Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research
  Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login  
  Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Users Online: 2180       

   Table of Contents      
VIEW POINT
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 140  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 707-709

Addressing tobacco use & dependence in primary care: A priority for tobacco control in the country


Public Health Foundation of India, Delhi NCR, Plot No. 47, Sector 44 Institutional Area, Gurgaon 122 002, Haryana, India

Date of Web Publication3-Mar-2015

Correspondence Address:
Rajmohan Panda
Public Health Foundation of India, Delhi NCR, Plot No. 47, Sector 44 Institutional Area, Gurgaon 122 002, Haryana
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 25758567

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Panda R. Addressing tobacco use & dependence in primary care: A priority for tobacco control in the country. Indian J Med Res 2014;140:707-9

How to cite this URL:
Panda R. Addressing tobacco use & dependence in primary care: A priority for tobacco control in the country. Indian J Med Res [serial online] 2014 [cited 2019 Sep 20];140:707-9. Available from: http://www.ijmr.org.in/text.asp?2014/140/6/707/152439

There are 27.5 crores adult tobacco users (rural-21.6 crores, urban-5.9 crores) in India and this is a major public health challenge [1] . In India, about a quarter of deaths among middle-aged men are caused by smoking [2],[3] . Additionally, tobacco use causes huge economic loss to the tune of ` 6011 crores (1 billion USDs) [4] . Tobacco cessation leads to short-term health benefits and curbs the tobacco death burden in the long term [5],[6] . Tobacco cessation has immediate health benefit and can reduce tobacco-related mortality in short term in comparison to other preventive measures for tobacco control [7],[8] . A wide range of pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic treatments have been successfully used to assist patients in quitting tobacco, the most effective approach to tobacco cessation appears to result from a combination of these modalities [9],[10] . Physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and other healthcare providers all have the potential to lead successful tobacco cessation interventions [11] . It is without doubt now that the most effective preventive intervention that a clinician can provide for tobacco using patients against heart disease, cancer, cerebrovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and tuberculosis is an empathic tobacco cessation intervention [1] . Nicotine replacement therapies (NRT) have been shown to further double the chances of successfully quitting smoking when used in conjunction with physician's advice [12] . The cost-effectiveness of NRT in low and middle income countries was estimated to be ` 16600 (USD 276) per disability-adjusted life year saved [13] . Keeping this in mind the Government of India and World Health Organization (WHO) had started tobacco cessation services as early as in 2002. Currently 19 Tobacco Cessation Centers (TCC) are functional in the country [14] . A study conducted by Kumar et al[15] in Delhi compared the effect of counselling alone with counselling and medication (bupropion) on abstinence rates. Findings of the study suggested that continuous abstinence rate in the counselling group at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months was 17, 17, 16, and 15 per cent, respectively, whereas in the counselling + medication group the rates were 60, 58, 54, and 53, respectively (P<0.001 for all comparisons). The abstinence was validated by breath carbon monoxide (CO) level measured during each visit [15] . These results also suggested the usefulness of both behavioural counselling as well as medication led cessation approaches in specialized tobacco cessation centers in India. However, these centers which are co-located within tertiary care health facilities have access to the tobacco users who are predominantly males, relatively older age group (mean age 37) and urban residents [16] . Thus, these centers do not meet the criteria for an appropriate public health response to cessation. These interventions now need to be scaled up at a population level so that there it can reach to a large number of tobacco users. The health ministry should look for effective ways in which successful and low cost tobacco cessation services can be a routine part of service delivery. Primary health care holds the promise of the delivery of low cost cessation service reaching large numbers of tobacco users especially in rural/semi-urban areas. However, the effectiveness of cessation services in primary care is yet to be tested. While primary health care does hold some promise for the delivery of cessation services, there are several structural problems which plague primary care including the shortage of trained human resources and qualified counsellors. There are other concerns of the extrapolation of the TCC models in primary health care settings. The TCC models are "top heavy" models, have never been evaluated for cost-effectiveness and operate in a controlled environment. These conditions cannot be replicated at the primary care level and thus severely limit their expansion for wider coverage.



Why primary health care?

There are many advantages of delivery of tobacco cessation services through designated primary care physicians. This will reduce the cost of long term care and patient will get help in determining the need for avoidable expensive treatment. Primary care practitioners are ideally positioned to intervene with their patients who smoke and use smokeless tobacco, and the r0 evised n0 ational g0 uidelines for p0 rimary h0 ealth c0 are (2010) strongly support such action [17] . For cessation to succeed, tobacco use must be recast from a disorder which is typically treated acutely to a chronic, relapsing condition that is likely to require long-term patient management. In India as in most developing countries, primary health care still serves large number of patients particularly in rural areas [18] . Most tobacco users try to quit multiple times, and repeated intervention is necessary to support this iterative process [19] it is also important that interventions must take into account the patient's readiness to change and the fact that the patient will determine whether or not change occurs. While the provision of adequate support for tobacco users who are motivated to quit is essential, it is equally important to continue to follow up throughout the process in order to maintain successful abstinence [20] . There is also a need to determine the levels of nicotine dependence among smokers and smokeless tobacco users using standardized and validated scales so that appropriate intervention can be delivered. This can only be done through repeated opportunistic interventions by health care providers in primary health care where the patient has a long term relationship with the doctor. In recent years, there has been a renewed thrust for the improvements and redesigning of the primary health care units [21] . The approach paper for the 12 th p0 lan advocating for universal health care recommends a renewed thrust at strengthening primary care for all service deliveries including non- communicable diseases (NCDs) [22] . In the coming years this will translate into better managed primary health care through both improvements in infrastructure as well as human resources. Tobacco use as a risk factor for many NCDs should be prioritized for appropriate interventions through the primary health care model.

Way forward

There is a considerable body of evidence on the real world effectiveness of specific interventions in health care settings for cessation in the developed countries but very limited evidence in developing countries like India. There are no large-scale studies testing the whole range of interventions currently recommended for helping people to give up tobacco use specifically those interventions that include motivational interviews for individuals who are not interested in quitting smoking in the immediate to short term. Given the diverse epidemiology of tobacco use in India, there is also a lack of basic research and efficacy trials testing the effectiveness of different interventions in tobacco control. Thus, the first step is to have trials for testing effectiveness of different packages of tobacco control interventions provided by different health care providers in primary health care settings in India. These interventions could range from screening and brief advice to intensive counselling with or without pharmacotherapy. The evidence generated from testing these different packages trial can be used for scaling up of feasible and appropriate low cost tobacco cessation models that will reach to a large number of tobacco users in India.

 
   References Top

1.
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Global adult smoking survey (GATS) - India, 2009-10. New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India; 2010.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Jha P, Jacob B, Gajalakshmi V, Gupta PC, Dhingra N, Kumar R, et al. A nationally representative case-control study of smoking and death in India. N Engl J Med 2008; 358 : 1137-47.   Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
World Health Organization (WHO). WHO report on the global smoking epidemic. Geneva: WHO; 2008.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
John RM, Sung HY, Max W. Economic cost of smoking use in India. Tob Control 2009; 18 : 138-43.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
US Department of Health and Human Services. The health benefits of smoking cessation: a report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centres for Disease Control, Office on Smoking and Health; 1990.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Kulik MC, Nusselder WJ, Boshuizen HC, Lhachimi SK, Fernandez E, Baili P, et al. Comparison of tobacco control scenarios: Quantifying estimates of long term health impact using the DYNAMO-HIA modeling tool. PLoS One 2012; 7 : e32363.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Jha P, Chaloupka FJ. The economics of global tobacco control. BMJ 2000; 321 : 358-61.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Peto R, Lopez AD. The future worldwide health effects of current smoking patterns. In: Koop CE, Pearson CE, Schwarz MR, editors. Critical issues in global health. New York: Jossey-Bass; 2001.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Mallin R. Smoking cessation: integration of behavioral and drug therapies. Am Fam Physician 2002; 65 : 1107-14.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Stitzer ML. Combined behavioral and pharmacological treatments for smoking cessation. Nicotine Tob Res 1999; 1 : S181-7.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Gorin SS, Heck JE. Meta-analysis of the efficacy of tobacco counseling by health care providers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004; 13 : 2012-22.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Silagy C, Lancaster T, Stead L, Mant D, Fowler G. Nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; 3 : CD000146.   Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Gilbert AR, Pinget C, Bovet P, Cornuz J, Shamlaye C, Paccaud F. The cost effectiveness of pharmacological smoking cessation therapies in developing countries: a case study in the Seychelles. Tob Control 2004; 13 : 190-5.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Varghese C, Kaur J, Desai NG, Murthy P, Malhotra S, Subbakrishna DK, et al. Initiating tobacco cessation services in India: challenges and opportunities. WHO South-East Asia J Public Health 2012; 1 : 159-168.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Kumar R, Kushwah AS, Mahakud GC, Prakash S, Vijayan VK. Smoking cessation interventions and continuous abstinence rate at one year. Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci 2007; 49 : 201-7.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
DSouza G, Rekha DP, Sreedaran P, Srinivasan K, Mony PK. Clinico-epidemiological profile of tobacco users attending a tobacco cessation clinic in a teaching hospital in Bangalore city. Lung India 2012; 29 : 137-42.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Tobacco dependence treatment guidelines. New Delhi: Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India; 2011.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Roy S. Primary Health Care in India. Health Popul Perspect Issues 1985; 8 : 135-67.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Hughes JR. Motivating and helping smokers to stop smoking. J Gen Intern Med 2003; 18 : 1053-7.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Niaura R. Nonpharmacologic therapy for smoking cessation: Characteristics and efficacy of current approaches. Am J Med 2008; 121 : 11-9.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Director General of Health Services, Government of India. Indian public health standard- Guideline for primary care centres (PHC). New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India; 2012.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Government of India. Faster, sustainable and more inclusive growth: An approach to the 12 th f0 ive y0 ear p0 lan. New Delhi; 2011. Available from: http://planningcommission.nic.in/plans/planrel/12appdrft/appraoch_12plan.pdf, accessed on November 15, 2013.  Back to cited text no. 22
    




 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed591    
    Printed8    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded223    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal