|Year : 2015 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 40-45
Association of serotonin transporter (SLC6A4) & receptor (5HTR1A, 5HTR2A) polymorphisms with response to treatment with escitalopram in patients with major depressive disorder : A preliminary study
Aniruddha Basu1, RK Chadda1, Mamta Sood1, Harpreet Kaur2, Ritushree Kukreti2
1 Department of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
2 CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, Delhi, India
|Date of Submission||17-May-2013|
|Date of Web Publication||4-Aug-2015|
R K Chadda
Department of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi 110 029
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Background & objectives: Genetic factors have potential of predicting response to antidepressants in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). In this study, an attempt was made to find an association between response to escitalopram in patients with MDD, and serotonin transporter (SLC6A4) and receptor (5HTR1A, 5HTR2A) polymorphisms.
Methods: Fifty five patients diagnosed as suffering from MDD, were selected for the study. The patients were treated with escitalopram over a period of 6-8 wk. Severity of depression, response to treatment and side effects were assessed using standardised instruments. Genetic variations from HTR1A (rs6295), HTR2A (rs6311 and rs6313) and SLC6A4 (44 base-pair insertion/deletion at 5-HTTLPR) were genotyped. The genetic data of the responders and non-responders were compared to assess the role of genetic variants in therapeutic outcome.
Results: Thirty six (65.5%) patients responded to treatment, and 19 (34.5%) had complete remission. No association was observed for genotype and allelic frequencies of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) among remitter/non-remitter and responder/non-responder groups, and six most common side-effects, except memory loss which was significantly associated with rs6311 ( p0 =0.03).
Interpretation & conclusions: No significant association was found between the SNPs analysed and response to escitalopram in patients with MDD though a significant association was seen between the side effect of memory loss and rs6311. Studies with larger sample are required to find out genetic basis of antidepressant response in Indian patients.
Keywords: Antidepressant response - pharmacogenetics - serotonin receptor polymorphism (HTR1A, HTR2A) - serotonin transporter (SLC6A4) polymorphism
|How to cite this article:|
Basu A, Chadda R K, Sood M, Kaur H, Kukreti R. Association of serotonin transporter (SLC6A4) & receptor (5HTR1A, 5HTR2A) polymorphisms with response to treatment with escitalopram in patients with major depressive disorder : A preliminary study. Indian J Med Res 2015;142:40-5
|How to cite this URL:|
Basu A, Chadda R K, Sood M, Kaur H, Kukreti R. Association of serotonin transporter (SLC6A4) & receptor (5HTR1A, 5HTR2A) polymorphisms with response to treatment with escitalopram in patients with major depressive disorder : A preliminary study. Indian J Med Res [serial online] 2015 [cited 2020 Apr 2];142:40-5. Available from: http://www.ijmr.org.in/text.asp?2015/142/1/40/162094
Genetic factors may serve as important predictors of drug response in major depressive disorder (MDD). In the last few years, due to its central role in the pathophysiology of depression, genes and their variants related to the serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) pathway, the serotonin transporter gene promoter polymorphism region (5-HTTLPR) has been the most studied genetic factors in association with antidepressant response  . The polymorphism consists of an insertion/deletion of 44 base-pair variations which have potential to influence the gene expression. The long L allele has been shown to have twice the expression in the basal state than the short S allele  . Other genes studied in the serotonin pathway include TPH1, HTR1A, HTR1B, HTR2A, HTR2C, HTR3A and HTR6. The findings, however, remain equivocal even today  .
Several reports in Caucasians have shown a positive association between L allele and better response ,[ , , but others failed to find an association  . A study from Japan  reported a better response in Japanese Asian population with SS genotype, but another study  from the same ethnicity found a better response with LL genotype. Another group of investigators  could not find any significant association. A study on association of serotonin receptor (HTR1A and HTR2A) polymorphisms with therapeutic outcome in patients with depression has shown inconsistent findings  .
Most of the studies on pharmacogenetics of depression have been conducted in Caucasian, Japanese and Chinese populations. An Indian study  from Kashmir reported significant differences in response to escitalopram in patients with depression with homozygous L-allele group and in those having S- allele. The study, however, did not give any details about the ethnicity of the sample. There is a lack of pharmacogenetic studies on antidepressant response in diverse ethnicities of Indian population, which is a crucial factor affecting the gene drug response relationship. This preliminary study was conducted to examine association of serotonin transporter (SLC6A4) and receptor (HTR1A, HTR2A) polymorphisms with response to treatment with escitalopram in an ethnically homogeneous north Indian population with MDD.
| Material & Methods|| |
This study was conducted in the outpatient setting at a tertiary care hospital (All India Institute of Medical Sciences, AIIMS) in New Delhi, India, from August 2010 to July 2011. The patients of north Indian ethnicity, in age group 18-65 yr, suffering from major depressive disorder, and off all psychotropic drugs (antidepressants, antipsychotics, anxiolytics, etc.) for a minimum period of one week (for fluoxetine, the minimum period was five weeks) were included  . Patients with severe medical diseases, on medications known to produce mood symptoms, pregnant and breast-feeding women and patients with recent suicide attempt or history of hypersensitivity to escitalopram were excluded. Past history of manic episodes, psychotic disorder, severe personality disorder and any substance dependence except nicotine, and history of mania in first or second degree biological relative were other exclusion criteria for the study. The north Indian ethnicity was defined as born in north India to parents of north Indian origin as per recommendations of the Indian Genome Variation Consortium  , as hailing from States of Punjab, Haryana, Uttar Pradesh and Delhi. Sample was of convenience.
The patients were assessed on Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI)  to diagnose MDD as per American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4 th edition-Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR)  . A written informed consent was taken from patients. Socio-demographic and basic clinical information was collected on a semi-structured proforma designed for the study. Birth places of patient and his/her parents were noted to ascertain ethnicity. Severity of depression was assessed on Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)  and Clinical Global Impressions Scale (CGI)  . Those having a minimum score of 22 on the MADRS and at least moderately ill in clinical severity item on CGI were included in the study to rule out sub-syndromal states. UKU Side Effect Rating Scale (Udvalg for Kliniske Undersoegelser: Committee for Clinical Investigation), a standard objective method to assess side effects in such studies  was used to assess the side effects. All adverse events were recorded, irrespective of the degree of severity and degree of association except those whose association was not possible.
At the time of first assessment, blood sample (10 ml) was collected for genotyping and treatment was started with tablet escitalopram (10 mg) once daily in morning, as per standard treatment practices. The patients continued their follow up in outpatient service. Dose could be increased to 15-20 mg per day by treating psychiatrist, if required as per clinical indication. During the study period, no other psychotropic drugs except anxiolytics, sedatives and hypnotics were allowed (mostly low dose benzodiazepines as per our standard clinical practice). However, medications for general medical condition, if any, were allowed. The patients did not receive any form of psychotherapy during this period.
All patients were followed up after six to eight weeks of initiation of therapy, as per recommendations of Serretti et al for pharmacogenetic studies of depression. An early follow up after two weeks was not considered as it would have picked up placebo response. At the time of second assessment, patients were considered compliant if drugs were taken on at least 80 per cent of days. Compliance was checked by self-report as well as from the family members (caregivers), besides the empty strips. On follow up visits, patients were assessed on MADRS, CGI and UKU Side Effect Rating scale, and were classified as responder (shown improvement in symptoms), if there was at least 50 per cent reduction in initial MADRS score and remitters (recovery from the episode of depression), if they scored ≤ 7 in MADRS scale  .
Genotyping was conducted at the Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology (IGIB), Delhi, India. Four single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) namely, rs6311, rs6313, rs6295 and 5-HTTLPR 44 base-pair insertion deletion were selected for testing, as these are part of the most probable candidate genes, and their biological relevance is supported by extensive literature. DNA was extracted using modified salting out procedure wherein blood cells were lysed, followed by lysis of nuclear membrane, digestion of nuclear proteins, saturation with sodium chloride and extraction of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) in ethanol  . After DNA extraction, samples were processed for genotyping of SNP. Three SNPs, rs6311, rs6313 and rs6295 were genotyped by the SNP genotyping platform, the SEQUENOME TM - where primer extension reaction followed by Matrix assisted Laser desorption/Ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (Sequenom Inc., San Diego, USA) was used. Genotyping of 44bases insertion/deletion was performed by DNA fragment analysis method using ABI-3130 genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA). The individuals performing genetic analysis were blind to clinical data. The study protocol was approved by the institute's ethics committee.
The data were analyzed using SPSS (version 17) (SPSS, Chicago, Illinos, USA) and PLINK software (version 1.07, PLINK, MA, USA).
| Results|| |
Eighty five patients of north Indian ethnicity were approached for inclusion in the study. Two patients did not give consent and two were later excluded from the study due to change in the diagnosis. Of the 81 patients, 55 (67.9%) were compliant and completed the study. Amongst the rest 26, patients, 16 did not come for follow up, six changed treatment due to inadequate response and four were not compliant with medications. Of the 55 compliant patients, 36 (65.5%) were responders and 19 (34.5%) remitters.
The mean age of the patients was 35±10.3 yr with 32 (58%) being males. Majority (80%) of them were married and were Hindus. Twenty nine per cent of the patients had received less than 10 yr of formal education, whereas about one third had been to college; 25 per cent patients were in paid employment, 25 per cent belonged to labour class or small businesses, and about one third were homemakers. No significant differences were observed between the responder and non responder groups on various socio-demographic variables.
Mean duration of index episode was 13.36 months. Mean score on MADRS was 28.3 ± 5.0 at baseline, and about three-fourth patients were moderately ill on CGI scale. A shorter duration of depressive episode was significantly associated with response ( p0 <0.05). Fifty eight per cent of the patients (n=36) had no side effects, interfering with daily life and 6 (11%) had mild side-effects. Dose was increased to 15 and 20 mg/day in 17 (31%) and 12 (22%) of the patients, respectively during follow up. Almost all our patients received low dose of benzodiazepines (maximum of 1 mg of clonazepam per day) as per standard prescribing practices. [Table 1] summarises the clinical details of the patients.
|Table 1. Distribution of clinical variables across the responder and non-responder groups |
Click here to view
All genotype and allele frequencies in the study were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. The study sample constituted SNPs with both homozygous and heterozygous allelic variants. However, for 5-HTTLPR 44base-pair insertion/deletion (S/L) polymorphism, L allele was not detected in homozygous condition though it presented as heterozygous. The observed allelic frequencies in 55 patients were 0.3 for L allele and 0.7 for S allele. Frequencies of S allele were found to be 0.88 and 0.82 in responder and non-responder groups, respectively [Table 2].
|Table 2. Distribution of genotype and allele frequencies between the responder and non-responder groups |
Click here to view
Linkage disequilibrium (LD) analysis was performed for rs6311 and rs6313 variants of HTR2A. A moderate LD was found among these SNPs (D′=0.84 and r  =0.71). There were no significant differences for constructed haplotypes among responders and non-responders [Table 3]. Similar results were obtained for remitter/non-remitter groups and across side-effects except memory loss which was found to be significantly associated with rs6311 (P=0.03).
|Table 3. Distribution of haplotypes between the responder and non-responder groups |
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
We attempted to find an association of serotonin transporter (SLC6A4) and serotonin receptor (5HTR1A, 5HTR2A) polymorphisms with response to treatment with escitalopram in patients with MDD. We studied four SNPs, namely rs6311, rs6313, rs6295 and 5-HTTLPR 44 base-pair insertion deletion. No significant association was found between the SNPs analysed and response to escitalopram, though a significant association was observed between the side effect of memory loss with rs6311. Our finding of no significant association between the SNPs tested with response to escitalopram was similar to that of a larger study like Sequenced Treatment to Relieve Depression (STAR*D)  . However, another study  has shown an association between SNPs and antidepressant response. The discrepant findings could be due to allele frequency differences in populations of diverse ethnicities. Our patients were predominantly from four northern StatesStates and had S allele frequency of 0.7, and there were no LL genotype. It is difficult to conclude, whether this is true allele frequency or a distorted value due to a small sample size.
A substantial number of our patients reported side effect of tension (31%) and memory disturbance (16%), which is unusual for escitalopram. This could be because both probable and possible side effects were included in listing as given in the UKU scale. It is possible that anxiety and difficulties in concentration, which are also symptoms of depression, were labelled as side effects by patients. The finding of association of the side effect of memory loss with rs6311 needs further investigation.
The study had a few limitations like a sample size of 55, which might not be considered adequate for a genetic study. Our study was a preliminary study. There is a need for studies with larger homogeneous sample size from India with a larger pool of SNPs which could unravel the genetic basis of response to antidepressants.
| References|| |
Huezo-Diaz P, Uher R, Smith R, Rietschel M, Henigsberg N, Marusic A, et al
. Moderation of antidepressant response by the serotonin transporter gene. Br J Psychiatry
Heils A, Teufel A, Petri S, Stöber G, Riederer P, Bengel D, et al
. Allelic variation of human serotonin transporter gene expression. J Neurochem
Smeraldi E, Zanardi R, Benedetti F, Di Bella D, Perez J, Catalano M. Polymorphism within the promoter of the serotonin transporter gene and antidepressant efficacy of fluvoxamine. Mol Psychiatry
Illi A, Poutanen O, Setälä-Soikkeli E, Kampman O, Viikki M, Huhtala H, et al
. Is 5-HTTLPR linked to the response of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in MDD? Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci
Kraft JB, Peters EJ, Slager SL, Jenkins GD, Reinalda MS, McGrath PJ, et al
. Analysis of association between the serotonin transporter and antidepressant response in a large clinical sample. Biol Psychiatry
Kim DK, Lim SW, Lee S, Sohn SE, Kim S, Hahn CG, et al
. Serotonin transporter gene polymorphism and antidepressant response. Neuroreport
Hong CJ, Chen TJ, Yu YW, Tsai SJ. Response to fluoxetine and serotonin 1A receptor (C-1019G) polymorphism in Taiwan Chinese major depressive disorder. Pharmacogenomics J
Min W, Li T, Ma X, Li Z, Yu T, Gao D, et al
. Monoamine transporter gene polymorphisms affect susceptibility to depression and predict antidepressant response. Psychopharmacology (Berl)
Yoshimura R, Umene-Nakano W, Suzuki A, Ueda N, Miyamoto K, Ikenouchi-Sugita A, et al
. Rapid response to paroxetine is associated with plasma paroxetine levels at 4 but not 8 weeks of treatment, and is independent of serotonin transporter promoter polymorphism in Japanese depressed patients. Hum Psychopharmacol
Margoob MA, Mushtaq D, Murtza I, Mushtaq H, Ali A. Serotonin transporter gene polymorphism and treatment response to serotonin reuptake inhibitor (escitalopram) in depression: an open pilot study. Indian J Psychiatry
Sussman N. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. In: Sadock BJ, Sadock VI , Ruiz P, editors. Kaplan and Sadock's comprehensive textbook of psychiatr
y, 9 th
ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009. p. 3190-205.
Indian Genome Variation Consortium. Genetic Landscape of the People of India: a canvas for disease gene exploration. J Genet
Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, Amorim P, Janavs J, Weiller E, et al
. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry
(Suppl 20): 22-33; quiz 34-57.
American Psychiatric Association (APA). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders
, 4 th
ed., text revision (DSM IV-TR). Washington, DC: APA; 2000.
Montgomery SA, Asberg M. A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry
Guy W. National Institute of Mental Health (U.S.). ECDEU assessment manual for psychopharmacology
, revised Rockville M d0 .: U. S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service Alcohol Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration, National Institute of Mental Health, Psychopharmacology Research Branch, Division of Extramural Research Programs; 1976.
Lingjaerde O, Ahlfors UG, Bech P, Dencker SJ, Elgen K. The UKU side effect rating scale. A new comprehensive rating scale for psychotropic drugs and a cross-sectional study of side effects in neuroleptic-treated patients. Acta Psychiatr Scand
Serretti A, Kato M, Kennedy JL. Pharmacogenetic studies in depression: a proposal for methodologic guidelines. Pharmacogenomics J
Illi A, Setälä-Soikkeli E, Viikki M, Poutanen O, Huhtala H, Mononen N, et al
. 5-HTR1A, 5-HTR2A, 5-HTR6, TPH1 and TPH2 polymorphisms and major depression. Neuroreport
Miller SA, Dykes DD, Polesky HF. A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nucleic Acids Res
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]
|This article has been cited by|
||A preliminary association study between serotonin transporter (5-HTTLPR), receptor polymorphisms (5-HTR1A, 5-HTR2A) and depression symptom-clusters in a north Indian population suffering from Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)
| ||Aniruddha Basu |
| ||Asian Journal of Psychiatry. 2019; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Ensemble Learning for Early-Response Prediction of Antidepressant Treatment in Major Depressive Disorder
| ||Cong Pei,Yurong Sun,Jinlong Zhu,Xinyi Wang,Yujie Zhang,Shuqiang Zhang,Zhijian Yao,Qing Lu |
| ||Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2019; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Association Between Side Effects and Blood microRNA Expression Levels and Their Targeted Pathways in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder Treated by a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor, Escitalopram: A CAN-BIND-1 Report
| ||Antoine Yrondi,Laura M Fiori,Benicio N Frey,Raymond W Lam,Glenda M MacQueen,Roumen Milev,Daniel J Müller,Jane A Foster,Sidney H Kennedy,Gustavo Turecki |
| ||International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology. 2019; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Genetic variants in major depressive disorder: From pathophysiology to therapy
| ||Xenia Gonda,Peter Petschner,Nora Eszlari,Daniel Baksa,Andrea Edes,Peter Antal,Gabriella Juhasz,Gyorgy Bagdy |
| ||Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 2018; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Overview of pharmacogenomic testing in clinical practice
| ||Tonya Gross,Jeremy Daniel |
| ||Mental Health Clinician. 2018; 8(5): 235 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Pharmacogenetics and Imaging–Pharmacogenetics of Antidepressant Response: Towards Translational Strategies
| ||Tristram A. Lett,Henrik Walter,Eva J. Brandl |
| ||CNS Drugs. 2016; 30(12): 1169 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|