Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research
  Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login  
  Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Users Online: 814       

   Table of Contents      
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 146  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 420-425

Staphylococcus hominis subsp. novobiosepticus, an emerging multidrug-resistant bacterium, as a causative agent of septicaemia in cancer patients


1 Department of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Microbiology, Delhi State Cancer Institute, New Delhi, India
2 Department of Clinical Oncology, Delhi State Cancer Institute, New Delhi, India

Date of Submission28-Aug-2015
Date of Web Publication18-Jan-2018

Correspondence Address:
Dr Nishat Hussain Ahmed
Ocular Microbiology Section, Dr. RP Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110 029
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1362_15

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Staphylococcus hominis subsp. novobiosepticus is a new sub-species of S. hominis, thus dividing S. hominis into subsp. hominis and novobiosepticus. This study was designed to identify subsp. novobiosepticus isolates amongst the S. hominis isolated from blood samples of patients with malignancy and septicaemia and to study their resistance profile. The identification was performed by using three simple tests which differentiated between the two sub-species. It was found that 22.8 per cent of S. hominis isolates belonged to subsp. novobiosepticus.

Keywords: D-trehalose - N-acetyl-D-glucosamine - novobiocin - septicaemia - Staphylococcus hominis subsp. hominis - Staphylococcus hominis subsp. novobiosepticus


How to cite this article:
Ahmed NH, Baruah FK, Grover RK. Staphylococcus hominis subsp. novobiosepticus, an emerging multidrug-resistant bacterium, as a causative agent of septicaemia in cancer patients. Indian J Med Res 2017;146:420-5

How to cite this URL:
Ahmed NH, Baruah FK, Grover RK. Staphylococcus hominis subsp. novobiosepticus, an emerging multidrug-resistant bacterium, as a causative agent of septicaemia in cancer patients. Indian J Med Res [serial online] 2017 [cited 2020 Apr 4];146:420-5. Available from: http://www.ijmr.org.in/text.asp?2017/146/3/420/223624

Staphylococcus hominis is one of the three most frequently identified isolates recovered from bloodstream infections (BSIs)[1]. In 1998, characterization of subsp. novobiosepticus divided S. hominis into two sub-species namely S. hominis subsp. hominis (SHH) and S. hominis subsp. novobiosepticus (SHN)[2]. SHN is reported to be exhibiting multidrug resistance, thus leaving narrow therapeutic options[3]. SHN has been reported from the USA, Spain and Brazil as a causative agent of invasive infections and outbreaks [2],[3],[4],[5]. This study was undertaken in the Microbiology division of Laboratory Medicine department in Delhi State Cancer Institute, a tertiary care cancer centre in New Delhi, India, over a period of 10 months (September 2013- July 2014) to look for the presence of subsp. novobiosepticus in the S. hominis isolates from patients with septicaemia and also to characterize their resistance profile to various antimicrobial agents. The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Blood samples were collected from all inpatients suspected of having BSI. As far as possible, blood was collected from two different sites at the same time. From adults, 10-20 ml of blood, and from paediatric patients, 5-10 ml of blood was collected and added to BacT/ALERT ® FA Plus Blood Culture Bottles and incubated in BacT/ALERT ® 3D system (BioMe'rieux, Durham, North Carolina, USA)[6]. Sub-cultures were performed from the culture bottles flagged as positive. The colony characteristics of sub-cultured organisms were examined and Gram staining was done. Gram-positive cocci were identified in VITEK ® 2 Compact System (BioMe'rieux, Durham, North Carolina, USA) using Gram-positive GP REF 21342 identification card. The pathogenicity of all coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) isolates was confirmed. They were considered to be pathogenic if (i) the same isolate was obtained from blood drawn from two or more peripheral sites, and/or (ii) the clinical presentation correlated with the isolate and condition improved on administration of specific antimicrobial therapy. In cases where a single blood specimen was received, or organism was isolated in one out of two samples received, a repeat blood specimen was obtained and similarly cultured. The patients were examined and their records were studied for clinical correlation. Those pathogenic isolates which were identified as S. hominis were preserved in nutrient agar slopes at 4°C for later confirmation of sub-species[6]. The pathogenic isolates of CoNS which were not identified as S. hominis and those isolates of S. hominis which were not considered to be pathogens were excluded from the study. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was done using VITEK ® 2 AST card P-628 (BioMe'rieux). Antibiogram results were expressed as susceptible, intermediate or resistant according to the criteria of the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)[7].

For confirmation of sub-species, all S. hominis isolates were subjected to testing for novobiocin susceptibility and the production of acid aerobically from D-trehalose and N-acetyl-D-glucosamine (NAG)[8]. Novobiocin susceptibility was tested by Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method[8] using 5 μg novobiocin disc (HiMedia ® Laboratories, Mumbai) in Mueller-Hinton agar. A zone size of <16 mm after incubation at 35°C for 24 h was considered indicative of resistance. The quality of novobiocin disc was checked using laboratory strains of Staphylococcus saprophyticus (resistant) and S. epidermidis (sensitive)[8]. Aerobic fermentation of D-trehalose and NAG was tested using peptone water fermentation medium with Andrade's indicator (HiMedia ® Laboratories). After overnight incubation of the inoculated medium at 37°C, a change in colour to dark pink was interpreted as positive and to light pink was considered as weak positive. Positive controls (Klebsiella pneumoniae for D-trehalose and Lactobacillus for NAG) and un-inoculated controls were used with each run[9].

Independently, the bio-profile and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern given by VITEK ® 2 compact of all the isolates was re-analyzed and the findings were noted.

A total of 815 blood samples were received in 10 months duration from patients suspected of having BSI. A total of 249 were found positive by BacT/ALERT ® 3D system and 172 grew clinically relevant pathogenic bacteria. In all, 102 staphylococci isolates were obtained, of which 92 were CoNS. The most commonly isolated CoNS were S. hominis (57/92 isolates, 61.9%). These 57 isolates identified as S. hominis by VITEK ® 2 compact were further processed for sub-species identification.

Of the 57 isolates, 11 were resistant to novobiocin. Acid production from D-trehalose was positive in 31 isolates, weakly positive in six and negative in 20 isolates. Acid production from NAG was positive in 32 isolates, weakly positive in seven and negative in 18 isolates. Those isolates which were oxacillin (based on MIC given by VITEK ® 2 Compact AST P-628 card) and novobiocin resistant were interpreted as belonging to sub-species novobiosepticus[7]. All the isolates thus identified as SHN failed to produce acid aerobically from D-trehalose, all except one isolates failed to produce acid aerobically from NAG also [Table 1]. On re-analysis of VITEK ® 2 Compact bio-profile and MIC, it was found that there were five isolates which were both oxacillin resistant (based on MIC given by VITEK ® 2 Compact AST P-628 card) and novobiocin resistant (based on the VITEK ® 2 Compact bio-pattern). They were identified as S. hominis with low discrimination by VITEK ® 2 Compact and the contraindicating biotype was shown to be SHN. These five isolates based on VITEK ® 2 Compact bio-patterns were also interpreted as SHN. On comparing the two independent results, it was found that there were three isolates which were identified as SHN both by manual methods and with re-analysis of VITEK ® 2 Compact bio-profile. [Table 1] shows the demographic, clinical and laboratory characteristics of the patients identified to be having SHN bacteraemia.
Table 1: Demographic, clinical and laboratory characteristics of the patients identified to be having Staphylococcus hominis Scientific Name Search  subspecies novobiosepticus septicaemia

Click here to view


All the isolates identified as SHN (by both methods) were uniformly resistant to penicillin, oxacillin and ciprofloxacin. All isolates except one (intermediate resistant) were resistant to erythromycin (92.3% resistance). Resistance to trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole was 61.5 per cent (eight out of 13 isolates being resistant) and that to clindamycin was 23.1 per cent (three out of 13 isolates being resistant). All isolates except one were susceptible to gentamicin (7.7% resistance). Susceptibility was maintained in all isolates against vancomycin, linezolid, daptomycin and tigecycline. The minimum inhibitory concentration of vancomycin (as shown by VITEK ® 2 Compact AST report) was ≤0.5 μg/ml in two isolates and 1 μg/ml in the remaining 11 isolates [Table 2]. The difference in resistance patterns of SHH and SHN was not found to be significant using Pearson's Chi square test, except for ciprofloxacin, against which SHN was significantly more resistant than SHH (P<0.05).
Table 2: Antimicrobial susceptibility results of the Staphylococcus hominis subspecies novobiosepticus isolates

Click here to view


In view of CoNS being one of the most important nosocomial pathogens related to BSIs and substantial increase in the frequency of methicillin resistance among CoNS isolates, accurate detection of pathogenic methicillin-resistant CoNS isolates by clinical microbiology laboratories is of crucial importance in guiding therapy and promoting the correct use of glycopeptides[3],[10]. Manual identification of CoNS is labour-intensive and requires long incubation (24-72 h). VITEK ® 2 automated detection system allows identification in lesser time (6-24 h) and provides high discrimination between species. However, the system identifies only the known pathogens which are fed into the software, and in case the bio-pattern obtained is not matching any organism, it gives a probable identification. Hence, if there is a doubt of a novel pathogen, the bio-pattern needs to be analyzed and interpreted by microbiologists, and also, the confirmation needs to be done by standard manual methods[11].

The most frequently isolated CoNS in our set-up were S. hominis, of which 22.8 per cent were SHN. After first described by Kloos et al[2] in 1998, SHN has been reported by authors from Europe, Spain and Brazil [Table 3][3],[4],[5],[12]. The highest number of isolates (67) has been reported by Balejova[12] from different clinical specimens. Palazzo et al[5] have reported six isolates from BSI patients, of which one identified as SHN by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis was found to be oxacillin susceptible. They have suggested that novobiocin resistance is intrinsic to SHN and oxacillin resistance has been acquired later on. SHN isolates causing BSIs are up till now described as vancomycin susceptible. However, increased MIC of SHN strains has been reported in an outbreak of BSI from the Intensive Care Unit in Brazil[4]. There are no reports of SHN from India, however, we have earlier reported probable presence of SHN in septicaemia cases, based on retrospective analysis of VITEK ® 2 bio-patterns[13].
Table 3: Studies from all over the world reporting Staphylococcus hominis subspecies novobiosepticus as causative agents of invasive infections

Click here to view


In the present study, no significant difference was seen in resistance pattern of SHH and SHN isolates (except in ciprofloxacin). All SHN isolates had vancomycin MICs ≤1 μg/ml; four SHH isolates had vancomycin MICs of 2 μg/ml. However, the MICs against vancomycin need to be confirmed using the gold standard microbroth dilution method to know the actual trend towards increasing MIC.

Small sample size was the major limitation of our study. Studies with large sample size and those involving molecular tests are required to know the actual load, susceptibility pattern and clinical prognosis of this multidrug-resistant CoNS.


   Acknowledgment Top


Authors thank Ms Nishi Sharma, Technologist, Delhi State Cancer Institute, for her technical help.

Conflicts of Interest: None.



 
   References Top

1.
Burnie JP, Naderi-Nasab M, Loudon KW, Matthews RC. An epidemiological study of blood culture isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci demonstrating hospital-acquired infection. J Clin Microbiol 1997; 35 : 1746-50.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Kloos WE, George CG, Olgiate JS, Van Pelt L, McKinnon ML, Zimmer BL, et al. Staphylococcus hominis subsp. novobiosepticus subsp. Nov. a novel trehalose- and N-acetyl-D-glucosamine-negative, novobiocin- and multiple-antibiotic-resistant subspecies isolated from human blood cultures. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1998; 48 (Pt 3) : 799-812.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Chaves F, García-Alvarez M, Sanz F, Alba C, Otero JR. Nosocomial spread of a Staphylococcus hominis subsp. novobiosepticus strain causing sepsis in a neonatal Intensive Care Unit. J Clin Microbiol 2005; 43 : 4877-9.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
d'Azevedo PA, Trancesi R, Sales T, Monteiro J, Gales AC, Pignatari AC, et al. Outbreak of Staphylococcus hominis subsp. novobiosepticus bloodstream infections in São Paulo City, Brazil. J Med Microbiol 2008; 57 : 256-7.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Palazzo IC, d'Azevedo PA, Secchi C, Pignatari AC, Darini AL. Staphylococcus hominis subsp. novobiosepticus strains causing nosocomial bloodstream infection in Brazil. J Antimicrob Chemother 2008; 62 : 1222-6.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Collee JG, Marr W. Culture of bacteria. In: Collee JG, Fraser AG, Marmion BP, Simmons A, editors. Mackie and McCartney practical medical microbiology. 14th ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1996. p. 121-4.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards For Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Twenty Third Informational Supplement. M100-S23. Vol. 33. Wayne, PA: CLSI; 2013.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Winn W Jr., Allen S, Janda W, Koneman E, Procop G, Schreckenberger P, et al. Koneman's color atlas and textbook of diagnostic microbiology. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2006.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Collee JG, Miles RS, Watt B. Tests for the identification of bacteria. In: Collee JG, Fraser AG, Marmion BP, Simmons A, editors. Mackie and McCartney practical medical microbiology. 14th ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1996. p. 133-4.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Hussain Z, Stoakes L, Lannigan R, Longo S, Nancekivell B. Evaluation of screening and commercial methods for detection of methicillin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci. J Clin Microbiol 1998; 36 : 273-4.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Spanu T, Sanguinetti M, Ciccaglione D, D'Inzeo T, Romano L, Leone F, et al. Use of the VITEK 2 system for rapid identification of clinical isolates of staphylococci from bloodstream infections. J Clin Microbiol 2003; 41 : 4259-63.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Balejova M. Staphylococcus hominis subsp. novobiosepticus - New pathogen in nosocomial infections. 14th European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases; European Society for Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Prague, Czech Republic, May 1-4, 2004. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15113312, accessed on March 13, 2015. [Abstract number: 902_p1354].  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Roy P, Ahmed NH, Biswal I, Grover RK. Multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus hominis subsp. novobiosepticus causing septicemia in patients with malignancy. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2014; 57 : 275-7.  Back to cited text no. 13
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Acknowledgment
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed497    
    Printed2    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded160    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal