Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research
  Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login  
  Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Users Online: 315       

   Table of Contents      
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 140  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 665-671

Time dependent enhanced resistance against antibiotics & metal salts by planktonic & biofilm form of Acinetobacter haemolyticus MMC 8 clinical isolate


1 Institute of Bioinformatics & Biotechnology, University of Pune, Pune, India
2 Department of Microbiology, University of Pune, Pune, India
3 Department of Chemistry, University of Pune, Pune, India

Date of Submission07-May-2013
Date of Web Publication9-Jan-2015

Correspondence Address:
Balu Ananada Chopade
Department of Microbiology, University of Pune, Pune 411 007, Maharashtra
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 25579150

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Background & objectives: Available literature shows paucity of reports describing antibiotic and metal resistance profile of biofilm forming clinical isolates of Acinetobacter haemolyticus. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the antibiotic and metal resistance profile of Indian clinical isolate of A. haemolyticus MMC 8 isolated from human pus sample in planktonic and biofilm form.
Methods: Antibiotic susceptibility and minimum inhibitory concentration were determined employing broth and agar dilution techniques. Biofilm formation was evaluated quantitatively by microtiter plate method and variation in complex architecture was determined by scanning electron microscopy. Minimum biofilm inhibiting concentration was checked by Calgary biofilm device.
Results: Planktonic A. haemolyticus MMC 8 was sensitive to 14 antibiotics, AgNO 3 and HgC1 2 resistant to streptomycin and intermediately resistant to netilmycin and kanamycin. MMC 8 exhibited temporal variation in amount and structure of biofilm. There was 32 - 4000 and 4 - 256 fold increase in antibiotic and metal salt concentration, respectively to inhibit biofilm over a period of 72 h as against susceptible planktonic counterparts. Total viable count in the range of 10 5 -10 6 cfu / ml was observed on plating minimum biofilm inhibiting concentration on Muller-Hinton Agar plate without antimicrobial agents. Biofilm forming cells were several folds more resistant to antibiotics and metal salts in comparison to planktonic cells. Presence of unaffected residual cell population indicated presence of persister cells.
Interpretation & conclusions: The results indicate that biofilm formation causes enhanced resistance against antibiotics and metal salts in otherwise susceptible planktonic A. haemolyticus MMC 8.

Keywords: Acinetobacter haemolyticus - antibiotic resistance - Calgary biofilm device - MBIC - MIC - persister cells - SEM


How to cite this article:
Gaidhani SV, Raskar AV, Poddar S, Gosavi S, Sahu PK, Pardesi KR, Bhide SV, Chopade BA. Time dependent enhanced resistance against antibiotics & metal salts by planktonic & biofilm form of Acinetobacter haemolyticus MMC 8 clinical isolate. Indian J Med Res 2014;140:665-71

How to cite this URL:
Gaidhani SV, Raskar AV, Poddar S, Gosavi S, Sahu PK, Pardesi KR, Bhide SV, Chopade BA. Time dependent enhanced resistance against antibiotics & metal salts by planktonic & biofilm form of Acinetobacter haemolyticus MMC 8 clinical isolate. Indian J Med Res [serial online] 2014 [cited 2019 Dec 11];140:665-71. Available from: http://www.ijmr.org.in/text.asp?2014/140/5/665/148995

Members of genus Acinetobacter are considered as one of the most important nosocomial pathogens [1] which exhibit multiple antibiotic and metal resistance and ability to form biofilm 2 . One of the members of the genus, A. haemolyticus is predominantly found on skin of tribal [3] and urban [4] Indian population. It has been reported to exhibit multidrug resistance against commonly used drugs for treatment [5],[6],[7],[8] and production of haemolytic enzymes [9] .

Biofilm is an important mode of bacterial life fostering elevated resistance towards antibiotics and metal salts used in medicine [10] . Earlier, biofilm of Staphylococcus spp. [11] and Escherichia coli[12] have been reported to exhibit elevated resistance against antibiotics. Studies on Pseudomonas aeruginosa have also indicated planktonic and biofilm cells to be resistant to antimicrobial agents [13] . Mechanisms of resistance in biofilm vary significantly from that of planktonic forms [14] . Biofilm resistance mechanisms include (i) production of exopolymeric substances (EPS), (ii) slow growth rate, (iii) spatial and physiological heterogeneity, (iv) persister cells, and (v) small colony variants [15],[16] . However, none of these mechanisms have been reported to be involved in biofilm mediated resistance of genus Acinetobacter.

Information on biofilm formation and comparison of antibiotic and metal resistance profile in planktonic and biofilm form of A. haemolyticus is not available. Thus, the present study was aimed at studying sensitivity pattern of A. haemolyticus MMC 8 against 20 antibiotics belonging to five classes and metal salts commonly used in treatment. The study was further extended to understand temporal variation in biofilm formation and its effect on resistance in biofilm form of A. haemolyticus MMC 8 in comparison to planktonic counterparts.


   Material & Methods Top


Bacterial cultures: Sixteen Acinetobacter strains isolated from clinical samples in the departments of Microbiology at three different hospitals namely Madurai Medical College (MMC), Madurai, Sri Ramchandra Medical College (SRMC), Chennai. All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India, were procured and identified by 16S rRNA gene sequencing and were used for biofilm screening at Institute of Bioinformatics and Biotechnology, University of Pune, Pune (data not shown). On the basis of biofilm formation ability A. haemolyticus MMC 8 (GenBank EU779836) was used for further studies. For antibiotic and metal susceptibility, Escherichia coli NCIM 2931 (ATCC 25922) was used as per recommendations of CLSI Document M07-A9 [17] . Cultures were maintained in 50 per cent (v/v) glycerol at - 80°C. Planktonic and biofilm cultures were grown at 37°C with 150 rpm and static conditions, respectively.

Susceptibility testing against antibiotics and metal salts: Susceptibility of A. haemolyticus MMC 8 was checked against 20 antibiotics, by Kirbey Bauer disc diffusion assay [4] . The antibiotics include amikacin, gentamicin, tobramycin, kanamycin, netilmycin, streptomycin, ampicillin, amoxycillin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid combination, penicillin-G, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, cefepime, meropenem, imipenem, lomefloxacin, chloramphenicol, polymyxin B, rifampicin and tetracycline. Overnight broth culture (100 μl, 10 [5] cfu/ml) was spread on Muller-Hinton agar (MHA) plates and antibiotic discs (Hi-Media Ltd, Mumbai) were placed aseptically. After 24 h of incubation, zone diameters were measured. Metal susceptibility was determined by agar dilution technique as described previously [18] . MHA plates containing concentrations of 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10 mM of AgNO 3 and HgCl 2 were prepared, spot inoculated (5 μl) with 10 [5] cfu / ml and incubated. After 24 h, plates were observed for presence or absence of growth.

Determination of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC): MIC of antibiotics was determined by broth dilution technique as described by CLSI [17] . Briefly, gentamycin, tobramycin, amoxycillin/clavualnic acid, rifampicin and polymyxin B in range of 2 - 2048 μg/ml were prepared in Muller-Hinton broth (MHB). Each tube was inoculated to maintain final density at 10 [5] cfu/ml and incubated. For metal salts, MHA plates containing metal concentrations in the range of 0.1 to 1 mM (AgNO 3 ) and 0.01 - 0.1 mM (HgCl 2 ) were prepared. Culture was spotted (5 μl) and the plates were incubated. After 24 h lowest concentration of antibiotic and metal salt which inhibited growth was recorded as MIC.

Biofilm formation: Biofilm formation was scored in microtiter plate as described earlier [19] with a few modifications. Briefly, culture (5 μl) was inoculated in 195 μl Luria Bertani (LB) broth maintaining final cell density of 10 [5] cfu/ml. After every 24 h broth was aspirated and wells were washed with PBS (200 μl). To the dried plate, aqueous 0.1 per cent (w/v) gentian violet (200 μl) was added and allowed to stand for 15 min. After careful aspiration bound stain was solubilized in alcohol (200 μl) and absorbance was measured at 570 nm on multiplate reader (Molecular devices, USA). Sterile uninoculated L-B broth was used as negative control.

Scanning electron microscopic (SEM) analysis of biofilm: SEM analysis of challenged and unchallenged pegs was performed as described earlier [19] .

Determination of minimum biofilm inhibiting concentration (MBIC): MBIC was determined employing Calgary Biofilm Device (CBD) (Innovotech, Canada). The plate trough was filled with 24.375 ml of MHB and inoculated with 0.625 μl culture (final cell density = 10 [5] cfu/ml). These plates were incubated for a period of 24, 48 and 72 h in static conditions. After the respective period of incubation CBD lid was washed with PBS and transferred to microtiter plate containing gentamycin, tobramycin, amoxycillin/clavualnic acid, rifampicin, polymyxin B, AgNO 3 and HgCl 2 dilutions. After incubation for 24 h, pegs were washed with PBS and transferred to a fresh plate containing 200 μl MHB in each well. This pegs, were sonicated in Ultrasonic cleaner, (Equitron, India) at 40 per cent power for 10 min and incubated for 24 h. The well which did not allow growth was recorded as MBIC and spotted on MHA plate. After 24 h of incubation, the spots which did not grow were recorded as minimum biofilm eradicating concentration (MBEC).


   Results Top


Planktonic A. haemolyticus MMC 8 is sensitive to antibiotics and metal salts: A. haemolyticus MMC 8 was sensitive to 14 antibiotics (amikacin, gentamicin, tobramycin, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, cefepime, lomefloxacin, ampicilin, amoxicillin, amoxicillin, clavulanic acid combination, penicillin chloramphenicol, rifampicin, tetracycline). However, it was resistant to streptomycin and intermediately resistant to kanamycin, netilmycin. In case of metal salts it was sensitive to both AgNO 3 and HgCl 2 . MIC of antibiotics which are commonly used for treatment suggested A. haemolyticus MMC 8 to be resistant to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid with highest MIC of 2048 μg/ml. For other antibiotics like gentamicin, tobramycin and rifampicin, MIC was 8, 64 and 2 μg/ ml, respectively while for polmyxin B it was 39.06 U/ml. MIC values of AgNO 3 and HgCl 2 were 0.4 and 0.03 mM, respectively ([Figure 1] a, b, c, e). Moreover, the MIC values for tobramycin and polymyxin B increased with culture age ([Figure 1]c, d), while for AgNO 3 and HgCl 2 these decreased to 0.1 and 0.02 mM, respectively ([Figure 1]f, g).
Figure 1: MIC and MBIC of antibiotics and metal salts against A. haemolyticus MMC 8 (a) MIC of antibiotics (Ak, amikacin; Gm, gentamicin; Kan, kanamycin; Nt, netilmycin; S, streptomycin; To, tobramycin; Caz, ceftazidime; Cir, ceftriaxone; Cpm, cefepime; Lmf, lomfloxacin; Am, ampicillin; Amc, amoxycillin/clavuanic acid combination; Amx, amoxycillin; P, penicillin G; C, chloramphenicol; R, rifampicin; Te, tetracycline), (b-h) Comparison of MIC and MBIC of antibiotics and metal salts against A. haemolyticus MMC 8 over a period of 72 h; (b) gentamicin, (c) tobramycin, (d) polymyxin B, (e) rifampicin, (f) HgCl2, (g) AgNO3, (h) amoxicillin/clavulanic acid. Each experiment was repeated twice and average value is plotted.

Click here to view


Biofilm formation of A. haemolyticus MMC 8 increases with incubation period: Biofilm formation by microtiter plate method demonstrated that A. haemolyticus MMC 8 established its biofilm over a period of time. The O.D. value of 24 h old biofilm was 0.192±0.0003, while for 48 and 72 h old biofilm these were 0.302 ± 0.006 and 0.85 ± 0.01, respectively. This indicated that the amount of biofilm formed by A. haemolyticus MMC 8 increased with increase in period of incubation ([Figure 2]a). Further, SEM analysis showed structural variation in compactness and architecture of biofilm. One day old biofilm ([Figure 2]b) comprised cellular aggregates while two days old ([Figure 2]c) biofilm was organized forming cellular heaps embedded within exopolymeric matrix. The three days old ([Figure 2]d) biofilm appeared like an intrinsically entangled aggregates of cells.
Figure 2: Biofilm formation by A. haemolyticus MMC 8 (a) Time course by microtiter plate method, Bars and error bars indicate mean and standard deviation of six readings obtained in two sets Scanning electron micrographs (b) 24 h, (c) 48 h, (d) 72 h of unchallenged biofilm, (e) biofilm challenged with gentamicin, (f) AgNO3. White arrows indicate affected cells due to gentamycin (8192 μg/ml) and silver nitrate (6.4 mM).

Click here to view


Biofilm formation enhances resistance in A. haemolyticus MMC 8 against antibiotics and metals salts: A. haemolyticus MMC 8 sensitive to four antibiotics (gentamycin, tobramycin, polymyxin B, rifamficin) and two metal salts (AgNO 3 , HgCl 2 ) became resistant to all after forming biofilm. This resistance increased with age of biofilm. The minimum antibiotic concentration required for inhibiting biofilm growth was about 1000 fold higher for 24 and 48 h biofilm and 4000 fold for 72 h old biofilm ([Table 1], [Figure 1]b-h). This was observed for all antibiotics. Further, on spot inoculating the well containing MBIC a few viable cells in the range of 10 5 - 10 6 cfu/ml survived the antibiotic and metal treatment. Presence of this unaffected cell population was confirmed by SEM analysis ([Figure 2] d, e). This indicated presence of metabolically inactive cells known as persister cells thriving even at high concentration of antibiotic and metals salts.
Table 1: MIC and MBIC of A. haemolyticus MMC 8 towards antibiotics and metal salts


Click here to view



   Discussion Top


In the present study, it was observed that A. haemolyticus MMC 8 produced and stabilized its biofilm over a period of 72 h. Concurrent with our results, Nancharaiah et al[20] have reported increasing biofilm formation of P. putida over a period of time.

It is important to note that one day old biofilm formed by A. haemolyticus MMC 8 was resistant to almost all the antibiotics and metal salts. However, three days old biofilm required relatively much higher concentrations of antibiotics and metal salts for inhibition. Earlier reports on P. aeruginosa have demonstrated five days old biofilm susceptible, while seven days old biofilm resistant towards tobramycin and pipercillin [21] . This indicates the severity of the infection caused by biofilm of A. haemolyticus and the necessity to treat at the earliest.

It was we observed that 32 - 4000 and 4 - 256 fold increase in antibiotic and metal salt concentration, respectively was required to inhibit biofilm even after 24 h of exposure as compared to planktonic counterparts. Earlier studies on S. aureus, E.coli and P. aeruginosa have shown it to be 2-64 times more resistant in biofilm form than in logarithmically growing planktonic cells against antibiotics and metal ions after 24 h of exposure [22] . Our results are concurrent with those of Teitzel and Parsek [23] who reported P. aeruginosa biofilm to be more resistant than planktonic free floating cells.

Biofilm formed by A. haemolyticus MMC 8 was found resistant to amoxicillin/calvulanic acid and positive for β-lactamse production. Prior studies on β-lactamse positive Klebsiella pneumoniae have demonstrated increased rate of antibiotic degradation than penetration in biofilm [24] . Similar mechanism may be exhibited by A. haemolyticus MMC 8. In our earlier studies on A. haemolyticus MMC 8 was found to produce exopolymeric substances (EPS) which increased with incubation period (unpublished data). EPS overproducing mutant of P. aeruginosa was found to produce thick biofilm which posed major problem in antibiotic diffusion leading to elevated resistance [25] . Moreover, EPS is known to be composed of charged polymers such as polypeptides [26] , nucleic acids [27] and polysaccharides [28] . These charged molecules make EPS act as ionic resin, thereby reducing the number of antibiotic molecules and metal ions entering in the interiors of biofilm [23] . This may be the reason for elevated resistance against aminoglycosides and metals.

In the course of biofilm formation, physiological gradients are produced within the biofilm decreasing growth rate of bacteria in small areas of biofilm [29] leading to development of subpopulation which remains unaffected by antibiotic and metal salts and known as persister cells [30] . Persister cells exhibit a typical phenotype of not growing in presence of high concentrations of antimicrobial agents or rather do not die and hence contribute to resistance [31] . In the present study, a small population (10 5 -10 6 cfu/ml) of cells was seen growing on MHA plates after removing antibiotic and metal salt stress. This indicated development of persister cells within biofilm formed by A. haemolyticus MMC 8 leading to an increase in resistance. Our results are concurrent with those of Singh et al[32] who have reported role of persister cells in antibiotic resistance in biofilm of S. aureus. Presence of metal ion resistant persister cell population has also been reported in E.coli[33] . Previously, higher concentrations of antibiotics have also been reported to be ineffective in eradicating biofilm of P. aeruginosa[34] .

In conclusion, the study describes antibiotic and metal resistant profile of planktonic and biofilm of A. haemolyticus MMC 8. Increasing complexity of biofilm, production of exopolymeric substances and presence of persister cells may be the reason leading to elevated resistance in biofilm formed over a period of 72 h.


   Acknowledgment Top


Authors acknowledge financial assistance to UPE Phase I and II awarded to University of Pune. The study was partly supported by a major research project awarded by the University Grants Commission, New Delhi, India, to the last author (BAC). Authors acknowledge the technical assistance provided by the scanning electron microscopy facility of Department of Physics, University of Pune.

 
   References Top

1.
Patwardhan RB, Dhakephalkar PK, Niphadkar KB, Chopade BA. A study on nosocomial pathogens in ICU with special reference to multiresistant Acinetobacter baumannii harbouring multiple plasmids. Indian J Med Res 2008; 128 : 178-87.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Dijkshoorn LA, Nemec A, Seifert H. An increasing threat in hospitals : multidrug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Nat Rev Microbiol 2007; 5 : 939-51.   Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Yavankar S, Pardesi KR, Chopade BA. Species distribution and physiological characterization of Acinetobacter genospecies isolated from healthy human skin of tribal population of India. Indian J Med Microbiol 2007; 25 : 336-45.   Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Baur AW, Kirby WMM, Sherris JC, Turk M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am J Clin Pathol 1966; 45 : 493-6.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Gospodarek E, Kania I. Occurrence of species from Acinetobacter genus in clinical material and other sources. Med Dosw Mikrobiol 1992; 44 : 41-8.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Tjenberg I. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Acinetobacter strains identified by DNA-DNA hybridization. Acta Pathol Microbial Immunol Scand 1990; 98 : 320-6.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Quinteira S, Grosso F, Ramos H, Peixe L. Molecular epidemiology of imipenem-resistant Acinetobacter haemolyticus and Acinetobacter baumannii isolates carrying plasmid-mediated OXA-40 from a portuguese hospital. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2007; 51 : 3465-6.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Traub WH, Spohr M. Antimicrobial drug susceptibility of clinical isolates of Acinetobacter species (A. baumannii, A. haemolyticus, genospecies 3 and genospecies 6). Antimcrob Agents Chemother 1989; 33 : 1617-9.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Grotiuz G, Sirok A, Gadea P, Varela G, Schelotto F. Shiga toxin 2-producing Acinetobacter haemolyticus associated with a case of bloody diarrhea. J Clin Microbiol 2006; 44 : 3838-41.   Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Stewart PS. Mechanisms of antibiotic resistance in bacterial biofilms. Int J Med Microbiol 2002; 292 : 107-13.   Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Cerca N, Martins S, Cerca F, Jefferson KK, Pier G B, Oliveira R, et al. Comparative assessment of antibiotic susceptibility of coagulase negative staphylococcal biofilm versus planktonic culture as assessed by bacterial enumeration or rapid XTT colorimetry. J Antimicrob Chemother 2005; 56 : 331-6.   Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Ito A, Taniuchi A, May T, Kawata K, Okabe S. Increased antibiotic resistance of Escherichia coli mature biofilm. App Env Microbiol 2009; 75 : 4093-100.   Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Spoering AL, Lewis K. Biofilms and planktonic cells of Pseudomonas aeruginosa have similar resistance to killing by antimicrobials. J Bacteriol 2001; 183 : 6746-51.   Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Nishimura S, Toshiyuki T, Akihiko Y, Koichi A, Hiroyuki S. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms isolated from infected total hip arthroplasty cases. J Orthop Sci 2006; 11 : 46-50.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Høiby N, Bjarnsholt T, Givskov M, Molin S, Ciofu O. Antibiotic resistance of bacterial biofilms. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2010; 35 : 322-32.   Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Harrison JJ, Ceri H, Turner RJ. Multimetal resistance and tolerance in microbial biofilms. Nature 2007; 5 : 928-38.   Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. Approved standards. 9 th ed. CLSI Document M07-A9. Wayne, PA, USA: CLSI; 2012.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Deshpande LM, Chopade BA. Plasmid mediated silver resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii BL54. BioMetals 1994; 7 : 49-56.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Sahu PK, Iyer PS, Oak AM, Pardesi KR, Chopade BA. Characterization of eDNA from the clinical strain Acinetobacter baumannii AIIMS 7 and its role in biofilm formation. Sci World J 2012; doi:10.1100/2012/973436.   Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Nancharaiah YV, Venugopalan VP, Wuertz S, Wilderer PA, Hausner M. Compatibility of the green fluorescent proteins and a general nucleic acid stain for quantitative description of a Pseudomonas putida biofilm. J Microbiol Methods 2005; 60 : 179-87.   Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Anwar H, Costerton JW. Enhanced activity of combination of tobramycin and piperacillin for eradication of sessile biofilm cells of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1990; 34 : 1666-71.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Harrison JJ, Ceri H, Stremick CA, Turner RJ. Biofilm susceptibility to metal toxicity. Environ Microbiol 2004; 6 : 1220-7.   Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Teitzel GM, Parsek MR. Heavy metal resistance of biofilm and planktonic Pseudomonas aeruginosa. App Environ Microbiol 2003; 69 : 2313-20.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Anderl JN, Franklin MJ, Stewart PS. Role of antibiotic penetration limitation in Klebsiella pneumoniae biofilm resistant to ampicillin and ciprofloxacin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2000; 44 : 1818-24.   Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Hentzer M, Teitzel GM, Balzer GJ, Heydorn A, Molin S, Givskov M, et al. Alginate overproduction affects Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm structure and function.J Bacteriol 2001; 183 : 5395-401.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Sutherland IW. The biofilm matrix-an immobilized but dynamic microbial environment. Trends Microbiol 2009; 9 : 222-7.   Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Whitchurch CB, Tolker-Neilsen T, Ragas PC, Mattick JS. Extracellular DNA required for bacterial biofilm formation. Science 2002; 295 : 1487.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Wozniak DJ, Wycoff TO, Starkey M, Keyser R, Azadi P, O'Toole GA, et al. Alginate is not a significant component of the extracellular polysaccharide matrix of PA14 and PAO1 Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100 : 7907-12.   Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Rani SA, Pitts B, Beyenal H, Veluchamy RA, Lewandowski Z, Davison WM, et al. Spatial patterns of DNA replication, protein synthesis and oxygen concentration within bacterial biofilms reveal diverse physiological states. J Bacteriol 2007; 189 : 4223-33.   Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Drenkard E. Antimicrobial resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Microb Infect 2003; 5 : 1213-9.   Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Keren I, Kaldalu N, Spoering A, Wang Y, Lewis K. Persister cells and tolerance to antimicrobials. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2004; 230 : 13-8.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Singh R, Ray P, Das A, Sharma M. Role of persisters and small colony variants in antibiotic resistance of planktonic and biofilm associated Staphylococcus aureus : an in vitro study. J Med Microbiol 2009; 58 : 1067-73.   Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Harrison JJ, Ceri H, Roper NJ, Badry EA, Sproule KM, Turner RJ. Persister cells mediate tolerance to metal oxyanions in Escherichia coli. Microbiology 2009; 151 : 3181-95.   Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Brooun A, Liu S, Lewis K. A dose response study of antibiotic in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2000; 44 : 640-6.  Back to cited text no. 34
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Material & Methods
   Results
   Discussion
   Acknowledgment
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed590    
    Printed16    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded229    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal