Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research
  Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login  
  Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Users Online: 572       

   Table of Contents      
CORRESPONDENCE
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 148  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 346-347

Authors' Response


Nutrition Foundation of India, New Delhi 110 016, India

Date of Submission16-Aug-2018
Date of Web Publication13-Nov-2018

Correspondence Address:
Prema Ramachandran
Nutrition Foundation of India, New Delhi 110 016
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0971-5916.245301

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Kalaivani K, Ramachandran P. Authors' Response. Indian J Med Res 2018;148:346-7

How to cite this URL:
Kalaivani K, Ramachandran P. Authors' Response. Indian J Med Res [serial online] 2018 [cited 2018 Dec 14];148:346-7. Available from: http://www.ijmr.org.in/text.asp?2018/148/3/346/245301

The issues raised by Gupta et al[1] have been stated in our published article[2]. Data from NFHS series showed that there was no consistent decline in prevalence of anaemia in pregnancy between 1998 and 2015 at State or national level. Data from DLHS 2, 4 and AHS CAB showed decline in prevalence and severity of anaemia in all States except Uttarakhand (where AHS CAB survey was not done in all districts)[2]. Factors associated with reduction in anaemia in different States were not explored in the published article[2].

Global and Indian studies have shown that Hemo Cue is not an accurate method for Hb estimation. Use of this convenient but not accurate method could have been the reason for the reported lower levels of anaemia, as well as lack of consistent decline in prevalence of anaemia in NFHS series. Cyanmethaemoglobin method is the gold standard method for Hb estimation; DLHS 2, 4 and AHS CAB used this method and showed that in 2002-2004 prevalence of anaemia was high and in 2014-2015 there was a reduction in prevalence of anaemia in pregnancy.

Data on prevalence of anaemia in pregnancy from NFHS series (NFHS 2, 3 and 4) were compared (not combined) with DLHS 2, 4, and AHS CAB. A national team of experts designed the sampling frames for all these massive surveys, so that State and national level estimates of parameters including prevalence of anaemia could be made.



 
   References Top

1.
Gupta A, Kapil R, Kapil U. Reduction in prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women. Indian J Med Res 2018; 148 : 345-7.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Kalaivani K, Ramachandran P. Time trends in prevalence of anaemia in pregnancy. Indian J Med Res 2018; 147 : 268-77.  Back to cited text no. 2
    




 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed77    
    Printed1    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded52    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal