Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research
  Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login  
  Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Users Online: 270       

   Table of Contents      
COMMENTARY
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 144  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 796-798

Insights into in vitro environments for human cartilage tissue engineering


1 Department of Surgery II, Yamanashi University-Faculty of Medicine, Chuo, Yamanashi, Japan; The Mary-Yoshio Translational Hexagon, Nichi-In Centre for Regenerative Medicine (NCRM), Chennai 600 034, Tamil Nadu, India
2 Mebiol Inc., Hiratsuka-shi, Kanagawa, Japan

Date of Submission27-Jul-2016
Date of Web Publication28-Apr-2017

Correspondence Address:
Samuel J. K. Abraham
Department of Surgery II, Yamanashi University-Faculty of Medicine, Chuo, Yamanashi, Japan; The Mary-Yoshio Translational Hexagon, Nichi-In Centre for Regenerative Medicine (NCRM), Chennai 600 034, Tamil Nadu, India

Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1237_16

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Abraham SJ, Yoshioka H. Insights into in vitro environments for human cartilage tissue engineering. Indian J Med Res 2016;144:796-8

How to cite this URL:
Abraham SJ, Yoshioka H. Insights into in vitro environments for human cartilage tissue engineering. Indian J Med Res [serial online] 2016 [cited 2017 Dec 13];144:796-8. Available from: http://www.ijmr.org.in/text.asp?2016/144/6/796/205341

Novel methodologies addressing the damages to human cartilage tissues using in vitro tissue-engineered autologous grafts have progressed to a clinical application in select conditions. However, still several challenges remain requiring significant improvisation. The in vitro expansion of chondrocytes, though is a challenging process owing to their limited proliferation capacity, slow doubling time and a higher extracellular matrix to cell ratio [1],[2] , compared to other tissues such as neurons or cardiomyocytes, it is relatively simpler to grow and transplant them for a successful engraftment into the defective area, as these do not require activation by electrical signals or membrane potentials to make them functional. In this issue, Balakumar et al[3] have used human autologous bone marrow cell-free extract (BME) to culture human iliac apophyseal chondrocytes, in which maintenance of hyaline phenotype in the BME supplemented cultures for nearly 21 days was demonstrated in contrast to the cultures using foetal bovine serum (FBS) which could not maintain the hyaline phenotype [3] . Although the authors have utilized only human iliac apophyseal chondrocytes, which are physiologically capable of in vivo proliferation until puberty [4] , but they have also included the references pertaining to adult articular-derived chondrocytes in their discussions and while deriving conclusions.

Expansion of chondrocytes in culture requires several inputs. One amongst them is the culture medium which provides nutrition to the cells and forms the main focus of the study by Balakumar et al[3] . The other two important inputs are scaffolds and physical forces and stimuli. Different kinds of extracellular matrices, both natural and synthetic scaffolds, have been used in the in vitro cartilage regeneration. Hydrogel polymers custom tailored to suit the cartilage providing optimal tissue delivery have been employed earlier [5],[6] , which combine the effects produced by chemical moieties with those produced by physical forces of an orbital shaker, to yield stable three-dimensional (3D) hyaline cartilage tissue in vitro. Physical forces such as dynamic compression and the associated fluid flow-induced shear, tissue shear and hydrostatic pressure [7] have also been utilized for cartilage tissue engineering. Several groups have employed various methodologies to introduce dynamic compression during in vitro cell culture, and the results have been significant in giving rise to tissues which mimic the native cartilage [8],[9] . The effects of fluid flow-induced shear stress on cartilage tissue engineering have been investigated using bioreactors systems such as spinner flasks and perfusion culture systems [10] . In addition, electrical stimuli have also been used to stimulate protein synthesis in cartilage explant cultures [11] .

After successful in vitro expansion of chondrocytes using appropriate culture media, stimuli and scaffolds, the laboratory grown tissue has to be transplanted clinically in place of a defective, dysfunctional or damaged cartilage tissue, which is the ultimate goal. A review of clinical results of such studies reveals that in spite of various methods employed to in vitro culture, post in vivo transplantation, the transplanted cartilage in articular cartilage injuries reverts to a fibrocartilage, and this is a major impediment in providing a long-term disease-free state in patients undergoing even established procedures such as the autologous chondrocyte implantation [12],[13] . In studies which were able to maintain hyaline phenotype in vitro using several other cartilage regeneration techniques and employing cells other than chondrocytes such as mesenchymal stem cells, the end result was the development of a relatively higher fibrocartilaginous tissue in the defect rather than a hyaline tissue, after in vivo transplantation [13] .

The present study by Balakumar et al[3] has shown that it is possible to maintain the hyaline phenotype of the cartilage tissue in vitro for nearly 21 days with BME supplementation. However, the ultimate goal of tissue engineering can be achieved only when in vivo transplantation of the hyaline cartilages developed in vitro, using methodologies such as the one described by Balakumar et al[3] , are attempted and the hyaline cartilage phenotype is found to be maintained in vivo for a long period of time even after being subjected to various physical forces, and finally be able to yield a disease-free status. Before a clinical translation is planned on lines of the work of Balakumar et al[3] , the following major points need further consideration:

(i). The authors have used chondrocytes from children undergoing hip surgery for dysplasia of hips, and the implications of the results on studying chondrocytes obtained from dysplastic joints may not hold valid for healthy chondrocytes, and this point needs to be analyzed by future studies on healthy joint chondrocytes.

(ii). The number of samples studied by Balakumar et al[3] is only four, and the age group from which the samples were derived was between two and nine years. More samples from donors of different age groups need to be studied to add value to the clinical relevance of the study.

(iii). Cartilage damage is a component that occurs as a varied spectrum across the age group of patients, manifesting as sports injury in the young, degenerative in the elderly, etc. Therefore, when similar applications are considered in a varied age group of patients, how far their bone marrow extract will supplement the in vitro growth of cells is a major question because bone marrow stem cells have shown to deplete with ageing [14] .

(iv). The bone marrow is a multifunctional tissue producing millions of cells on a day-to-day basis, with several of the bone marrow produced cells reaching the target by circulation, resulting in damage repair along with actively performing their function of replenishment of blood cells. Therefore, the principle behind breaking of the bone marrow barrier to utilize its extract to grow cartilage cells (which actually are not directly supplied by vascular supply) and this effect of vascular or avascular components of the BME in producing nutrition to chondrocytes must be thoroughly studied. The reason for taking the bone marrow for a different high-value component or protocol such as the lifesaving haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in comparison to in vitro culture of chondrocytes should be justified. The clinical implications of depriving the bone marrow and necessary clinical procedure-related complications pertaining to the procedure described by Balakumar et al[3] to obtain BME also needs consideration.

(v). A thought process on comparing how the effect produced by such a high-value BME can, in fact, be provided using scaffolds [5],[6],[15] , physical forces, [5],[7] etc., for maintaining the hyaline cartilage phenotype has to be considered. In addition to evaluation of BME, effects of alternatives to FBS such as human platelet lysate, insulin transferrin selenium, human serum, serum-free defined medium and others need to be evaluated, or the comparative data from the literature have to be analyzed to justify the advantages of BME.

With 3D bioprinting revolutionizing the field of regenerative medicine, bioprinted cartilage has already become a reality [16] and engineering of complex organs such as lung and heart would be possible using decellularized extracellular matrix scaffolds [17] . Factory made cartilages will not be a distant dream in the path to create such ready-to-use cartilage tissues. Emphasis should be laid on the in vitro tissue culture conditions including the use of right culture methodologies, culture media and growth factors as has been attempted by Balakumar et al[3] . Furthermore, excluding FBS will provide animal protein-free culture methodologies which will be highly useful in clinical translation of the methodologies. Hence, efforts like this need to be encouraged for achieving stable, ready-made and custom-tailored cartilage tissues which would be a boon to address a spectrum of cartilage-related disorders in future.

 
   References Top

1.
Salih V. Cartilage tissue engineering. In: Boccaccini AR, Gough J, editors. Tissue engineering using ceramics and polymers. 1 st ed. Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing Series in Biomaterials, Elsevier; 2007.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Patrick CW, Mikos AG, McIntire LV, editors. Frontiers in tissue engineering. New York, USA: Elsevier; 1998.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Balakumar B, Rajagopal K, Madhuri V. Bone marrow extract as a growth supplement for human iliac apophyseal chondrocyte culture. Indian J Med Res 2016; 144 : 831-7.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Bassett JH, Williams GR. Role of thyroid hormones in skeletal development and bone maintenance. Endocr Rev 2016; 37 : 135-87.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.
Yasuda A, Kojima K, Tinsley KW, Yoshioka H, Mori Y, Vacanti CA. In vitro culture of chondrocytes in a novel thermoreversible gelation polymer scaffold containing growth factors. Tissue Eng 2006; 12 : 1237-45.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    
6.
Karthik B, Arumugam S, Senthilkumar R, Srinivasan T, Abraham S. In vitro expansion of chondrocytes in a three dimensional manner using a hybrid approach; our experience with human and animal cartilage tissues. Oral Presentation. 34 th SICOT World Orthopedic Congress; Hyderabad, India; October 17-19, 2013.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Lee C, Grad S, Wimmer M, Alini M. The influence of mechanical stimuli on articular cartilage tissue engineering. In: Ashammakhi N, Reis RL, editors. Topics in tissue engineering, Vol. 2. 2005. Available from: http://www.oulu.fi/spareparts/ebook_topics_in_t_e_vol2/abstracts/alini_0102.pdf , accessed on July 20, 2016.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Kisiday JD, Jin M, DiMicco MA, Kurz B, Grodzinsky AJ. Effects of dynamic compressive loading on chondrocyte biosynthesis in self-assembling peptide scaffolds. J Biomech 2004; 37 : 595-604.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]    
9.
Davisson T, Kunig S, Chen A, Sah R, Ratcliffe A. Static and dynamic compression modulate matrix metabolism in tissue engineered cartilage. J Orthop Res 2002; 20 : 842-8.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]    
10.
Vunjak-Novakovic G, Martin I, Obradovic B, Treppo S, Grodzinsky AJ, Langer R, et al. Bioreactor cultivation conditions modulate the composition and mechanical properties of tissue-engineered cartilage. J Orthop Res 1999; 17 : 130-8.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]    
11.
MacGinitie LA, Gluzband YA, Grodzinsky AJ. Electric field stimulation can increase protein synthesis in articular cartilage explants. J Orthop Res 1994; 12 : 151-60.  Back to cited text no. 11
[PUBMED]    
12.
Dewan AK, Gibson MA, Elisseeff JH, Trice ME. Evolution of autologous chondrocyte repair and comparison to other cartilage repair techniques. Biomed Res Int 2014; 2014 : 272481.  Back to cited text no. 12
[PUBMED]    
13.
Roelofs AJ, Rocke JP, De Bari C. Cell-based approaches to joint surface repair: a research perspective. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2013; 21 : 892-900.  Back to cited text no. 13
[PUBMED]    
14.
Abraham SJ. Reservations in accepting that there is "depletion of bone marrow progenitor cells with aging." Generalization should be avoided. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2013; 68 : 404-5.  Back to cited text no. 14
[PUBMED]    
15.
Luo Z, Jiang L, Xu Y, Li H, Xu W, Wu S, et al. Mechano growth factor (MGF) and transforming growth factor (TGF)-β3 functionalized silk scaffolds enhance articular hyaline cartilage regeneration in rabbit model. Biomaterials 2015; 52 : 463-75.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Kang HW, Lee SJ, Ko IK, Kengla C, Yoo JJ, Atala A. A 3D bioprinting system to produce human-scale tissue constructs with structural integrity. Nat Biotechnol 2016; 34 : 312-9.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Tapias LF, Ott HC. Decellularized scaffolds as a platform for bioengineered organs. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2014; 19 : 145-52.  Back to cited text no. 17
    




 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed324    
    Printed2    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded164    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal