatozoa capacitated in vitro. Theriogenology 2007; 67 : 801-15.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Roychoudhury S, Jedlicka J, Parkanyi V, Rafay J, Ondruska L, Massanyi P, et al. Influence of a 50 Hz extra low frequency electromagnetic field on spermatozoa motility and fertilization rates in rabbits. J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng 2009; 44 : 1041-7.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Sepehrimanesh M, Kazemipour N, Saeb M, Nazifi S, Davis DL. Proteomic analysis of continuous 900-MHz radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure in testicular tissue: A rat model of human cell phone exposure. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2017; 24 : 13666-73.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Dasdag S, Taş M, Akdag MZ, Yegin K. Effect of long-term exposure of 2.4GHz radiofrequency radiation emitted from Wi-Fi equipment on testes functions. Electromagn Biol Med 2015; 34 : 37-42.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Ozguner M, Koyu A, Cesur G, Ural M, Ozguner F, Gokcimen A, et al. Biological and morphological effects on the reproductive organ of rats after exposure to electromagnetic field. Saudi Med J 2005; 26 : 405-10.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Lee HJ, Pack JK, Kim TH, Kim N, Choi SY, Lee JS, et al. The lack of histological changes of CDMA cellular phone-based radio frequency on rat testis. Bioelectromagnetics 2010; 31 : 528-34.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Varma MM, Traboulay EA Jr. Biological effects of microwave radiation on the testes of Swiss mice. Experientia 1975; 31 : 301-2.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Kowalczuk CI, Saunders RD, Stapleton HR. Sperm count and sperm abnormality in male mice after exposure to 2.45 GHz microwave radiation. Mutat Res 1983; 122 : 155-61.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Straume A, Oftedal G, Johnsson A. Skin temperature increase caused by a mobile phone: A methodological infrared camera study. Bioelectromagnetics 2005; 26 : 510-9.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Lee JS, Ahn SS, Jung KC, Kim YW, Lee SK. Effects of 60 Hz electromagnetic field exposure on testicular germ cell apoptosis in mice. Asian J Androl 2004; 6 : 29-34.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Saygin M, Caliskan S, Karahan N, Koyu A, Gumral N, Uguz A. Testicular apoptosis and histopathological changes induced by a 2.45 GHz electromagnetic field. Toxicol Ind Health 2011; 27 : 455-63.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Imai N, Kawabe M, Hikage T, Nojima T, Takahashi S, Shirai T, et al. Effects on rat testis of 1.95-GHz W-CDMA for IMT-2000 cellular phones. Syst Biol Reprod Med 2011; 57 : 204-9.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Salama N, Kishimoto T, Kanayama HO, Kagawa S. The mobile phone decreases fructose but not citrate in rabbit semen: A longitudinal study. Syst Biol Reprod Med 2009; 55 : 181-7.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Dasdag S, Zulkuf Akdag M, Aksen F, Yilmaz F, Bashan M, Mutlu Dasdag M, et al. Whole body exposure of rats to microwaves emitted from a cell phone does not affect the testes. Bioelectromagnetics 2003; 24 : 182-8.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Khillare B, Behari J. Effect of amplitude-modulated radiofrequency radiation on reproduction pattern in rats. Electromagn Biol Med 1998; 17 : 43-55.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Ribeiro EP, Rhoden EL, Horn MM, Rhoden C, Lima LP, Toniolo L, et al. Effects of subchronic exposure to radio frequency from a conventional cellular telephone on testicular function in adult rats. J Urol 2007; 177 : 395-9.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Forgács Z, Kubinyi G, Sinay G, Bakos J, Hudák A, Surján A, et al. Effects of 1800 MHz GSM-like exposure on the gonadal function and hematological parameters of male mice. Magy Onkol 2005; 49 : 149-51.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Guney M, Ozguner F, Oral B, Karahan N, Mungan T. 900 MHz radiofrequency-induced histopathologic changes and oxidative stress in rat endometrium: Protection by vitamins E and C. Toxicol Ind Health 2007; 23 : 411-20.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Hong CY, Chiang BN, Turner P. Calcium ion is the key regulator of human sperm function. Lancet 1984; 2 : 1449-51.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Moustafa YM, Moustafa RM, Belacy A, Abou-El-Ela SH, Ali FM. Effects of acute exposure to the radiofrequency fields of cellular phones on plasma lipid peroxide and antioxidase activities in human erythrocytes. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2001; 26 : 605-8.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Tenorio BM, Jimenez GC, Morais RN, Torres SM, Albuquerque Nogueira R, Silva Junior VA, et al. Testicular development evaluation in rats exposed to 60Hz and 1mT electromagnetic field. J Appl Toxicol 2011; 31 : 223-30.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Malpaux B, Daveau A, Maurice F, Gayrard V, Thiery JC. Short-day effects of melatonin on luteinizing hormone secretion in the ewe: Evidence for central sites of action in the mediobasal hypothalamus. Biol Reprod 1993; 48 : 752-60.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Kato M, Honma K, Shigemitsu T, Shiga Y. Circularly polarized 50-hz magnetic field exposure reduces pineal gland and blood melatonin concentrations of long-Evans rats. Neurosci Lett 1994; 166 : 59-62.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Yellon SM. Acute 60 Hz magnetic field exposure effects on the melatonin rhythm in the pineal gland and circulation of the adult Djungarian hamster. J Pineal Res 1994; 16 : 136-44.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.
Wang SM, Wang DW, Peng RY, Gao YB, Yang Y, Hu WH, et al. Effect of electromagnetic pulse irradiation on structure and function of Leydig cells in mice. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue 2003; 9 : 327-30.  Back to cited text no. 45
    
46.
Forgács Z, Somosy Z, Kubinyi G, Bakos J, Hudák A, Surján A, et al. Effect of whole-body 1800 MHz GSM-like microwave exposure on testicular steroidogenesis and histology in mice. Reprod Toxicol 2006; 22 : 111-7.  Back to cited text no. 46
    
47.
Zhou W, Wang XB, Yang JQ, Liu Y, Zhang GB. Influence of electromagnetic irradiation on P450scc mRNA expression in rat testis tissues and protective effect of the shield. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue 2005; 11 : 269-71.  Back to cited text no. 47
    
48.
Oyewopo AO, Olaniyi SK, Oyewopo CI, Jimoh AT. Radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation from cell phone causes defective testicular function in male Wistar rats. Andrologia 2017; 49 : e12772.  Back to cited text no. 48
    
49.
Jung KA, Ahn HS, Lee YS, Gye MC. Effect of a 20 kHz sawtooth magnetic field exposure on the estrous cycle in mice. J Microbiol Biotechnol 2007; 17 : 398-402.  Back to cited text no. 49
    
50.
Rodriguez M, Petitclerc D, Burchard JF, Nguyen DH, Block E. Blood melatonin and prolactin concentrations in dairy cows exposed to 60 Hz electric and magnetic fields during 8 h photoperiods. Bioelectromagnetics 2004; 25 : 508-15.  Back to cited text no. 50
    
51.
Dawson BV, Robertson IG, Wilson WR, Zwi LJ, Boys JT, Green AW. Evaluation of potential health effects of 10 kHz magnetic fields: A rodent reproductive study. Bioelectromagnetics 1998; 19 : 162-71.  Back to cited text no. 51
    
52.
Aydin M, Cevik A, Kandemir FM, Yuksel M, Apaydin AM. Evaluation of hormonal change, biochemical parameters, and histopathological status of uterus in rats exposed to 50-Hz electromagnetic field. Toxicol Ind Health 2009; 25 : 153-8.  Back to cited text no. 52
    
53.
Yamashita H, Hata K, Yamaguchi H, Tsurita G, Wake K, Watanabe S, et al. Short-term exposure to a 1439-MHz TDMA signal exerts no estrogenic effect in rats. Bioelectromagnetics 2010; 31 : 573-5.  Back to cited text no. 53
    
54.
Oral B, Guney M, Ozguner F, Karahan N, Mungan T, Comlekci S, et al. Endometrial apoptosis induced by a 900-MHz mobile phone: Preventive effects of vitamins E and C. Adv Ther 2006; 23 : 957-73.  Back to cited text no. 54
    
55.
Kuzay D, Ozer C, Sirav B, Canseven AG, Seyhan N. Oxidative effects of extremely low frequency magnetic field and radio frequency radiation on testes tissues of diabetic and healthy rats. Bratisl Lek Listy 2017; 118 : 278-82.  Back to cited text no. 55
    
56.
Kesari KK, Behari J. Effects of microwave at 2.45 GHz radiations on reproductive system of male rats. Toxicol Environ Chem 2010; 92 : 1135-47.  Back to cited text no. 56
    
57.
Kesari KK, Behari J. Microwave exposure affecting reproductive system in male rats. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2010; 162 : 416-28.  Back to cited text no. 57
    
58.
Kesari KK, Kumar S, Behari J. Effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic wave exposure from cellular phones on the reproductive pattern in male Wistar rats. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2011; 164 : 546-59.  Back to cited text no. 58
    
59.
Kesari KK, Kumar S, Behari J. Mobile phone usage and male infertility in Wistar rats. Indian J Exp Biol 2010; 48 : 987-92.  Back to cited text no. 59
    
60.
Lai H, Singh NP. Single – And double-strand DNA breaks in rat brain cells after acute exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation. Int J Radiat Biol 1996; 69 : 513-21.  Back to cited text no. 60
    
61.
Garaj-Vrhovac V, Horvat D, Koren Z. The effect of microwave radiation on the cell genome. Mutat Res 1990; 243 : 87-93.  Back to cited text no. 61
    
62.
Maes A, Verschaeve L, Arroyo A, De Wagter C, Vercruyssen L. In vitro cytogenetic effects of 2450 MHz waves on human peripheral blood lymphocytes. Bioelectromagnetics 1993; 14 : 495-501.  Back to cited text no. 62
    
63.
Sarkar S, Ali S, Behari J. Effect of low power microwave on the mouse genome: A direct DNA analysis. Mutat Res 1994; 320 : 141-7.  Back to cited text no. 63
    
64.
Aitken RJ, Baker MA. Oxidative stress, sperm survival and fertility control. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2006; 250 : 66-9.  Back to cited text no. 64
    
65.
Nikolova T, Czyz J, Rolletschek A, Blyszczuk P, Fuchs J, Jovtchev G, et al. Electromagnetic fields affect transcript levels of apoptosis-related genes in embryonic stem cell-derived neural progenitor cells. FASEB J 2005; 19 : 1686-8.  Back to cited text no. 65
    
66.
De Iuliis GN, Newey RJ, King BV, Aitken RJ. Mobile phone radiation induces reactive oxygen species production and DNA damage in human spermatozoa in vitro. PLoS One 2009; 4 : e6446.  Back to cited text no. 66
    
67.
Gollapudi BB, McFadden LG. Sample size for the estimation of polychromatic to normochromatic erythrocyte ratio in the bone marrow micronucleus test. Mutat Res 1995; 347 : 97-9.  Back to cited text no. 67
    
68.
Borhani N, Rajaei F, Salehi Z, Javadi A. Analysis of DNA fragmentation in mouse embryos exposed to an extremely low-frequency electromagnetic field. Electromagn Biol Med 2011; 30 : 246-52.  Back to cited text no. 68
    
69.
Ohnishi Y, Mizuno F, Sato T, Yasui M, Kikuchi T, Ogawa M, et al. Effects of power frequency alternating magnetic fields on reproduction and pre-natal development of mice. J Toxicol Sci 2002; 27 : 131-8.  Back to cited text no. 69
    
70.
Sage C, Carpenter DO, editors. A rationale for a biologically-based exposure standard for electromagnetic fields (ELF and RF). BioInitiative Working Group; 2012. Available from: http://www.bioinitiative.org, accessed on June 7, 2018.  Back to cited text no. 70
    
71.
Rezk AY, Abdulqawi K, Mustafa RM, Abo El-Azm TM, Al-Inany H. Fetal and neonatal responses following maternal exposure to mobile phones. Saudi Med J 2008; 29 : 218-23.  Back to cited text no. 71
    
72.
Fejes I, Závaczki Z, Szöllosi J, Koloszár S, Daru J, Kovács L, et al. Is there a relationship between cell phone use and semen quality? Arch Androl 2005; 51 : 385-93.  Back to cited text no. 72
    
73.
Wdowiak A, Wdowiak L, Wiktor H. Evaluation of the effect of using mobile phones on male fertility. Ann Agric Environ Med 2007; 14 : 169-72.  Back to cited text no. 73
    
74.
Agarwal A, Desai NR, Makker K, Varghese A, Mouradi R, Sabanegh E, et al. Effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic waves (RF-EMW) from cellular phones on human ejaculated semen: An in vitro pilot study. Fertil Steril 2009; 92 : 1318-25.  Back to cited text no. 74
    
75.
Andersen AG, Jensen TK, Carlsen E, Jørgensen N, Andersson AM, Krarup T, et al. High frequency of sub-optimal semen quality in an unselected population of young men. Hum Reprod 2000; 15 : 366-72.  Back to cited text no. 75
    




 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
    Radiofrequency R...
    Radiofrequency R...
    Epidemiological ...
   Conclusion
    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed299    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded63    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal