Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research
  Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login  
  Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Users Online: 1780       
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 136  |  Issue : 7  |  Page : 36-43

Recruitment of at-risk population through network based sampling: experiences from Maharashtra IBBA Round-I survey


1 National AIDS Research Institute (ICMR), Pune, India
2 National AIDS Research Institute (ICMR), Pune; Formally associated with Family Health International, New Delhi, India
3 National AIDS Research Institute (ICMR), Pune; Formally associated with IBBA project in National AIDS Research Institute, Pune, India

Correspondence Address:
Ramesh Paranjape
Director, National AIDS Research Institute (ICMR), Plot No. 73, "G" Block, M.I.D.C. Bhosari, Pune 411 026
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

Background & objectives: Respondent Driven Sampling (RDS) method is increasingly being used for surveys among hard to reach populations. It essentially relies on the networking among the target population. Key behavioural indicators, HIV and sexually transmitted infection (STI) prevalence were measured under Integrated Behavioural and Biological Assessment (IBBA), designed to study the impact of Avahan India AIDS Initiative. RDS surveys were conducted in 2006 and 2007 among high risk populations. Methods: Four separate surveys covered female sex workers (FSW) (Mumbai, Parabhani), Bar Girl (Mumbai) and injecting drug users (IDU) (Mumbai-Thane) population through RDS. Respondents were recruited through the personal and social networks of the initially selected "seeds". Successive recruitments were done through snowball effect. Duel compensation for participation and recruitment was given. Three uniquely numbered coupons were given to recruit peers from network. Through subsequent waves of recruitment desirable sample was achieved. Informed and voluntary consent was obtained. Results: A total of 338 bar girls, 403 FSWs (Mumbai), 367 FSW (Parbhani) and 376 IDUs (Mumbai/Thane) were recruited through RDS. The desired samples were achieved within three months period. Average seeds recruited for each survey ranged from 22 to 35. Average reported network size ranged from 4.8 to 13.2. Homophily index for each survey group was found to be 0.0 except for bar girl survey (0.3). Some seeds yielded multiple waves of recruitment while many failed to go beyond first wave. Interpretation & conclusions: Our findings suggest that RDS does not appear to recruit more marginalized or undercovered section of the targeted group. Greater preparatory activity and better understanding of networks may be required for setting up appropriate venues across geographical boundaries. Further in-depth network analysis is needed in diverse regional structures and population coverage in conducting RDS surveys locally.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed890    
    Printed29    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded152    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal