Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research
  Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login  
  Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Users Online: 1432       

   Table of Contents      
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 136  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 656-663

Molecular epidemiology of Vibrio cholerae causing outbreaks & sporadic cholera in northern India


1 Department of Medical Microbiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India
2 Department of Medical Microbiology, National Institute of Cholera & Enteric Diseases (ICMR), Kolkata, India

Date of Submission05-Aug-2010
Date of Web Publication8-Nov-2012

Correspondence Address:
Neelam Taneja
Associate Professor, Medical Microbiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh 160 012
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 23168707

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Background & objectives: Several outbreaks of cholera have been reported in Chandigarh region during a span of seven years from 2002-2008. The genetic characteristics of Vibrio cholerae isolates obtained during these outbreaks have not been adequately studied. The aim of this study was to do molecular typing of V. cholerae isolated from the sporadic and outbreak cases by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), Rep-PCR and ribotyping.
Methods: Fifty representative isolates of V. cholerae from outbreak as well as sporadic cases were subjected to molecular typing by PFGE, 173 isolates (163 clinical and 10 environmental) were typed by rep-PCR and ribotyping. Ribotyping was done by determination of rRNA restriction pattern of BglI restriction digestion and hybridization with 7.2 kb rRNA probe of pKK3535 plasmid using DIG DNA labelling and detection kit. Universal VC1 primer was used for rep-PCR.
Results: PFGE generated 15 pulsotypes, of which four matched the published pulsotypes and there were 11 new pulsotypes. PFGE was the most discriminatory method that could differentiate between isolates belonging to single ribotype. Pulsotype P1 corresponding to known pulsotype H1 was the major pulsotype till 2003. Pulsotype P3 corresponding to known pulsotype L emerged in 2004. The 2007 outbreaks in Punjab and Haryana were caused by P5 though P1 and P3 were isolated from the sporadic cases from the same region. The 2008 outbreak was caused by pulsotypes P6 and P7. Ribotype IV was the most predominant followed by RIII. This ribotype was not isolated after 2003 and ribotype IV became the most predominant 2004 onwards. Of the two unknown ribotypes (UNI and UN2), UNI was more common (27 isolates). Rep-PCR was the least discriminatory and divided all clinical isolates into four major profiles. The dendrogram analysis of PFGE revealed similarity of some clinical isolates with environmental isolates indicating the genetic relatedness.
Interpretation & conclusion: Our findings showed that Rep-PCR was least discriminatory method. Ribotyping was a reliable and reproducible method. Ribotype IV was predominant ribotype followed by RIII. A total of 15 pulsotypes were generated and 11 of these were not reported earlier. Genetic relatedness was shown by clinical and environmental isolates which needs to be confirmed in future studies.

Keywords: Molecular typing - PFGE - rep-PCR - ribotyping - Vibrio cholerae


How to cite this article:
Taneja N, Sangar G, Chowdhury G, Ramamurthy T, Mishra A, Singh M, Sharma M. Molecular epidemiology of Vibrio cholerae causing outbreaks & sporadic cholera in northern India. Indian J Med Res 2012;136:656-63

How to cite this URL:
Taneja N, Sangar G, Chowdhury G, Ramamurthy T, Mishra A, Singh M, Sharma M. Molecular epidemiology of Vibrio cholerae causing outbreaks & sporadic cholera in northern India. Indian J Med Res [serial online] 2012 [cited 2019 Sep 20];136:656-63. Available from: http://www.ijmr.org.in/text.asp?2012/136/4/656/103276

Cholera is an acute diarrhoeal disease endemic in India and whole of the Ganges basin from where it has spread in the form of epidemics and pandemics to several other parts of the world with devastating effects. Recent years have witnessed resurgence in global incidence of cholera cases as reported to WHO. Globally, cholera alone causes 120,000 deaths annually [1] . Cholera is endemic in southern Asia and in several parts of Africa and Latin America where seasonal outbreaks occur [2] . At the tertiary care referral centre at Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, north India, cases of cholera are referred from nearby areas of Punjab, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand. Vibrio cholerae serogroup O139 was isolated during a small outbreak of cholera in 1994 in Chandigarh [3] . After this outbreak, cholera has been quiescent with a few sporadic cases. These cases were recorded mostly between July and September. In July 2002, a large outbreak of cholera occurred in Chandigarh. The pockets affected had a mixture of urban slum and rural areas. Spill-over of cholera cases also occurred in the nearby areas of Punjab and Haryana affecting more than a 1000 people [4] . A gross contamination of drinking water occurred because of breakage in sewage pipes. The outbreak was due to V. cholerae O1 biotype El Tor serotype Ogawa. In July 2004, another outbreak of cholera occurred in a laborours' encampment in Chandigarh [5] . V. cholerae was also isolated from the hand pump, the soil surrounding hand pump and a pond in the affected areas. Similarly, between July and September 2007, six clusters of cholera outbreak were recorded involving four deaths. These outbreaks occurred in Punjab and Haryana with a total of 745 admitted cases of cholera (attack rate, 183 cases per thousand population). Number of cases varied from 15 to 400 in six clusters, affecting mainly adult population [6] . Two clusters of cholera occurred in 2008 (Punjab and Haryana). All outbreaks were identified due to V. cholerae O1 Ogawa (unpublished data). Since the genetic characteristics of the V. cholerae O1 isolated were not fully explored, it was decided to study the molecular epidemiology of outbreak and sporadic cholera associated isolates from northern region. In the present study isolates were typed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), ribotyping and rep-PCR to study the clonality. V. cholerae isolated from water from the same region were also included.


   Material & Methods Top


The present study was conducted at the Enteric Laboratory, Department of Medical Microbiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India.

V. cholerae isolates used for molecular typing: A total of 173 isolates were included in the molecular typing that were isolated between 2002 and 2008. These included outbreak isolates from July 2002 and July 2004 in Chandigarh. In 2007, six clusters of cholera outbreaks were confirmed in Punjab and Haryana (Ambala, Raili, Mohali, Noorpur, Kurali, Panchkula) and two clusters of cholera occurred in Panchkula (Haryana) and Mohali districts (Punjab) in 2008. In 2003, 2005 and 2006, very few cases of cholera were reported to PGIMER, mainly from neighbouring States. Sporadic isolates from various States were also included [Table 1].
Table 1: Break-up of V. cholerae isolates studied

Click here to view


Biochemical, serological characterization: Isolates of V. cholerae were characterized biochemically using standard methods [7] . The isolates were positive for oxidase test, string test, cholera red reaction, lysine and orinithine decarboxyaltion, and confirmed by serotyping using commercially available antisera (Denka-Seiken Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Biotyping was performed with chick cell agglutination, sheep RBC haemolysis (tube haemolysis with 1% glycerol), polymixin B sensitivity and Voges-Proskauer (VP) test [7] . Isolates were preserved in trypticase soya broth with glycerol at -70 °C.

Isolation of V. cholerae from water samples: Water samples (n=236) were collected from cholera affected areas. These included 26 from tube wells, 88 from taps, 53 from hand pumps, 46 from water stored in tanks, buckets and cans, 7 from pond water, 5 from naalas (large drains), 10 from river bodies and one from water tanker. Water (250 ml) was collected in the sterile container and passed through a membrane filter with pore size of 0.45μm (Millipore Corporation, USA). After filtration, the membrane was placed in 10 ml alkaline peptone water (APW, pH 8.5). After 6 h of incubation a subculture was made from the alkaline peptone water (APW) onto thiosulphate bile salt sucrose agar (TCBS, DIFCO Laboratories, USA). After 24-48 h incubation, typical golden yellow colonies were picked up and subcultured for further identification.

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE): PFGE was performed according to the PulseNet 1-day standardized PFGE protocol for subtyping V. cholerae O1 (http://pulsenetinternational.org). Fifty isolates were tested in the PFGE and selection was made based on the year and place of isolation. Briefly, an isolated colony from an individual V. cholerae isolate was streaked onto blood agar and incubated at 37°C for 14 to 18 h. Agarose plugs were prepared by mixing equal volumes of bacterial suspensions with molten 1 per cent SeaKem Gold agarose (Cambrex Corporation, USA), 1 per cent N-lauroyl sarcosine (Sigma Chemicals Co., USA) and 0.1 mg/ml Proteinase K (Invitrogen, USA). Cells were lysed for 1 h in water bath at 55°C and washed 2 times with distilled water and 4 times with TE buffer at 50°C before restriction digestion, which was carried out with 50 U of NotI (Fermantas International Inc, Canada) at 37°C for overnight. Restriction fragments were separated on a CHEF DR III (Bio-Rad, USA). The total run time was 19 h with 2 blocks, in the 1 st block switch time of 2 to 10 sec for 13 h and in 2 nd block switch time of 20 to 25 sec for 6 h with a voltage gradient of 6 V per cm. The gel was stained with 1 μl/mg of ethidium bromide solution (Sigma Chemicals Co., USA) and destained with distilled water. Images were captured with a Gel Doc system (BioRad, Hercules, USA).

Ribotyping: V. cholerae isolates were cultured in Luria-Bertani (L-B) medium, and 3 ml of culture was used to extract and purify the genomic DNA using the Genomic DNA Extraction kit (Fermantas International Inc, Burlington, Ontario Canada). Aliquots of genomic DNA of each isolate was digested with BglI for ribotyping. The digested DNA fragments were separated by agarose gel electrophoresis (0.7% gel) and were blotted on to nylon membranes. The probe DNA was 7.5 kb BamHI fragment of pKK3535 [8] which is a pBR322 derived plasmid containing an  Escherichia More Details coli rRNA operon consisting of one copy of the genes coding for 5S, 16S, and 23 rRNA, and tRNA glu . The probe DNA was labelled using DIG DNA labelling kit (Roche Applied Science, USA). For southern hybridization, the membranes were prehybridized at 42°C for 2 h in a solution containing 2x SSC (1× SSC is 0.15 M NaCl + 0.015 M sodium citrate), 1 per cent blocking reagent, 0.1 per cent N-lauryl sarcosine, 0.02 per cent sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS), and 50 per cent formamide. The membranes were then hybridized with the freshly denatured digoxigenin-labelled gene probes at 42°C for 12 h. The hybridized membranes were washed twice in 2x SSC- 0.1 per cent SDS for 5 min at room temperature and then twice in 0.1X SSC- 0.1 per cent SDS for 15 min at 68°C. Non radioactive detection was based on digoxigenin- anti-digoxigenin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, according to the manufacturer's instructions of the DNA labelling and detection kit.

Rep-PCR fingerprinting using VC1 primer: The genomic DNA was isolated by lysis method and purified using phenol-chloroform method [9] . The oligonucleotide primer was obtained from Genxbio Health Science (P) Ltd, Delhi, India. Rep-PCR primer VC1with the sequence 5'-AACTGTGTGATTAGGATCAACGAA-3'was used for the amplification. This primer was designed from ERIC related sequence of V. cholerae designed by Sharples and Lloyds [10] . The DNA was amplified using the amplification cycle as 95 o C for 5 min to denature template, followed by low stringency cycles of 94 0 C for 5 min, 40 o C for 5 min, 72 o C for 5 min and 30 cycles of high stringency of 94 o C for 1 min, 55 o C for 1 min 72 o C for 2 min and final extension of 72 o C for 10 min. The amplified products were separated by agrose gel electrophoresis in 1.5 per cent agrose in 0.5x TBE containing ethidium bromide (1 μg/ml) at 60 V for 4-5 h. Gels were photographed using Alpha imager TM -3400 (Santa Clara, USA). The fingerprints obtained by Rep-PCR were visually compared. All samples were prepared and examined on at least two different occasions.


   Results Top


Molecular typing was performed for 163 representative clinical and 10 environmental isolates obtained from 236 water samples. All clinical isolates were phenotypically biotype El Tor. Majority of isolates were Ogawa, only a few were Inaba (17 isolates). All environmental isolates were typed as non O1 non O139. [Table 2] shows the list of isolates used in the PFGE (50 isolates), ribotyping (173) and Rep-PCR (173).
Table 2: Number of isolates studied by various typing methods

Click here to view


Analysis of results of PFGE: The PFGE profile differentiated the 50 V. cholerae isolates into 15 types (P1 to P15) according to the Tanover's criteria [11] . Overall, 15 patterns [Figure 1] & [Figure 2] of PFGE were obtained with 12 isolates in type P1, 11 in type P3, six in type P5, four in type P6, three in type P12, two each in P7, P4, P11 and P 13 types. Six patterns were unique with overall discriminatory index of 0.838 for PFGE. No association was obtained between the PFGE pattern and the geographic distribution of isolates and also with year of isolation. Five environmental V. cholerae non-O1 non-O139 isolates exhibited unique profiles different from the clinical V. cholerae O1 isolates. Four patterns P1, P2, P3 and P11 matched with the known pulsotypes (H1, A2, L and O). Twenty four isolates belonged to 11 unknown pulsotypes including all environmental isolates which exhibited different profiles. The year-wise details of isolates along with different pulsotypes are summarised in [Table 3]. It was interesting to note that even the outbreaks were caused by isolates of multiple pulsotypes, e.g. though P1(H1) was the major pulsotype during 2002, P2(A2), P11 (O) and P12 also existed, and from sporadic cases, only pulsotype P1(H1) was obtained. In 2003, only pulsotype P1 was recorded from isolates of Karnal, Pinjore, Panipat, and Chandigarh. In 2004, pulsotype P3(L) became predominant along with P4 though some isolates still belonged to pulsotype P1. In 2006, from sporadic cases pulsotypes 3, 11, 12 were obtained. In 2007, six outbreaks occurred in Punjab and Haryana, mainly with pulsotype P5 though P1 and P3 were isolated from sporadic cases from the same region. In 2008, outbreaks were due to P6, P3 and P7. Environmental isolates were different, though dendogram analysis [Figure 2] showed matching profile with some clinical isolates. This indicates the clonal relatedness of these two major groups of V. cholerae. Though many pulsotypes were circulating in the region only some of them caused outbreaks.
Figure 1: PFGE fragment patterns of Not-I digested total cellular DNA from representative V. cholerae isolated in Chandigarh, India. Lane M: Molecular weight marker  Salmonella More Details enterica serovar Braenderup H9182, Lanes 1-15 are the representative 15 pulsotypes obtained.

Click here to view
Figure 2: Dendrogram of representative pulsotypes obtained by PFGE analysis. Distance matrix method: Dice coefficient, cluster method-UPGMA. Year represents the year of isolation and all environmental isolates were non agglutinating.

Click here to view
Table 3: Year-wise analysis of pulsotypes from outbreaks and sporadic cases

Click here to view


Ribotyping results: Among 163 clinical O1 isolates, ribotyping produced four restriction patterns with discriminatory index of 0.48 [Figure 3] and [Figure 4]. Ribotype IV was the commonest (120 isolates) pattern while 16 isolates belonged to ribotype III. There were two unknown types, marked UNI and UN2. UNI was more common (27 isolates) and the UN2 was seen with environmental isolates. It was observed that during a single outbreak in 2002, which was quite large and due to breakage of sewage pipes, ribotypes III, IV and UNI were found. Ribotype III was not detected after 2003, and ribotype IV was the major type. Similarly, pulsotypes were also different during the same year. [Table 4] shows year-wise analysis of ribotypes. The 2002 outbreak was caused by multiple ribotypes. The outbreaks of 2004, 2007 and 2008 were caused by ribotype IV. However, the sporadic cases were caused by different ribotypes. During 2002, 2003, 2007 and 2008 cholera outbreaks, more than one ribotypes were disseminated but during 2004 and 2006, there was uniformity in the distribution of ribotypes.
Figure 3: Molecular weight marker, Lane 22, UN1, Lane 23 ribotype III, Lanes 24, 25, 27 through 31 Ribotype IV, Lane 26: Unknown type II.

Click here to view
Figure 4: Ribotypes of V. cholerae isolates observed after hybridization with digoxigenin-labeled PKK3535 probe. R4: Standard strain from NICED ribotype IV, R3: Standard strain from NICED ribotype III, Lane 13 through 21-Ribotype IV.

Click here to view
Table 4: Year-wise ribotype analysis of the V. cholerae O1

Click here to view


Results of Rep-PCR: Rep-PCR generated four major profiles in clinical isolates [Figure 5]. Rep-PCR differentiated clearly between the pathogenic and non-pathogenic isolates as environmental isolates exhibited distinct profiles. Type Rp1 was the commonest (130 isolates, 80%), followed by Rp2 (17, isolates 10.4%), Rp4 (10 isolates, 6.13%) and Rp3 (6 isolates, 3.68%). Rep-PCR was the least discriminatory method with Simpson's index of diversity coefficient of 0.35. However, except three, most of the environmental isolates gave unique patterns and these profiles did not match with any of clinical isolates. In addition, there was no association between the year and origin of the isolates as the diversity co-efficient was low.
Figure 5: Rep-PCR analysis of V. cholerae isolates. M- Molecular weight marker. Lanes- 1-22 are V. cholerae collected at different frame of time. Lane M- Molecular marker lane Type 1 (Rp1) 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,9,10,11,12,14,15,16,17,18,20,21 Type 2 (Rp2) Lane, 19, 22 Type 3 (Rp3) Lane 8 Type 4 (Rp 4) Lane 13.

Click here to view


[Table 5] shows the comparison between three typing methods for the 50 isolates which were typed by all three methods. PFGE easily distinguished among isolates exhibiting same ribotype and repPCR patterns. Multiple clones of V. cholerae O1 existed at any given time. The year-wise analysis of isolates collected from different regions indicated presence of different clones associated with outbreaks and sporadic infection of cholera. Each outbreak was caused by more than one pulsotype.
Table 5: Comparison of isolates typed by all three methods (n=50)

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


Cholera is an acute diarrhoeal disease endemic in India causing seasonal outbreaks. Recent years have witnessed resurgence of cholera in Chandigarh and several north western States mainly during 2002-2008. The outbreaks were due to contaminated drinking water and occurred in semi urban and rural populations. All the outbreaks were caused by V. cholerae O1 El Tor biotype. The genetic diversity or clonality among V. cholerae causing outbreak and sporadic cholera was studied in order to ascertain the circulation of pulsotypes and ribotypes and genetic similarity between the clinical and environmental isolates, if any. A total of 163 clinical and 10 environmental isolates were analyzed. Forty five V. cholerae O1 isolates representing all the outbreaks as well as sporadic cases and five from environment were subjected to PFGE. Ribotyping and Rep-PCR were performed for all the isolates. Ribotype IV was the most predominant followed by RIII. RIII was not isolated after 2003 and ribotype IV became the most predominant from 2004 onwards. Study by Sharma et al[12] showed that RIII emerged in 1993 after the spread of O139 serogroup in many cholera endemic regions. Ribotype IV appeared for the first time during 2004-2005 [13] . In 2004, we reported the serotype switch from Ogawa to Inaba and in many northern parts of the country [14] . The re-emerged Inaba isolates from Delhi, Tripura and Gwalior were found to belong to this new ribotype IV [14] . Our findings showed that the ribotype RIV existed in northern region during 2002 among Ogawa isolates also. Further comparison of the ribotypes revealed that during 2002, 2003, 2007 and 2008 more than one ribotypes were identified among V. cholerae O1, while during 2004 and 2006, uniform ribotype pattern was observed. Ribotyping which uses labelled E. coli rRNA to probe the ubiquitous and polymorphic rDNA loci is widely accepted as a powerful epidemiological tool. Popovic et al[15] proposed a standardized scheme and showed that strains causing the seventh cholera pandemic belonged to several ribotypes. Ribotyping as observed by earlier investigators is a straight forward approach to study the clonal structure of bacterial populations and is highly reproducible. Our study also confirms the high degree of reproducibility of ribotyping as previously reported [16] .

PFGE generated 15 pulsotypes, of which four matched with the published pulsotypes. Some of the isolates were found to be unique to our region with hitherto unreported pulsotypes, which need further characterization. PFGE was the most discriminatory method and could differentiate between isolates belonging to single ribotype. P1 corresponding to H1 was the major pulsotype till 2003. Dutta et al[13] have also shown that H and H1 were the dominant pulsotypes as seen in our study. P3 corresponding to pulsotype L emerged in 2004, as also shown by Dutta et al[13] . The 2007 cholera outbreaks in Punjab and Haryana were caused by isolates mainly belonging to pulsotypes P5 though P1 and P3 were associated with sporadic cases from the same region. The 2008 outbreak was caused by pulsotypes P6, P13 and P7. The dendrogram analysis of PFGE revealed similarity of some clinical isolates with environmental isolates indicating the genetic relatedness. Further study with the inclusion of large number of environmental and clinical isolates is needed to confirm the present findings. A detailed study on environmental reservoir of V. cholerae may shed more light on preventing such outbreaks in future.

Rep-PCR was the least discriminatory and separated all clinical isolates into four major profiles. However, it was a good technique to differentiate clinical toxigenic isolates from environmental non toxigenic isolates.


   Acknowledgment Top


The authors acknowledge the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), New Delhi, for financial support, and thank Dr G.B. Nair, NICED, Kolkata, for providing control strains for ribotyping. The technical and, administrative support of ICMR and local health authorities is also acknowledged. Authors also acknowledge the initial help provided by Defence Research Development Organisation, Mysore for providing guidance regarding standardization of ribotyping.

 
   References Top

1.Sack DA, Sack RB, Chaignat CL. Getting serious about cholera. N Engl J Med 2006; 355 : 649-51.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.Shangkuan YH, Lin HC, Wang TM. Diversity of DNA sequences among Vibrio cholerae O1 and non O1 isolates detected by whole cell repititive element sequence based polymerase chain reaction. J Appl Microbiol 1997; 82 : 335-44.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.Prabhakar H, Lal M, Kaur H. Outbreak of gastroenteritis due to a new strain of non O group 1 Vibrio cholerae, in Ludhiana in May-August 1993. Indian J Med Res 1994; 99 : 107-8.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.Taneja N, Kaur J, Sharma K, Singh M, Kalra JK, Sharma NM, et al. A recent outbreak of cholera due to Vibrio cholerae O1 Ogawa in & around Chandigarh, North India. Indian J Med Res 2003; 117 : 243-6.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.Taneja N, Biswal M, Tarai B, Kaur J, Sharma M, Sharma NM. Outbreak of cholera in a labour encampment in suburbs of a modern city in north India. J Commun Dis 2007; 39 : 241-4.   Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Taneja N, Mishra A, Sangar G, Singh G, Sharma M. Outbreaks caused by new variants of Vibrio cholerae O1 El Tor, India. Emerg Infect Dis 2009; 15 : 352-4.   Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.WHO. Manual for laboratory infection of acute enteric infections. CDD/83.3. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 1987.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Brosius J, Ullrich A, Racker MA, Gray A, Dull TJ. Construction and fine mapping of the recombinant plasmids containing the RAPD ribosomal RNA operon of E. coli. Plasmid 1981; 6 : 112-8.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Ausubel FM, Brent R, Kingston RE, Moore DD, Seidman JG, Smith JA, Struhl K, editors. Current protocols in molecular biology. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 2002.   Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Sharples GJ, Lloyd RG. A novel repeated DNA sequence located in the intergenic regions of bacterial chromosomes. Nucleic Acids Res 1990; 18 : 6503-8.   Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Tenover FC, Arbeit RD, Goering RV, Mickelsen PA, Murray BE, Persing DH, et al. Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J Clin Microbiol 1995; 33 : 2233-9.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.Sharma C, Nair GB, Mukhopadhyay AK, Bhattacharya SK, Ghosh RK, Ghosh A. Molecular characterization of Vibrio cholerae O1 biotype El Tor strains isolated between 1992 and 1995 in Calcutta, India: evidence for the emergence of a new clone of the El Tor biotype. J Infect Dis 1997; 175 : 1134-41.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.Dutta B, Ghosh R, Sharma NC, Pazhani GP, Taneja N, Raychowdhuri A, et al. Spread of cholera with newer clones of Vibrio cholerae O1 El Tor, serotype Inaba, in India. J Clin Microbiol 2006; 44 : 3391-3.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Taneja N, Biswal M, Tarai B, Sharma M. Emergence of Vibrio cholerae O1 biotype El Tor serotype Inaba in North India. Jap J Infect Dis 2005; 58 : 238-40.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.Popovic T, Bopp C, Olsvik O, Wachsmuth K. Epidemiologic application of a standardized ribotype scheme for Vibrio cholerae 01. J Clin Microbiol 1993; 31 : 2474-82.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.Faruque SM, Roy SK, Alim ARMA, Siddique AK, Albert MJ. Molecular epidemiology of toxigenic Vibrio cholerae in Bangladesh studied by numerical analysis of rRNA gene restriction patterns. J Clin Microbiol 1995; 33 : 2833-8.  Back to cited text no. 16
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
    Material & M...
   Results
   Discussion
   Acknowledgment
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1252    
    Printed39    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded461    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal