Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research
  Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login  
  Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Users Online: 585       

   Table of Contents      
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 135  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 64-71

Polymorphisms in base-excision & nucleotide-excision repair genes & prostate cancer risk in north Indian population


Department of Urology & Renal Transplantation, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India

Date of Submission20-Apr-2010
Date of Web Publication1-Mar-2012

Correspondence Address:
Rama Devi Mittal
Additional Professor (Biochemistry), Department of Urology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Raebareli Road, Lucknow 226 014
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0971-5916.93426

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Background & objectives: Genetic variation in the DNA repair genes might be associated with altered DNA repair capacities (DRC). Reduced DRC due to inherited polymorphisms may increase the susceptibility to cancers. Base excision and nucleotide excision are the two major repair pathways. We investigated the association between two base excision repair (BER) genes (APE1 exon 5, OGG1 exon 7) and two nucleotide excision repair (NER) genes (XPC PAT, XPC exon 15) with risk of prostate cancer (PCa).
Methods: The study was designed with 192 histopathologically confirmed PCa patients and 224 age matched healthy controls of similar ethnicity. Genotypes were determined by amplification refractory mutation specific (ARMS) and PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) methods.
Results: Overall, a significant association in NER gene, XPC PAT Ins/Ins (I/I) genotype with PCa risk was observed (Adjusted OR- 2.55, 95%CI-1.22-5.33, P=0.012). XPC exon 15 variant CC genotypes presented statistically significant risk of PCa (Adjusted OR- 2.15, 95% CI-1.09-4.23, P=0.026). However, no association was observed for polymorphism with BER genes. Diplotype analysis of XPC PAT and exon 15 revealed that the frequency of the D-C and I-A diplotype was statistically significant in PCa. The variant genotypes of NER genes were also associated with high Gleason grade.
Interpretation & conclusions: The results indicated that there was a significant modifying effect on the association between genotype XPC PAT and exon 15 polymorphism and PCa risk which was further confirmed by diplotype analysis of XPC PAT and exon 15 in north Indian population.

Keywords: Bone metastatis - DNA repair gene - Gleason score - polymorphism - prostate cancer


How to cite this article:
Mandal RK, Gangwar R, Kapoor R, Mittal RD. Polymorphisms in base-excision & nucleotide-excision repair genes & prostate cancer risk in north Indian population. Indian J Med Res 2012;135:64-71

How to cite this URL:
Mandal RK, Gangwar R, Kapoor R, Mittal RD. Polymorphisms in base-excision & nucleotide-excision repair genes & prostate cancer risk in north Indian population. Indian J Med Res [serial online] 2012 [cited 2020 Feb 22];135:64-71. Available from: http://www.ijmr.org.in/text.asp?2012/135/1/64/93426

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common malignancy in men and the second leading cause of cancer mortality in western countries [1] . In India, it is the sixth most commonly diagnosed cancer in men [2] . It is well established that genetic factors also play an important role in the pathogenesis of PCa [3] . Therefore, there is an increasing interest in the role that genetic variants such as single nucleotide polymorphic (SNPs) variants play in PCa risk.

Deficient DNA repair capacity is known to be a cancer predisposing factor [4] . DNA damage induced by reactive oxygen species (ROS) may be repaired by the base excision repair (BER) pathway. Human OGG1 (also known as 8-oxoguanine glycosylase) is a DNA glycosylase that performs the initial step of recognizing the 8-oxo-dG damage and the subsequent step of hydrolyzing the N-glycosyl bond, which releases the damaged base but leaves a site of base loss [apurinic (AP) site] in the DNA. Apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease I (APE1) then cleaves the AP site and assembles pol b onto AP sites and allows pol b and ligase III to complete the DNA repair process [5] . However, genetic variants in BER have not been well studied in PCa. Two studies have reported an association between the OGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism and PCa but the results are ambiguous [6],[7] . Although one of the common polymorphisms T>G transversion (Asp>Glu; rs1130409) of APE1 has shown association with various neoplasm such as the lung, stomach, head and neck [8] .

The xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group C (XPC) protein plays a key role in nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway. The functional DNA-binding domains of XPC interact with HR23B to form a complex that recognizes and binds to the sites of DNA damage [9] . Deficiency in XPC has been implicated in tumourigenesis. More than 100 polymorphic variants in the XPC gene have been identified and the two most common polymorphisms are Lys939Gln (XPC A33512C, rs2228001) and a poly (AT) insertion/deletion polymorphism (XPC PAT I/D) in intron 9 which have been associated with risks of many human malignancies, including cancers of lung, bladder, breast, oesophagus, skin, oral cavity, and head and neck [10] . A potential rationale behind these gene-cancer risk associations is that these genetic variants may result in alterations in phenotypes like DNA repair capacity (DRC).

In this study, we investigated whether functional variants of BER (APE1 exon 5, OGG1 exon 7) and NER (XPC PAT and exon 15) genes play any role in the pathogenesis of PCa.


   Material & Methods Top


Study subjects: The study subjects were enrolled consecutively in department of Urology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow between January 2006 to February 2009. The participants were unrelated individuals of similar ethnicity from Lucknow and other adjoining cities of north India. All symptomatic men for lower urinary tract infection (LUTS) suspected to have PCa based on serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) >4 ng/ml and/or abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE), had transrectal systematic ultrasound-guided needle biopsies. The primary end point was the histologic presence of adenocarcinoma of the prostate in the biopsy specimen. Tumour grade was evaluated in PCa samples by the Gleason scoring system [11] . The two most common pattern of growth (well differentiated and poorly differentiated) were combined to a score. The patients were then divided in two groups - Gleason total <7 (less aggressive disease) and Gleason total ≥7 (highly aggressive disease). A total of 192 histologically confirmed PCa patients were enrolled for the study. Bone scan was conducted in patients suspected for bone metastasis. A total of 224 cancer free, unrelated, age matched healthy control individuals of similar ethnicity, randomly selected from general population from Lucknow and adjoining areas, were recruited from individuals attending PCa screening programmes. PSA was done in all the control individuals. Individuals with total PSA >4 ng/ml and/or any irregularity in DRE, or with history of cancer were excluded from the study. Serum PSA was assayed by sandwich ELISA using CanAg PSA kit, Sweden. The study was approved by the Ethical Committee Review Board of the Institute and informed written consent was obtained from each participant.

DNA extraction and genotype analysis: Standard venipuncture was used to collect five ml of peripheral blood in EDTA tubes. Genomic DNA was extracted from the stored peripheral blood by salting out method [12] . Genotyping were performed using amplification refractory mutation specific (ARMS) PCR methodology for OGG1 exon 7 (C>G) and APE1 exon 5 (T>G) [13],[14] . Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were used to amplify regions of XPC-PAT [15] . XPC exon 15 (A>C) was genotyped by PCR-RFLP method using PvuII (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA, USA) restriction enzyme, as shown in [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3] and [Figure 4] respectively. All the four gene polymorphisms were successfully genotyped in 224 controls and 192 PCa patients.
Figure 1: Representative gel picture of APE1 (C>G) polymorphism. Lane 1: 100bp ladder, Lane 2: hetero (TG), Lane 3: wild (TT), Lane 4: variant (GG).

Click here to view
Figure 2: Representative gel picture of OGG1 (C>G) polymorphism. Lane 1: 100bp ladder, Lane 2: wild (CC), Lane 3: hetero (CG), Lane 4: variant (GG).

Click here to view
Figure 3: Representative gel picture of XPC PAT polymorphism. Lane 1: 50bp ladder, Lane 2: Variant (I/I), Lane 3: Hetero (I/D), Lane 4: wild (D/D).

Click here to view
Figure 4: Representative gel picture of XPC exon 15 (A>C) polymorphism. Lane 1: 50bp ladder, Lane 2: wild (AA), Lane 3: hetero (AC), Lane 4: variant (CC).

Click here to view


Quality control procedures: Precise quality control procedures were applied during the genotyping process. As a negative control, PCR mix without DNA sample was used to ensure contamination free PCR product. Samples that failed to genotype were scored as missing and subjected to repetition. Ten per cent of samples from patients and controls were repeated to evaluate the quality of genotyping which showed 100 per cent concordance. Genotyping was performed without knowledge of the case or control status.

Diplotype analysis: Diplotype was constructed and the frequencies assessed using the maximum-likelihood method, using an expectation - maximization algorithm by performing 100,000 permutations through software Arlequin (Version 2.0, Switzerland). Odds ratio (OR) was calculated using unconditional logistic regression for risk diplotype taking the wild-type diplotype as reference.

Statistical analyses: Power of study was calculated using Quanto program version 1.1 (http://hydra.usc.edu/gxe) with input of the following variables: case- control study design, significance level <0.05 (2 sided), model of inheritance=log additive, minor allele frequency=0.26 (minor allele frequency of APE1 exon 5 which was the lowest in all of the four polymorphism), genetic effect OR <0.6 or >1.6. Present study achieved 80 per cent of power which was sufficient to consider OR of <0.6 or >1.6. Chi-square analysis was used to assess deviation from Hardy-Weinberg's Equilibrium (HWE) and to compare the genotype/allele/diplotype frequency between PCa and controls. Odds ratios were obtained by unconditional logistic regression analysis and adjusted for age as a continuous variable. Statistical significance was set at P<0.05. All the statistical analysis were performed with the SPSS software, version 11.5 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA).


   Results Top


Demographical and clinical details of study subjects: A total of 416 individuals (192 PCa and 224 controls) were analyzed in the study. There was no significant difference between age of the patients (62.6±8.9 yr) and healthy controls (59.1±10.4 yr) and smoking habits. As expected, there was statistically significant difference (P<0.001) between serum PSA of PCa patients (221±57.4 ng/ml) and controls (2.3±0.8 ng/ml); 55.2 per cent patients had <7 and 44.8 per cent patients had >7 Gleason grade at the time of diagnosis, 41.8 per cent of patients were diagnosed to have bone metastasis [Table 1].
Table 1: Clinical and demographic details of study subjects

Click here to view


Association of APE1, OGG1 and XPC genotype variants with PCa risk: The genotypic distributions of these gene polymorphisms in the controls were in HWE. To evaluate the association between genetic variant with risk of PCa, BER genes APE1 exon 5, OGG1 exon 7 and NER gene XPC genotype frequency distribution was compared in the PCa and control group [Table 2]. Overall, individuals carrying the G-G (Glu/Glu) of APE1 and G-G (Cys/Cys) homozygous genotype of OGG1 did not demonstrate any significant risk associated with PCa. The genotype frequency distribution of XPC PAT and XPC exon 15 revealed significant association with PCa risk. XPC PAT insertion (II) genotype showed 2.5 fold [Adjusted (Adj.) OR-2.55, 95% CI-1.22-5.33, P=0.012] increased risk with PCa and variant genotype CC of XPC exon 15 showed 2.1 fold (Adj.OR-2.15, 95%CI-1.09-4.23, P=0.026) increased risk. However, no significant association was observed in case of alleles in these two gene polymorphism. Further, to elucidate the combined influence of these polymorphisms, we constructed XPC PAT and XPC exon 15 diplotype [Table 3]. Diplotype results showed that D of XPC PAT and C of exon 15, diplotype (D-C) was associated with 1.6 folds (OR- 1.62, 95%CI- 1.14-2.32, P=0.007) and I of XPC PAT- A of XPC exon 15; (I-A) demonstrated association with increased risk of PCa (OR- 1.69, 95%- 1.15-2.47, P=0.007), respectively.
Table 2: Association between DNA repair gene polymorphisms and PCa risk

Click here to view
Table 3: Diplotype frequencies of XPC PAT and XPC exon 15 gene polymorphisms

Click here to view


Analysis of APE1, OGG1 and XPC gene polymorphism with risk for higher Gleason grades: For genotypic comparison the patients with different Gleason grades were sub-categorized in to two groups (Low grade <7, High grade ≥7) based on degree of differentiation between cells. The genotypes frequencies of APE1 exon 5 and OGG1 exon 7 were analysed between the control and high Gleason group. Marginally significant risk was associated with combined genotype (CG+GG) of OGG1 in higher grades of Gleason score of PCa disease, when OR was adjusted with age, significance was lost. In XPC PAT the variant genotype I/I demonstrated 2.8-fold increased risk (Adj.OR-2.88, 95%CI 1.22-6.79, P=0.015) with high Gleason grade of PCa patients. Similarly, combined genotype DI+II also showed 1.9 fold increased risk (Adj. OR-1.95, 95% CI 1.17-3.25, P=0.010) [Table 4].
Table 4: Association between DNA repair gene polymorphisms and tumour grade

Click here to view


Analysis of APE1, OGG1 and XPC polymorphism with risk for bone metastasis: Association between the APE1, OGG1 and XPC gene variants and the risk associated with bone metastasis was also investigated. The PCa patients were stratified in to two groups, one with positive and the other with negative bone metastasis. No association of these polymorphism was observed with PCa bone metastasis [Table 5].
Table 5: ORs and 95% CIs for PCa in relation to APE1, OGG1 and XPC gene polymorphism by positive metastasis and negative metastasis status

Click here to view


Interaction of APE1, OGG1 and XPC polymorphism with smoking habit in PCa: The gene-smoking interaction was evaluated to study the modulation of PCa risk with respect to APE1, OGG1 and XPC gene polymorphisms. The PCa patients were grouped in to non smoker (never smoked) and smokers (smoking more than 5 yr). On analyzing the genotype frequency between these two groups for susceptibility to PCa, none of the polymorphisms demonstrated association (data not shown).


   Discussion Top


Multiple repair mechanisms have been evolved in humans to minimize the consequences of DNA damage, preserving genomic integrity. The DNA repair pathways like BER and NER repair specific types of lesions, and individuals with a suboptimal repair capacity may have higher susceptibility to PCa.

In the present study, we did not find evidence to support such an association between the variant genotype GG (Glu/Glu) of APE1 and GG (Cys/Cys) genotype of OGG1 in the aetiology of PCa. Some earlier studies showed that the APE1 variant (Glu) genotype did not affect the frequency of X-ray or ultraviolet-induced chromosome aberrations [16] . However, many studies have investigated the association between APE1 T>G (Glu/Glu) and cancer risks; conversely, the findings were varied among different ethnic populations and different cancer types. Agachan et al[17] found that the GG genotype was associated with the risk of lung cancer in a Turkey population, whereas others [18],[19] did not observe any association with PCa and bladder cancer. Although OGG1 is abundantly expressed in prostate tissue, initially the OGG1 326Ser enzyme was shown to have higher activity than the 326Cys variant enzyme [20] . Several studies have shown that the frequency of the OGG1 G>C polymorphism depends on race and ethnicity. Our finding is consistent with the result of a previous study of OGG1 G>C polymorphism in PCa risk [21] . But our results contradict the findings of another study, in which a significantly elevated risk of PCa was observed [7] .

We observed that individuals with XPC PAT Ins/Ins and XPC exon 15 CC genotypes were at significant increased risk of PCa. A recent meta-analysis of 34 case-control studies by Zhang et al[10] showed XPC Lys939Gln allele C and XPC PAT I allele to be associated with lung, breast, bladder, colorectal, oesophageal, and other cancer risks. Therefore, it can be speculated that functional variation of XPC may influence the individual susceptibility of PCa. Qiao et al[22] studied XPC genotype-related DRC using a host-cell re-activation assay and found that healthy subjects with the homozygous variant genotype of the PAT polymorphism (I/I) exhibited lower DRC as compared to wild-type carriers (D/D), and has been proposed as a useful biomarker to identify individuals at increased risk for developing cancer. Blankenburg et al[23] reported that XPC PAT and exon 15 polymorphisms are associated with risk of melanoma, while Hirata et al[24] reported significantly reduced risk of PCa with XPC Lys939Gln (CC) genotype. Interestingly, diplotype of XPC PAT and exon 15 (D-C, p- 0.007; I-A, p-0.007) demonstrated increased risk with PCa [24] . Gleason grade is generally used to categorize the patients based on cell differentiation. We observed significant association of XPC PAT with high Gleason grade of PCa. This indicated that these polymorphisms may have a role in the initiation of PCa. We did not find significant association of these two polymorphisms (APE1 and OGG1) with high Gleason grade of PCa. However, there was no association either with bone metastasis in PCa. Thus, the interactions among genetic polymorphisms in NER pathway genes may affect the DNA damage repair capacity and contribute to increased PCa risk.

In conclusion, our results suggested that the XPC PAT and XPC exon 15 polymorphisms may be a risk for PCa in north Indian population. Moreover, the diplotype analysis of XPC PAT and XPC exon 15 was also found to be associated with PCa risk. Further studies are warranted to validate these observations with large sample size and diverse ethnicity.

Conflict of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest.


   Acknowledgment Top


Authors acknowledge the Council of Science & Technology, Lucknow, (UP) for funding the project. The first author (RKM) is thankful to the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi, for Junior Research Fellowship (JRF).

 
   References Top

1.Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Murray T, et al. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin 2008; 58 : 71-96.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Sinha R, Anderson DE, McDonald SS, Greenwald P. Cancer risk and diet in India. J Postgrad Med 2003; 49 : 222-8.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Lichtenstein P, Holm NV, Verkasalo PK, Iliadou A, Kaprio J, Koskenvuo M, et al. Environmental and heritable factors in the causation of cancer--analyses of cohorts of twins from Sweden, Denmark, and Finland. N Engl J Med 2000; 343 : 78-85.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Berwick M, Vineis P. Markers of DNA repair and susceptibility to cancer in humans: an epidemiologic review. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000; 92 : 874-97.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Boiteux S, Radicella JP. The human OGG1 gene: structure, functions, and its implication in the process of carcinogenesis. Arch Biochem Biophys 2000; 377 : 1-8.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Zhang J, Dhakal IB, Greene G, Lang NP, Kadlubar FF. Polymorphisms in hOGG1 and XRCC1 and risk of prostate cancer: effects modified by plasma antioxidants. Urology 2010; 75 : 779-85.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Dhillon VS, Yeoh E, Fenech M. DNA repair gene polymorphisms and prostate cancer risk in South Australia-results of a pilot study. Urol Oncol 2011; 29 : 641-6.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Goode EL, Ulrich CM, Potter JD. Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes and associations with cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2002; 11 : 1513-30.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.van Hoffen A, Balajee AS, van Zeeland AA, Mullenders LH. Nucleotide excision repair and its interplay with transcription. Toxicology 2003; 193 : 79-90.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Zhang D, Chen C, Fu X, Gu S, Mao Y, Xie Y, et al. A meta-analysis of DNA repair gene XPC polymorphisms and cancer risk. J Hum Genet 2008; 53 : 18-33.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Gleason DF, Mellinger GT. Prediction of prognosis for prostatic adenocarcinoma by combined histological grading and clinical staging. J Urol 1974; 111 : 58-64.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.Miller SA, Dykes DD, Polesky HF. A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nucleic Acids Res 1988; 16 : 1215.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.Le Marchand L, Donlon T, Lum-Jones A, Seifried A, Wilkens LR. Association of the hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism with lung cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2002; 11 : 409-12.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Ito H, Matsuo K, Hamajima N, Mitsudomi T, Sugiura T, Saito T, et al. Gene-environment interactions between the smoking habit and polymorphisms in the DNA repair genes, APE1 Asp148Glu and XRCC1 Arg399Gln, in Japanese lung cancer risk. Carcinogenesis 2004; 25 : 1395-401.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.López-Cima MF, González-Arriaga P, García-Castro L, Pascual T, Marrón MG, Puente XS, et al. Polymorphisms in XPC, XPD, XRCC1, and XRCC3 DNA repair genes and lung cancer risk in a population of northern Spain. BMC Cancer 2007; 7 : 162.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.Au WW, Salama SA, Sierra-Torres CH. Functional characterization of polymorphisms in DNA repair genes using cytogenetic challenge assays. Environ Health Perspect 2003; 111 : 1843-50.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.Agaçhan B, Küçükhüseyin O, Aksoy P, Turna A, Yaylim I, Görmüs U, et al. Apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease (APE1) gene polymorphisms and lung cancer risk in relation to tobacco smoking. Anticancer Res 2009; 29 : 2417-20.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.Chen L, Ambrosone CB, Lee J, Sellers TA, Pow-Sang J, Park JY. Association between polymorphisms in the DNA repair genes XRCC1 and APE1, and the risk of prostate cancer in white and black Americans. J Urol 2006; 175 : 108-12.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.Wang M, Qin C, Zhu J, Yuan L, Fu G, Zhang Z, et al. Genetic variants of XRCC1, APE1, and ADPRT genes and risk of bladder cancer. DNA Cell Biol 2010; 29 : 303-11.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.Kohno T, Shinmura K, Tosaka M, Tani M, Kim SR, Sugimura H, et al. Genetic polymorphisms and alternative splicing of the hOGG1 gene, that is involved in the repair of 8-hydroxyguanine in damaged DNA. Oncogene 1998; 16 : 3219-25.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.Agalliu I, Kwon EM, Salinas CA, Koopmeiners JS, Ostrander EA, Stanford JL. Genetic variation in DNA repair genes and prostate cancer risk: results from a population-based study. Cancer Causes Control 2010; 21 : 289-300.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.Qiao Y, Spitz MR, Shen H, Guo Z, Shete S, Hedayati M, et al. Modulation of repair of ultraviolet damage in the host-cell reactivation assay by polymorphic XPC and XPD/ERCC2 genotypes. Carcinogenesis 2002; 23 : 295-9.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.Blankenburg S, König IR, Moessner R, Laspe P, Thoms KM, Krueger U, et al. Assessment of 3 xeroderma pigmentosum group C gene polymorphisms and risk of cutaneous melanoma: a case-control study. Carcinogenesis 2005; 26 : 1085-90.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.Hirata H, Hinoda Y, Tanaka Y, Okayama N, Suehiro Y, Kawamoto K, et al. Polymorphisms of DNA repair genes are risk factors for prostate cancer. Eur J Cancer 2007; 43 : 231-7.  Back to cited text no. 24
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]


This article has been cited by
1 Absence of APE1 (Asp148Glu) gene polymorphism in North-West Indian population: A comparison with world population
Karashdeep Kaur,Rupinder Kaur
Meta Gene. 2018; 16: 208
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Polymorphisms in XPC gene and risk for prostate cancer
Rahma Said,Karim Bougatef,Nouha Setti Boubaker,Rim Jenni,Amine Derouiche,Mohamed Chebil,Slah Ouerhani
Molecular Biology Reports. 2018;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Genetic variants of the DNA repair genes from Exome Aggregation Consortium (EXAC) database: significance in cancer
Raima Das,Sankar Kumar Ghosh
DNA Repair. 2017;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 HOGG1 C1245G Gene Polymorphism Associated with Prostate Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
Yang Chen,Jie Li,Tianyu Li,Zengnan Mo
The International Journal of Biological Markers. 2015; 30(2): 161
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 A systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between OGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism and cancers
Ping-Ting Zhou,Bo Li,Jun Ji,Meng-Meng Wang,Chun-Fang Gao
Medical Oncology. 2015; 32(2)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
6 OGG1 Mutations and Risk of Female Breast Cancer: Meta-Analysis and Experimental Data
Kashif Ali,Ishrat Mahjabeen,Maimoona Sabir,Humera Mehmood,Mahmood Akhtar Kayani
Disease Markers. 2015; 2015: 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
7 Common variants of xeroderma pigmentosum genes and prostate cancer risk
Aneta Mirecka,Katarzyna Paszkowska-Szczur,Rodney J. Scott,Bohdan Górski,Thierry van de Wetering,Dominika Wokolorczyk,Tomasz Gromowski,Pablo Serrano-Fernandez,Cezary Cybulski,Aniruddh Kashyap,Satish Gupta,Adam Golab,Marcin Slojewski,Andrzej Sikorski,Jan Lubinski,Tadeusz Debniak
Gene. 2014; 546(2): 156
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
8 Association between APE1 T1349G polymorphism and prostate cancer risk: evidence from a meta-analysis
Xin Li,Geng Zhang,Yong-Jun Huai,Zhi-Qiang Cao
Tumor Biology. 2014;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
9 The association between the APE1 Asp148Glu polymorphism and prostate cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis based on case–control studies
Xue Zhou,Li Wei,Guangjun Jiao,Wei Gao,Mingzhen Ying,Ning Wang,Yajie Wang,Chuan Liu
Molecular Genetics and Genomics. 2014;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
10 Associations of Lys939Gln and Ala499Val polymorphisms of theXPCgene with cancer susceptibility: A meta-analysis
Jing He,Ting-Yan Shi,Mei-Ling Zhu,Meng-Yun Wang,Qiao-Xin Li,Qing-Yi Wei
International Journal of Cancer. 2013; 133(8): 1765
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
11 DNA repair genes polymorphism and lung cancer risk with the emphasis to sex differences
L. Letkova,T. Matakova,L. Musak,M. Sarlinova,M. Krutakova,P. Slovakova,E. Kavcova,V. Jakusova,M. Janickova,A. Drgova,P. Berzinec,E. Halasova
Molecular Biology Reports. 2013; 40(9): 5261
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
12 Poly (AT) deletion/insertion polymorphism of the XPC gene contributes to urinary system cancer susceptibility: A meta-analysis
Qiang-Sheng Dai,Rui-Xi Hua,Ruoxin Zhang,Yu-Shan Huang,Zhu-Ming Hua,Cheang Tuck Yun,Rui-Fang Zeng,Jian-Ting Long
Gene. 2013; 528(2): 335
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
13 Association ofXPCGene Polymorphisms with Susceptibility to Prostate Cancer: Evidence from 3,936 Subjects
Yan-Feng Zou,Jin-Hui Tao,Qian-Ling Ye,Hai-Feng Pan,Fa-Ming Pan,Hong Su,Dong-Qing Ye
Genetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers. 2013; 17(12): 926
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
14 APEX Nuclease (Multifunctional DNA Repair Enzyme) 1 Gene Asp148Glu Polymorphism and Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis Involving 58 Articles and 48903 Participants
Dan Hu,Xiandong Lin,Hejun Zhang,Xiongwei Zheng,Wenquan Niu,Steven George Rozen
PLoS ONE. 2013; 8(12): e83527
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
15 Association of XPD and XRCC1 Genetic Polymorphisms with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk
Lian-Yi Guo,Xu-Peng Jin,Wei Niu,Xiao-Fei Li,Bao-Hai Liu,Yu-Lin Wang
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention. 2012; 13(9): 4423
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Material & Methods
   Results
   Discussion
   Acknowledgment
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2134    
    Printed74    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded404    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 15    

Recommend this journal