Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research
  Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login  
  Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Users Online: 1386       

   Table of Contents      
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 140  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 77-83

Prevalence of systemic co-morbidities in patients with various grades of diabetic retinopathy


1 Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi, India
2 Department of Nephrology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi, India
3 Department of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi, India
4 Department of Cardiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi, India

Date of Submission13-Feb-2012
Date of Web Publication4-Sep-2014

Correspondence Address:
Pradeep Venkatesh
E-104, AIIMS campus, Ansari Nagar (East), New Delhi 110 029
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 25222781

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Background & objectives : Though diabetes affects multiple organs, most studies highlight the occurence of only one complication in isolation. We conducted a hospital-based study to estimate the co-existence of significant systemic co-morbid conditions in patients with varying grades of diabetic retinopathy.
Methods : A total of 170 consecutive patients with diabetic retinopathy were prospectively recruited for the study between June 2009 to June 2010 at a tertiary care eye centre in north India. Retinopathy was graded by fundus biomicroscopy and fundus photography and classified into three categories (mild-moderate nonproliferative retinopathy, proliferative retinopathy requiring only laser and proliferative retinopathy requiring surgery). Nephropathy was classified by calculating the six variable estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) for all patients. Nerve conduction studies and clinical assessment were used to determine presence of neuropathy. Co-existence of macrovascular disease and peripheral vascular disease was also ascertained.
Results : The percentages of patients with overt nephropathy in the three groups were 19.2, 38.0 and 41.2, respectively. Significant linear trends were observed for serum creatinine (P=0.004), albumin (P=0.017) and eGFR (P=0.030). A higher per cent had abnormal nerve conduction on electrophysiology than that diagnosed clinically (65.4 vs. 44.2, 76.0 vs. 40.0 and 64.8 vs. 48.6, respectively). The odds ratio (95% CI) for co-existence of nephropathy, neuropathy, CVA (cerebrovascular accidents) and PVD (peripheral vascular disease) was 2.9, 0.9, 4.8 and 3.5, respectively. Independent of retinopathy severity, patients with clinically significant macular oedema (CSME) had a higher percentage of nephropathy ( p0 < 0.005).
Interpretation & conclusions : The co-existence of overt nephropathy, nerve conduction based neuropathy and macrovascular co-morbidity in patients with early grades of diabetic retinopathy was significant. Screening for overt nephropathy by eGFR should be considered in all patients with clinically significant macular oedema.

Keywords: Diabetes mellitus - GFR - microalbuminuria - nephropathy - neuropathy - retinopathy


How to cite this article:
Venkatesh P, Tibrewal S, Bhowmik D, Tripathi M, Ramakrishnan S, Vashist N, Vohra R, Garg S. Prevalence of systemic co-morbidities in patients with various grades of diabetic retinopathy. Indian J Med Res 2014;140:77-83

How to cite this URL:
Venkatesh P, Tibrewal S, Bhowmik D, Tripathi M, Ramakrishnan S, Vashist N, Vohra R, Garg S. Prevalence of systemic co-morbidities in patients with various grades of diabetic retinopathy. Indian J Med Res [serial online] 2014 [cited 2019 May 25];140:77-83. Available from: http://www.ijmr.org.in/text.asp?2014/140/1/77/139993

The number of people worldwide who have diabetes mellitus (DM) is expected to increase to almost 300 million by the year 2025 [1] . Diabetes can affect multiple organs in the body and the risk of complications increases with disease duration. After 20 years nearly 99 per cent of patients of type 1 and about 60 per cent of type 2 diabetes mellitus develop some grade of retinopathy [2] . Diabetes has become the most common single cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD), accounting for over one- third of all patients who are on dialysis. Approximately 25 to 40 per cent of patients with DM type I, and 20-30 per cent of DM type II ultimately develop diabetic nephropathy [3],[4] . Nephropathy progresses sequentially from stage 1

(very early diabetes) to stage 5 (ESRD) and without specific interventions, 80 per cent of stage 2 patients will evolve to stage 3 over a period of 10-15 years [5],[6] . About 60 to 70 per cent people with diabetes have some form of neuropathy [7] . Cardiovascular disease is increased in individuals with type 1 or type 2 DM. The Framingham heart study revealed diabetes mellitus to be a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease [8] .

Patients with one microvascular complication are likely to have a higher incidence of other micro- and macro-vascular complications. These complications increase the risk of mortality and cause a profound economic burden [9] . Previous studies have reported the presence of a single or only a few complications in diabetic patients [10],[11],[12],[13],[14],[15],[16],[17],[18],[19],[20],[21],[22],[23] .

This hospital-based study, carried out at an apex eye centre in New Delhi, India reports the occurrence of nephropathy, neuropathy, cardiovascular disease, cerebrovascular disease and peripheral vascular disease in a group of diabetic retinopathy patients.


   Material & Methods Top


The study was carried out at Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India between June 2009 and June 2010. A total of 170 consecutive patients (105 men and 65 women) with diabetic retinopathy were prospectively recruited for the study. All patients were diagnosed with diabetes mellitus and had established retinopathy. Patients were prospectively recruited from the medical retina clinic and inpatient admissions (for surgery) in the retina unit of this tertiary care hospital. The study was approved by the Institute Ethics committee, and each subject provided written informed consent before the start of the study. The main inclusion criterion for the study was patients with pre-existing or newly diagnosed diabetic retinopathy. Patients with other retinal disorders like retinal vascular occlusion, age related macular degeneration were excluded. Subjects were categorized into three groups based on the severity of retinopathy [Group 1 (NP, n=52): Mild-moderate non-proliferative retinopathy, Group 2 (PNS, n=50): Proliferative retinopathy (not requiring surgery), Group 3 (PS, n=68): Patients admitted for diabetic vitreoretinal surgery].

Severity of diabetic retinopathy was determined by fundus biomicroscopy and/or retinal photography. The Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) classification for diabetic retinopathy grading was followed [24] . For identification of nephropathy, the six variable estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated for all the patients. (eGFR is a function of the patient's age, gender, ethnicity, blood urea, serum creatinine and serum albumin). The Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) classification [25] , based on eGFR and presence/ absence of microalbuminuria, was used to grade nephropathy (grades 1-5). In case of any evidence of nephropathy, obstructive disorders were ruled out by an abdominal ultrasound. Presence and pattern of diabetic neuropathy was determined by nerve conduction studies and clinical evaluation of sensory/ motor and autonomic systems. VikingSelect™ (Nicolet biomedical TM , Madison WI, USA) was used for nerve conduction velocity (NCV) analysis. For the upper limb, conduction was checked in the median and ulnar motor and sensory nerves. For the lower limb, motor nerve conduction was checked in the peroneal and tibial nerves, while sural nerves were used for sensory testing. Presence of cardiac disease was determined by history of an episode of angina/ myocardial infarction and procedures of cardiac angiography/angioplasty. The cardiac risk profile was assessed taking account of obesity, hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, pedal oedema, history of smoking, family history of cardiovascular disease, blood pressure, chest X-ray and changes on ECG. Further evaluation was undertaken (e.g. stress testing, echocardiography) in the event of multiple risk factors or presence of abnormalities in the above tests. Presence of cerebral and peripheral vascular disease was elicited by history of mild/ major stroke and of gangrene/amputation, respectively.

Statistical analysis was performed after compilation of data using SPSS (version 15.0, Chicago IL, USA) for descriptive and comparative results. Arithmetic mean, standard deviation and frequency distribution were calculated for all the descriptive parameters. Chi-square test was used to determine the significance of association between a categorical risk factor and a given diabetes complication. For risk factors measurable on an interval scale, comparisons were made using Students' t-test. In case of large range, variation and small number of observations, the data were compared using non parametric tests like Mann-Whitney test and Kruskal-Wallis test. Cornfields' odds ratios were computed to examine the estimated relative risk of each complication with staged severity of retinopathy. The significance of associations between retinopathy severity level and the occurrence of other diabetic complications was examined using the chi-square test.


   Results Top


A total of 170 patients with diabetic retinopathy were assessed and grouped depending on the severity of retinopathy. There were 52 patients with mild- moderate non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy, NPDR (group NP), 50 with PDR not requiring surgery (group PNS) and 68 patients with PDR who were undergoing vitreoretinal surgery for a complication ensuing from diabetic retinopathy (group PS).

The baseline characteristics of various parameters between the three groups are shown in [Table 1] . The mean age of the subjects was 54 yr; 62 per cent were males and 38 per cent were females. There were eight patients with type 1 and 162 with type 2 diabetes. The mean duration of diabetes mellitus was 12.17 yr.
Table 1: Baseline characteristics of study subjects

Click here to view


The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) proportionately decreased with increase in severity of diabetic retinopathy. The log MAR (logarithm of minimum angle of resolution) BCVA values in the three groups were (mean ± S.D.; R,L)- NPDR, 0.50±0.53, 0.51±0.46; PDR not requiring surgery, 1.07±0.76, 0.84±0.5 and PDR requiring surgery, 1.56±0.70, 1.64±0.62; overall p <0.001. In the surgical group, the indications for surgery were (% of all) tractional retinal detachment - 39, vitreous haemorrhage- 26, subhyaloid haemorrhage - 25, combined tractional-rhegmatogenous retinal detachment - 6 and neovascular glaucoma - 3.

The percentage of patients with overt nephropathy (CKD grade ≥ 3) in the three groups were 19.2, 38.0 and 41.2, respectively, ( p =0.030). Significant linear trends were observed for serum creatinine ( p =0.004), serum albumin ( p =0.017) and eGFR ( p =0.030). The difference was most marked between groups NP and PS for each of the above parameters. A comparison of the quantitative nephropathy parameters between the various groups of retinopathy is shown in [Table 2] . Between the groups with duration of DM ≤ 5, >5-10 and >10 yr, the renal function declined progressively, the mean eGFR were 95.4, 74.1 and 80.9. There was a significant reduction of eGFR when values in subjects with duration of disease ≤ 5 yr was compared to those with 5-10 yr ( p =0.034) or >10 yr ( p =0.041).
Table 2: Comparison of nephropathy parameters with severity of retinopathy. All values are represented as mean (SE)


Click here to view


In each of the three groups, a higher percentage of patients had neuropathy based on abnormal nerve conduction on electrophysiology than those diagnosed clinically (65.4 vs. 44.2, 76.0 vs. 40.0 and 64.8 vs. 48.6, respectively). The presence of neuropathy (based on electrophysiology) also increased progressively (50.0, 65.1, 79.5 respectively; p =0.003).

The per cent of other co-morbidities in the three groups is shown [Table 3]. Except for the rate of CVA, which was higher in patients with PDR requiring surgery ( p=0.045), there was no significant difference in the frequency of other macrovascular co- morbidities between the groups. Among the macrovascular diseases, there was a significant rise in the per cent of cases with peripheral vascular disease (2.3, 11.6 and 19.3, respectively; p=0.024) [Table 4]. No significant difference was seen for the other macrovascular co- morbidities.
Table 3: Comparison of macrovascular risk factors/disease between groups

Click here to view


A sub-analysis of group NP was done with respect to the presence or absence of clinically significant nuclear oedema (CSME). The mean values of blood urea and serum creatinine were higher in those with CSME than those without (47.1 vs. 29.8 mg%, p = 0.004; 1.1 vs. 0.9 mg%, p=0.67, respectively). The eGFR showed a direct inverse relation and was significantly lower in those with CSME than those without CSME (88.4 vs. 110.7 ml/min, p= 0.036). Likewise, the percentage of patients with overt nephropathy increased in those with CSME from those without CSME (25.0 vs. 6.3%) but fell short of significance. The presence of neuropathy (based on electrophysiology) increased significantly in patients with CSME when compared to those without CSME (77.8 vs. 37.5%, p =0.005). Associated hypertension and hyperlipidaemia in the two groups was 66.7 vs. 37.5 per cent, p=0.049 and 38.9 vs. 18.8, p =0.141; respectively.

The patients were also stratified based on the duration of diabetes to ≤ 5, 5-10 and >10 yr, and a comparative analysis for co-existence of microvascular and macrovascular complications was done. Results are summarized in [Table 4] . The percentage of patients with NPDR, PDR not requiring surgery and PDR requiring surgery in subjects with duration of disease less than 5 yr was 22.7, 36.4 and 40.9, respectively. The distribution for subjects with 5-10 yr duration was 46.5, 13.9 and 39.5; and for subjects with more than 10 years- 26.5, 33.7 and 39.8, respectively. A high proportion of patients with ≤ 5 yr diabetes duration was also noted to have advanced PDR that required surgery.
Table 4: Comparison of micro- and macro-vascular complications with duration of diabetes mellitus (% of patients)


Click here to view



   Discussion Top


Our results highlight the widespread co-existence of microvascular and macrovascular co-morbidities in patients with even early grades of diabetic retinopathy. Of the microvascular complications, high occurrence of both overt nephropathy and neuropathy (based on nerve conduction studies) was found. Hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, cardiovascular disease and cerebrovascular events were also observed in all patients, strikingly even in those with non-proliferative stage of the disease. Peripheral vascular disease showed a rising but non significant trend.

Some studies have demonstrated retinopathy to be strongly associated with diabetic nephropathy, with or without increased blood pressure [25],[26],[27],[28],[29] . El-Asrar and colleagues [30] have reported that the prevalence of diabetic nephropathy increases with increasing severity of diabetic retinopathy. Recent data from an Indian population study observed that the odds ratios for presence of nephropathy in those with NPDR without macular oedema and in those with sight threatening retinopathy, were 2.3 and 5.3, respectively in comparison to those with no retinopathy [31] . However, other studies have found pronounced discordance between the severity of nephropathy and diabetic retinopathy. We observed a high percentage of overt nephropathy in all patients. The percentage of nephropathy observed in our study in patients with NPDR was higher than that that reported by El-Asrar et al[30] . In our study univariate analyses indicated that patients with PDR undergoing medical/laser treatment and those undergoing surgery were 2.5 and 2.9 times as likely to have nephropathy as those with mild- moderate NPDR.

Since the presence of macular oedema has often been regarded as a risk factor/ marker of systemic imbalance, a sub-analysis was done in the NPDR group. This revealed higher values of urea and lower eGFR in those with CSME. This corroborated with an earlier report of association of macular oedema with nephropathy [32] . eGFR seems to be an important marker of renal dysfunction as changes are detected earlier than an evident rise in creatinine.

Previous reports have emphasized on the frequent occurrence of abnormal nerve conduction in absence of clinical neuropathy in patients with type 1 DM [33],[34] . One study found at least two abnormal independent neurophysiologic nerve parameters in upto 96.6 per cent of 30 diabetic patients who were all clinically asymptomatic [34] . The CURES study [31] used the vibratory perception threshold of big toe > 20mV as the marker of neuropathy and reported the prevalence to be 28.4 per cent for NPDR without macular oedema and 47.5 per cent for sight threatening retinopathy. We found a high percentage neuropathy in all patients with some form of retinopathy, relative to the reported prevalence in diabetic populations without retinopathy. Nerve conduction studies detected more patients to be having neuropathy than diagnosed clinically even in those with early stages of retinopathy. Subgroup analysis revealed that within the NPDR group, those with CSME had a significantly higher probability of coexisting neuropathy.

In our study, the percentage of patients with any cerebrovascular accident was 3.8 per cent in patients with NPDR and increased to 16.2 per cent in those with advanced retinopathy. Our observation supported the high incidence of cerebrovascular disease even in those with early retinopathy, and the risk was significantly higher in the proliferative stage. Autopsy studies have shown that the increased risk of ischemic stroke in diabetes is a result of occlusion of small paramedian penetrating arteries and not carotid disease and that the vascular lesions in the small vessels of the brain are proliferative lesions [35],[36] . This supports our observation that diabetic subjects with retinopathy, especially proliferative retinopathy appear to be at a high risk of ischaemic strokes.

Diabetes increases the risk of macrovascular complications, which can lead to a 10-15 times higher risk of lower extremity amputation and ischaemic heart disease. Several prospective studies have documented a higher cardiovascular morbidity/ mortality in those with diabetic retinopathy, especially in the proliferative stage, in patients with diabetes mellitus, independent of other known risk factors [30] . In our study, hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, CVD and peripheral vascular disease were observed in a high proportion of patients.

Limitations of our study include the small sample size and the failure to include a group of diabetes patients with no retinopathy. Also, this being a hospital-based study in a tertiary care set up a large proportion of our patients had higher grades of retinopathy needing surgical intervention. Hence, the findings cannot be translated to the general population.

In conclusion, the co-existence of nephropathy, neuropathy, hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and cardiovascular disease was found in patients with early grades of diabetic retinopathy. These results indicate that a thorough search for concurrent systemic co-morbidities must be carried out in all patients with retinopathy irrespective of the severity. This approach may aid in reducing the morbidity and mortality associated with late detection of diabetes end organ damage.

 
   References Top

1.Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H. Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care 2004; 27 : 1047-53.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.King GL, Blankenship G, Cavallerano JD, Ferris III FL. Diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care 2002; 25 : s90-s3.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Clark CM Jr1, Lee DA. Prevention and treatment of the complications of diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1995; 332 : 1210-7.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.Andersen AR, Christiansen JS, Andersen JK, Kreiner S, Deckert T. Diabetic nephropathy in type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes: an epidemiological study. Diabetologia 1983; 25 : 496-501.   Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.Levey AS, Eckardt KU, Tsukamoto Y, Levin A, Coresh J, Rossert J, et al. Definition and classification of chronic kidney disease: a position statement from kidney disease: Improving global Outcomes (KDIGO). Kidney Int 2005; 67 : 2089-100.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Gross JL, de Azevedo MJ, Silveiro SP, Canani LH, Caramori ML, Zelmanovitz T. Diabetic nephropathy: diagnosis, prevention, and treatment. Diabetes Care 2005; 28 : 164-76.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Aring AM, Jones DE, Falko JM. Evaluation and prevention of diabetic neuropathy. Am f0 am p0 hysician 2005; 71 : 2123-8.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Kannel WB, Hjortland M, Castelli WP. Role of diabetes in congestive heart failure: the Framingham study. Am j0 c0 ardiol 1974; 34 : 29-34.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Haffner SM, Lehto S, Ronnemaa T, Pyorala K, Laakso M. Mortality from coronary heart disease in subjects with type 2 diabetes and in nondiabetic subjects with and without prior myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1998; 339 : 229-34.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Cheung N, Wang JJ, Rogers SL, Brancati F, Klein R, Sharrett AR, et al. ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities) Study Investigators. Diabetic retinopathy and risk of heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 51 : 1573-8.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Dinneen SF, Gerstein HC. The association of microalbuminuria and mortality in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. a0 systematic overview of the literature. Arch Intern Med 1997; 157 : 1413-8.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.Klein R, Klein BE, Moss SE, Cruickshanks KJ. Association of ocular disease and mortality in a diabetic population. Arch Ophthalmol 1999; 117 : 1487-95.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.Rajala U, Pajunpaa H, Koskela P, Keinanen- Kiukaanniemi S. High cardiovascular disease mortality in subjects with visual impairment caused by diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care 2000; 23 : 957-61.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.van Hecke MV, Dekker JM, Nijpels G, Moll AC, van Leiden HA, Heine RJ, et al; Hoorn Study. Retinopathy is associated with cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in both diabetic and nondiabetic subjects: the Hoorn Study (Letter). Diabetes Care 2003; 26 : 2958.  Back to cited text no. 14
[PUBMED]    
15.Soedamah-Muthu SS, Chaturvedi N, Toeller M, Ferriss B, Reboldi P, Michel G, et al. EURODIAB Prospective Complications Study Group. Risk factors for coronary heart disease in type 1 diabetic patients in Europe: the EURODIAB Prospective Complications Study. Diabetes Care 2004; 27 : 530-7.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.Torffvit O, Lövestam-Adrian M, Agardh E, Agardh CD. Nephropathy, but not retinopathy, is associated with the development of heart disease in Type 1 diabetes: a 12-year observation study of 462 patients. Diabet Med 2005; 22 : 723-9.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.Lövestam-Adrian M, Hansson-Lundblad C, Torffvit O. Sight-threatening retinopathy is associated with lower mortality in type 2 diabetic subjects: a 10-year observation study.Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2007; 77 : 141-7.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.Pedro RA, Ramon SA, Marc BB, Juan FB, Isabel MM. Prevalence and relationship between diabetic retinopathy and nephropathy, and its risk factors in the North-East of Spain, a population-based study. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2010; 17 : 251-65.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.Romero P, Salvat M, Fernández J, Baget M, Martinez I. Renal and retinal microangiopathy after 15 years of follow-up study in a sample of Type 1 diabetes mellitus patients. J Diabetes Complications 2007; 21 : 93-100.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.Wolf G, Müller N, Mandecka A, Müller UA. Association of diabetic retinopathy and renal function in patients with types 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus.Clin Nephrol 2007; 68 : 81-6.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.Lövestam-Adrian M, Agardh E, Agardh CD. The incidence of nephropathy in type 1 diabetic patients with proliferative retinopathy: a 10-year follow-up study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 1998; 39 : 11-7.   Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.Girach A, Vignati L. Diabetic microvascular complications- can the presence of one predict the development of another? J Diabetes Complications 2006; 20 : 228-37.   Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.Pradeepa R, Anjana RM, Unnikrishnan R, Ganesan A, Mohan V, Rema M. Risk factors for microvascular complications of diabetes among South Indian subjects with type 2 diabetes - the Chennai Urban Rural Epidemiology Study (CURES) Eye Study-5. Diabetes Technol Ther 2010; 12 : 755-61.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.[No authors listed]. Grading diabetic retinopathy from stereoscopic color fundus photographs - An extension of the modified airlie house classification: ETDRS Report Number 10. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Ophthalmology 1991; 98 (5 Suppl) : 786-806.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.Parving HH, Mogensen CE, Thomas MC, Brenner BM, Cooper ME. Poor prognosis in proteinuric type 2 diabetic patients with retinopathy: insights from the RENAAL study. QJM 2005; 98 : 119-26.   Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.Barr EL, Wong TY, Tapp RJ, Harper CA, Zimmet PZ, Atkins R, et al. Is peripheral neuropathy associated with retinopathy and albuminuria in individuals with impaired glucose metabolism? The 1999-2000 AusDiab. Diabetes Care 2006; 29 : 1114-6.   Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.Unnikrishnan RI, Rema M, Pradeepa R, Deepa M, Shanthirani CS, Deepa R, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of diabetic nephropathy in an urban South Indian population: the Chennai Urban Rural Epidemiology Study (CURES 45). Diabetes Care 2007; 30 : 2019-24.   Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.Molitch ME, Steffes MW, Cleary PA, Nathan DM. Baseline analysis of renal function in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. Kidney Int 1993; 43 : 668-74.   Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.Stephenson JM, Fuller JH, Viberti GC, Sjolie AK, Navalesi R; The EURODIAB IDDM Complications Study Group. Blood pressure, retinopathy and urinary albumin excretion in IDDM: the EURODIAB IDDM Complications Study. Diabetologia 1995; 38 : 599-603.   Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.El-Asrar AM Al-, Rubeaan KA Al-, Amro SA, Moharram OA, Kangave D. Retinopathy as a predictor of other diabetic complications. Int Ophthalmol 2002; 24 : 1-11.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.Pradeepa R, Anjana RM, Unnikrishnan R, Ganesan A, Mohan V, Rema M. Risk factors for microvascular complications of diabetes among south Indian subjects with type 2 diabetes - the Chennai Urban Rural Epidemiology Study (CURES) Eye Study-5. Diabetes Technol Ther 2010; 12 : 755-61.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.Romero P, Baget M, Mendez I, Fernández J, Salvat M, Martinez I. Diabetic macular edema and its relationship to renal microangiopathy: a sample ofType I diabetes mellitus patients in a 15-year follow-up study. J Diabetes Complications 2007; 21 : 172-80.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.Lee SS, Han HS, Kim H. A 5-yr follow-up nerve conduction study for the detection of subclinical diabetic neuropathy in children with newly diagnosed insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Pediatr Diabetes 2010; 11 : 521-8.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.Karsidag S, Morali S, Sargin M, Salman S, Karsidag K, Us O. The electrophysiological findings of subclinical neuropathy in patients with recently diagnosed type 1 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2005; 67 : 211-9.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.Alex M, Baron EK, Goldenberg S, Bumenthal HT. An autopsy of cerebrovascular accidents in diabetes mellitus. Circulation 1962; 25 : 663-73.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.Aronson SM. Intracranial vascular lesions in patients with diabetes mellitus. J n0 europathology e0 xp n0 eurol 1973; 32 : 183-96.  Back to cited text no. 36
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Material & Methods
   Results
   Discussion
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed879    
    Printed16    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded367    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal