Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research
  Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login  
  Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Users Online: 645       

   Table of Contents      
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 146  |  Issue : 7  |  Page : 15-22

Investigation into a community outbreak of Salmonella Typhi in Bengaluru, India


1 Department of Hospital Infection Control, Narayana Health City, Bengaluru, India
2 Department of Microbiology, Narayana Health City, Bengaluru, India
3 Department of Microbiology, Narayana Health, Bengaluru, India
4 Department of Pathology & Microbiology, Command Hospital, Bengaluru, India
5 Sir Dorabji Tata Center for Research in Tropical Diseases, Innovation Center, Indian Institute of Science Campus, Bengaluru, India
6 Mazumdar Shaw Centre for Translational Research, Narayana Health City, Bengaluru, India

Date of Submission07-Jul-2016
Date of Web Publication4-Dec-2017

Correspondence Address:
Vasan K Sambandamurthy
Mazumdar Shaw Centre for Translational Research, Narayana Health City, A-Block, 8th Floor #258/A, Bengaluru 560 099, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1201_16

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Background & objectives: Outbreaks of infection due to Salmonella enterica servovar Typhi (S. Typhi) are a great threat to public health. A rapid molecular typing method to characterize strains implicated in an outbreak is critical in implementing appropriate control measures. This study was done to demonstrate the power of a PCR-based method to provide rapid insights into the genetic relatedness amongst the Salmonella isolates implicated in a suspected typhoid fever outbreak.
Methods: Forty two S. Typhi isolates originating from three geographically distinct areas, with one area suspected to have a single-source outbreak were included in the study. The genetic fingerprint of all isolates was generated using enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus sequence based-PCR (ERIC-PCR). The antimicrobial susceptibility profiles were also evaluated.
Results: ERIC-PCR was found to be rapid and reproducible with a discriminatory index of 0.766. The dendrogram constructed based on ERIC-PCR fingerprinting revealed the existence of 12 distinct genotypes. The location suspected to have an outbreak displayed two genotypes amongst the 24 isolates. The other two locations (18 isolates) displayed genetic heterogeneity. The clonality of the outbreak isolates from the time-matched control isolates was established. The observed antimicrobial susceptibility profiles did not have any discriminatory power to subtype the isolates compared to the genetic fingerprints.
Interpretation & conclusions: Our study demonstrated the discriminatory power and value of ERIC-PCR in the typing of S. Typhi isolates and providing valuable epidemiological insights.

Keywords: Clonality - enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus-polymerase chain reaction - outbreak investigation -Salmonella Typhi


How to cite this article:
Purighalla S, Esakimuthu S, Reddy M, Seth T, Patil SD, Varghese GK, Dasarathy R, Richard VS, Sambandamurthy VK. Investigation into a community outbreak of Salmonella Typhi in Bengaluru, India. Indian J Med Res 2017;146, Suppl S1:15-22

How to cite this URL:
Purighalla S, Esakimuthu S, Reddy M, Seth T, Patil SD, Varghese GK, Dasarathy R, Richard VS, Sambandamurthy VK. Investigation into a community outbreak of Salmonella Typhi in Bengaluru, India. Indian J Med Res [serial online] 2017 [cited 2017 Dec 11];146, Suppl S1:15-22. Available from: http://www.ijmr.org.in/text.asp?2017/146/7/15/219460

 Salmonella More Details enterica serovar Typhi (S. Typhi) is the leading cause of community-acquired bloodstream infection resulting in prolonged fever and in some cases leading to an asymptomatic carrier state [1]. Typhoid fever is widely prevalent in many regions of the world with poor sanitation. The scenario is one of either endemicity due to multiple sources of infection or occasionally a single source outbreak [2].

In a community outbreak of typhoid fever, early detection of the source of infection and rapid typing of isolates is critical for the prevention of further transmission [3]. Pulse-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) has been used as the molecular typing technique to study clonality amongst isolates [4]. This technique is expensive, laborious and has limited interlaboratory reproducibility [5]. Several rapid, PCR-based typing methods to delineate genetic relatedness of bacterial strains have been reported [6].

One such technique, based on the enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus (ERIC) relies on the PCR-based amplification of short target sequences that are highly conserved. The variability in the position of repeat elements between the genomes of bacteria has been exploited as a genetic marker to characterize isolates within a bacterial species [7]. An earlier study established ERIC-PCR to be the most reliable method for differentiation of Salmonella serovars based on a comparison of four molecular techniques [8]. In addition, molecular genotyping using ERIC-PCR is faster and cheaper than PFGE for establishing genetic relatedness amongst Salmonella serovars [9],[10]. Therefore, repetitive DNA elements remain as a valid analytical tool for epidemiological investigation of infection outbreaks in countries with limited public health resources. This study was undertaken to demonstrate the resolution of ERIC-PCR-based method to rapidly determine the genetic relatedness of S. Typhi isolates implicated in a typhoid outbreak from a single neighbourhood within a defined period of time.


   Material & Methods Top


This study was carried out in the Infection Control Laboratory at Narayana Health City, Bengaluru, India. S. Typhi isolates (24 isolates) were collected consecutively from blood cultures from patients who presented to Narayana Health, City Bengaluru, over a period of four months (December 2015-March 2016) during the outbreak, as opposed to a low number of isolates (<5) usually seen over a quarter of a year. A retrospective analysis in terms of their age, sex and geographical location was carried out to evaluate the epidemiological context of all 24 patients who were diagnosed with typhoid fever. As matching controls, 18 isolates (time-matched) that were randomly collected from two different geographical locations (Bommasandra and Ulsoor in Bengaluru) were evaluated. Most of the patients presented with continuous fever and abdominal pain with or without diarrhoea. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee, and all participants gave written informed consent.

All the isolates were identified from blood culture (20 ml blood collected during the febrile phase) using BD Phoenix Automated system (B D Diagnostic Systems, Sparks, MD, USA) following the manufacturer's guidelines.

Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles: Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of the clinical isolates were determined using the Phoenix™ (B D Diagnostic Systems) as recommended by the manufacturer. The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values obtained by the above-mentioned methods were categorized according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute breakpoints, as susceptible (S), intermediate (I) or resistant (R) to various drugs [11]. The following antibiotics were tested ampicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, ceftriaxone, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin and co-trimoxazole.

Molecular fingerprinting using enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus-polymerase chain reaction (ERIC-PCR): A single colony from a pure culture of each isolate was resuspended in sterile water and boiled for 10 min [12]. One microlitre of the boiled extract was used in a 25 μl PCR mixture to amplify the target genes using specific primers as described. The PCR amplification was performed by adding a mixture of 18 μl of sterile distilled water, 2.5 μl of 10X PCR buffer, 1 μl of 10 mM dNTPs, 1 μl of each primer, ERIC 1R: 5′-ATG TAA GCT CCT GGG GAT TCA-3′ and ERIC 2: 5′-AAG TAA GTG ACT GGG GTG AGC G-3′, 0.5 μl of Taq polymerase and 1 μl of the template DNA to the reaction mixture [7]. The cycling parameters were as follows: initial denaturation for three minutes at 94°C and thirty cycles of one minute at 94°C, three minutes at 55°C and two minutes at 72°C followed by a final amplification of 10 min at 72°C.

The amplified products were separated by electrophoresis on 1.5 per cent agarose gel and photographed under an ultraviolet transilluminator. A 100 kb DNA ladder was used as the molecular size marker.

Molecular fingerprint analysis: Isolates were categorized according to their PCR banding pattern, as identical, similar or unrelated. A similarity index was calculated using the Dice coefficient, and cluster analysis of the matrices was generated using the unweighted pair group method using arithmetic averages (UPGMA). Dendrograms of isolates were generated with the tree option using the PAST programme [13]. The discriminatory (D) index was calculated according to the method of Hunter and Gaston [14]. The index of discrimination represents the probability that two randomly chosen isolates, sampled consecutively, would be distinguished by the test and range from D=0 to D=1.


   Results Top


A total of 42 patients, (19 female and 23 male) were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 32±15 yr, ranging from 7 to 61 yr. Retrospective analysis revealed that 24 of these patients were all residents of the same locality (HSR layout in Bengaluru).

All isolates recovered from patients at three hospitals in geographically different locations within Bengaluru city were typed using ERIC-PCR. Being a community outbreak, we were unable to obtain the food or water consumed by the patients during the epicentre of this outbreak.

Molecular fingerprinting using ERIC-PCR: All 42 S. Typhiisolates were fingerprinted using ERIC-PCR to assess an epidemiological link amongst the isolates. Using specific primers for ERIC-PCR, five to eight bands were detected ranging from sizes 0.2 to 2 kb. Four bands at approximately 188, 252, 489 and 522 bp were more frequently observed in 68 per cent (29/42) of the isolates [Figure 1]. With a diversity index of 0.766 and polymorphic loci generated by this marker, 12 distinct genotypes (I-XII) were identified (≥90% similarity level). The most prevalent ERIC-PCR types were Type VII found in 45 per cent (19/42) of the isolates and Type VIII found in 17 per cent (7/42) of the isolates. The remaining genotypes contained 1-3 isolates each [Table 1].
Figure 1: A representative 1.5 per cent agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide showing the amplification pattern obtained for Salmonella Typhi isolates using enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus-polymerase chain reaction (ERIC-PCR). Lanes 1-10, 100 bp ladder, S3, S4, S5, S8, S26, S27, S30, S10, S14.

Click here to view
Table 1: Antimicrobial resistance and enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus-polymerase chain reaction. (ERIC-PCR) profiles of 42 Salmonella Typhi isolates

Click here to view


The dendrogram showed that distinct fingerprint types were observed for isolates from different geographical regions. [Figure 2] shows all isolates from neighbourhood 1 to display three distinct profiles, with one isolate (S8) quite distinct from the predominant profile from that location (ERIC-PCR Type VII and VIII). Of the 18 time-matched control isolates (S25-S42), 11 distinct ERIC-PCR fingerprints were observed. All isolates from neighbourhood 3 (S34-S42), displayed unique ERIC-PCR profiles, with the exception of isolates S36 and S37. Isolates from neighbourhood 2 (S25-S33) showed lesser variability and revealed three distinct ERIC-PCR profiles. In contrast to the above finding, geographically distant isolates occasionally shared the same ERIC-PCR profile. This was seen in isolates S25, S26, S28 (Type I), S8 and S30 (Type X). Overall, cluster analysis revealed greatest variability in isolates from neighbourhood 3 and least variability amongst isolates from neighbourhood 1.
Figure 2: Unweighted pair group method using arithmetic averages dendrograms at 90 per cent similarity level of the studied Salmonella serotype Typhi isolates derived from amplification patterns using enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus-polymerase chain reaction (ERIC-PCR). S and N numbers indicate isolate and neighbourhood numbers, respectively.

Click here to view


Antimicrobial susceptibility profile: To evaluate if there was an association between the antimicrobial susceptibility pattern and ERIC-PCR profile, the MICs of all 42 S. Typhi isolates were determined. Based on the susceptibility profile to six antimicrobials, the 42 isolates were found to group into three distinct profiles. More than half of the isolates (23/42) were susceptible to all of the drugs tested. Of the 45 percent of isolates (19/42) that were resistant to ciprofloxacin, 12 percent (5/42) displayed resistance to ceftriaxone also [Table 1].

Despite sharing a similar antibiogram, a few outbreak isolates were genetically distinct from the control isolates [Table 1]. This observation was also noted in isolates within a neighbourhood (N3). In some instances, the outbreak isolates that shared the same ERIC-PCR profile, differed in sensitivity to ciprofloxacin. Overall, there was no association between the genotype and susceptibility profile for the isolates investigated in this study.


   Discussion Top


Salmonella serovars are known to cause  Salmonellosis More Details through the consumption of contaminated food such as raw meat, milk and poultry products [2]. A rapid molecular fingerprinting method is required in an epidemiological surveillance during an outbreak. The present work evaluated the discriminatory power of ERIC-PCR genetic relatedness between S. Typhi isolates from a suspected outbreak. PFGE analysis of S. Typhi isolates from various typhoid endemic regions have shown the outbreak isolates to be homogenous and clonal in nature, whereas sporadic isolates to display a high degree of diversity [15]. Similar observation was made in the present study, wherein the outbreak isolates (neighbourhood 1) displayed very little genetic heterogeneity in comparison to isolates from the other two neighbourhoods (neighbourhood 2 and 3) where S. Typhi infections are known to be endemic. Within the outbreak isolates, there were two major clones, suggesting the likelihood of two concurrent infections caused by genetically distinct strains within the same neighbourhood. This result highlights the resolution power of ERIC-PCR method and demonstrates the value in identifying the type of strain involved in an outbreak where most of the patients have a similar clinical presentation. In addition, this method also had the power to differentiate endemic from outbreak isolates. The observed discriminatory potential (0.766) of ERIC-PCR in this study was in concordance with the report of Kumao et al[16], who showed the intraserotype discriminatory power of this technique. In another report, an analysis of S. Typhi strains from patients estimated a discriminatory index value of 0.993, reiterating the potential of ERIC-PCR [17]. In agreement with a previous report, we found low molecular weight bands in random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis to be irreproducible and faint, thereby introducing a high degree of subjectivity (data not shown)[17].

There were three categories of sensitivity patterns observed in the isolates. Isolates from the same outbreak did not share an identical antimicrobial profile possibly due to antimicrobial usage and patient compliance. The observed difference in resistance to antimicrobials within the isolates from different neighbourhood reflects likely variances in therapeutic measures, in the type of drugs and the frequency of their use. The susceptibility patterns herein reported show similarities relative to those reported for the serotype Typhi in other countries [4],[18],[19]. Consistent with earlier published reports, low level of resistance to ampicillin, chloramphenicol and co-trimoxazole was observed in all isolates [4],[20]. In agreement with previous findings, low-level resistance (5%) to the third-generation cephalosporin, ceftriaxone, was also observed in the present study [21],[22],[23]. It is well documented that drug resistance in S. Typhi arises due to either a chromosomal mutation or the acquisition of a plasmid or transposon [24]. However, in non-typhoidal Salmonella species, increased ceftriaxone resistance is linked to the expression of plasmid-mediated ampC or ESBL genes blaCTX-M and blaCMY-2[25],[26]. Given that fluoroquinolones remain an important therapeutic option for typhoid fever, it was worrisome to note that 45 per cent of the isolates were resistant to ciprofloxacin. Our results were in concordance with an earlier report on an increase in quinolone resistance amongst strains in India [27]. The emergence of drug-resistant S. Typhi isolates emphasizes the necessity to implement stringent sanitation practices to prevent community level outbreaks.

Antimicrobial profiles alone were found to be of limited value in differentiating closely related strains. However, ERIC-PCR was able to differentiate amongst isolates that were indistinguishable based on their drug susceptibility profile. No relation between the antimicrobial susceptibility pattern and ERIC profile was observed for most isolates. We observed a lack of association between the antimicrobial profile and the molecular fingerprint. For instance, isolates sharing ERIC-PCR profile VII have isolates that are susceptible as well as resistant to ciprofloxacin. It is difficult to explain why a particular cluster has isolates that display different antibiogram profiles. Lack of association between the genotype and the antimicrobial susceptibility profile has already been documented for S. enterica serotypes [9],[28],[29]. This interpretation can be explained by the fact that repetitive genetic elements are widely dispersed throughout the bacterial chromosome, whereas the genetic resistance determinants are usually clustered in defined genetic regions on the bacterial chromosome or mediated through extrachromosomal mechanisms involving plasmids or transposons. In addition, detection of isolates with different antibiotic resistance profile within a cluster suggests the likelihood of ongoing selection pressure amongst the strains belonging to a clone, making them either sensitive or resistant to a given drug. The existence of some isolates that did not cluster with any of the major clones suggest the existence and dissemination of several different haplotypes of serotype Typhi within the community resulting in independent transmission events [15],[30]. The selective pressure induced by the use of antimicrobials act as a driving force to trigger the emergence of resistance. In most instances, these mechanisms are genetically encoded and can be readily transmitted horizontally across bacterial species [24]. Given the global emergence of drug-resistant strains of Salmonella, it is imperative to restrict the usage of extended-spectrum cephalosporins and rely on continuous surveillance for resistant strainsin the environment.

The present study also documents the limitation of not collecting environmental samples during an outbreak, a limitation that hinders the design to infection prevention plans in a timely manner. This would also have provided key information into identifying the source of the outbreak.

In conclusion, our results suggested that two genetically related clones of S. Typhi were responsible for an outbreak in a neighbourhood within a short span of time. This further reinforces the power of molecular genetic markers to effectively discriminate isolates associated with outbreaks. As demonstrated in the present study, ERIC-PCR can be used for routine molecular typing of S. Typhi to provide information for designing and implementing effective prevention and control programmes.


   Acknowledgment Top


The authors thank Dr Devi Shetty for his valuable guidance throughout the course of this study. Authors also thank Drs Karthik S.M., Anirudh Shetty, Reshu Aggarwal, Avinash S, Abhinav Malhotra and Vinutha Vinutha J.O. for their clinical support. Authors thank Dr Nikhil Moorchung for providing us with control isolates (neighbourhood 3) in this study.

Conflicts of Interest: None.



 
   References Top

1.
Dougan G, Baker S. Salmonella enterica serovar typhi and the pathogenesis of typhoid fever. Annu Rev Microbiol 2014; 68 : 317-36.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.
Wain J, Hendriksen RS, Mikoleit ML, Keddy KH, Ochiai RL. Typhoid fever. Lancet 2015; 385 : 1136-45.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.
Martín MC, González-Hevia MA, Moro I, Mendoza MC. Genetic typing methods applied to the differentiation of clonal lines among Salmonella enterica serogroup G strains causing human salmonellosis. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 1997; 19 : 215-21.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Menezes GA, Harish BN, Khan MA, Goessens WH, Hays JP. Antimicrobial resistance trends in blood culture positive Salmonella typhi isolates from Pondicherry, India, 2005-2009. Clin Microbiol Infect 2012; 18 : 239-45.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.
Goering RV. Pulsed field gel electrophoresis: A review of application and interpretation in the molecular epidemiology of infectious disease. Infect Genet Evol 2010; 10 : 866-75.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    
6.
Millemann Y, Lesage-Descauses MC, Lafont JP, Chaslus-Dancla E. Comparison of random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis and enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus-PCR for epidemiological studies of Salmonella. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 1996; 14 : 129-34.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]    
7.
Versalovic J, Koeuth T, Lupski JR. Distribution of repetitive DNA sequences in eubacteria and application to fingerprinting of bacterial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 1991; 19 : 6823-31.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8.
Lim H, Lee KH, Hong CH, Bahk GJ, Choi WS. Comparison of four molecular typing methods for the differentiation of Salmonella spp. Int J Food Microbiol 2005; 105 : 411-8.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]    
9.
Turki Y, Mehri I, Cherif H, Najjari A, Aissa RB, Hassen A, et al. Epidemiology and antibiotic resistance of Salmonella enterica serovar Kentucky isolates from Tunisia: The new emergent multi-drug resistant serotype. Food Res Int 2012; 45 : 925-30.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Weigel RM, Qiao B, Teferedegne B, Suh DK, Barber DA, Isaacson RE, et al. Comparison of pulsed field gel electrophoresis and repetitive sequence polymerase chain reaction as genotyping methods for detection of genetic diversity and inferring transmission of Salmonella. Vet Microbiol 2004; 100 : 205-17.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]    
11.
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Twenty-Fourth Informational Supplement. M100-S24. Wayne, PA: CLSI; 2014.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Yang JL, Wang MS, Cheng AC, Pan KC, Li CF, Deng SX. A simple and rapid method for extracting bacterial DNA from intestinal microflora for ERIC-PCR detection. World J Gastroenterol 2008; 14 : 2872-6.  Back to cited text no. 12
[PUBMED]    
13.
Hammer Ø, Harper D, Ryan P. PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electron 2001; 4 : 1-9.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Hunter PR, Gaston MA. Numerical index of the discriminatory ability of typing systems: An application of Simpson's index of diversity. J Clin Microbiol 1988; 26 : 2465-6.  Back to cited text no. 14
[PUBMED]    
15.
Thong KL, Puthucheary S, Yassin RM, Sudarmono P, Padmidewi M, Soewandojo E, et al. Analysis of Salmonella typhi isolates from Southeast Asia by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. J Clin Microbiol 1995; 33 : 1938-41.  Back to cited text no. 15
[PUBMED]    
16.
Kumao T, Ba-Thein W, Hayashi H. Molecular subtyping methods for detection of Salmonella enterica serovar Oranienburg outbreaks. J Clin Microbiol 2002; 40 : 2057-61.  Back to cited text no. 16
[PUBMED]    
17.
Nath G, Maurya P, Gulati AK. ERIC PCR and RAPD based fingerprinting of Salmonella typhi strains isolated over a period of two decades. Infect Genet Evol 2010; 10 : 530-6.  Back to cited text no. 17
[PUBMED]    
18.
Rahman BA, Wasfy MO, Maksoud MA, Hanna N, Dueger E, House B. Multi-drug resistance and reduced susceptibility to ciprofloxacin among Salmonella enterica serovar typhi isolates from the Middle East and Central Asia. New Microbes New Infect 2014; 2 : 88-92.  Back to cited text no. 18
[PUBMED]    
19.
Mushtaq MA. What after ciprofloxacin and ceftriaxone in treatment of Salmonella typhi. Pak J Med Sci 2006; 22 : 51-4.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Singhal L, Gupta PK, Kale P, Gautam V, Ray P. Trends in antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella typhi from North India (2001-2012). Indian J Med Microbiol 2014; 32 : 149-52.  Back to cited text no. 20
[PUBMED]    
21.
Capoor MR, Nair D. Quinolone and cephalosporin resistance in enteric fever. J Glob Infect Dis 2010; 2 : 258-62.  Back to cited text no. 21
[PUBMED]    
22.
Saha SK, Talukder SY, Islam M, Saha S. A highly ceftriaxone-resistant Salmonella typhi in Bangladesh. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1999; 18 : 387.  Back to cited text no. 22
[PUBMED]    
23.
Al Naiemi N, Zwart B, Rijnsburger MC, Roosendaal R, Debets-Ossenkopp YJ, Mulder JA, et al. Extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase production in a Salmonella enterica serotype typhi strain from the Philippines. J Clin Microbiol 2008; 46 : 2794-5.  Back to cited text no. 23
[PUBMED]    
24.
Denyer SP, Hodges NA, Gorman SP, Gilmore BF. Hugo and Russell's pharmaceutical microbiology, 8th ed. New Delhi: Wiley Blackwell Publishing House; 2011.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Su LH, Wu TL, Chia JH, Chu C, Kuo AJ, Chiu CH. Increasing ceftriaxone resistance in Salmonella isolates from a university hospital in Taiwan. J Antimicrob Chemother 2005; 55 : 846-52.  Back to cited text no. 25
[PUBMED]    
26.
Li WC, Huang FY, Liu CP, Weng LC, Wang NY, Chiu NC, et al. Ceftriaxone resistance of nontyphoidal Salmonella enterica isolates in Northern Taiwan attributable to production of CTX-M-14 and CMY-2 beta-lactamases. J Clin Microbiol 2005; 43 : 3237-43.  Back to cited text no. 26
[PUBMED]    
27.
Chande CA, Chopdekar KA, Pradnya V, Unnati R, Jyoti B, Ritesh S, et al. Current trend of antibiotic sensitivity of Salmonella typhi and other Salmonellae in Mumbai: A 5 years study. Indian J Med Microbiol 2016; 34 : 115-6.  Back to cited text no. 27
[PUBMED]    
28.
Bessa MC, Michael GB, Canu N, Canal CW, Cardoso M, Rabsch W, et al. Phenotypic and genetic characterization of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhimurium isolated from pigs in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Res Vet Sci 2007; 83 : 302-10.  Back to cited text no. 28
[PUBMED]    
29.
Hyeon JY, Chon JW, Park JH, Kim MS, Oh YH, Choi IS, et al. A comparison of subtyping methods for differentiating Salmonella enterica serovar enteritidis isolates obtained from food and human sources. Osong Public Health Res Perspect 2013; 4 : 27-33.  Back to cited text no. 29
[PUBMED]    
30.
Thong KL, Cheong YM, Puthucheary S, Koh CL, Pang T. Epidemiologic analysis of sporadic Salmonella typhi isolates and those from outbreaks by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. J Clin Microbiol 1994; 32 : 1135-41.  Back to cited text no. 30
[PUBMED]    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
    Material & M...
   Results
   Discussion
   Acknowledgment
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed101    
    Printed1    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded70    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal