|Year : 2012 | Volume
| Issue : 4 | Page : 674-675
Resistance to ceftriaxone in Vibrio cholerae
Jharna Mandal1, V Preethi1, R Vasanthraja1, S Srinivasan2, Subhash Chandra Parija1
1 Department of Microbiology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, Puducherry 605 006, India
2 Department of Paediatrics, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, Puducherry 605 006, India
|Date of Web Publication||8-Nov-2012|
Subhash Chandra Parija
Department of Microbiology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, Puducherry 605 006
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
|How to cite this article:|
Mandal J, Preethi V, Vasanthraja R, Srinivasan S, Parija SC. Resistance to ceftriaxone in Vibrio cholerae. Indian J Med Res 2012;136:674-5
|How to cite this URL:|
Mandal J, Preethi V, Vasanthraja R, Srinivasan S, Parija SC. Resistance to ceftriaxone in Vibrio cholerae. Indian J Med Res [serial online] 2012 [cited 2019 Sep 22];136:674-5. Available from: http://www.ijmr.org.in/text.asp?2012/136/4/674/103282
Cholera characterized by rice water stools is more common in developing countries due to poor sanitation and improperly protected water supply  . As with most enteric pathogens cholera can be controlled by rehydration alone but antimicrobials are indicated in severe cases and also to reduce the course of disease. Spread of cholera epidemics has been associated with emergence of drug resistant strains  . The current therapy for cholera as indicated by the World Health Organization  primarily involves tetracycline and ciprofloxacin. Drug resistance in bacterial pathogens has increased at an alarming rate over the last few decades. Progressive drug resistance in Vibrio cholerae has been noted as evident from the available literature ,,,, . Though the use of a third generation cephalosporin is not yet recommended for the treatment of cholera, but the appearance of resistance to this group of antimicrobials is quite alarming , . Here, we report the resistance to ceftriaxone, a third generation cephalosporin, in V. cholerae isolates from three paediatrics cases.
The three cases (age range two boys of 1 and 4 yr and one 2 yr girl) had reported to the department of Pediatrics between the months of June and August 2010 at Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, with history of passing loose, watery stools (>9-10 time in a day) and were provisionally diagnosed to be suffering from cholera. The cases reported to the hospital on different months, independent of each other. Also, they did not belong to the same locality and were unrelated.
The stool samples were inoculated onto MacConkey agar and thiosulphate citrate bile-salt sucrose (TCBS) agar (Hi-media, Mumbai). Enrichment was provided with alkaline peptone water, subculture from which was done after 6 h of incubation at 37°C onto MacConkey agar and TCBS agar. Suspected colonies were identified as V. cholerae by the standard biochemical tests , , the serogroup was confirmed by agglutination with specific antiserum (BD Difco TM , Becton Dickinson, USA). Antibiotic susceptibility was determined by the Kirby-Bauer method as per Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines (CLSI)  , which showed that this isolate was resistant to ampicillin (10 μg), ceftriaxone (30 μg), co-trimoxazole (25 μg) and sensitive only to ciprofloxacin (5 μg) and tetracycline (30 μg). All the three children were treated with ciprofloxacin.
The three isolates were subjected to the agar dilution test and E test (BioMe΄rieux, Sweden) for the determination of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of ceftriaxone. For the agar dilution method, ceftriaxone-sodium salt (Hi-media, Mumbai, India) and Mueller-Hinton (M-H) agar (Hi-media, Mumbai, India) were used. The drug was reconstituted in sterile distilled water (as described by the manufacturer), was stored at 4°C and used within 2 days of reconstitution. Different dilutions of the drug were used starting from 0.5 to 128 μg/ml. For growth controls, plates containing drug free agar were also prepared. The MIC was performed as per recommendations  . ATCC Escherichia More Details coli 25922 was inoculated on each plate as growth control. To check for viability of each test isolate and also as an added check for purity, control plates that did not contain drugs were inoculated last. Inoculated plates were allowed to stand for several minutes until the inoculum drops had been completely absorbed by the medium; then the plates were inverted and incubated at 37°C for 20 h before the results were read. The E-test was carried out as per the manufacturer's instructions. The strips containing the antibiotics were applied with sterile forceps and incubated at 37°C overnight. Tear drop shaped zone of inhibition was observed in all three agar plates. MIC was read as the value on the E strip where the two arms of the ellipse met. According to the CLSI  , the breakpoints for MIC of cefrtiaxone are sensitive (<1 μg/ml), intermediate resistant (2 μg/ml) and resistant (>4 μg/ml). The MIC of the three V. cholerae isolates was 16 μg/ml, by the agar dilution method as well as the E test method, which indicated resistance to ceftriaxone. The double disk synergy test was performed as described earlier  which was negative. As the genetic analysis of these isolates could not be done, therefore the mechanisms mediating the reduced susceptibility of these isolates to ceftriaxone is not yet clear.
Increase in antimicrobial resistance in enteric pathogens is especially important in developing countries where diarrhoea is common. Globally, many strains of V. cholerae have shown resistance to commonly used antibiotics including tetracycline, co-trimoxazole, ampicllin, chloramphenicol and nalidixic acid  but have largely remained susceptible to the third generation cephalosporins. Resistance to cephalosporins was first documented in Argentina  where the MIC of ceftazidime was determined to be 64 μg/ml.
The detection of resistance to ceftriaxone in V. cholerae is a matter of concern, considering the epidemic potential of the organism. Excessive use and misuse of antimicrobials can create an effective selection pressure on microbes which in turn can develop mechanisms to render these antimicrobials ineffective. There is a need to monitor the resistance pattern of this organism and also the use of antimicrobials in its control.
| References|| |
|1.||Mandomando I, Espasa M, Valles X, Sacarlal J, Sigau'que B, Ruiz J, et al. Antimicrobial resistance of Vibrio cholerae O1 serotype Ogawa isolated in Manhica District Hospital, southern Mozambique. J Antimicrob Chemoth 2007; 60 : 662-4. |
|2.||Tjaniadi P, Lesmana M, Subekti D, Machpud N, Komalarini S, Santoso W, et al. Antimicrobial resistance of bacterial pathogens associated with diarrheal patients in Indonesia. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2003; 68 : 666-70. |
|3.||Cholera outbreak. Assessing the outbreak response and improving preparedness. Geneva: WHO. Global task force on cholera control. WHO/CDS/CPE/ZFK/2004.4. |
|4.||Sabeena F, Thirivikramji G, Radhakutty G, Indu P, Singh DV. In vitro susceptibility of Vibrio cholerae O1 biotype El Tor strains associated with an outbreak of cholera in Kerala, Southern India. J Antimicrob Chemoth 2001; 47 : 357-68. |
|5.||Okeke IN. Antimicrobial resistance in developing countries. Part I: recent trends and current status. Lancet Infect Dis 2005; 5 : 481-93. |
|6.||Roychowdhury A, Pan A, Dutta D, Mukhopadhyay AK, Ramamurthy T, Nandy RK, et al. Emergence of tetracycline-resistant Vibrio cholerae O1serotype Inaba in Kolkata, India. Jpn J Infect Dis 2008; 61 : 128-9. |
|7.||Garg P, Sinha S, Chakraborty R, Bhattacharya SK, Nair GB, Ramamurthy T, et al. Emergence of fluoroquinolone-resistant strains of Vibrio cholerae O1 biotype El Tor among hospitalized patients with cholera in Calcutta, India. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2001; 45 : 1605-6. |
|8.||Chander J, Kaistha N, Gupta V, Mehta M, Singla N, Deep A, et al. Epidemiology & antibiograms of Vibrio cholerae isolates from a tertiary care hospital in Chandigarh, north India. Indian J Med Res 2009; 129 : 613-7. |
|9.||Sharma NC, Mandal PK, Dhillon R, Jain M. Changing profile of Vibrio cholerae O1, O139 in Delhi & its periphery (2003-2005). Indian J Med Res 2007; 125 : 633-40. |
|10.||Petroni A, Corso A, Melano R, Cacace ML, Bru AM, Rossi A, et al. Plasmidic extended-spectrum ß-lactamases in Vibrio cholerae O1 El Tor isolates in Argentina. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2002; 46 : 1462-8. |
|11.||Laboratory methods for the diagnosis of epidemic dysentery and cholera. Atlanta, Georgia: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 1999. WHO/CDS/CSR/EDC/99.8. |
|12.||Kay Bradford A, Bopp Cheryl A, Wells Joy G. Isolation and identification of Vibrio cholerae O1 from fecal specimens. In: Wachsmuth IK, Blake PA, Olsvik O, editors. Vibrio cholerae and cholera: Molecular to global perspectives. Washington DC, USA: ASM Press; 1994. p. 3-25. |
|13.||Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Methods for antimicrobial dilution and disk susceptibility testing of infrequently isolated or fastidious bacteria; approved guideline. M45A2. 2 nd ed. Wayne, PA: CLSI; 2010. |
|14.||Jarlier V, Nicolas M, Fournier G, Philippon A. Extended spectrum â-lactamases conferring transferable resistance to newer â-lactam agents in Enterobacteriaceae : Hospital prevalence and susceptibility patterns. Rev Infect Dis 1988; 10 : 867-78. |