Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research
  Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login  
  Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Users Online: 2273       

   Table of Contents      
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 147  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 256-262

Whole-body 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) for staging locally advanced breast cancer: A prospective study from a tertiary cancer centre in south India


1 Department of Surgical Oncology, Sri Venkateswara Institute of Medical Sciences, Tirupati, India
2 Department of Radiology, Sri Venkateswara Institute of Medical Sciences, Tirupati, India
3 Department of Pathology, Sri Venkateswara Institute of Medical Sciences, Tirupati, India
4 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sri Venkateswara Institute of Medical Sciences, Tirupati, India

Date of Submission14-Aug-2016
Date of Web Publication18-Jun-2018

Correspondence Address:
Dr Narendra Hulikal
Department of Surgical Oncology, Sri Venkateswara Institute of Medical Sciences, Tirupati 517 501, Andhra Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1368_16

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Background & objectives: Locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) is associated with substantial risk of occult metastases. The patients with LABC have high rate of systemic relapse, suggesting inadequacy of the current conventional staging in detecting the occult metastatic spread. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) is a new modality in the staging of breast cancer patients. Hence, this study was conducted to evaluate the role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in initial staging of LABC and to compare it with conventional methods.
Methods: This prospective study included biopsy-confirmed female patients diagnosed with LABC meeting the selection criteria and attending surgical, medical and radiation oncology departments of a tertiary care centre in south India, from April 2013 to December 2014. Conventional workup included serum chemistry, mammogram, bone scan, contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) chest and upper abdomen and ultrasound abdomen and pelvis. All patients following conventional workup underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT.
Results: In this study, 61 women with LABC underwent both conventional workup and 18F-FGD PET/CT. The 18F-FDG PET/CT, in comparison to conventional workup, revealed unsuspected N3 nodal disease in 11 more patients, revealed distant metastasis in seven more patients and also detected extra sites of metastasis in five patients. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of PET/CT to detect distant metastasis were 95, 98, 95, 98 and 97 per cent, respectively, whereas the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of conventional imaging to detect distant metastasis were 65, 93, 81, 84 and 84 per cent, respectively.
Interpretation & conclusions: The 18F-FDG PET/CT was found to be more accurate than conventional imaging for staging and modified stage and treatment in 30 and 38 per cent of patients, respectively. It was particularly useful in detecting occult distant metastasis and N3 nodal disease with an added advantage of examining whole body in single session. However, CECT chest was superior over 18F-FDG PET/CT for detecting pulmonary metastasis.

Keywords: Breast neoplasms - computed tomography - distant metastasis - 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose - PET/CT


How to cite this article:
Gajjala SR, Hulikal N, Kadiyala S, Kottu R, Kalawat T. Whole-body 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) for staging locally advanced breast cancer: A prospective study from a tertiary cancer centre in south India. Indian J Med Res 2018;147:256-62

How to cite this URL:
Gajjala SR, Hulikal N, Kadiyala S, Kottu R, Kalawat T. Whole-body 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) for staging locally advanced breast cancer: A prospective study from a tertiary cancer centre in south India. Indian J Med Res [serial online] 2018 [cited 2019 Oct 23];147:256-62. Available from: http://www.ijmr.org.in/text.asp?2018/147/3/256/234598

Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in the developed world. Locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) poses a significant challenge to healthcare budget in the less developed world as it contributes to anywhere between 30 and 60 per cent of the total breast cancer patients [1]. According to the available data, the chance of harbouring occult metastasis in this subset of breast cancer patients is around 20 per cent [2]. Correct staging of disease in these patients is crucial from treatment point of view, healthcare costs and prognostication. At present patients clinically diagnosed with LABC are evaluated with the conventional tools consisting of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) of the chest and abdomen, a whole-body bone scintigraphy apart from the serum chemistry [3]. Following this initial staging, patients who staged LABC would undergo multimodal treatment consisting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgery and radiation. In such patients, the initial extent of disease, defined by clinical examination and imaging studies, is a critical determinant of subsequent loco-regional therapeutic decisions. Therefore, women with LABC require careful, comprehensive workup before initiation of multimodality treatment. Further, LABC patients have high rate of systemic relapse during follow up, so the current conventional baseline staging evaluations are likely to underestimate the extent of disease [4]. Consequently, there is a need for more sophisticated staging procedures to exclude patients with metastatic disease from this aggressive treatment strategy in LABC. Studies have shown that positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) can detect extra-axillary disease as well as occult systemic spread missed by the conventional staging methods [5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11]. Most of these studies are from western world, with only a few from India. The aim of this study was therefore, to evaluate the utility of 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18 F-FDG) PET/CT in initial staging of LABC and to compare it with conventional methods.


   Material & Methods Top


This prospective study was conducted at Sri Venkateswara Institute of Medical Sciences (SVIMS), Tirupati, Chittoor district, Andhra Pradesh, India from April 2013 to December 2014. The study protocol was approved by the institutional ethics committee and all participants gave written informed consent.

All consecutive female patients with the biopsy-proven, unilateral, newly diagnosed LABC [defined as those belonging to stage III, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC/TNM), 7th edition, 2010[12] after conventional staging] presenting to surgical, medical or radiation oncology departments of SVIMS, Tirupati, during the study period were included. Those with early breast cancer, who have already received treatment elsewhere, male patients with breast cancer, and patients with LABC who did not give consent for the study, were excluded.

All patients presenting with clinical suspicion of LABC underwent initial core needle or incisional biopsy of the tumour for histological confirmation and immunohistochemistry for hormone receptor status, HER2/neu amplification and Ki-67 expression [13]. Tumour molecular subtype was classified as luminal-A (hormonal receptor positive, no HER2/neu overexpression and Ki-67 <14%); luminal-B (hormonal receptor positive with HER2/neu overexpression or Ki-67 >14%); HER2/neu rich (hormonal receptor negative with HER2/neu overexpression) and triple-negative [triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC)] when hormonal receptor and HER2/neu were negative [14]. The conventional staging included serum chemistry, mammo-sonogram of the breast,99m Tc-MDP bone scan, ultrasonography of the abdomen and pelvis and CECT chest and upper abdomen. All patients underwent whole-body 18 F-FDG PET/CT (Biograph 6, Siemens, Germany). Patients were fasting for minimum 6 hours, and the blood glucose level was <160 mg/dl at the time of isotope injection. Ten milli-Curie of 18 F-FDG was injected intravenously and the images were acquired after 60 minutes. No intravenous contrast was used, and 30 ml of oral contrast mixed in water was used. Imaging was done in supine position from vertex to the mid-thigh level with both the arms raised. The patients could breathe normally, and the first CT was performed with 5 mm cuts followed by PET acquisition every 2 min per bed position in three-dimensional mode. The images were fused and reviewed with TrueD Software (Siemens). The lesions were analyzed using maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax). SUVmax was calculated using the formula based on body weight. The SUVmax was measured in breast tumour, regional lymph nodes and areas of metastasis. Extra-axillary lymph node involvement was confirmed using fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC), and distant metastasis was confirmed with biopsy or FNAC wherever possible. When PET/CT or conventional imaging detected multiple lesions with typical appearance of metastases, such as lytic/blastic or mixed lesions in the skeleton, multiple lung nodules and multiple liver lesions, those were considered as distant metastases. When solitary lesion was detected, it was confirmed with histopathology wherever possible. Where lesion was solitary and biopsy was not possible, other sensitive imaging studies such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the spine were done.

Statistical analysis: Statistical analysis was done using IBM SPSS software version 20.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Median SUVmax and mean SUVmax were calculated. Mean SUVmax among various molecular subtypes was compared using ANOVA with post hoc analysis to look for significant association between them. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of conventional and PET/CT for staging were calculated.


   Results Top


A total of 61 patients met the selection criteria and underwent both conventional staging and 18 F-FDG PET/CT. The patient and tumour characteristics are given in [Table 1].
Table 1: Tumour characteristics of patients (n=61)

Click here to view


The 18 F-FDG PET/CT detected primary site of cancer in all the patients and the SUVmax ranged from 3.5 to 42.6, with a median of 13.2 with interquartile range of 9.73-16.65. The mean SUVmax of the breast tumour was 14.69. The mean SUVmax of primary breast lesion among the molecular subtypes was luminal-A: 9.18, luminal-B: 14.39, Her-2: 14.38 and TNBC: 16.56. The mean SUVmax in TNBC patients was significantly higher than luminal-A patients (P=0.022). There was no significant difference among other molecular subtypes.

Of the 60 patients with clinically palpable axillary lymph node, eight patients showed no metabolic activity in the axillary lymph node. The sensitivity and specificity of PET/CT for detecting the axillary Level I and II lymph nodes were 87 and 100 per cent, respectively. The N3 disease was seen in 19 (31%) patients, and the sites were Level III axillary lymph node (LN) (N3a) alone in six, internal mammary (IM) and Level III axillary LN (N3b) in five, supraclavicular lymph node (SCLN)±IM or Level III LN in four and SCLN (N3c) alone in four patients. Confirmation of involvement for IM and Level III LN was based on imaging and FDG activity (SUVmax) and for SCLN was done by FNAC. PET/CT detected all 19 patients with N3 disease and revealed unsuspected N3 nodal in 11 (18%) additional patients not detected on conventional imaging. Among these 11 patients, three had distant metastasis, so PET/CT upstaged eight patients with stages IIIA/B to stage IIIC.

Distant metastasis: Occult distant metastasis was detected in 20 (33%) patients [Figure 1]. The sites of metastasis were bone - 12, distant LN - 11, lung - 9, liver - 6 and brain - 1 as shown in [Table 2]. Conventional imaging revealed metastasis in 16 patients, of whom three were false positive. It did not detect distant metastasis in seven (11.5%) patients (false negative) and they were all picked by 18 F-FDG PET/CT. Among these seven patients, one had contralateral SCLN which was confirmed by FNAC, one had multiple liver metastasis, one had lytic bone lesions and the remaining four had multiple site metastasis. Of these seven patients, three had luminal-B tumours, two had TNBC tumours and one each had luminal-A and Her2/neu-rich tumours. Three patients were premenopausal, three were aged <50 yr, one was 55 yr old, and three were >60 yr. The 18 F-FDG PET/CT detected distant metastasis in 20 patients, of whom one was falsely diagnosed as lung metastasis, which turned out to be abscess on biopsy. PET/CT was false negative in one patient which was detected by bone scan and was confirmed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) spine. In comparison to conventional workup, PET/CT detected additional sites of metastasis in five patients. PET/CT downstaged 5 per cent (n=3) of patients from stage IV to stage III. The comparison between conventional imaging and PET/CT to detect distant metastasis is given in [Table 3].
Figure 1: (A) Maximal intensity projection image showing breast lesion with secondaries in spine and liver, (B) Sagittal positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) image showing bone metastasis. Axial PET/CT images (C) showing primary in breast with liver metastasis, (D) lesion in vertebral body.

Click here to view
Table 2: Sites of metastasis in conventional imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT)

Click here to view
Table 3: Comparison of 18F-flourodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) and conventional imaging in detecting distant metastasis

Click here to view


Comparison of 99m Tc-MDP bone scan with 18 F-FDG PET/CT: Bone was the common site of metastasis and was seen in 12 (20%) patients. Bone scan missed six patients with osteolytic and two patients with osteoblastic osseous metastasis, which were detected on 18 F-FDG PET/CT. The bone scan had false-positive findings in three patients; the site of the lesion was spine in two cases and first costochondral junction in one patient. These lesions which were negative on PET/CT were further confirmed with MRI spine and CECT chest. The 18 F-FDG PET/CT missed one osteoblastic metastasis, which was picked up by bone scan and further confirmed with MRI spine. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and accuracy in diagnosing bone lesions were, respectively, 50, 94, 57, 85 and 82 per cent for bone scan and 92, 100, 100, 98 and 98 per cent for 18 F-FDG PET/CT.

Comparison of CECT chest with 18 F-FDG PET/CT for pulmonary metastasis:Pulmonary metastasis was present in nine (15%) patients, and all of them were diagnosed by the CECT chest. However,18 F-FDG PET/CT missed pulmonary metastasis in two patients. Since these two patients harboured additional distant visceral metastasis, this did not affect the staging. In one patient, PET/CT falsely characterized lung lesion as metastasis which was found to be abscess on biopsy. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy for 18 F-FDG PET/CT in diagnosing pulmonary lesions were 78, 98, 87.5, 96 and 95 per cent, respectively.

Other sites: The 18 F-FDG PET/CT revealed distant lymph node involvement in 11 (18%) patients, of whom conventional imaging detected only in four (7%) patients. Mediastinal lymph node involvement was common and was seen in eight patients, contralateral axillary lymph node in five patients, cervical lymph nodes in two patients and abdominal lymph nodes in one patient. The hepatic metastasis was present in six (10%) patients. Conventional imaging showed solitary liver metastasis in two patients. The 18 F-FDG PET/CT detected multiple liver lesions in these two patients, in addition to detecting liver metastasis in four more patients. The PET/CT also detected brain metastasis in one patient.

Thus,18 F-FDG PET/CT changed stage in 18 patients (30%); eight were upstaged from IIIA/B to stage IIIC, seven to stage IV and three were downstaged from stage IV to stage III. Further,18 F-FDG PET/CT changed treatment plan in 23 (38%) patients. These were 18 patients as mentioned above and another five patients, in whom PET/CT revealed additional sites of metastasis.


   Discussion Top


The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines in oncology [13] recommend 18 F-FDG PET/CT as category 2B option for the workup of a patient with LABC. The panel also advocates the performance of PET/CT, particularly in patients with equivocal or suspicious findings on standard staging studies [13]. One of the reasons for not advocating the routine use of the PET/CT is the lack of data showing clinical benefit. With the proven superiority of combined PET/CT over PET [15],[16], the emerging data on combined PET/CT can change the future guidelines. In comparison to conventional tools, PET/CT is a sensitive tool with reported advantages of the detection of occult metastasis, extra-axillary nodal disease and incidental second primaries [7],[8],[9],[10],[11].

In this study, significant 18 F-FDG uptake was seen in all primary breast lesions with sensitivity of 100 per cent and this was comparable to the previous studies [7],[8],[10],[17]. There was significantly higher 18 F-FDG uptake in TNBC patients when compared with luminal-A, as was evident in other studies [18],[19]. This may be because of larger size, higher proliferation and poor differentiation of TNBC tumours [20]. There was no significant difference in 18 F-FDG uptake among other subtypes.

As already known, PET/CT had difficulty in diagnosing involved axillary lymph nodes because of micrometastases. In this study, the sensitivity and specificity for detecting axillary Level I and II lymph nodes were 87 and 100 per cent, respectively. The sensitivity was higher than the study by Fuster et al[8], which showed sensitivity of 70 per cent and specificity of 100 per cent. In a meta-analysis, Cooper et al[21] noted across seven studies of PET/CT (n=862) that mean sensitivity was 56 per cent (range, 44-67%) and mean specificity was 96 per cent (range, 90-99%). The reported higher sensitivity in the present study might be attributed to higher risk among LABC patients to harbour lymph nodal metastasis. PET/CT was superior to conventional imaging in detecting the extra-axillary lymph node involvement as it was evident from the previous studies [7],[8],[10],[11]. In our study, PET/CT upstaged 13 per cent of patients to stage IIIC. This information also helped in planning the loco-regional treatment such as altering radiation field to include infraclavicular, IM or supraclavicular area.

In LABC, detection of occult metastasis has an impact on prognosis and treatment options. The patients with metastasis can be spared of aggressive multimodality treatment, and palliative local therapy such as radiotherapy for bone metastasis or radiofrequency ablation of liver lesions can be offered. In our study, 33 per cent of the patients had distant metastasis; PET/CT revealed occult metastasis in 11.5 per cent of the patients which were missed on conventional imaging. It also showed additional sites of metastases in eight per cent of patients who were harbouring metastasis on conventional workup. In a study of 117 patients with LABC, Groheux et al[10] reported that 15 (13%) cases of distant metastasis were unsuspected before FDG-PET/CT. Manohar et al[11] showed the presence of distant metastasis in 10 of 43 patients, who otherwise were negative on conventional imaging. In the present study, the PET/CT down-staged three patients from stage IV to stage III. High sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive values for PET/CT have been reported in earlier studies also [8],[9],[11].

In the evaluation of osseous metastasis, PET/CT outperformed bone scintigraphy. This can be explained by the higher pick up rate of the lytic osseous metastasis with PET/CT, which are often missed by the conventional bone scan [10],[22]. Although the blastic metastasis has lower metabolic activity and is frequently undetected on PET alone, the CT component detects sclerosis [22],[23],[24],[25],[26],[27]. For pulmonary parenchyma, although PET/CT efficiently detects nodules of more than 1 cm size, because of the partial volume effect and respiratory movements, PET lacks sensitivity for smaller nodules [28]. Further, free-breathing CT as used in the PET/CT is less efficient than the standard diagnostic thoracic CT [10],[28] in diagnosing pulmonary metastasis. This explains our finding of superiority of CECT over PET/CT in the diagnosis of pulmonary metastasis. In 18 F-FDG PET/CT, use of intravenous contrast and breath hold during acquisition of chest images may yield results equivalent to that of CECT chest and may be considered. Though 18 F-FDG PET/CT detected brain metastasis in a single patient in our study, this is not the ideal tool for picking up such metastasis due to high background activity and MRI is often preferred. Further, PET/CT was superior in detecting distant lymph node involvement as was evident in other studies [10]. In comparison to conventional tools,18 F-FDG PET/CT identified unsuspected liver lesions in four patients and additional liver lesions in two patients diagnosed to have solitary liver metastasis.

Our study had some limitations. Though the calculated sample size was 139, during the study period, 91 patients with LABC presented, of whom only 61 patients met the selection criteria. Low sample size was the major limitation of the study. Though it is known that age and menopausal status influence the prognosis of breast cancer, these might not have impacted the results of staging, and since the number was small, the results were not specifically analysed with respect to either age or menopausal status.

In conclusion, our findings showed that 18 F-FDG PET/CT was more accurate than conventional imaging for staging of cancer. It altered stage and plan of treatment in 30 and 38 per cent of patients, respectively. It was particularly useful in detecting occult distant metastasis and N3 nodal disease with an added advantage of examining whole body in a single session. With respect to detection of pulmonary metastasis,18 F-FDG PET/CT missed two of the nine lesions, all of which were picked by CECT chest.


   Acknowledgment Top


The authors acknowledge the Prandhanam Scheme of the SVIMS-Tirumala Tirupati Devastanams, Tirupati, for providing facility for free PET/CT for patients.

Financial support & sponsorship: None.

Conflicts of Interest: None.



 
   References Top

1.
Gupta D, Raina V, Rath GK, Shukla NK, Mohanti BK, Sharma DN. Clinical and pathological response rates of docetaxel-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer and comparison with anthracycline-based chemotherapies: Eight-year experience from single centre. Indian J Cancer 2011; 48 : 410-4.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.
Tham YL, Kramer R, Osborne CK. Evaluation of patients for metastasis prior to primary therapy. In: Harris JR, Lippman ME, Morrow M, Osborne CK, editors. Diseases of the breast. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010. p. 483.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Whitman GJ, Strom EA. Workup and staging of locally advanced breast cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol 2009; 19 : 211-21.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.
Al-Husaini H, Amir E, Fitzgerald B, Wright F, Dent R, Fralick J, et al. Prevalence of overt metastases in locally advanced breast cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2008; 20 : 340-4.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.
Schirrmeister H, Kühn T, Guhlmann A, Santjohanser C, Hörster T, Nüssle K, et al. Fluorine-18 2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose PET in the preoperative staging of breast cancer: Comparison with the standard staging procedures. Eur J Nucl Med 2001; 28 : 351-8.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Mahner S, Schirrmacher S, Brenner W, Jenicke L, Habermann CR, Avril N, et al. Comparison between positron emission tomography using 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose, conventional imaging and computed tomography for staging of breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2008; 19 : 1249-54.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]    
7.
Groheux D, Moretti JL, Baillet G, Espie M, Giacchetti S, Hindie E, et al. Effect of (18)F-FDG PET/CT imaging in patients with clinical stage II and III breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008; 71 : 695-704.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8.
Fuster D, Duch J, Paredes P, Velasco M, Muñoz M, Santamaría G, et al. Preoperative staging of large primary breast cancer with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography compared with conventional imaging procedures. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26 : 4746-51.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
van der Hoeven JJ, Krak NC, Hoekstra OS, Comans EF, Boom RP, van Geldere D, et al. 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography in staging of locally advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22 : 1253-9.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]    
10.
Groheux D, Giacchetti S, Delord M, Hindié E, Vercellino L, Cuvier C, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT in staging patients with locally advanced or inflammatory breast cancer: Comparison to conventional staging. J Nucl Med 2013; 54 : 5-11.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Manohar K, Mittal BR, Bhoil A, Bhattacharya A, Singh G. Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in identifying distant metastatic disease missed by conventional imaging in patients with locally advanced breast cancer. Nucl Med Commun 2013; 34 : 557-61.  Back to cited text no. 11
[PUBMED]    
12.
Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene F, Trotti A, editors. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 7th ed. New York: Springer; 2010. p. 347.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Breast Cancer, V 2.2016. Available from: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/breast.pdf, accessed on June 1, 2016.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Goldhirsch A, Wood WC, Coates AS, Gelber RD, Thürlimann B, Senn HJ, et al. Strategies for subtypes - dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: Highlights of the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011. Ann Oncol 2011; 22 : 1736-47.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Tatsumi M, Cohade C, Mourtzikos KA, Fishman EK, Wahl RL. Initial experience with FDG-PET/CT in the evaluation of breast cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2006; 33 : 254-62.  Back to cited text no. 15
[PUBMED]    
16.
Fueger BJ, Weber WA, Quon A, Crawford TL, Allen-Auerbach MS, Halpern BS, et al. Performance of 2-deoxy-2-[F-18]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography and integrated PET/CT in restaged breast cancer patients. Mol Imaging Biol 2005; 7 : 369-76.  Back to cited text no. 16
[PUBMED]    
17.
Mittal BR, Manohar K, Kashyap R, Bhattacharya A, Singh B, Singh G, et al. The role of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in initial staging of patients with locally advanced breast carcinoma with an emphasis on M staging. Hell J Nucl Med 2011; 14 : 135-9.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Basu S, Chen W, Tchou J, Mavi A, Cermik T, Czerniecki B, et al. Comparison of triple-negative and estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast carcinoma using quantitative fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose/positron emission tomography imaging parameters: A potentially useful method for disease characterization. Cancer 2008; 112 : 995-1000.  Back to cited text no. 18
[PUBMED]    
19.
Groheux D, Giacchetti S, Moretti JL, Porcher R, Espié M, Lehmann-Che J, et al. Correlation of high 18F-FDG uptake to clinical, pathological and biological prognostic factors in breast cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2011; 38 : 426-35.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Park S, Koo JS, Kim MS, Park HS, Lee JS, Lee JS, et al. Characteristics and outcomes according to molecular subtypes of breast cancer as classified by a panel of four biomarkers using immunohistochemistry. Breast 2012; 21 : 50-7.  Back to cited text no. 20
[PUBMED]    
21.
Cooper KL, Harnan S, Meng Y, Ward SE, Fitzgerald P, Papaioannou D, et al. Positron emission tomography (PET) for assessment of axillary lymph node status in early breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 2011; 37 : 187-98.  Back to cited text no. 21
[PUBMED]    
22.
Cook GJ, Houston S, Rubens R, Maisey MN, Fogelman I. Detection of bone metastases in breast cancer by 18FDG PET: Differing metabolic activity in osteoblastic and osteolytic lesions. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16 : 3375-9.  Back to cited text no. 22
[PUBMED]    
23.
Uematsu T, Yuen S, Yukisawa S, Aramaki T, Morimoto N, Endo M, et al. Comparison of FDG PET and SPECT for detection of bone metastases in breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 184 : 1266-73.  Back to cited text no. 23
[PUBMED]    
24.
Segaert I, Mottaghy F, Ceyssens S, De Wever W, Stroobants S, Van Ongeval C, et al. Additional value of PET-CT in staging of clinical stage IIB and III breast cancer. Breast J 2010; 16 : 617-24.  Back to cited text no. 24
[PUBMED]    
25.
Damle NA, Bal C, Bandopadhyaya GP, Kumar L, Kumar P, Malhotra A, et al. The role of 18F-fluoride PET-CT in the detection of bone metastases in patients with breast, lung and prostate carcinoma: A comparison with FDG PET/CT and 99mTc-MDP bone scan. Jpn J Radiol 2013; 31 : 262-9.  Back to cited text no. 25
[PUBMED]    
26.
Hahn S, Heusner T, Kümmel S, Köninger A, Nagarajah J, Müller S, et al. Comparison of FDG-PET/CT and bone scintigraphy for detection of bone metastases in breast cancer. Acta Radiol 2011; 52 : 1009-14.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Morris PG, Lynch C, Feeney JN, Patil S, Howard J, Larson SM, et al. Integrated positron emission tomography/computed tomography may render bone scintigraphy unnecessary to investigate suspected metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28 : 3154-9.  Back to cited text no. 27
[PUBMED]    
28.
Groheux D, Espié M, Giacchetti S, Hindié E. Performance of FDG PET/CT in the clinical management of breast cancer. Radiology 2013; 266 : 388-405.  Back to cited text no. 28
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]


This article has been cited by
1 Precise image fusion standardization for separated modalities using dedicated multimodal heart phantom
Katarzyna Matusiak
The Imaging Science Journal. 2018; : 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Material & Methods
   Results
   Discussion
   Acknowledgment
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed735    
    Printed4    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded179    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal