Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research
  Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login  
  Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Users Online: 2380       

   Table of Contents      
VIEW POINT
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 140  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 11-14

Holobionts: emerging strategy for interventions against infectious diseases, metabolic disorders & cancer


1 Kusuma School of Biological Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Hauz Khas New Delhi 110 067, India
2 Kusuma School of Biological Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Hauz Khas New Delhi 110 067; Dr Reddy's Institute of Life Sciences University of Hyderabad Campus, Gachibowli Professor C.R. Rao Road Hyderabad 500 046, India

Date of Web Publication4-Sep-2014

Correspondence Address:
Seyed E Hasnain
Kusuma School of Biological Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Hauz Khas New Delhi 110 067; Dr Reddy's Institute of Life Sciences University of Hyderabad Campus, Gachibowli Professor C.R. Rao Road Hyderabad 500 046
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 25222772

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Singh Y, Hasnain SE. Holobionts: emerging strategy for interventions against infectious diseases, metabolic disorders & cancer. Indian J Med Res 2014;140:11-4

How to cite this URL:
Singh Y, Hasnain SE. Holobionts: emerging strategy for interventions against infectious diseases, metabolic disorders & cancer. Indian J Med Res [serial online] 2014 [cited 2018 Jan 19];140:11-4. Available from: http://www.ijmr.org.in/text.asp?2014/140/1/11/139957

Human gut harbours up to 100 trillion microbes and these interact with the host to provide benefits in terms of nutrition, development and immunomodulation. Abundance and diversity of microbes in an organism probably contribute to the evolution of specific host microbe interactions leading to survival of the fittest, both for the host as well as for the microbe [1] . Such interactions have led to the formation of a hologenome that comprises the genetic information of holobiont (host and its associated microbiota) together as a single unit. The phenotype of host is, therefore, not just because of its own genes but those of its associated microbiota as well. The hologenome theory of evolution readily explains our understanding of forces for selection of such interactions during the evolution [1],[2] .

A recent study on gut immune maturation after colonization with a host specific microbiota revealed the crucial importance of the host microbiota for the development of a normal healthy immune system [3] . In this study, human gut microbiota and mouse gut microbiota were used to stimulate immune maturation of mouse. It was found that although human gut microbiota appeared to be similar at the phylum level to the mouse gut microbiota, yet species and the strain differences contributed to the incomplete maturation of mouse gut immune system. Further, mice colonized with human microbiota exhibited increased susceptibility to Salmonella infection. It was likely that co-evolution of host and microbiota favoured specific host microbiota interactions conferring this specificity. Therefore, it is not only the microbiota which adapts according to the host but the host also acquires 'changes' to allow the microbiota to stay inside. In another recent study [4] , it was shown that CD71 + cells suppressed the immune system to reduce inflammation during the initial colonization of microbiota in the infant gut after parturition. While this suppression renders the infants highly vulnerable to infection it also provides them the protective benefits of gut microbiota colonization. Manipulating these cells could be strategically exploited to design new interventions to curb neonatal infections and effective vaccinations, as well as normal gut development in premature babies/caesarian section infants who fail to acquire normal gut microbiota from the birth canal.

Some recent studies have added a new dimension to our understanding of the involvement of microbiota in various non-infectious diseases like rheumatoid arthritis [5] , neuro-developmental disorders [6] , diabetes [7] , obesity [8] , ageing [9] and cancer [10] including modulating cancer treatment [11],[12] . While a direct correlation between expansion of a specific gut bacteria Prevotella copri with increased susceptibility to arthritis in human patients has been shown [5] , an association between human gut bacteria Bacteroides fragilis and the amelioration of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in a mouse model, as a consequence of the modulation of the levels of several host metabolites by the bacteria, has been reported [6] . Altered gut microbiota is found to be associated with the risk of colorectal cancer [10] , and a strong link between altered gut microbiota and prediction of diabetes with a geographically distinct gut microbiota composition has been shown [7] . Further study by Duca et al[8] linked the presence of unfavourable gut microbiome with the host susceptibility to obesity by observing germ free mice becoming obese upon transfer of microbiota from obese prone rat.

Besides the microbiota influence on metabolism, its involvement in normal physiological process like ageing has also been reported in an invertebrate Drosophila fly model recently [9] . The anti-cancer immune effects of cyclophosphamide could be modulated by the intestinal microbiota in a mouse model [12] . That the modulation of tumour microenvironment by the commensal gut microbiota also helped in controlling response to the anti-cancer therapies is an observation of profound clinical importance [11] .

Pathogenic enteric and gut microbiota share similar niche factors but differ in the outcome of their colonization [13] . That gut microbiota takes both shelter and nutrition from the host, the question remains as to how pathogenicity among gut microbial strains occurs. An understanding of the mechanisms behind the adaptation of some pathogenic bacteria to a particular host range during the course of evolution may help not only in identifying the origin of pathogenicity but also the evolution of pathogenicity [14] . Carrier animals/human hosts for certain microbial diseases, such as Typhoid Mary [15] , are interesting examples where even though they harbour the pathogenic bacteria they show no symptoms. In such cases the role of gut microbiota in prevention of infection in the host cannot be ignored. The struggle for niche sites between pathogenic and gut microbiota may have also contributed towards the evolution of pathogenicity or symbiosis as competition for resources may have led to the origin of virulence in pathogenic strains. Pathogenic strains and normal gut microbiota contain pathogenicity islands and symbiosis islands, respectively, responsible for their respective activity [14],[16] . Hologenome theory of evolution can further help us to understand the development of pathogenicity or symbiosis. Considering the hologenome theory of evolution, a microbe (bacterium/fungus/protozoan) may have many fates depending upon the immune status of the host. Immuno-compromised host can lead to transformation into a pathogen from a normal microbe/commensal by reducing the selection pressure due to poor immunity. Further, transmission of hologenome variations can lead to potentiation of virulence in the subsequent host generations if they have a poor immune status. In another case, if the pathogen encounters a strong host immune response it can lead to either its elimination from host or formation of a carrier host. This type of a holobiont (carrier host and pathogen) will pass its hologenome to its progeny with fidelity. This progeny under the selective immune pressure may shed the genes responsible for virulence and again can revert to normal commensal in the subsequent host generations. Thus a disease can be interpreted as an interplay between the host, microbiota and pathogenic microbes.

While the examples cited earlier point to the possible microbial 'contribution' to many metabolic, non-communicable and inflammatory disorders, many such diseases perhaps deserve to be reclassified as "Non-infectious microbial associated disorders (NIMAD)". This also seriously questions the primary importance of human genome in genetic susceptibility and pre-disposition to various diseases. This argues for a shift in our focus on studying human genome alone to that of both human and the holobiont genome, to understand disease pathogenesis. Functional analysis of human hologenome with its huge diversity, several log more than the human genome, will pose a great challenge but will have potentially huge pay offs [Figure 1] in term of designing new interventions to stop pathogenic bacteria from colonizing the host. Equally important strategy will be to enhance the colonization of beneficial bacteria to combat [Figure 2] infectious and non-infectious microbial origin disorders - immunological, neurodevelopmental, metabolic disorders and even cancer.
Figure 1: Functional analysis of human hologenome is more challenging than that of human genome alone due to greater genetic diversity providing more avenues for interventions in the context of human diseases.

Click here to view
Figure 2: Altered gut microbiota can lead to non-infectious microbial associated disorders (NIMAD). Beneficial bacteria colonization of gut can be used as a treatment/prophylactic strategy for these disorders. Functional analysis of human hologenome will help to identify the most beneficial microbiota for a particular disorder/disease.

Click here to view



   Acknowledgment Top


This work was supported by 'Centre of Excellence' r0 esearch Grant to SEH by the Department of Biotechnology, Government of India. The first author acknowledges (YS) the Ministry of Human Resource Development for Senior Research Fellowship. The second author (SEH) is a JC Bose National Fellow, Government of India and Robert Koch Fellow, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.

 
   References Top

1.Singh Y, Ahmad J, Musarrat J, Ehtesham NZ, Hasnain SE. Emerging importance of holobionts in evolution and in probiotics. Gut p0 athog 2013; 5 : 12.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Rosenberg E, Koren O, Reshef L, Efrony R, Zilber-Rosenberg I. The role of microorganisms in coral health, disease and evolution. Nat r0 ev Microbiol 2007; 5 : 355-62.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Chung H, Pamp SJ, Hill JA, Surana NK, Edelman SM, Troy EB, et al. Gut immune maturation depends on colonization with a host-specific microbiota. Cell 2012; 149 : 1578-93.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Elahi S, Ertelt JM, Kinder JM, Jiang TT, Zhang X, Xin L, et al. Immunosuppressive CD71+ erythroid cells compromise neonatal host defence against infection. Nature 2013; 504 : 158-62.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Scher JU, Sczesnak A, Longman RS, Segata N, Ubeda C, Bielski C, et al. Expansion of intestinal Prevotella copri correlates with enhanced susceptibility to arthritis. e0 life 2013; 2 : e01202.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Hsiao EY, McBride SW, Hsien S, Sharon G, Hyde ER, McCue T, et al. Microbiota modulate behavioral and physiological abnormalities associated with neurodevelopmental disorders. Cell 2013; 155 : 1451-63.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Karlsson FH, Tremaroli V, Nookaew I, Bergstrom G, Behre CJ, Fagerberg B, et al. Gut metagenome in European women with normal, impaired and diabetic glucose control. Nature 2013; 498 : 99-103.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Duca FA, Sakar Y, Lepage P, Devime F, Langelier B, Dore J, et al. Replication of obesity and associated signaling pathways through transfer of microbiota from obese-prone rats. Diabetes 2014; 63 : 1624-36.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Guo L, Karpac J, Tran SL, Jasper H. PGRP-SC2 promotes gut immune homeostasis to limit commensal dysbiosis and extend lifespan. Cell 2014; 156 : 109-22.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Ahn J, Sinha R, Pei Z, Dominianni C, Wu J, Shi J, et al. Human gut microbiome and risk for colorectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2013; 105 : 1907-11.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Iida N, Dzutsev A, Stewart CA, Smith L, Bouladoux N, Weingarten RA, et al. Commensal bacteria control cancer response to therapy by modulating the tumor micro- environment. Science 2013; 342 : 967-70.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.Viaud S, Saccheri F, Mignot G, Yamazaki T, Daillere R, Hannani D, et al. The intestinal microbiota modulates the anticancer immune effects of cyclophosphamide. Science 2013; 342 : 971-6.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.Hill C. Virulence or niche factors: what's in a name? J Bacteriol 2012; 194 : 5725-7.  Back to cited text no. 13
[PUBMED]    
14.Ahmed N, Dobrindt U, Hacker J, Hasnain SE. Genomic fluidity and pathogenic bacteria: applications in diagnostics, epidemiology and intervention. Nat r0 ev Microbiol 2008; 6 : 387-94.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.Marr JS. Typhoid Mary. Lancet 1999; 353 : 1714.  Back to cited text no. 15
[PUBMED]    
16.Finan TM. Evolving insights: symbiosis islands and horizontal gene transfer. J Bacteriol 2002; 184 : 2855-6.  Back to cited text no. 16
[PUBMED]    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
   Acknowledgment
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed601    
    Printed33    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded291    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal