|Year : 2015 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 228-235
Prevalence of tuberculosis in Faridabad district, Haryana State, India
SK Sharma1, Ashish Goel2, SK Gupta3, Krishna Mohan1, V Sreenivas4, SK Rai3, UB Singh5, LS Chauhan6
1 Department of Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
2 Department of Medicine, University College of Medical Sciences, Delhi, India
3 Centre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
4 Department of Biostatistics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
5 Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
6 National Centre for Disease Control, Government of India, Delhi, India
|Date of Acceptance||30-Jul-2012|
|Date of Web Publication||21-Apr-2015|
Dr. S K Sharma
Department of Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110 029
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Background & objectives : Epidemiological information on tuberculosis (TB) has always been vital for planning control strategies. It has now gained further importance for monitoring the impact of interventions to control the disease. The present study was done to estimate the prevalence of bacillary tuberculosis in the district of Faridabad in Haryana State of India among persons aged older than 15 years.
Methods: In this cross-sectional study, residents of Faridabad district were assessed for the prevalence of tuberculosis. Twelve rural and 24 urban clusters with estimated populations of 41,106 and 64,827 individuals were selected for the study. Two sputum samples were collected from individuals found eligible for inclusion. The samples were also cultured by modified Petroff's method and were examined for growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis once a week for eight weeks. A person found positive by smear and/or culture was identified as sputum-positive pulmonary TB positive.
Results: A total of 105,202 subjects were enumerated in various clusters of the Faridabad district. There were 50,057 (47.58%) females and 55,145 (52.42%) males. Of these 98,599 (93.7%) were examined by the study group (47,976 females; 50,623 males). The overall prevalence of sputum smear or culture positive pulmonary tuberculosis in our study was found to be 101.4 per 100,000 population.
Interpretation & conclusions : The present results showed that the prevalence of sputum positive pulmonary tuberculosis was higher in Faridabad district than the notification rates recorded by the World Health Organization for the contemporary period, a disparity that could be explained by a difference in case detection strategy employed for the study.
Keywords: Community-based survey - epidemiology - pulmonary tuberculosis - sputum-positive-tuberculosis
|How to cite this article:|
Sharma S K, Goel A, Gupta S K, Mohan K, Sreenivas V, Rai S K, Singh U B, Chauhan L S. Prevalence of tuberculosis in Faridabad district, Haryana State, India. Indian J Med Res 2015;141:228-35
|How to cite this URL:|
Sharma S K, Goel A, Gupta S K, Mohan K, Sreenivas V, Rai S K, Singh U B, Chauhan L S. Prevalence of tuberculosis in Faridabad district, Haryana State, India. Indian J Med Res [serial online] 2015 [cited 2020 Mar 28];141:228-35. Available from: http://www.ijmr.org.in/text.asp?2015/141/2/228/155593
Prior to the twentieth century, tuberculosis as a disease was considered to be of little importance to the general population in India. Much more importance was attached to the description of disease in European immigrants as compared to its occurrence in native Indians, a fact that is much different from the situation today. In his notes on the prevalence of tuberculosis in India, Lt Col Wilkinson noted with interest in 1914 that the mention of tuberculosis in Indian literature was scanty due to its low prevalence  . However, he considered the possibility of the disease having been confused with an alternate diagnosis of malaria, which was more prevalent. Wilkinson documented a rise in the incidence of tuberculosis in India and also the mortality associated with it. While several studies during the last century have improved our understanding of the disease, yet the literature on tuberculosis in India leaves much to be desired.
Epidemiological information on tuberculosis has always been vital for planning control strategies, and has now gained further importance for monitoring the impact of interventions against the disease. There are only a few reports on the magnitude of tuberculosis from population based surveys, but most data come from health institution based case notifications in selected subsets and often lack completeness and consistency ,,,,, . In view of low health service coverage, a developing diagnostic network, and a weak disease notification system, it is not only difficult to determine the magnitude of tuberculosis from case notification alone, but it is also impossible to monitor the effectiveness of control measures. The targets for tuberculosis control framed within the United Nations' Millennium Development Goals include reduction of the prevalence and mortality associated with the disease in 1990 to by 50 per cent by 2015. While monitoring control, the aim is to assess the incidence of tuberculosis accurately through routine surveillance. Prevalence surveys give an unbiased measure of burden and are justified in high burden countries where many cases may be otherwise missed , .
A survey conducted in 2003 indicated the presence of as many as 1.5 million infective cases of tuberculosis in the community  . Further, with 1.6-2.4 million incident cases in 2008, India was ranked first in terms of the total number of incident cases of tuberculosis in 2008  . Tuberculosis is responsible for as many as 29 deaths per year per 100,000 people. In a country with over a billion people this translates to as many as 290,000 deaths in a year  . With a reported prevalence of 283 cases per 100,000 population, India is among the 22 high burden countries for tuberculosis in the world  . Different studies across the country have estimated a prevalence of smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis between 60 and 760 per 100,000 population, culture positive tuberculosis between 170 and 980, and culture and/or smear positive prevalence between 180 and 1270 per 100,000 people  .
The present study was done to estimate the prevalence of bacillary tuberculosis in Faridabad district in Haryana, India, among persons aged older than 15 yr.
| Material & Methods|| |
The Faridabad district has a population of 2,194,586 people, growing at a rate of 48.47 per cent as recorded over the last decade, with a sex ratio of 839 females per 1000 males  . More than half (56%) of the people reside in the urban areas and almost a third are illiterate. The Revised National Tuberculosis Programme was adopted in Faridabad district in April 2000  . Currently, there are four treatment units in the district at Ballabgarh, Palwal, Hodal and Faridabad city besides the 21 designated microscopy centers. In this cross-sectional study, residents of Faridabad district were assessed for the prevalence of tuberculosis. The rural and urban clusters were sampled separately proportional to their size.
Training of staff: The research staff recruited for the study was trained at Tuberculosis Research Center (now National Institute of Tuberculosis Research) in Chennai, for four weeks in November 2007. The field staff was trained for door-to-door census, elicitation of symptoms, sputum collection and reporting. The laboratory technicians were trained for sputum microscopic examination, use of fluorescent microscope and culture processing. Further, the research team was also trained to use 'TPT 69' card.
Before initiating field work, cooperation and support was obtained from the district health officials, and medical officers of various tuberculosis units and centers. In addition, local community leaders were contacted and sensitized towards the study. Cluster mapping was undertaken with their help.
Subject selection and data collection: The current recommended strategy for identification of cases of pulmonary tuberculosis is one of passive case finding among patients with respiratory symptoms who present spontaneously to health care facilities. Symptoms such as cough for two weeks or more is used to guide examination of sputum for tuberculosis detection. In a cross-sectional house-to-house survey over 15 months between January 2008 and March 2009, all individuals over 15 years were registered and screened by enquiring for previously defined symptoms suggestive of tuberculosis vis-à-vis cough, fever, chest pain and previous history of tuberculosis. The district was taken as the sampling universe and stratified cluster sampling was undertaken. Rural and urban clusters were sampled separately. The rural cluster was a village while an urban cluster was defined as an area which covered two contiguous polling booths. Rural and urban clusters were sampled separately so that the rural-urban distribution in the sample was similar to the rural-urban distribution of the population in the district. Clusters in urban and rural areas were selected systematically from the entire list of such clusters in the district and arranged in ascending order of the population. The sampling was proportional to size. The entire eligible population in the selected cluster was covered.
Individuals were classified as symptomatics if they had cough for over two weeks; or chest pain or fever for over one month; or haemoptysis on any occasion over six months preceding the interview. They were labelled asymptomatic but eligible if they had previously received anti-tubercular treatment on any occasion. It was estimated that 60 per cent of cases would be picked up by eliciting their symptoms and thus the prevalence was estimated at 2.4 per 1000 population. To achieve a precision of 20 per cent with 95 % confidence intervals presuming a minimum coverage of 90 per cent with a design effect of 2, the sample size required was calculated to be 90,000 individuals older than 15 yr. Twelve rural and 24 urban clusters with estimated populations of 41,106 and 64,827 individuals were selected for the study.
Two sputum samples were collected, one was taken on spot and the second was obtained next morning from all eligible subjects. The sputum samples were collected in sterile, single-use disposable containers and were transported to the central laboratory at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi on the same day in ice-packs for storage. The samples collected were examined by direct smear microscopy and subjects were identified as smear positive cases of tuberculosis if at least one sputum sample was found positive for acid-fast bacilli (AFB). These were processed by modified Petroff's method  and examined under fluorescence microscopy. The sputum was cultured on Lowenstein-Jensen medium and examined for growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis once a week for eight weeks. A person found positive by smear and/or culture was identified as a sputum-positive pulmonary tuberculosis case. All subjects identified as cases, were treated with Directly Observed Treatment Short-course (DOTS) under the Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme (RNTCP). Subjects were excluded if no sputum could be obtained despite efforts at induction.
The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi. All participants were included only after they gave written and informed consent.
Quality control: A random sample of study participants screened for symptoms by field workers was screened independently by an independent supervisor on day-to-day basis; 10 per cent of the individuals included in the study were reviewed by the supervisors who stayed in the field with investigators and interviewed the participants. The extent of agreement was reviewed between the two regularly during the course of the survey. Excellent concordance was reported by the supervisors in their survey. Sputum examination and culture were subjected to quality assurance protocols as per the guidelines under the Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme. Five positive and five negative slides were re-examined by systematic random method and a feedback on quality of smear, stain, reading and reporting was given. The extent of agreement was ascertained and found to be excellent. The progress of the project was periodically reviewed by a team of experts including members from WHO, Geneva constituted by the Central TB Dvision of the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India.
Statistical analysis: The results were analyzed using SPSS version 11.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). The outcome variable was the diagnosis of tuberculosis and the proportion of cases of tuberculosis among all included subjects was calculated. The prevalence of sputum and/or culture positive cases was calculated using appropriate formulae. The differences in proportions were analyzed for significance using the chi-square test.
| Results|| |
A total of 105,202 subjects were enumerated in various clusters of the Faridabad district. There were 50,057 (47.58%) females and 55,145 (52.42%) males; 61,368 (58.33%) were from the urban clusters while 43,834 (41.67%) were from the rural clusters. Of these, 98,599 (93.7%); (50,623 men and 47,976 women; 41,261 rural and 57,338 urban) were examined by the study group. A flowchart detailing the conduct of the study is presented in the [Figure 1].
Among those found eligible for participation (n=1860), 221 (11.9%) subjects complained of cough for two to four weeks; 258 (14%) had cough for one month to less than two months; 122 (6.6%) had cough for two to three months; 154 (8.3%) had cough for three months to less than six months; while 576 (31%) had cough for more than six months duration. While evaluating chest pain it was found that 105 (5.6%) subjects had chest pain for over one to two months; 52 (2.8%) for two to three months; 75 (4%) for three to six months; while 156 (8.4%) subjects had chest pain for over six months. Further, 41 (2.2%) subjects had fever for one to two months; 18 (1%) since two to three months; 15 (0.8%) since three to six months; while 46 (2.5%) subjects were febrile for over six months. A total of 167 (9%) participants had haemoptysis over the previous six months and 786 (42.3%) subjects received anti-tuberculosis treatment in the past.
Of the 1860 individuals found eligible for sputum examination, two samples could be examined for 1362 (73.2%) subjects and at least one was examined for 1337 (71.9%) subjects. Sputum could not be examined from individuals who either refused (86, 4.6%), could not produce (89, 4.8%) or collection was not feasible (348, 18.7%). A total of 81 (4.4%) sputum samples were found smear positive while 82 (4.4%) were culture positive. Sixty three (3.4%) subjects were both smear and culture positive, while 19 were smear negative but culture positive and 18 (1%) were only smear positive for AFB. Of the total eligible population (105,202) in the district, 100 were found either smear or culture positive during the study. The overall prevalence of sputum smear or culture positive pulmonary tuberculosis in our study was found to be 101.4 per 100,000 population. The distribution of the examined subjects, results of the sputum examination and the calculated prevalence among the subjects is presented in the [Table 1].
|Table 1. Prevalence of sputum smear or culture positive in the examined subjects of tuberculosis |
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
A total of 105,202 individuals in urban and semi-urban sectors of Faridabad were included in the current cross-sectional house-to-house survey between January 2008 and March 2009, and the adjusted prevalence of smear positive pulmonary tuberculosis was found to be 101.4 per 100,000 population.
The prevalence of tuberculosis in India was first studied comprehensively in 150 villages, six cities and 30 towns in India in nearly 300,000 subjects aged more than five years by Chakraborty et al in 1950 and it was found that the disease was more prevalent in the rural areas with an overall prevalence of 400 per 100,000 population  . Several surveys have been done in subsequent decades for the estimation of tuberculosis in Tumkur  , Madanapalli  , Bengaluru, Car Nicobar  , Chingleput  , Delhi  , Raichur  , North Arcot  , Wardha  , Morena  , Chhindwara  and Jammu  . The prevalence of tuberculosis has shown little change over the years as revealed by serial surveys ,, .
The World Health Organization (WHO) has recorded a prevalence of 283 cases per 100,000 population of all forms of tuberculosis in India in its report published in 2009  . In the same report a notification rate of 51 new sputum smear positive cases per 100,000 population/year has been reported. Our prevalence of 101.4 sputum smear positive cases per 100,000 population appears to be higher than the notification rate as reported by the WHO but this discrepancy may easily be due to the difference in the passive approach to case notification as compared to a more active case detection employed during the current study settings.
Individual studies across India have estimated a prevalence of smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis between 60 and 760 per 100,000 population  . Authors have shown the association of occurrence of tuberculosis to several determinants including use of biomass fuels  , age, sex, initial tuberculin sensitivity  and lower socio-economic index  . Narang et al studied a total of 114,266 individuals over five years of age in the tribal and non-tribal population in Ashti and Karanja districts of Wardha, Maharashtra in India in a cross-sectional house-to-house survey. They found that the prevalence of tuberculosis was highest in males over 55 years of age. The authors found a total of 148 sputum positive cases of tuberculosis. Of these, 55 were positive on both microscopy and culture while 65 were detected positive on culture alone. They found a prevalence of 142 smear positive cases per 100,000 population in the total population which is higher than our estimate. In another study, Chakma et al have reported a prevalence of 12.7 per 100,000 population of Morena district of Madhya Pradesh. In a recently concluded study, Rao et al estimated the overall prevalence of pulmonary sputum positive tuberculosis among the Bharia tribal population in Patalkot valley of Chhindwara district of Madhya Pradesh at 432 per 100,000 population. They found that the prevalence increased significantly in those over 45 yr of age  . Ray and Abel  while studying four villages in the KV Kuppam Block of North Arcot Ambedkar district of Tamil Nadu, south India, covered the entire population of 22,847 people aged older than 10 yr in the area and estimated a prevalence of 241 per 100,000. Gopi et al, have found that the prevalence of smear positive TB was 323 per 100,000 and that of culture positive TB was 605 in Tiruvallur district in south India. Data available from Delhi and neighbouring areas indicated that the prevalence of tuberculosis in the region was 330 per 100,000 population in 1991  . However, this estimate represents an era prior to the implementation of DOTS in the region and the statistics are likely to have changed with the implementation of RNTCP. A decline in prevalence has previously been noted in this district of Tiruvallur following the implementation of DOTS approach under the RNTCP over five years and the prevalence in the same population has been reported to be 169 smear positive cases per 100,000  in 2008.
In the neighbouring countries in an earlier study Alvi et al have reported a prevalence of 554 smear positive cases detected from examination of a single spot sputum sample in a population of 100,000 while studying 1077 people in Shimshal Valley in Pakistan. They found a prevalence of 1949 cases of smear negative active tuberculosis diagnosed on chest radiography in the same region. Hussain et al from the same region reported a high prevalence of latent tuberculosis detected by tuberculin skin test in institutional setting from the North West Frontier Province in Pakistan. Similar studies have been conducted in other developing countries to estimate the burden of pulmonary tuberculosis. Shargie et al studied a population of 28,464 in Lemo district of Ethiopia and estimated a prevalence of 78 per 100,000 people in the area in 2003. They showed that the patients detected through their study were younger and ill for longer duration than those who were already on treatment. They also showed that for every two patients on treatment, there was one case of infective tuberculosis in the community who remained untreated and was diagnosed due to the survey.
The major strength of the current study was that it was one of the largest community based Indian studies to determine the prevalence of tuberculosis after the initiation of the Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme with door-to-door survey and collection of data supported by sputum smears and cultures. It would have been desirable to have 100 per cent sputum collection from the 1860 subjects identified eligible for sputum examination but this was not possible due to operational difficulties and no sputum samples could be collected for 498 participants while only one sample could be examined for 25 participants. It would be interesting to consider how it would have affected our results had the study achieved an ideal one hundred per cent coverage within the study subjects. Considering similar positivity rates among the eligible subjects whose sputum could not be examined, our results might slightly underestimate the actual prevalence of tuberculosis in the community. While it would have been further desirable to support the diagnosis with radiographic evidence in the form of an X-ray of chest, this was beyond the scope of the current study.
In conclusion, the present study estimated the prevalence of sputum smear positive pulmonary tuberculosis to be 101.4 per 100,000 individuals in Faridabad district in Haryana. This compares favourably to the recorded national prevalence rate of 283 per 100,000 population and a case notification rate of 51 new sputum smear positive cases per 100,000 population per year  . Special efforts may be needed to identify individual pockets of higher prevalence of disease and address them specifically while planning and designing control programmes.
| Acknowledgment|| |
Authors acknowledge the role of the project staff during the conduct of this study for their invaluable help during the identification of cases and collection of data. The research project was funded by the National Operational Research Committee of the Central TB Division (CTD), Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India.
| References|| |
Wilkinson E. Notes on the prevalence of tuberculosis in India. Proc R Soc Med
Sakhuja V, Jha V, Varma PP, Joshi K, Chugh KS. The high incidence of tuberculosis among renal transplant recipients in India. Transplantation
Agrawal D, Udwadia ZF, Rodriguez C, Mehta A. Increasing incidence of fluoroquinolone-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis
in Mumbai, India. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis
Das P, Ahuja A, Gupta SD. Incidence, etiopathogenesis and pathological aspects of genitourinary tuberculosis in India: A journey revisited. Indian J Urol
Gupta A, Nayak U, Ram M, Bhosale R, Patil S, Basavraj A, et al
. Postpartum tuberculosis incidence and mortality among HIV-infected women and their infants in Pune, India, 2002-2005. Clin Infect Dis
Hussain H, Akhtar S, Nanan D. Prevalence of and risk factors associated with Mycobacterium tuberculosis
infection in prisoners, North West Frontier Province, Pakistan. Int J Epidemiol
Rajasekaran S, Raja K, Jeyaseelan L, Vijilat S, Priya K, Mohan K, et al
. Post-HAART tuberculosis in adults and adolescents with HIV in India: incidence, clinical and immunological profile. Indian J Tuber
Dye C, Bassili A, Bierrenbach AL, Broekmans JF, Chadha VK, Glaziou P, et al
. Measuring tuberculosis burden, trends, and the impact of control programmes. Lancet J Infect Dis
Chadha VK. Tuberculosis epidemiology in India: a review. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis
Chadha VK. Epidemiological situation of tuberculosis in India. Indian Med Assoc
Khanna RM. Anti-TB programme in entire State of Haryana from November. The Tribune
October 12, 2003.
Cruickshank R, Duguid IP, Maimion BP, Swain RHA. Medical microbiology.
ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1975.
Chakraborty AK. Prevalence and incidence of tuberculosis infection and disease in India: a comprehensive review
. WHO/TB/97.231. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1997. p. 1-26.
Gothi GD, Chakraborty AK, Nair SS, Ganapathy KT, Bannerjee GC. Prevalence of tuberculosis in a south Indian district twelve years after initial survey. Indian J Tuberc
Frimodt-Moller J, Acharyulu GS, Kesava Pillai K. A controlled study of the effect of a domiciliary tuberculosis chemotherapy programme in a rural community in south India. Indian J Med Res
Murhekar MV, Kolappan C, Gopi PG, Chakraborty AK, Sehgal SC. Tuberculosis situation among tribal population of Car Nicobar, India, 15 years after intensive tuberculosis control project and implementation of a national tuberculosis programme. Bull World Health Organ
Radhakrishna S, Frieden TR, Subramani R, Kumaran PP. Trends in the prevalence and incidence of tuberculosis in south India. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis
New Delhi TB Center. Study of epidemiology of tuberculosis in an urban population of Delhi-report on 30 year follow up. Indian J Tuberc
Gopi PG, Vallishayee RS, Appe Gowda BN, Paramasivan CN, Ranganatha S. A tuberculosis prevalence survey based on symptoms questioning and sputum examination. Indian J Tuberc
Ray D, Abel R. Incidence of smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis from 1981-83 in a rural area under an active health care programme in south India. Tuber Lung Dis
Narang P, Tyagi NK, Mendiratta DK, Jajoo UN, Bharambhe MS, Nayar S. Prevalence of sputum-positive pulmonary tuberculosis in tribal and non-tribal populations of the Ashti and Karanja tahsils in Wardha district, Maharashtra State, India. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis
Chakma T, Vinay Rao P, Pall S, Kaushal LS, Datta M, Tiwari RS. Survey of pulmonary tuberculosis in primitive tribe of Madhya Pradesh. Indian J Tuberc
Rao VG, Bhat J, Yadav R, Gopi PG, Selvakumar N, Wares DF. Prevalence of pulmonary tuberculosis among the Bharia, a primitive tribe of Madhya Pradesh, central India. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis
Mayurnath S, Anantharaman DS, Baily GV, Radhamani MP, Vallishayee RS, Venkataraman F, et al
. Tuberculosis prevalence survey in Kashmir valley. Indian J Med Res
Mishra VK, Retherford RD, Smith KR. Biomass cooking fuels and prevalence of tuberculosis in India. Int J Infect Dis
Radhakrishna S, Frieden TR, Subramani R. Association of initial tuberculin sensitivity, age and sex with the incidence of tuberculosis in south India: a 15-year follow-up. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis
Muniyandi M, Ramachandran R, Gopi PG, Chandrasekaran V, Subramani R, Sadacharam K, et al
. The prevalence of tuberculosis in different economic strata: a community survey from South India. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis
Gopi PG, Subramani R, Radhakrishna S, Kolappan C, Sadacharam K, Devi TS, et al
. A baseline survey of the prevalence of tuberculosis in a community in south India at the commencement of a DOTS programme. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis
Gopi PG, Subramani R, Santha T, Kumaran PP, Kumaraswami V, Narayanan PR. Relationship of ARTI to incidence and prevalence of tuberculosis in a district of south India. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis
Subramani R, Radhakrishna S, Frieden TR, Kolappan C, Gopi PG, Santha T, et al
. Rapid decline in prevalence of pulmonary tuberculosis after DOTS implementation in a rural area of South India. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis
Alvi AR, Hussain SF, Shah MA, Khalida M, Shamsudin M. Prevalence of pulmonary tuberculosis on the roof of the world. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis
Shargie EB, Yassin MA, Lindtjorn B. Prevalence of smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis in a rural district of Ethiopia. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis
|This article has been cited by|
||Prevalence of pulmonary tuberculosis in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis
| ||Ramadass Sathiyamoorthy,Mani Kalaivani,Praveen Aggarwal,SanjeevKumar Gupta |
| ||Lung India. 2020; 37(1): 45 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Increasing trends of lung cancer in Golestan province, Northern Iran (2004–2016)
| ||Faezeh Salamat,Mahmoud Khandashpour,Mohammad Naeimi-Tabiei,Ali Ariannia,Mohammad Ashaari,SeyedMehdi Sedaghat,Fatemeh Ghasemi-Kebria,Fatemeh Salamat,Abbas Moghaddami,Susan Hasanpour-Heidari,Reza Hoseinpour,Nastaran Jafari-Delouei,Hamid Ghayoriardahaei,Masoomeh Gholami,Abdolreza Fazel,Gholamreza Roshandel,Jacques Ferlay,Elisabete Weiderpass |
| ||Cancer Epidemiology. 2020; 65: 101687 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Estimation of the burden of bacteriologically positive Tuberculosis among Adults in Kashmir: A baseline for future surveys in the Valley
| ||Saleem-ur- Rehman,Rehana Kausar,SyedM Kadri,Nasreen Jan,Bilal Bhat,S Najar,VijayK Chattu |
| ||Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care. 2020; 9(1): 56 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Sub-national TB prevalence surveys in India, 2006-2012: Results of uniformly conducted data analysis
| ||V. K. Chadha,Sharda M. Anjinappa,Paresh Dave,Kiran Rade,D. Baskaran,P. Narang,C. Kolappan,K. Katoch,S. K. Sharma,V. G. Rao,A. N. Aggarwal,P. Praseeja,R. Jitendra,S. Swaminathan,Dipankar Chatterji |
| ||PLOS ONE. 2019; 14(2): e0212264 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Active tuberculosis case finding in India – The way forward
| ||V.K. Chadha,P. Praseeja |
| ||Indian Journal of Tuberculosis. 2018; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Tuberculosis preventive treatment: the next chapter of tuberculosis elimination in India
| ||Patrick K Moonan,Sreenivas A Nair,Reshu Agarwal,Vineet K Chadha,Puneet K Dewan,Umesh D Gupta,Christine S Ho,Timothy H Holtz,Ajay M Kumar,Nishant Kumar,Prahlad Kumar,Susan A Maloney,Sundari R Mase,John E Oeltmann,C N Paramasivan,Malik M Parmar,Kiran K Rade,Ranjani Ramachandran,Raghuram Rao,Virendra S Salhorta,Rohit Sarin,Sanjay Sarin,Kuldeep S Sachdeva,Sriram Selvaraju,Rupak Singla,Diya Surie,Jamhoih Tonsing,Srikanth P Tripathy,Sunil D Khaparde |
| ||BMJ Global Health. 2018; 3(5): e001135 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Sensitivity and specificity of screening tools and smear microscopy in active tuberculosis case finding
| ||V.K. Chadha,S.M. Anjinappa,Kiran Rade,D. Baskaran,P. Narang,C. Kolappan,J. Ahmed,P. Praseeja |
| ||Indian Journal of Tuberculosis. 2018; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Sex Differences in Tuberculosis Burden and Notifications in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
| ||Katherine C. Horton,Peter MacPherson,Rein M. G. J. Houben,Richard G. White,Elizabeth L. Corbett,John Z Metcalfe |
| ||PLOS Medicine. 2016; 13(9): e1002119 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|