Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research
  Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login  
  Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Users Online: 1935       

   Table of Contents      
CORRESPONDENCE
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 135  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 441-442

Authors' response


Department of P.G. Studies & Research in Microbiology, Gulbarga University, Gulbarga 585 106, Karnataka, India

Date of Web Publication3-May-2012

Correspondence Address:
S M Gaddad
Department of P.G. Studies & Research in Microbiology, Gulbarga University, Gulbarga 585 106, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Thati V, Shivannavar C T, Gaddad S M. Authors' response. Indian J Med Res 2012;135:441-2

How to cite this URL:
Thati V, Shivannavar C T, Gaddad S M. Authors' response. Indian J Med Res [serial online] 2012 [cited 2019 Jun 19];135:441-2. Available from: http://www.ijmr.org.in/text.asp?2012/135/3/441/95642

Sir,

We thank the author to point out certain queries on our article [1] and would like to present the following clarifications:

  1. MRSA were isolated and confirmed by both phenotypic and genotypic methods as per CLSI guidelines. Since, MRSA is not the main topic of our paper, we did not mention MRSA screening in detail. Oxacillin and methicillin have not been tested together.
  2. The PCR work was done at Bio-serve Biotechnologies, Hyderabad. They have isolated DNA by using standard kit methods.
  3. The primers used by us were of Biswajit et al[2] . They have validated the primers.
  4. True, but we have tested the antibiogram of the isolates using different antibiotics and reported the same.
  5. True, no new methods were followed for inducible clindamycin test for Ery resistance isolates.
  6. mecA has been detected by PCR.
  7. True, but we have not concentrated on the treatment aspects. We agree, suggestions could have been made.
  8. We have not carried out MIC 90 and MIC 50 .
  9. True, we have not mentioned MIC 50 and 90 .
  10. This is another aspect.
  11. One VISA strain was isolated; however, it was not used for PCR. The same has been mentioned in the paper.
  12. The clinical source of VRSA isolates has been mentioned in the Table.


 
   References Top

1.Thati V, Shivannavar CT, Gaddad SM. Vancomycin resistance among methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from intensive care units of tertiary care hospitals in Hyderabad. Indian J Med Res 2011; 134 : 704-8.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Biswajit S, Anil KS, Abhrajyoti G, Manjusri B. Identification & characterization of a vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from Kolkata (South Asia). J Med Microbiol 2008; 57 : 72-9.  Back to cited text no. 2
    




 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed483    
    Printed23    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded128    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal