Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research
  Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login  
  Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Users Online: 2485       

   Table of Contents      
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 145  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 815-823

Association between intimate partner violence & HIV/AIDS: Exploring the pathways in Indian context


1 Department of Community Medicine, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, India
2 Ministry of Defence, New Delhi, India

Date of Submission04-Dec-2014
Date of Web Publication23-Oct-2017

Correspondence Address:
Seema Patrikar
Department of Community Medicine, Armed Forces Medical College, Ministry of Defence, Pune 411 040, Maharashtra
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1782_14

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Background & objectives: Violence against women cutting across diverse socio-economic classes is an under-recognized human rights violation in the world. This analysis was undertaken to examine the prevalence along with predictors of intimate partner violence (IPV) and its association with HIV/AIDS and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in Indian ever-married women.
Methods: The data obtained from 2005 to 2006 third round of National Family Health Survey-3 (NFHS-3) were used in this study. Analyses were conducted on ever-married women by linking individual women data including violence information and HIV test results.
Results: The analyses indicated all forms of violence to be prevalent in India. The prevalence of lifetime IPV reported was 35.3 per cent. Multivariate analysis using logistic regression identified younger age of women, higher number of children, low level of education of women as well as her partner, working status of women, higher spousal age, rural residence, alcohol consumption by husband, childhood witness of violence among parents, nuclear household and lower standard of living to be positively associated with the experience of IPV by the women (P<0.05). HIV-positive status of women, as well as women from high HIV prevalent State, were at increased odds of IPV (P<0.05).
Interpretation & conclusions: Significantly higher reporting of HIV/STIs by women experiencing IPV hints at new pathways that link violence and HIV. Further, our analysis showed a high prevalence of IPV in India.

Keywords: HIV/AIDS - human immunodeficiency virus - predictors - variance inflation factor - violence against women


How to cite this article:
Patrikar S, Basannar D, Bhatti V, Chatterjee K, Mahen A. Association between intimate partner violence & HIV/AIDS: Exploring the pathways in Indian context. Indian J Med Res 2017;145:815-23

How to cite this URL:
Patrikar S, Basannar D, Bhatti V, Chatterjee K, Mahen A. Association between intimate partner violence & HIV/AIDS: Exploring the pathways in Indian context. Indian J Med Res [serial online] 2017 [cited 2020 Apr 6];145:815-23. Available from: http://www.ijmr.org.in/text.asp?2017/145/6/815/216968

Violence against women cutting across diverse socio-economic classes is an under-recognized human rights violation in the world [1]. The data from the worldwide literature suggest that intimate partner violence (IPV) is almost a universal phenomenon existing in all communities [2]. The prevalence of both physical and sexual violence against women within marriage has been increasingly documented in India, but information regarding its correlates and health consequences are scant. There are a several factors that complicate the issue in India, as in other countries such as lack and denial of access to economic, political and social resources, vulnerability to indigenous oppressive institutions of caste, religion, traditional family structures, non-democratic political structures and dowry system. Studies conducted in India suggest that about 50 per cent of women experienced at least one of the violent behaviours at least once in their married life [3],[4]. Preventing violence against women is considered as a way to contribute to achieving the millennium development goals (MDGs)[5]. As noted by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, to prevent violence against women, it is crucial to understand the circumstances, and the risk and protective factors that influence its occurrence [6].

Violence can have direct consequences for women's health and can increase woman's risk of future ill health. Documented effects include delayed prenatal care, inadequate weight gain, increased smoking and substance abuse, sexually transmitted infections (STIs), vaginal and cervical infections, kidney infections, miscarriages and abortions [7], premature labour, foetal distress and bleeding during pregnancy [8]. The literature emphasizes the linkages between the experience of IPV and both fatal and nonfatal outcomes for women and their children [9],[10],[11]. Increased prevalence of STI/HIV may reflect greater likelihood of STI/HIV exposure in abused women, rendering IPV a risk marker for their male partners' STI/HIV infection.

This study was, therefore, undertaken to provide a comprehensive analysis of the prevalence of different forms of violence in ever married Indian women and its associated risk factors with emphasis to linkage with HIV. The primary objective was to estimate the prevalence of IPV in terms of physical, sexual and emotional violence in ever married Indian women and to identify various predictors of IPV. The secondary objective was to determine the association between IPV and proportion of HIV/AIDS and self-reported STIs.


   Material & Methods Top


For this study the data obtained from 2005 to 2006 third round of National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3)[12], a representative sample of households throughout India, were used. Data on 69,704 ever married women who were interviewed for IPV taking precautions, in keeping with the World Health Organization's ethical and safety recommendations for research on IPV [11], were analysed. For these analyses, only ever married women were included since the outcome of interest is lifetime IPV experience. NFHS-3 tested 102,946 men and women for HIV of whom 52,855 were women. Of the total number of women tested for HIV, 57 per cent (n=30,033) were interviewed for IPV module. The two files were then merged.

The NFHS-3 volume 1[13] reports that the baseline characteristics such as age, residential, educational, religious, caste/tribe and wealth index distributions of the subsample of women who completed the IPV module and HIV testing were virtually identical to the entire NFHS-3 sample of eligible women, hence baseline characteristics were not tested. The key dependent variables of interest in this analysis were lifetime experience of various forms of violence. Ever-married women were asked a series of questions on the experience of physical, emotional and sexual violence based on a modified version of the revised Conflict Tactics Scale [14]. A 'yes' response to one or more of items (a) to (g) in the appendix constitutes evidence of physical violence, while a 'yes' response to items (h) or (i) constitutes evidence of emotional violence and a 'yes' response to items (j) or (l) constitutes evidence of sexual violence. A dichotomous variable IPV was constituted as evidence of IPV if the women experienced either of physical and/or sexual and/or emotional violence.

The various correlates or predictor variables considered were women's characteristics, husband's characteristics, union characteristics and intergenerational effect in terms of violence in childhood. These variables were drawn from literature on women's experience of IPV [15],[16]. The presence of HIV and self-reported presence of STIs was also recorded. In the NFHS-3 survey all women who ever had sexual intercourse were asked whether they had sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), genital sore/ulcer and vaginal discharge in the past 12 months. The HIV status of the women in IPV module of NFHS-3 was determined by linking and merging the IPV data with HIV data for each women of NFHS-3.

Statistical analysis: The prevalence of various forms of violence is described with 95 per cent confidence interval (CI), and the associations are expressed in terms of odds ratio (OR). Multivariate analysis using logistic regression was adopted to predict IPV as well as other types of violence. As the prevalence of HIV/AIDS was high in six States namely- Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Maharashtra, Manipur, Nagaland, and Tamil Nadu and moderate/low in other States, the regression models were adjusted for the prevalence of the States in predicting IPV. Results are shown in terms of OR with OR of >1 implying risk factor and <1 as protective factor. Four logistic regression models were run with the outcome variable as physical, sexual or emotional violence alone as well as for physical and/or sexual and/or emotional violence. Multicollinearity in the variables predicting violence was detected by tolerance and variance inflation factor (VIF). VIFs exceeding four was considered as a sign of multicollinearity requiring correction [17]. The model was rerun after testing for multicollinearity. All these analyses were carried out using SPSS 22.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA) at 0.05 level of significance.


   Results Top


The socio-demographic variables are depicted in [Table 1]. [Table 2] gives the experience of violence by ever-married Indian women along with 95 per cent CI. The analysis of ever-married women revealed that 35.3 per cent (24,394) women respondents experienced IPV with 95 per cent CI of 34.80-35.51.
Table 1: Distribution of various sociodemographic factors as per residence, National Family Health Survey-3, 2005-2006

Click here to view
Table 2: Lifetime and current prevalence in per cent (95% CI) of various forms of violence in Indian women

Click here to view


The results of multivariate analysis using logistic regression are given in [Table 3]. The analysis showed four models to predict the dependent outcome variable based on independent predictors. Age at first marriage was removed from the analysis as it indicated strong collinearity with marital duration.
Table 3: Logistic regression with adjusted odds ratio and 95 per cent CI dependent variable: Physical and/or emotional and/or sexual violence, physical violence only, emotional violence only and sexual violence only

Click here to view


Physical and/or emotional and/or sexual violence: Younger age of women, higher number of children, low level of education of women as well as her partner, working status of women increased the odds of experiencing IPV by women ([Table 3]). In addition, higher spousal age, rural residence, nuclear household and lower standard of living were positively associated with the experience of IPV by the women (P<0.05). Women whose husbands did not consume alcohol did not experience IPV. Women who witnessed their father beat their mother were also at higher risk of experiencing violence. HIV-positive status of women as well as women from high HIV prevalent State are at increased odds of IPV (P<0.05).

Physical violence only: The correlates associated with women experiencing physical violence were similar to IPV except HIV status of women. HIV-positive status of women was not found to be associated with physical violence, however, analysis showed that women from high HIV prevalent State were at increased odds of physical violence (P<0.05).

Emotional violence only: The results were similar to physical violence except that residence and household structure were not associated with women experiencing emotional violence ([Table 3]).

Sexual violence only: All the correlates considered in the analysis were significant in predicting sexual violence except residence, household structure and husband's education level ([Table 3]). HIV-positive status of women, as well as women from high HIV prevalent States, showed strong association with women experiencing sexual violence with increased odds of 1.71 and 2.42, respectively (P<0.05) ([Table 3]).

Association of violence with STIs and HIV: [Table 4] depicts the percentage of women by HIV status and women who reported having STDs, genital sore/ulcer and genital discharge in the 12 months preceding the survey. NFHS-3 indicated that 0.28 per cent of adults age 15-49yr were infected with HIV. The HIV prevalence rate was 0.22 per cent for women (95% CI=0.23-0.33)[12]. When the association of violence with HIV was studied, it revealed that higher percentage of HIV-positive women reported experiencing violence as compared to women who never experienced violence. Overall, a total of 786 women (1.1%) reported having STD, 1415 (2.0%) reported having genital sore/ulcer and 5941 women (8.5%) reported having genital discharge in the past 12 months. Higher percentage of women experiencing violence reported STIs. The odds of reporting STIs with the exposure of violence were calculated. The OR was significant and equal to 2.20 (95% CI=0.91-2.56) of having STD for women reporting IPV. Similarly, significantly higher proportion of women experiencing IPV reported genital sore/ulcer (OR=3.02, 95% CI=2.71-3.37) and genital discharge (OR=2.55, 95% CI=2.41-2.69).
Table 4: Bivariate distribution of violence and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in per cent (n)

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


The past two decades have seen an increase in both international attention and programmatic efforts towards developing interventions to prevent and respond to violence against women. The 2010 Global Burden of Disease Study ranks IPV as 5th in years of life lost as a result of disability for women [18]. Our analysis showed a high prevalence of violence against women in India (35.3%). Other studies overestimated lifetime prevalence of IPV in the range of 20-50 per cent [2],[19]. WHO multi-country study [1] on IPV in 10 countries estimated physical violence in the range of 13-61 per cent and sexual violence at 6-59 per cent. Our findings corroborated with the studies carried out in both developed and developing countries [16],[19],[20],[21],[22],[23].

The findings from our study demonstrated some key predictors associated with IPV, such as younger age of women, higher number of children, low level of education of women as well as her partner, working status of women, alcohol consumption by husband, higher spousal age, rural residence, nuclear household and lower standard of living. Studies conducted worldwide have attempted to explain several of these factors and their interplay with violence against women [3],[24],[25].

IPV and HIV are hypothesized to have critical intersections, and women's vulnerability to HIV may be influenced by violence caused by culturally accepted gender inequalities [26]. The finding of our study about a significant positive association between HIV status and IPV in married women in general population in India hints towards new pathways that link violence and HIV. It suggests that the pathways do not rely almost exclusively on higher risk behaviours, but IPV in married women may also be an independent risk factor for HIV. Our analysis showed HIV-positive status of women as well as women from high HIV prevalent State to be positively associated with experiencing sexual violence with increased odds. Our study also showed an association between violence and STIs. Dunkle and Decker [27] have suggested a possible intersection of IPV with HIV infection. HIV transmission risk is higher in the presence of other STIs and when exposed to sexual secretions and/or blood [28]. IPV is an important correlate of a wide range of adverse reproductive health outcomes for women, including STIs [25]. However, much of the evidence pertains to the developed world and draws heavily on data from patients at STI clinics or women in IPV shelters [29], leaving largely unanswered the question of whether the positive IPV-STI association is equally applicable to women in the general population of developing countries. Our study analysis provides the association in general population at a national level for India.

While the evidence is not conclusive, research suggests that violence limits women's ability to negotiate condom use [30],[31]. Violence or fear of violence has also been implicated as a barrier to disclosure of HIV status among those women who do seek testing. For many women worldwide, the threat of violence exacerbates their risk of contracting HIV. Studies show the increasing links between violence against women and HIV and demonstrate that HIV-infected women are more likely to have experienced violence and those women who experience violence are at higher risk for HIV [32],[33]. A systematic review and meta-analysis on association between IPV and HIV pooled results of 28 studies indicated that physical IPV [pooled relative risk (RR) (95% CI): 1.22 (1.01, 1.46)] and any type of IPV [pooled RR (95% CI): 1.28 (1.00, 1.64)] were significantly associated with HIV infection among women [34]. Our findings support arguments that partner violence increases women's risk of HIV and STIs.

Limitations of the current study included the inability to establish a temporal relationship based on the cross-sectional nature of the data. There could be recall and information bias as STIs were self-reported and retrospective. Because of the sensitivities attached with violence, it was possible that women underreported their experience owing to social desirability bias. To conclude, our data analysis indicated all forms of violence against women to be prevalent in India. This study also showed a significant association between HIV/STIs and IPV contributing considerably to women's vulnerability to HIV and STIs.


   Acknowledgment Top


The authors thank the Demographic Health Survey (DHS) for supplying the data of NFHS-3 survey.

Conflicts of Interest: None.



 
   References Top

1.
World Health Organization. WHO multi-country study on women's health and IPV against women: Summary report of initial results on prevalence, health outcomes and women's responses. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Krug EG, Mercy JA, Dahlberg LL, Zwi AB. The world report on violence and health. Lancet 2002; 360: 1083-8.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.
Burton B, Duvvury N, Varia N. IPV in India: A summary report of a multi-site household survey. Washington, DC: International Council for Research on Women; 2000.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Pandey MK, Singh P, Yadav RA. IPV and women's health in India: Evidence from Health Survey. Germany: University Library of Munich; 2008.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Perry EC, Jaggernath J. Violence against women, vulnerabilities and disempowerment: Multiple and interrelated impacts on achieving the Millennium Development Goals in South Africa. Agenda 2012; 26: 20-32.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Intimate partner violence. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/intimatepartnerviolence/, accessed on April 7, 2017.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Sabbe A, Oulami H, Zekraoui W, Hikmat H, Temmerman M, Leye E. Determinants of child and forced marriage in Morocco: Stakeholder perspectives on health, policies and human rights. BMC Int Health Hum Rights 2013; 13: 43.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8.
Campbell JC. Health consequences of intimate partner violence. Lancet 2002; 359: 1331-6.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]    
9.
Vizcarra B, Hassan F, Hunter WM, Muñoz SR, Ramiro L, De Paula CS. Partner violence as a risk factor for mental health among women from communities in the Philippines, Egypt, Chile, and India. Inj Control Saf Promot 2004; 11: 125-9.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Kumar S, Jeyaseelan L, Suresh S, Ahuja RC. IPV and its mental health correlates in Indian women. Br J Psychiatry 2005; 187: 62-7.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
World Health Organization. Putting women first: Ethical and safety recommendations for research on IPV against women. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2010.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and Macro International. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), 2005-06: India. Mumbai, India: IIPS; 2007.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
National Family Health Survey 2005-2006 (NFHS-3) India Reports. Available from: http://hetv.org/india/nfhs, accessed on April 7, 2017.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Straus, MA. Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics Scales. J Marriage Fam 1979; 41: 75-88.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Gerstein L. In India Poverty and lack of education are associated with men's physical and sexual abuse of their wives. Int Fam Plan Perspect 2000; 26: 44-5.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
INCLEN. Domestic violence in India 3: A summary report of a multi-site household survey. Washington, DC: International Center for Research on Women and the Center for Development and Population Activities; 2000.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
O'brien RM. A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Qual Quant 2007; 41: 673-90.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Murray CJ, Vos T, Lozano R, Naghavi M, Flaxman AD, Michaud C, et al. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990-2010: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2012; 380: 2197-223.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Madhivanan P, Krupp K, Reingold A. Correlates of intimate partner physical violence among young reproductive age women in Mysore, India. Asia Pac J Public Health 2014; 26: 169-81.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Andersson N, Ho-Foster A, Mitchell S, Scheepers E, Goldstein S. Risk factors for domestic physical violence: National cross-sectional household surveys in eight southern African countries. BMC Womens Health 2007; 7: 11.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and ORC Macro. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-2), 1998-1999. Mumbai, India: IIPS; 2000.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Jejeebhoy SJ, Cook RJ. State accountability for wife-beating: The Indian challenge. Lancet 1997; 349 (Suppl 1): sI10-2.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Rao V. Wife-beating in rural South India: A qualitative and econometric analysis. Soc Sci Med 1997; 44: 1169-80.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Pandey MK, Singh P, Yadav RA. IPV and women's health in India: Evidence from Health Survey. Germany: University Library of Munich; 2008.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Kishor S, Johnson K. Profiling domestic violence – A multi-country study. Calverton, Maryland: ORC Macro; 2004.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
World Health Organization. Violence against women and HIV/AIDS: Critical intersections-intimate partner violence and HIV/AIDS. Geneva: WHO; 2004. Available from: http://www.who.int/hac/techguidance/pht/InfoBulletinIntimatePartnerViolenceFinal.pdf, accessed on April 10, 2017.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Dunkle KL, Decker MR. Gender-based violence and HIV: reviewing the evidence for links and causal pathways in the general population and high-riskgroups. Am J Reprod Immunol 2013; 69 (Suppl 1): 20-6.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Dunkle KL, Jewkes RK, Brown HC, Gray GE, McIntryre JA, Harlow SD. Gender-based violence, relationship power, and risk of HIV infection in women attending antenatal clinics in South Africa. Lancet 2004; 363: 1415-21.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Cunradi CB, Caetano R, Schafer J. Religious affiliation, denominational homogamy, and IPV among US couples. J Sci Study Relig 2002; 41: 139-51.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Go VF, Sethulakshmi CJ, Bentley ME, Sivaram S, Srikrishnan AK, Solomon S, et al. When HIV-prevention messages and gender norms clash: The impact of domestic violence on women's HIV risk in slums of Chennai, India. AIDS Behav 2003; 7: 263-72.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Jewkes RK, Levin JB, Penn-Kekana LA. Gender inequalities, intimate partner violence and HIV preventive practices: Findings of a South African cross-sectional study. Soc Sci Med 2003; 56: 125-34.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
UNAIDS. 2004 Report on the Global AIDS Epidemic: 4th global report. Available from: http://files.unaids.org/en/media/unaids/contentassets/documents/unaidspublication/2004/GAR2004_en.pdf, accessed on April 7, 2017.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
World Health Organization. Gender dimensions of HIV status disclosure to sexual partners: Rates, barriers and outcomes: A review paper. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Li Y, Marshall CM, Rees HC, Nunez A, Ezeanolue EE, Ehiri JE. Intimate partner violence and HIV infection among women: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Int AIDS Soc 2014; 17: 18845.  Back to cited text no. 34
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]


This article has been cited by
1 Domestic violence against women in west of Iran: the prevalence and related factors
Abdorrahim Afkhamzadeh,Namam-Ali Azadi,Shirin Ziaeei,Amjad Mohamadi-Bolbanabad
International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare. 2019; 12(5): 364
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Equity in health care: An urban and rural, and gender perspective; the Suriname Health Study
CCF Smits,JR Toelsie,MGM Eersel,ISK Krishnadath
AIMS Public Health. 2018; 5(1): 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Material & Methods
   Results
   Discussion
   Acknowledgment
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1157    
    Printed6    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded214    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 2    

Recommend this journal