Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research
  Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login  
  Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Users Online: 475       

   Table of Contents      
EDITORIAL
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 138  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 175-177

Treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with probiotics: growing evidence


Chief of Service of Gastroenterology, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova (Valencia), Titular Professor of Internal Medicine & Gastroenterology, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain

Date of Web Publication3-Sep-2013

Correspondence Address:
Miguel Bixquert
Chief of Service of Gastroenterology, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova (Valencia), Titular Professor of Internal Medicine & Gastroenterology, University of Valencia, Valencia
Spain
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 24056591

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Bixquert M. Treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with probiotics: growing evidence. Indian J Med Res 2013;138:175-7

How to cite this URL:
Bixquert M. Treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with probiotics: growing evidence. Indian J Med Res [serial online] 2013 [cited 2019 Oct 22];138:175-7. Available from: http://www.ijmr.org.in/text.asp?2013/138/2/175/117537

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is characterized by abdominal pain or discomfort relieved by defecation or release of gases and by altered bowel habits, over a period of at least three months. No morphological or biochemical cause has been confirmed that links IBS with organic disease. The main symptoms of the syndrome, sensation of incomplete defecation, urgent need to defecate, rectal tenesmus, pain on defecation and mucorrhoea suggest visceral hypersensitivity. Patients often experience extra-intestinal symptoms, including back, head, joint and muscle pain, palpitations, urinary frequency, menstrual irregularities, sleep disturbances and depression. At least 50 per cent of patients have one or more somatic comorbid condition, and this comorbidity has a significant influence on the patient's consultation pattern, diagnostic management, therapeutic plan, and the outcome of treatment [1],[2] .


   Aetiology and pathophysiology Top


The aetiology of IBS seems to be multifactorial. Its pathophysiology is largely unknown, though several of the mechanisms which underlie IBS affect the type and severity of symptoms. Although genetic factors are known to play a minor role, yet these influence symptomatic expression and therapeutic response, at least in some IBS patients. Certain patients show a higher sensitivity to distension of the bowel wall or an increased sense of a central sensitive perception. Psychosomatic disorders are not the cause, but rather the consequence of IBS, and these disorders can modulate and sometimes intensify patients' perception of the severity of their abdominal symptoms [2],[3],[4] .

Post-infectious IBS (PI-IBS) accounts for about 20-35 per cent of all cases of IBS. There is a six times greater risk of it developing following a gastrointestinal infection. These post-infectious forms of IBS have given rise to new concepts regarding its pathophysiology, with both intestinal flora and alteration of intestinal permeability having been assigned a role in the syndrome [5],[6] . The identified risk factors are female gender, a context of stress and anxiety, and duration of episodes for more than five days. It has been shown that genetic factors can promote PI-IBS suggesting that post-infectious IBS is the result of genetic anomalies that affect the immune response to bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract [3],[4],[7],[8] .


   Diagnosis and management Top


The differential diagnosis of IBS can be difficult. It is particularly important to exclude infections, food intolerances, inflammatory diseases, gastrointestinal tumours, side effects of drugs (antibiotics, tricyclic antidepressants, proton pump inhibitors, etc.) and secondary small bowel bacterial overgrowth (diverticula, intestinal estenosis, ileocecal resection, immunological disorders, diabetes mellitus, chronic renal insufficiency, etc.) [1],[2],[3],[5] .

This common disorder is clinically managed through varying approaches involving lifestyle changes, and medication to treat the predominant symptom, as no standard therapeutic strategy has been established. Currently available therapies provide symptomatic relief at best and have been shown to be only slightly more effective than placebos (35-45% in IBS). Further, some medicines can cause ischaemic colitis and severe cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events [2],[7],[9] . Patients often resort to alternative or complementary medicines, but randomized controlled studies with these types of therapy are non-existent or compromised by their low methodological quality.


   Probiotics in the treatment of IBS Top


Several lines of evidence link symptomatic expression of this syndrome with the intestinal microbiota: (i) IBS patients exhibit subtle differences in their luminal and mucosal-associated intestinal flora when compared with controls; (ii) new-onset IBS symptoms develop in about 30 per cent individuals following recovery from a self-limited episode of infectious gastroenteritis, (iii) small bowel bacterial overgrowth has been reported in a proportion of IBS patients, and (iv) antibiotics such as rifaximin relieve IBS symptoms in some individuals [5],[10] .

Probiotics are the focus of considerable interest in relation to the treatment of IBS, though it is important to emphasize that different strains may not necessarily share the same activity. The definition of "probiotic" is: "Live microorganisms that confer a health benefit on the host when administered in adequate amounts". Probiotics are microbially-derived factors that stimulate the growth of other microorganisms, and are intended to assist the body's naturally occurring gut microbiota. Research into probiotics has accelerated over the last ten years, but clear guidelines regarding the functional and safety aspects (as pharma-food or nutraceutical) are needed if new probiotis strains are to be introduced for human use [6],[9] .

The expected actions of probiotics in the treatment of IBS include: (i) the counteraction of factors that alter balance of the normal intestinal microflora, and the production of bacteriocins to inhibit pathogens; (ii) to stop development of IBS following bacterial gastroenteritis; (iii) the correction of lactose intolerance; (iv) the relief of bloating, flatulence and distension; (v) the local modulation of the functions of the gut-associated lymphoid tissue and cytokine profiles; (vi) to maintain the capacity of deconjugate bile salts; and (vii) the suppression of the local inflammatory response by reducing tumour necrosis factor α (TNFα) secretion, which rectifies the imbalance in intramucosal serotonin production, and the anomalous activation of intestinal motility and visceral hypersensitivity [6],[8],[9],[11] .

There is controversy surrounding the subject and it would appear that bacteria contribute to at least some of the symptoms of IBS; however, the effects of probiotics on this gastrointestinal disorder are unclear. Some studies have reported an improvement in IBS symptoms with probiotics, whereas other have failed to detect any benefits. General recommendations from the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) and expert consensus panels from both Europe and the USA have come to similar conclusions; there is a reasonable rationale for the efficacy of probiotics as a treatment for IBS [2],[3],[4],[6],[9],[11] . The evidence of their benefits is not strong enough to warrant general recommendation of probiotics as therapy of IBS; however, their effect on single species of lactobacilli and Bifidobacteria is demonstrated, and certain combinations of probiotics appear to be of use. Probiotics may help patients to experience an overall improvement in their symptoms rather than a specific improvement in their bowel function [2],[9],[11] .

In addition, due to growing evidence of a role for mucosal microinflammation in the pathophysiology of IBS, there has been recent interest in the use of probiotics in this condition. The results of therapeutic trials to date are variable, which may be explained by the heterogeneity of the IBS subtypes included, variation in study design and the diversity of probiotic strains tested [11],[12],[13],[14] .


   One probiotic or several species of probiotics? Top


It is well established that microorganisms vary considerably in their properties, and so it is inappropriate to combine the results of different trials [2],[14],[15] . Probiotics are available as single and multispecies formulations, but Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium are the most studied microorganisms with respect to IBS. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses show a trend toward an improvement of symptoms with Bifidobacterium infantis, B. brevis and B. animalis (bloating and constipation), and with Lactobacillus plantarum, L. casei, L. reuteri, L. acidophilus and L. rhamnosus (abdominal pain, bloating, diarrhoea and constipation). The most common combinations are Lactobacilli and Bifidobacteria, administered in the form of yoghourt or nutraceutics [11],[13],[15] . As probiotics are safe to consume (as well as having beneficial properties), these are ideal adjuncts to IBS therapy. In time, these are likely to assume an adjunctive therapeutic role in the treatment of IBS, but for the moment there are fundamental aspects that need to be resolved. Many of the studies published to date have been carried out in small and/or specific populations (children; women; young, not elderly people, etc.), or over short periods, so further research is needed.

It should be emphasized that probiotics are viewed as food and not drugs by the medical community. In addition to the need for a robust evidence-based approach to convince the clinical community of the health benefits of probiotics [11],[15] , these agents will need to demonstrate their effectiveness within existing regulatory frameworks: (i) the traits that underlie probiotics'function will need to be understood; (ii) different strains must be compared at gene level in vitro; (iii) natural strains should be selected for specific gene products to improve probiotic function; (iv) optimal natural strains need to be determined; and (v) clinical documentation of the effect of probiotic strains must be provided. The clinical evidence needs to be appraised in a different manner to that concerning drugs and therapeutics in order to demonstrate that can enhance the proliferation of beneficial microbes and thus produce sustainable changes in the human microbiome [13] .

 
   References Top

1.Nikfar S, Rahimi R, Rahimi F, Derakhshani S, Abdollahi M. Efficacy of probiotics in irritable bowel syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 2008; 51 : 1775-80.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.Bixquert Jimenez M. Treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with probiotics. An etiopathogenic approach at last?. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2009; 101 : 553-64.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Brandt LJ, Chey WD, Foxx-Orenstein AE, Schiller LR, Schoenfeld PS, Spiegel BM, et al. American College of Gastroenterology Task Force on Irritable Bowel Syndrome. An evidence-based position statement on the management of irritable bowel syndrome. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104 (Suppl 1): S1-S35.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Spiller R, Garsed K. Postinfectious irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology 2009; 136 : 1979-88.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.Brenner DM, Moeller MJ, Chey WD, Schoenfeld PS. The utility of probiotics in the treatment of irritablde bowel syndrome: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104 : 1033-49; quiz 1050.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    
6.Hoveyda N, Heneghan C, Mahani KR, Perera R, Roberts N, Glasziou P. A systematic review and meta-analysis: probiotics in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome. BMC Gastroenterol 2009; 9 : 15-26.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Guyonnet D, Woodcock A, Stefani B, Trevisan C, Hall C. Fermented milk containing Bifidobacterium lactis DN-173010 improved self-reported digestive comfort amongst a general population of adults. A randomized, open-label, controlled, pilot study. J Dig Dis 2009; 10 : 61-70.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8.Villani AC, Lemire M, Thabane M, Belisle A, Geneau G, Garg AX, et al. Genetic risk factors for post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome following a waterborne outbreak of gastroenteritis. Gastroenterology 2010; 138 : 1502-13.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Moayyedi P, Ford AC, Talley NJ, Cremonini F, Foxx-Orenstein AE, Brandt LJ, et al. The efficacy of probiotics in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review. Gut 2010; 59 : 325-32.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]    
10.Pimentel M, Lembo A, Chey WD, Zakko S, Ringel Y, Yu J, et al. Rifaximin therapy for patients with irritable bowel syndrome without constipation. N Engl J Med 2011; 364 : 22-32.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]    
11.Ki Cha B, Mun Jung S, Hwan Choi C, Song ID, Woong Lee H, Joon Kim H, et al. The effect of a multispecies probiotic mixture on the symptoms and fecal microbiota in diarrhea-dominant irritable bowel syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Gastreonterol 2012; 46 : 220-7.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.Clarke G, Cryan JF, Dinan TG, Quigley EM. Review article: probiotics for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome - Focus on lactic acid bacteria. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2012; 35 : 403-13.  Back to cited text no. 12
[PUBMED]    
13.Simren M, Doré J. Gut microbiota for health - current insights and understanding. Eur Gastroenterol Hepatol Rev 2012; 8 : 77-81.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.McKenzie YA, Alder A, Anderson W, Wills A, Goddard L, Gulia P, et al. British Dietetic Association evidence-based guidelines for the dietary management of irritable bowel syndrome in adults. J Hum Nutr Diet 2012; 25 : 260-74.  Back to cited text no. 14
[PUBMED]    
15.Ciorba MA. A gastroenterologist's guide to probiotics. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 10 : 960-8.  Back to cited text no. 15
[PUBMED]    




 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Aetiology and pa...
    Diagnosis and ma...
    Probiotics in th...
    One probiotic or...
    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1336    
    Printed20    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded447    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal