|Year : 2011 | Volume
| Issue : 4 | Page : 419-431
An insight into the drug resistance profile & mechanism of drug resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae
Achchhe Lal Patel1, Uma Chaudhry1, Divya Sachdev1, Poonam Nagpal Sachdeva1, Manju Bala2, Daman Saluja1
1 Dr B.R. Ambedkar Center for Biomedical Research, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
2 Regional STD Teaching Training & Research Centre, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College & Safdarjang Hospital, New Delhi, India
|Date of Submission||27-Oct-2009|
|Date of Web Publication||15-Nov-2011|
Dr B.R. Ambedkar Center for Biomedical Research, University of Delhi, Delhi 110 007
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Among the aetiological agents of treatable sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), Neissseria gonorrhoeae is considered to be most important because of emerging antibiotic resistant strains that compromise the effectiveness of treatment of the disease - gonorrhoea. In most of the developing countries, treatment of gonorrhoea relies mainly on syndromic management rather than the aetiological based therapy. Gonococcal infections are usually treated with single-dose therapy with an agent found to cure > 95 per cent of cases. Unfortunately during the last few decades, N. gonorrhoeae has developed resistance not only to less expensive antimicrobials such as sulphonamides, penicillin and tetracyclines but also to fluoroquinolones. The resistance trend of N. gonorrhoeae towards these antimicrobials can be categorised into pre-quinolone, quinolone and post-quinolone era. Among the antimicrobials available so far, only the third-generation cephalosporins could be safely recommended as first-line therapy for gonorrhoea globally. However, resistance to oral third-generation cephalosporins has also started emerging in some countries. Therefore, it has become imperative to initiate sustained national and international efforts to reduce infection and misuse of antibiotics so as to prevent further emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance. It is necessary not only to monitor drug resistance and optimise treatment regimens, but also to gain insight into how gonococcus develops drug resistance. Knowledge of mechanism of resistance would help us to devise methods to prevent the occurrence of drug resistance against existing and new drugs. Such studies could also help in finding out new drug targets in N. gonorrhoeae and also a possibility of identification of new drugs for treating gonorrhoea.
Keywords: Epidemiology - mechanism of drug resistance - Neisseria gonorrhoeae
|How to cite this article:|
Patel AL, Chaudhry U, Sachdev D, Sachdeva PN, Bala M, Saluja D. An insight into the drug resistance profile & mechanism of drug resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Indian J Med Res 2011;134:419-31
|How to cite this URL:|
Patel AL, Chaudhry U, Sachdev D, Sachdeva PN, Bala M, Saluja D. An insight into the drug resistance profile & mechanism of drug resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Indian J Med Res [serial online] 2011 [cited 2020 Mar 29];134:419-31. Available from: http://www.ijmr.org.in/text.asp?2011/134/4/419/89853
| Introduction|| |
Despite the recent advances in diagnosis, surveillance and treatment, sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) remain one of the leading diseases throughout the world. Increased promiscuity and onset of sexual activity at an early age are two important contributing factors to the spread of sexually transmitted diseases. Neisseria More Details gonorrhoeae (also known as the gonococcus) colonizes primarily in the human genitourinary tract, giving rise to the sexually transmitted infection gonorrhoea. It causes both symptomatic and asymptomatic genital and extragenital tract infections. Disease caused by this organism is a significant public health problem despite continual advances in treatment , . Worldwide, there are an estimated 62 million new cases a year, with an average of 22 million cases at any given time ,, . N. gonorrhoeae inhabits mainly mucosal surfaces of the urethra in males and the cervix in females. As the signs and symptoms of infection are often absent or obscure, complications such as pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), infertility, ectopic pregnancy arise  . Infection in pregnant women may lead to crucial perforation and blindness in the newborn. Gonococcal infections have also been documented to facilitate acquisition and transmission of HIV and HPV infections , . Asymptomatic infections by N. gonorrhoeae largely contribute to the persistence and transmission of disease in a community  . Therefore, to eliminate N. gonorrhoeae infections and in turn to control HIV and HPV infections it is important not only to screen high-risk population but also to treat them immediately with most effective drugs. Control of gonococcal infections has relied on effective single-dose antibiotic therapy given at the initial clinical visit, prior to any knowledge of the organism's susceptibility pattern. In the recent past, there has been an alarming increase in the number of isolates of N. gonorrhoeae resistant to commonly used drugs ,,,, . Surveillance is, therefore, necessary to understand ongoing resistance trends and to ensure the success of any therapy. The irrational and injudicious use of antibacterial agents, especially in the developing countries is encouraging this trend and the situation is expected to worsen unless appropriate steps are initiated. Thus, resistance of the gonococcus to antibiotics has been the cause of much concern in recent years and has been the subject of extensive investigation. The present review summarizes and trends of drug resistance in N. gonorrhoeae, mechanism of drug resistance and discusses the treatment regime. In addition, the need to look for new and alternative antibacterial agents is also emphasized.
| Characteristics of gonoccocus|| |
N. gonorrhoeae is a Gram-negative diplococcus and is known to infect humans only. It is closely related to and probably derived from Neisseria meningitidis More Details, but has become highly adapted to survival in the genital tract. It is transmitted by human-to-human contact and survives poorly outside the human body. N. gonorrhoeae is a very successful pathogen as it can evade or adapt to host defences, persist without severely damaging the host, and be transmitted to and infect other hosts, thereby maintaining itself. Particularly in women, gonococci may produce only mildly symptomatic or asymptomatic disease. This adaptation allows the organism to persist and disseminate over long periods  .
The most important characteristics of N. gonorrhoeae, in the context of antimicrobial resistance pattern, are its phenotypic and genotypic variability which enables it to evade the host response. Phenotypic variability occurs through differential expression of existing parts of the genome. Genotypic variation is achieved by incorporation of new genetic material, which can be acquired either by conjugation or transformation. It is because of this feature that N. gonorrhoeae has acquired penicillinase producing plasmids. Another important feature of N. gonorrhoeae is its antigenic variability. This helps the bacterium to survive in its limited host, i.e., humans. Antigenic variability of N. gonorrhoeae is partially due to its ability to acquire genetic material from related organisms , .
| Epidemiology|| |
Single dose therapy for N. gonorrhoeae infection has become the norm in most of the countries throughout the world. The basic reason behind this is that single dose therapy is most effective and assures adequate treatment. World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations for selecting any treatment for gonorrhoea states that the antimicrobial prescribed should be such that the cure rate is about 95 per cent , . Moreover, during the past few years N. gonorrhoeae has started developing resistance against most of the antimicrobials that are prescribed for its therapy. Therefore, surveillance of the antimicrobial resistance becomes very important in monitoring the emergence and spread of resistance and in planning appropriate treatment regimens. Gonorrhoea is a disease mainly found in resource-poor settings where laboratory facilities are limited or unavailable. Due to this reason, culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of N. gonorrhoeae is hardly done in the developing countries. Developed countries have collected the data in proper manner due to availability of adequate resources. Such planned studies are always of help in monitoring resistance pattern in the bacteria. However, resistance data obtained from developing countries are mainly from point prevalence studies, which cannot be used to follow the trend. Such epidemiological studies need to be done on a regular basis because the prevailing strains of the bacteria and their antimicrobial susceptibility profiles keep on changing. The data obtained on N. gonorrhoeae susceptibility, so far, are incomplete and there is an urgent need for proper surveillance throughout the world.
| Pre-quinolone era|| |
Sulphanilamide was introduced as an antimicrobial against N. gonorrhoeae as early as in 1937 , . However, the bacteria became resistant quickly against sulphanilamides within a span of two years. At the same time, when sulphanilamides were given as treatment for gonorrhoea, Alexander Fleming also documented the ability of penicillin to inhibit the growth of N. gonorrhoeae in his 1929 paper describing penicillin discovery  . Thereafter, penicillin became the choice of antimicrobial for the treatment of gonorrhoea in 1943 and remained so for decades  . Suceptibility profile of N. gonorrhoeae against penicillin (and other antimicrobials) was monitored throughout the world, and in vitro resistance to penicillin was expressed in a uniform manner in terms of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC). During the initial years of treatment of gonorrhoea with penicillin, all the isolates had an MIC of <0.0125 mg/l (0.02 IU/l) and were considered to be sensitive to the treatment , . However, N. gonorrhoeae began developing low level resistance to penicillin. The MIC values of N. gonorrhoeae isolates gradually increased to >0.12 mg/l , and gradually most of the strains became resistant to penicillin (MIC >0.5 mg/l)  . Due to this increase in the MIC values, it was necessary to increase the effective dose of penicillin from 50,000 units in 1945 to 4.8 million units by 1970s , . This increase in penicillin resistance was proved to be the additive effect of multiple chromosomal mutation resulting in altered penicillin binding proteins, increase in the antibiotic efflux system and probably decrease in the antibiotic uptake from the membrane  . Chromosomal mediated penicillin resistance was found to be of low level as determined by the MIC values. Simultaneous to the development of chromosomal mediated resistance, high-level plasmid mediated resistant isolates of N. gonorrhoeae were also observed in various countries ,, . These isolates were termed as penicillinase producing N. gonorrhoeae (PPNG) as these harboured a plasmid having a gene of β-lactamase, the product of which conferred resistance towards penicillin. Reports of such high level penicillin resistant isolates were documented in Africa, Asia, North America, Europe and Australia  . Due to the emergence of penicillin resistant isolates (both chromosomal and plasmid mediated) of N. gonorrhoeae, penicillin was no longer considered an effective treatment for gonorrhoea by 1989 and, therefore, penicillin was also prohibited in most parts of the world ,, .
A few documented reports of antimicrobial susceptibility data from India suggested a slow step-wise increase in penicillin resistance ,, . Low level resistance of N. gonorrhoeae to penicillin was observed first in India as early as 1981 in Madras, where the first case of β-lactamase isolate of N. gonorrhoeae was documented  . Thereafter, various other reports indicated the increase in the resistance profile of N. gonorrhoeae towards penicillin. Most of the isolates resistant to penicilline were found to be harbouring β-lactamase producing plasmid, . Use of penicillin for the treatment of gonorrhoea was discontinued in India in 1990  . As a result, penicillin resistance (both chromosomal and plasmid mediated) decreased subsequently  . Thereafter resistance towards penicillin once again showed a steep rise to 42.4 and 66.7 per cent in 2000 and 2001 respectively, along with increase in isolation of penicillinase producing N. gonorrhoea (PPNGs)  . Study conducted by Ray et al showed high level of penicillin resistance from Hyderabad (79%) and Chennai (62.5%), while low level of resistance (20-33%) for penicillin was observed from isolates obtained from Kolkata, Nagpur and Pune.
Coincident with the development of resistance to penicillin, gonococci also developed resistance to several other antibiotics, including tetracycline, chloramphenicol, erythromycin and streptomycin ,,, . Tetracycline was also considered as another important antimicrobial during the pre-quinolone era. Since tetracycline was not very expensive and thus was a widely used antimicrobial, and most importantly tetracycline was given as an adjunct therapy for Chlamydia trachomatis, it was not possible to evaluate the contribution of tetracycline in the management of gonorrhoea. Same was the case with azithromycin, even though it was considered to be a more expensive alternative. Gradually through constant use of tetracycline to treat such co-infections, N. gonorrhoeae acquired low-level resistance towards this antimicrobial. High-level chromosomally mediated tetracycline resistance emerged in the 1970s along with chromosomally mediated penicillin resistance  . Plasmid mediated tetracycline resistant N. gonorrhoeae (TRNG) emerged in 1985 in Atlanta and The Netherlands and was probably a result of the acquisition on a plasmid, a tet-M determinant from streptococcal species ,,,,, .
Various reports from USA also indicated the presence of both chromosomal mediated tetracycline resistance and TRNG , . In 1997, 25.6 per cent of isolates from USA were tetracycline-resistant, of which 17 per cent were chromosomally mediated and 8.6 per cent were TRNG  . Regional data from USA showed an increase in TRNG from less than 5 per cent in 1990 to early 15 per cent in 1995. In the WHO Western Pacific study, TRNG were widely but unevenly distributed. In 1998, particularly high proportions of TRNG were seen in Singapore (84%), the Solomon Islands (74%) and Vietnam (35.9%), continuing a pattern observed in earlier years  . In all other regions TRNG distribution was below 10 per cent. Reports of high level tetracycline resistance were also documented in Africa, Europe and Netherlands  .
TRNG strains were also identified in the WHO South East Asia Region, and Thailand alone accounted for about 16 per cent of isolates in 1994-1997  . An additional 55 per cent of strains had chromosomal-mediated resistance. Indonesia had particularly high rates of TRNG, and virtually all N. gonorrhoeae isolates show one or the other forms of resistance  . In India, decreased susceptibility towards tetracycline was reported as early as in 1971 in Mumbai with 28 per cent of the isolates with decreased susceptibility towards tetracycline  . Bhalla et al found 28 per cent of 50 consecutive isolates in New Delhi to be TRNG. In 1997, 10 per cent of 94 isolates from Bangladesh were TRNG  . In 2000/2001, a study conducted by Ray et al reported high percentage resistance in three centers of India (Hyderabad, Nagpur and Pune).
Another important antimicrobial, the aminocyclitol (spectinomycin) was introduced for the therapy against antibiotic resistant gonococci or in patients who were allergic to other drugs. Most gonococci have remained sensitive to spectinomycin, except for the report describing three strains in Europe, which are apparently single-step high-level resistant mutants  . First case of spectinomycin resistant N. gonorrhoeae isolate was reported in India in 2002  .
| Quinolone era|| |
Quinolones in the treatment of N. gonorrhoeae: In 1989, in response to the increasing frequency of isolation of penicillin, tetracycline, streptomycin and spectinomycin-resistant strains of N. gonorrhoeae in the United States and also throughout the world, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended the use of broad-spectrum cephalosporins or fluoroquinolones for the primary treatment of uncomplicated gonorrhoea  . Similar policies were also adopted by various national organizations in other parts of the world. The quinolones most widely used for the treatment of gonorrhoea are second generation antimicrobials such as ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin and ofloxacin  . The fourth-generation quinolones, such as trovafloxacin, have been tested for the treatment of gonorrhoea, but information on resistance to this antimicrobial is not available. It was noticed that among the quinolones, fluoroquinolones had excellent oral absorption and good tissue distribution, achieved excellent interstitial fluid levels and adequate penetration into macrophages, were free from any serious toxic side effects and induced low frequency of spontaneous single-step mutations. Due to their excellent safety and tolerability, these have become popular alternatives to penicillin and cephalosporin derivatives in the treatment of various infections including gonococcal infection. Soon fluoroquinolones were regarded to be as close as possible to the 'ideal' antimicrobial agent, since these possessed a broad spectrum of antimicrobial activity. By 1993, ciprofloxacin was recommended as the first line therapy to treat gonorrhoea throughout the world  .
Quinolone resistance profile in N. gonorrhoeae: Initially most of the isolates of gonococci were found to be extremely susceptible to quinolones and more importantly, fluoroquinolones. Widespread use of fluoroquinolones in last 20 years and often misuse, coupled with emerging resistance, gradually compromised their utility  . Since the importance of proper documentation of antimicrobial susceptibility studies was understood, data became available from all parts of the world  . Knapp's criteria for in vitro resistance to quinolones have been followed in almost all the studies carried so far  . In most of these studies, it was evident that the resistance towards fluoroquinolones, which is almost chromosomal mediated, develops in an incremental manner. Most of these studies indicate that the initial isolates which were less susceptible towards ciprofloxacin were found to have MIC values of 0.06 mg/l, which gradually increased to 1 mg/l (such strains being referred to as intermediate resistant) and later to as high as 16 mg/l (classified as resistant isolates). Such strains were referred to as quinolone resistant N. gonorrhoeae (QRNG). Strains with MIC value >4 μg/l were considered as high level resistance (HLR) strains. Patients infected with these isolates showing decreased susceptibility or intermediate resistance towards ciprofloxacin, usually responded very well to 500 mg of ciprofloxacin. Later on, a few reports of treatment failure also appeared  .
The ciprofloxacin resistant isolates were reported in mid 1980s from many parts of the world , . By the end of 1992, more than 40 per cent ciprofloxacin resistant isolates were documented in Japan  . Thereafter, ciprofloxacin resistant strains spread very quickly from Asia to Australia, Hawaii and North America ,,, . Studies from USA also indicated a rise in ciprofloxacin resistant isolates especially in California  . Significant ciprofloxacin resistance emerged simultaneously from the WHO Western Pacific Region  and SEAR  . In these countries, it was thought that the emergence of ciprofloxacin resistance was accelerated mainly because of its use for the treatment of other diseases as well. There were two reports of increasing ciprofloxacin resistance from Bangladesh , . In India, the use of ciprofloxacin, as the first-line therapy for gonorrhoea started in 1990  . It was also included in the syndromic management in cases of suspected gonorrhoea. Resistance to norfloxacin soon appeared in 1996 from New Delhi, India  . By the end of 2000, a burst in ciprofloxacin-resistant isolates was observed in India ,-,,, . Interestingly, with the emergence of fluoroquinolone resistant strains in India, a rapid decline of PPNGs was observed  . Similar observation was also reported from other countries indicating a penicillinase producing plasmid curing effect on an ecological scale , . In most of these studies, the molecular basis of antibiotic resistance was not investigated. In a study from India, decrease in ciprofloxacin resistant strains was observed which may be due to ciprofloxacin not being used for treatment of gonorrhoea in India  . Studies from developed countries such as Australia, Canada and US suggest that quinolone resistant strains were introduced sporadically over many years. Once introduced into sexual networks, these subtypes spread and eventually achieved endemic transmission. In response to the increase in ciprofloxacin resistant isolates from throughout the world, the use of this antimicrobial to treat gonorrhoea was discontinued in early 2000s from most of the countries  . In 2004, CDC discontinued the use of ciprofloxacin to treat gonococcal infections  . The use of ciprofloxacin was continued in Europe till 2004 and was discontinued only in 2005 , . Simultaneously, the use of quinolone group of antimicrobials for the treatment of gonorrhoea was also discontinued in India ,,,, .
| Post-quinolone era|| |
Consequent to the increase in the resistance profile of N. gonorrhoeae towards quinolones, third-generation cephalosporins, both injectable (ceftriaxone) and oral (cefixime and cefdinir), were the only available treatment recommended by the CDC and other national organizations for the gonococcal infections ,,,, . In patients allergic to cephalosporins, spectinomycin was recommended as the drug of choice. Cephalosporins were discovered  in 1945. These are known to work as other β-lactams, by inhibiting the cell wall synthesis through binding and inhibiting the action of enzymes responsible for inserting peptidoglycan cross-linkage structures into the cell wall.
Cephalosporins are known to be important antimicrobials for the last 10 years. Despite their historic reliability, resistance to cephalosporins also started developing in Asia and later on in other regions of the world as well. The resistance towards cephalosporins was documented as early as in 1996 and then later in 2000 in Japan , . Several subsequent reports from Japan also indicated much higher MIC values for cephalosporins ,,,,, . Similar results were also documented from other countries like China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Europe, US and Africa ,,,,,,, . A surveillance report from India, wherein isolates collected from different laboratories of India, Bangladesh, Nepal and Sri Lanka during 1999-2001, documented significant increase in the isolates with decreased susceptibility to ceftriaxone  . In India, Bala et al reported nine isolates with ceftriaxone MIC of 0.064 mg/l among the 382 isolates studied during 2002-2006. All cases were treated with ceftrixone 400 mg and there were no treatment failures observed. Some N. gonorrhoeae isolates demonstrating reduced cephalosporin susceptibility also have reduced susceptibility to multiple drug classes, including quinolones, macrolides, penicillins, and tetracyclines  . These ceftriaxone less sensitive strains almost always exhibited resistance to quinolones or quinolones and penicillin as reported from Australia, Japan and India suggesting increasing prevalence of these multi-resistant strains in these countries ,, .
Potential alternatives in the treatment of N. gonorrhoeae infections: Until 1980s, there was a parallel and consistent development of the new antibacterials, which were active against most of the resistant strains of bacteria. The increasing drug resistance in almost all bacteria in the recent past, has prompted scientists to look for possible alternatives such as immunotherapy, vaccination, identification of novel targets for drugs, probiotics, etc . Attacking virulence mechanisms rather than the whole bacterial structure offers a wide range of possibilities. An advantage of such a strategy is that it seems less likely to apply selection pressure. Although no work has been done for N. gonorrhoeae, in other bacteria, targets that have been investigated include receptor sites, sortases, quorum sensing signals, Shiga toxin, and staphylococcal enterotoxinB ,,,,. In addition, the therapies derived from complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) used by the general public, need to be explored , .
Spectinomycin can also be considered as a therapeutic option for persons with gonococcal urogenital infection who cannot tolerate cephalosporins  . However, it would probably remain as an alternative treatment rather than a recommended one, because high levels of resistance developed when this antimicrobial was widely used in the mid-1980s  . Azithromycin, 2 g, taken orally has been shown to be effective against uncomplicated gonococcal infection and could be thought as an option for persons who are allergic to cephalosporins. However, concerns about the development of antimicrobial resistance to macrolides with widespread use restrict current treatment recommendations to limited circumstances. Macrolides such as azithromycin and erythromycin, have also been associated with the multiple transferable resistance efﬂux system , .
Several naturally occurring bacterial DNA gyrase inhibitors, such as the coumarins, which include novobiocin, clorobiocin and coumermycin A1, have been shown to have antibacterial property  . The coumarin derivatives inhibit ATPase activity of DNA gyrase by competing with ATP for binding to the B subunit of the enzyme. Recently activity of some medicinal plants has been evaluated against N. gonorrhoeae which seems to have a promising future  . Among the compounds that were evaluated, eugenol, a compound from Ocimum sanctum was also found to be active against multi-resistant isolates of N. gonorrhoeae, .
| Mechanism of drug resistance|| |
N. gonorrhoeae , originally highly susceptible to antibiotics can adapt to adverse conditions  . A hostile environment in which antibiotics are present may select for the multiple changes which result in resistance and treatment failure. Mechanisms of antibiotic resistance in gonococci may be conveniently grouped as those that involve reduced access of the antibiotic to the target site and those that involve alteration of the target site itself. Access of antibiotics to the target site may be limited by reduced permeability of the cell envelope caused by changes in porin proteins; active export of antibiotics from the cell by means of efflux pumps; and destruction of the antibiotic before it can interact with the target. Alteration or deletion of the target site of the antibiotic results in a reduction of its affinity for the antibiotic. Genetically, these changes may be mediated by either chromosomal or extra-chromosomal elements (plasmids). Multiple resistance determinants may co-exist in a single organism so that the level of resistance can increase incrementally and a single strain can be resistant to a number of different antibiotics.
In gonococci, chromosomally mediated resistance is generally slow to emerge and disseminate. In N. gonorrhoea, the process of genetic transformation is known to be responsible for acquiring drug resistance. But such a change is visible only if many such acquisitions of the determinant take place  . Plasmid-mediated resistance, at present limited to penicillins and tetracyclines, is transmitted by means of conjugation. This process requires the presence of a conjugative plasmid to mobilize the plasmid carrying the resistance determinants. Since not all strains possess conjugative plasmids, the rate of spread of resistance may be limited to some extent. However, conjugative plasmids are also transferable during conjugation, so that some recipient strains then become donors themselves  . Different rates of dissemination of extra-chromosomally mediated resistance have been observed. For example, the 'Asian' PPNG plasmid spread more rapidly than the 'African' PPNG plasmid because initially only strains carrying the former determinant also contained conjugative elements. In N. gonorrhoeae, plasmid-mediated resistance spreads more rapidly than chromosomally mediated resistance. Amongst non-quinolone drugs, several studies have been carried out to understand the mechanism of penicillin resistance, which has been summarized below.
(i) Resistance to penicillins: The penicillins were widely used for the treatment of gonorrhoea for many years (and still are in some regions). Originally, N. gonorrhoeae was extremely sensitive to almost all the drugs, known so far, and treatment with 150,000 units of penicillin was effective in most instances. Later on decreased in vitro susceptibility towards penicillin appeared and it was thought to be associated with treatment failure  . Increasing the recommended dose of penicillin 'temporarily alleviated the clinical problems resulting from infection with these strains, but almost inexorably levels of resistance increased and large numbers of treatment failures again occurred, even with high-dose regimens , . This was an example of step-wise accrual of chromosomal changes over a period of many years. The targets of β-lactam agents are the penicillin binding proteins (PBPs), enzymes located in the cell envelope that participate in cell wall metabolism. Alterations in PBP-2 and PBP-1 decreased their affinity for the penicillins, and thus the susceptibility of the organism. PBP-2 is encoded by the penA locus  . Changes in other loci such as mtr and penB produce additive effects. The mtr locus mediates resistance to a wide range of antibiotics, detergents and dyes through an active efflux system , . Mutations in the penB locus, which affect a porin, result in reduced permeability of the cell envelope to hydrophilic antibiotics and other compounds , . N. gonorrhoeae also has a porA 'pseudogene' which is not expressed  . In contrast, N. meningitidis expresses two porins, PorA and PorB. The combined effect of penA mutations and increased expression of mtr is shown to increase the MIC of penicillin by 120-fold  . Gonococci exhibiting these changes are termed chromosomally resistant N. gonorrhoeae (CMRNG). Reduced susceptibility to cephalosporins, tetracyclines and other agents is also mediated by chromosomal mechanisms in the concerned genes ,, .
In addition to chromosome mediated resistance, resistance to penicillins is also mediated by a plasmid-borne, inducible TEM-1 type β-lactamase. β-lactamase is known to hydrolyze the β-lactam ring of penicillins, thus inactivating them. Chromosome mediated resistance is slow and incremental, on the contrary, resistance mediated by plasmid is a single step process. PPNG were detected at the same time in the United Kingdom and the USA . The first isolates were reported, respectively, from Africa and the Far East. Although the same TEM type of β-lactamase was present in both instances, the gene was carried on plasmids of different sizes, which became known as the 'African' and 'Asian' plasmids. Transmission of the resistance by conjugation required the presence of another mobilizing plasmid, which was already present in the Asian PPNG when it was first isolated, but was not found in the African strains until 1981  . Thus, the Asian strain disseminated more widely and more quickly. Lactamase production (PPNG) and chromosomal changes (CMRNG) can co-exist in the same isolate. This is relevant because of the clinical use of penicillins in combination with β-lactamase inhibitors. These substances, such as clavulanic acid and sulbactam, prevent the β-lactamases from inactivating the penicillins. Combinations such as amoxycillin/clavulanic acid are widely used to treat other infections. In theory, and sometimes in practice these represent an effective oral therapy for PPNG infections, but more commonly single-dose regimens of penicillin/inhibitor combinations have failed  . This appears to be due to PPNG strains having a high frequency of underlying intrinsic or chromosomally mediated penicillin resistance. Chromosomally mediated resistance can be measured reliably only after the organism is 'cured' of its plasmid and the MICs reassessed  .
(ii) Resistance to quinolones : As already stated, the quinolone antibiotics most widely used for the treatment of gonorrhoea are 'second generation' agents such as ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin. As in the case of chromosome mediated penicillin resistance, resistance to these antibiotics has developed incrementally over a number of years and multiple chromosomal changes are involved. Access of quinolones to their targets is reduced by changes in cell permeability and possibly by efflux mechanisms. These events produce low-level quinolone resistance. The targets of the quinolones are topoisomerases, including DNA gyrase ,, . High-level clinically relevant resistance is mediated by alteration of the target sites, initially via mutation in the gyrA gene  . Multiple amino acid substitutions have been described which, when combined, result in high-level resistance. Multiple mutations also occur in the parC gene which codes for the production of topoisomerase IV, a secondary target for quinolones in gonococci, but again found in association with high-level resistance. Changes in ParC seem to arise in the presence of mutations affecting GyrA. The more recent (fourth generation) quinolones are more active against strains with altered ParC, but are less effective against GyrA mutants. Thus, these compounds will in theory, be active against some, but not all, ciprofloxacin-resistant gonococci  . The newer quinolones have yet to be assessed for efficacy against gonorrhoea. One of these agents, trovafloxacin, has been withdrawn from use in many countries because of toxic side-effects.
(iii) Resistance to cephalosporin antibiotics: Altered gonococcal susceptibility to cephalosporin antibiotics is chromosomally mediated and is due to the same changes that account for decreased penicillin susceptibility , . There is cross-resistance between penicillins and early generation cephalosporins such as cefuroxime , . However, this is not the case for the later generation cephalosporins such as ceftriaxone and cefixime. Not all cephalosporins are hydrolyzed by the TEM-1 type β-lactamase, and therefore, some of these compounds are active against PPNG. Other β-lactamases (cephalosporinases), which are constitutively expressed by many other Gram-negative genera, have thus far not been detected in gonococci and there has been no transfer of genetic material encoding production of extended spectrum β-lactamases into pathogenic Neisseria . If such an event occurs, it would be devastating for gonorrhoea treatment programmes that rely heavily on the third-generation cephalosporins. In the past five years, gonococci with decreased susceptibility to ceftriaxone has been reported though the mechanism of resistance has not been fully understood  . Recent data also suggest that the emergence and spreading of cephalosporins- resitance gonococci is quite similar to the data showing the emergence of quinolone-resistance strains  .
| Conclusion|| |
Despite a high prevalence of uncomplicated gonorrhoea and an increasing incidence of resistant isolates of N. gonorrhoeae, throughout the world, standardized monitoring of the antimicrobial susceptibility profile has been restricted to Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project (GISP) in United States, Gonococcal Resistance to Antimicrobials Surveillance Program (GRASP) in England and Wales and Gonococcal Antimicrobial Susceptibility Program (GASP) in the America and the Caribbean. There is a need for better control of gonococcal disease including enhanced global surveillance of resistance and improved treatment. The cost associated with culture of gonococci for determination of antimicrobial resistance profile forbids routine determination of MIC before treatment. Hence, there is an undeniable need to simplify and standardize the in vitro antibacterial susceptibility procedures. The E-test method though expensive, is an attractive alternative to the earlier, agar dilution technique, for gonococcal antibacterial susceptibility testing. Molecular technology can provide an alternate procedure to the culture method for the surveillance of the antimicrobial susceptibility. It is believed that the single tube assays using techniques like hybridization capture for the detection of wide range of resistance genes would allow their application beyond the laboratory directly in clinical practice  . Efforts should be made to design common assay for detection as well as to investigate the drug resistance profile of N. gonorrhoeae so that infected patients can be treated immediately. Such methods would facilitate an early treatment with the most effective drugs as well as will control the transmission of infection.
The single dose approach has also contributed to the ability of N. gonorrhoeae to develop resistance to commonly used, inexpensive and effective drugs. The capacity and ease for genetic recombination and high transmissibility of resistant genes has made the development of new antibiotics a challenging area of research. The choice of antibacterial agent must take into account the data generated by laboratory based surveillance of susceptibility. This surveillance would be useful not only in deciding the correct treatment but also in helping to detect the emergence of new antibiotic resistant traits and to monitor the effectiveness of prescribed treatment. To make this information reliable, the laboratories need to adopt and use standardized laboratory procedures and take part in external quality assessment programme  . Studies addressing the effect of continued suppression of bacteria by an antimicrobial agent (post-antibiotic effect) and the effect exerted at sub-inhibitory concentrations, known as the post-antibiotic sub-MIC effect (PA-SME) need to be carried out for the rational use of antibiotics in N. gonorrhoeae infection. Global initiatives are imperative to integrate diagnostics, disease management and control of antimicrobial resistance.
It has also been observed that the problem of antibiotic resistance is greatly influenced by poverty and the factors related to it. Due to the cost involved, treatment of gonorrhoea relies on syndromic management in developing countries including India. The problem of drug-resistance in these countries, though an important issue, is thus not properly addressed, as there are other issues such as basic health care of higher priority. Formulation and implementation of policies related to understanding of the problem and the consequences of lack of control, both by users and policy makers will help in reducing transmission of resistant strains.
| References|| |
|1.||Tanaka M, Nakayama H, Notomi T, Irie S, Tsunoda Y, Okadome A, et al. Antimicrobial resistance of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Japan, 1993-2002: continuous increasing of ciprofloxacin-resistant isolates. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2004; 24 (Suppl 1): S15-22. |
|2.||Reyn A, Korner B, Bentzon MW. Effects of penicillin, streptomycin, and tetracycline on Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolated in 1944 and 1957. Br J Vener Dis 1958; 34 : 227-31. |
|3.||World Health Organization Western Pacific Region Gonococcal Surveillance Programme Surveillance of antibiotic susceptibility of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in the WHO Western Pacific Region 1992-4. Genitourin Med 1997; 73 : 355-61. |
|4.||World Health Organization Western Pacific Region Gonococcal Surveillance Programme (1993) annual report. Commun Dis Intell 1994; 18 : 307-10. |
|5.||Tapsall JW. What management is there for gonorrhea in the post-quinolone era. Sex Transm Dis 2006; 33 : 8-10. |
|6.||Hillis SD, Owens LM, Marchbanks, PA, Amsterdam LF, Mac Kenzie WR. Recurrent chlamydial infections increase the risks of hospitalization for ectopic pregnancy and pelvic inflammatory disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 176 : 103-7. |
|7.||Laga M, Manoka A, Kivuvu M, Malele B, Tuliza M, Nzila N, et al. Non-ulcerative sexually transmitted diseases as risk factors for HIV-1transmission in women from a cohort study. AIDS 1993; 7 : 95-102. |
|8.||Quinn TC. Association of sexually transmitted diseases and infection with the human immunodeficiency virus: biological cofactors and markers of behavioral interventions. Int J STD AIDS 1996; 7 : 17-24. |
|9.||Hunter HH. Neisseria gonorrhoeae. In: Mendell G, Douglas RG, Bennett JE, editors. Principles and practice of infectious diseases. New York: Churchill Livingstone;1990. p. 1613-31. |
|10.||Chaudhry U, Ray K, Bala M, Saluja, D. Detection of a novel point mutation in gyrA gene of Neisseria gonorrhoeae associated with increased ciprofloxacin resistance. Sex Trans Infect 2002; 78 : 440-4. |
|11.||Stathi M, Flemetakis A, Miriagou V, Avgerinou H, Kyriakis KP, Maniatis AN, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Greece: data for the years 1994-2004. J Antimicrob Chemother 2006; 57 : 775-9. |
|12.||Enders M, Turnwald-Maschler A, Regnath T. Antimicrobial resistance of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates from the Stuttgart and Heidleberg areas of Southern Germany. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2006; 25 : 318-22. |
|13.||Bala M, Ray K, Kumari S. Alarming increase in ciprofloxacin and penicillin resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates in New Delhi, India. Sex Transm Dis 2003; 30 : 523-5. |
|14.||Bala M, Ray K, Gupta SM, Muralidhar S, Jain RK. Changing trends of antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in India and the emergence of ceftriaxone less susceptible N. gonorrhoeae strains. J Antimicrob Chemother 2007; 60 : 582-6. |
|15.||Brunham RC, Plummer FA, Stephens RS. Bacterial antigenic variation, host immune response, and pathogen-host coevolution. Infect Immun 1993; 61 : 2273-6. |
|16.||Catlin BW. Nutritional profiles of Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Neisseria meningitidis and Neisseria lactamica in chemically defined media and the use of growth requirements for gonococcal typing. J Infect Dis 1973; 128 : 178-94. |
|17.||Sarafian SK, Knapp JS. Molecular epidemiology of gonorrhea. Clin Micro Rev 1989; 2 (Suppl): S49-S55. |
|18.||Tapsall J. Antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae. WHO/CDS/CSR/DRS/2001.3. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001. |
|19.||World Health Organization. Management of sexually transmitted diseases. WHO/UNAIDS; WHO/GPA/94.1 Rev.1. Geneva: WHO; 1997. |
|20.||Dees JE, Colston JAC. The use of sulfanilamide in gonococci infections. JAMA 1937; 108 : 1855-8. |
|21.||Nelson NA. The Treatment of syphilis and gonorrhea as of today. Am J Nurs 1944; 44 : 737-41. |
|22.||Fleming A. On the antibacterial action of cultures of a penicillium, with special reference to their use in the isolation of B. influenzae. 1929. Bull World Health Organ 2001; 79 : 780-90. |
|23.||Van Slyke CJ, Arnold RC, Buchholtz M. Penicillin therapy in sulfonamide-resistant gonorrhea in men. Am J Public Health 1943; 33 : 1392-4. |
|24.||Whittington WL, Knapp JS. Trends in resistance of Neisseria gonorrhoeae to antimicrobial agents in the United States. Sex Transm Dis 1988; 15 : 202-10. |
|25.||Catlin BW, Reyn A. Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolated from disseminated and localised infections in pre-penicillin era. Auxotypes and antibacterial drug resistances. Br J Vener Dis 1982; 58 : 158-65. |
|26.||Thayer J, Field F, Magnusos H. The sensitivity of gonococci to penicillin and its relationship to penicillin failures. Antibiot Chemother 1957; 7 : 306-10. |
|27.||Jaffe HW, Biddle JW, Thornsberry C, Johnson RE, Kaufman RE, Reynolds GH, et al. National gonorrhea therapy monitoring study: in vitro antibiotic susceptibility and its correlation with treatment results. N Engl J Med 1976; 294 : 5-9. |
|28.||Centers for Disease Control. CDC recommended treatment schedules, 1974. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1974; 23 : 341-2. |
|29.||Ison CA. Antimicrobial agents and gonorrhoea: therapeutic choice, resistance and susceptibility testing. Genitourin Med 1996; 72 : 253-7. |
|30.||Phillips I. Beta-lactamase-producing, penicillin-resistant gonococcus. Lancet 1976; 2 : 656-7. |
|31.||Ashford WA, Golash RG, Hemming VG. Penicillinase-producing Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Lancet 1976; 2 : 657-8. |
|32.||Lind I. Antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Clin Infect Dis 1997; 24 (Suppl 1): S93-7. |
|33.||Workowski KA, Berman SM. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2006. MMWR Recomm Rep 2006; 55 : 1-94. |
|34.||Bhalla P, Sethi K, Reddy BSN, Mathur MD. Antimicrobial susceptibility and plasmid proﬁle of Neisseris gonorrhoeae in India (New Delhi). Sex Transm Infect 1998; 74 : 210-3. |
|35.||Divekar A, Gogate A. Ciproﬂoxacin resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolated in Mumbai (formerly Bombay), India. Sex Transm Infect 1999; 75 : 122. |
|36.||Ray K, Bala M, Kumar J, Misra RS. Trend of antimicrobial resistance in N. gonorrhoeae at New Delhi, India. Int J STD AIDS 2000; 11 : 115-8. |
|37.||Vijaylakshmi K, Gopalan KN, GopalKrishnan B, Mohanram CC. The first case of â-lactamase strain of Neisseria gonorrhoeae from Madras. Indian J Sex Trans Dis 1982; 3 : 13. |
|38.||Kulkarni MS, Shetty CR, Murti P. Antibiotic susceptibility of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Indian J Sex Trans Dis 1983; 4 : 1. |
|39.||Moorthy PK, Thomas K, Sasidharan P, Papali C. Penicillinase (â-lactamase) producing Neisseria from Kerala. lndian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 1984; 50 : 227-8. |
|40.||Ray K, Bala M, Kumari S. Antimicrobial resistance of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in selected World Health Organization Southeast Asia Region countries: An Overview. Sex Transm Dis 2005; 32 : 178-84. |
|41.||Curtis FR, Wilkinson AE. A comparison of the in vitro sensitivity of gonococci to penicillin and the results of treatment. Br J Vener Dis 1958; 34 : 70-7. |
|42.||Wilcox RP. A survey of problems in the antibiotic treatment of gonorrhoea, with special reference to South-East Asia. Br J Vener Dis 1970; 46 : 217-20. |
|43.||Ison CA, Terry P, Bindayna K, Gill MJ, Adams J, Woodford N. Tetracycline-resistant gonococci in the U.K. Lancet 1988; 1 : 651-2. |
|44.||Stolz E, Zwart GF, Michel MF. Activity of eight antimicrobial agents in vitro against Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Br J Vener Dis 1975; 51 : 257-60. |
|45.||Martin IM, Hoffmann S, Ison CA. European surveillance of sexually transmitted infections (ESSTI): the first combined antimicrobial susceptibility data for Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Western Europe. J Antimicrob Chemother 2006; 58 : 587-93. |
|46.||Morse SA, Johnson SR, Biddle JW, Roberts MC. High-level tetracycline resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae is result of acquisition of streptococcal tetM determinant. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1986; 30 : 64-70. |
|47.||Knapp JS, Zenilman JM, Biddle JW, Perkins GH, DeWitt WE, Thomas ML, et al. Frequency and distribution in the United States of strains of Neisseria gonorrhoeae with plasmid-mediated high-level resistance to tetracycline. J Infect Dis 1987; 155 : 819-22. |
|48.||Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance, 1997. Division of STD Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 1998. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/std/stats97/1997_surveillance_report.pdf. |
|49.||Djajakusumah T, Sudigdoadi S, Meheus A, Van Dyck E. Plasmid patterns and antimicrobial susceptibilities of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Bandung, Indonesia. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1998; 92 : 105-7. |
|50.||Moses JM, Desai MS, Bhosle CB, Trasi MS. Present pattern of antibiotic sensitivity of gonococcal strains isolated in Bombay. Br J Vener Dis 1971; 47 : 273-8. |
|51.||Rahman M, Sultan Z, Monira S, Alam A, Nessa K, Islam S, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolated in Bangladesh (1997 to 1999): Rapid shift to fluoroquinolone resistance. J Clin Microbiol 2002; 40 : 2037-40. |
|52.||Reyn A, Schmidt H, Trier M. Spectinomycin hydrochloride [Trobicin] in the treatment of gonorrhoea. Observation of resistant strains of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Br J Vener Dis 1973; 49 : 54-9. |
|53.||Bala M, Ray K, Salhan S. First case of spectinomycin resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolate in New Delhi, India. Sex Transm Infect 2005; 81 : 186-7. |
|54.||Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1989; 38 : S8. |
|55.||Andriole VT. The quinolones, prospects. In: Andriole VT, editor. The quinolones, 2 nd ed. San Diego: Academic Press; 1998. p. 417-29. |
|56.||Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 1993 sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines. MMWR Recomm Rep 1993; 42 : 1-102. |
|57.||DiCarlo RP, Martin DH. Use of quinolones in sexually transmitted diseases. In: Andriole VT, editor. The quinolones, 2 nd ed. San Diego: Academic Press; 1998. p. 203-27. |
|58.||Knapp JS, Hale JA, Neal SW, Wintersheid K, Rice RJ, Whittington WL. Proposed criteria for interpretation of susceptibilities of strains of Neisseria gonorrhoeae to ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, enoxacin, lomefloxacin and norfloxacin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1995; 39 : 2442-5. |
|59.||Ison CA, Woodford PJ, Madders H, Claydon E. Drift in susceptibility of Neisseria gonorrhoeae to ciprofloxacin and emergence of therapeutic failure. Antimicrob Agent Chemother 1998; 42 : 2919-22. |
|60.||Dan M. The use of fluoroquinolones in gonorrhoea: the increasing problem of resistance. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2004; 5 : 829-54. |
|61.||Tanaka M, Kumazawa J, Matsumoto T, Kobayashi I. High prevalence of Neisseria gonorrhoeae strains with reduced susceptibility to fluoroquinolones in Japan. Genitourin Med 1994; 70 : 90-3. |
|62.||Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Fluoroquinolone resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae - Colorado and Washington, 1995. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1995; 44 : 761-4. |
|63.||Gorwitz RJ, Nakashima AK, Moran JS, Knapp JS. Sentinel surveillance for antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae - United States, 1988-1991. The Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project Study Group. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ 1993; 42 : 29-39. |
|64.||Tapsall JW, Phillips EA, Shultz TR, Thacker C. Quinolone-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolated in Sydney, Australia, 1991 to 1995. Sex Transm Dis 1996; 23 : 425-8. |
|65.||Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Increases in fluoroquinolone-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae among men who have sex with men - United States, 2003, and revised recommendations for gonorrhea treatment, 2004. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2004; 53 : 335-8. |
|66.||GRASP Steering Group. The Gonococcal Resistance to Antimicrobials Surveillance Programme (GRASP) Year 2007 report. London: Health Protection Agency; 2008 [12/8/2008]. Available at: http://www.hpa.org.uk/web/HPAwebFile/HPAweb_C/1221117895841. |
|67.||Bhuiyan BU, Rahman M, Miah MR, Nahar S, Islam N, Ahmed M, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility and plasmid contents of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates from commercial sex workers in Dhaka, Bangladesh: emergence of high level resistance to ciproﬂoxacin. J Clin Microbiol 1999; 37 : 1130-6. |
|68.||Rahman M, Alam A, Nessa K, Nahar S, Dutta DK, Yasmin L, et al. Treatment failure with the use of ciproﬂoxacin for gonorrhoea correlates with the prevalence of ﬂuoroquinolone resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae strains in Bangladesh. Clin Infect Dis 2001; 32 : 884-9. |
|69.||Divekar AA, Gogate AS, Shivkar LK. Association between auxotypes, serogroups, and antibiotic susceptibilities of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolated from women in Mumbai (formerly Bombay), India. Sex Transm Dis 1999; 26 : 358-63. |
|70.||Fox KK, Knapp JS, Holmes KK Hook EW 3rd, Judson FN, Thompson SE, et al. Antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae in the United States, 1988-1994: the emergence of decreased susceptibility to the fluoroquinolones. J Infect Dis 1997; 175 : 1396-403. |
|71.||Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Update to CDC's sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2006: fluoroquinolones no longer recommended for treatment of gonococcal infections. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2007; 56 : 332-6. |
|72.||BASHH (British Association for Sexual Health and HIV). National Guideline on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Gonorrhoea in Adults 2005. Available from: http://www.bashh.org/documents/116/116.pdf. |
|73.||Sethi S, Sharma D, Mehta SD, Singh B, Smriti M, Kumar B, et al. Emergence of ciproﬂoxacin resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae in north India. Indian J Med Res 2006; 123 : 707-10. |
|74.||Bhalla P, Vidhani S, Reddy BS, Chowdhry S, Mathur MD. Rising quinolone resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates from New Delhi. Indian J Med Res 2002; 115 : 113-7. |
|75.||World Health Organization. Guidelines for the management of sexually transmitted infections. Geneva, Switzerland: 2003. Available from: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2003/9241546263.pdf. |
|76.||Andes DR, Craig WA. Cephalosporins. In: Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R, editors. Principles and practice of infectious diseases. vol. 6. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Elsevier, Churchill Livingstone; 2005. p. 1756-62. |
|77.||Akasaka S, Muratani T, Yamada Y, Inatomi H, Takahashi K, Matsumoto T. Emergence of cephem and aztreonam-high-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae that does not produce beta-lactamase. J Infect Chemother 2001; 7 : 49-50. |
|78.||Yamaguchi K, Domon H, Miyazaki S, Tateda K, Ohno A, Ishii K, et al. In vitro and in vivo antibacterial activities of CS-834, a new oral carbapenem. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1998; 42 : 555-63. |
|79.||Ito M, Yasuda M, Yokoi S, Ito S, Takahashi Y, Ishihara S, et al. Remarkable increase in central Japan in 2001-2002 of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates with decreased susceptibility to penicillin, tetracycline, oral cephalosporins, and fluoroquinolones. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004; 48 : 3185-7. |
|80.||Tanaka M, Nakayama H, Huruya K, Konomi I, Irie S, Kanayama A, et al. Analysis of mutations within multiple genes associated with resistance in a clinical isolate of Neisseria gonorrhoeae with reduced ceftriaxone susceptibility that shows a multidrug-resistant phenotype. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2006; 27 : 20-6. |
|81.||Yokoi S, Deguchi T, Ozawa T, Yasuda M, Ito S, Kubota Y, et al. Threat to cefixime treatment for gonorrhea. Emerg Infect Dis 2007; 13 : 1275-7. |
|82.||Osaka K, Takakura T, Narukawa K, Takahata M, Endo K, Kiyota H, et al. Analysis of amino acid sequences of penicillin-binding protein 2 in clinical isolates of Neisseria gonorrhoeae with reduced susceptibility to cefixime and ceftriaxone. J Infect Chemother 2008; 14 : 195-203. |
|83.||Tapsall JW, Limnios EA, Murphy D. Analysis of trends in antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolated in Australia, 1997-2006. J Antimicrob Chemother 2008; 61 : 150-5. |
|84.||WHO Western Pacific Gonococcal Antimicrobial Surveillance Programme. Surveillance of antibiotic resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae in the WHO Western Pacific Region, 2006. Commun Dis Intell 2008; 32 : 48-51. |
|85.||Ye S, Su X, Wang Q, Yin Y, Dai X, Sun H. Surveillance of antibiotic resistance of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates in China, 1993-1998. Sex Transm Dis 2002; 29 : 242-5. |
|86.||Tzelepi E, Daniilidou M, Miriagou V, Siatravani E, Pavlidou E, Flemetakis A. Cluster of multidrug-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae with reduced susceptibility to the newer cephalosporins in Northern Greece. J Antimicrob Chemother 2008; 62 : 637-9. |
|87.||Wang SA, Harvey AB, Conner SM, Zaidi AA, Knapp JS, Whittington WL, et al. Antimicrobial resistance for Neisseria gonorrhoeae in the United States, 1988 to 2003: the spread of fluoroquinolone resistance. Ann Intern Med 2007; 147 : 81-8. |
|88.||Wang SA, Lee MV, O'Connor N, Iverson CJ, Ohye RG, Whiticar PM, et al. Multidrug-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae with decreased susceptibility to cefixime-Hawaii, 2001. Clin Infect Dis 2003; 37 : 849-52. |
|89.||Moodley P, Martin IM, Pillay K, Ison CA, Sturm AW. Molecular epidemiology of recently emergent ciprofloxacin-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae in South Africa. Sex Transm Dis 2006; 33 : 357-60. |
|90.||Dillon JA, Ruben M, Li H, Borthagaray G, Marquez C, Fiorito S, et al. Challenges in the control of gonorrhea in South America and the Caribbean: monitoring the development of resistance to antibiotics. Sex Transm Dis 2006; 33 : 87-95. |
|91.||Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Racial disparities in nationally notifiable diseases - United States, 2002. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2005; 54 : 9-11. |
|92.||Ito M, Deguchi T, Mizutani K-S, Yasuda M, Yokoi S, Ito S, et al. Emergence and spread of Neisseria gonorrhoeae clinical isolates harboring mosaic-like structure of penicillin-binding protein 2 in Central Japan. Antimicrob Agent Chemother 2005; 45 : 137-43. |
|93.||Bala M, Ray K, Gupta SM Comparison of antimicrobial resistance pattern of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates from peripheral health centres and STD clinic attendees of a tertiary care centre in India. Intl J STD AIDS 2008; 19 : 378-80. |
|94.||Ahmad SI. Treatment of post-burns bacterial infections by bacteriophages, specifically ubiquitous Pseudomonas spp. notoriously resistant to antibiotics. Med Hypoth 2002; 58 : 327-31. |
|95.||Zopf D, Roth S. Oligosaccharide anti-infective agents. Lancet 1996; 347 : 1017-21. |
|96.||Svensson A, Larsson A, Emtenas H, Hedenström M, Fex T, Hultgren SJ, et al. Design and evaluation of pilicides: potential novel antibacterial agents directed against uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Chembiochem 2001; 2 : 915-8. |
|97.||Scott CJ, McDowell A, Martin SL, Lynas JF, Vandenbroeck K, Walker B. Irreversible inhibition of the bacterial cysteine protease-transpeptidase sortase (SrtA) by substrate-derived affinity labels. Biochem J 2002; 366 : 953-8. |
|98.||Dong YH, Gusti AR, Zhang Q, Xu JL, Zhang LH. Identification of quorumquenching N-acyl homoserine lactonases from Bacillus species. Appl Environ Microbiol 2002; 68 : 1754-9. |
|99.||Nishikawa K, Matsuoka K, Kita E, Okabe N, Mizuguchi M, Hino K, et al. A therapeutic agent with oriented carbohydrates for treatment of infections by Shiga toxin producing Escherichia coli O157:H7. Proc Natl Acid Sci USA 2002; 99 : 7669-74. |
|100.||Kessler RC, Davis RB, Foster DF, Van Rompay MI, Walters EE, Wilkey SA, et al. Long-term trends in the use of complementary and alternative medical therapies in the United States. Ann Int Med 2001; 135 : 262-8. |
|101.||Vandenbroucke JP, de Craen MAJ. Alternative medicine: a 'mirror image' for scientific reasoning in conventional medicine. Ann Int Med 2001; 135 : 507-13. |
|102.||Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Notice to readers: discontinuation of spectinomycin. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2006; 55 : 370. |
|103.||Boslego JW, Tramont EC, Takafuji ET, Diniega BM, Mitchell BS, Small JW, et al. Effect of spectinomycin use on the prevalence of spectinomycin-resistant and of penicillinase-producing Neisseria gonorrhoeae. N Engl J Med 1987; 317 : 272-8. |
|104.||Johnson SR, Sandul AL, Parekh M, Wang SA, Knapp JS, Trees DL. Mutations causing in vitro resistance to azithromycin in Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2003; 21 : 414-9. |
|105.||Xia M, Whittington WL, Shafer WM, Holmes KK. Gonorrhea among men who have sex with men: outbreak caused by a single genotype of erythromycin-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae with a single-base pair deletion in the mtrR promoter region. J Infect Dis 2000; 181 : 2080-2. |
|106.||Maxwell A. The interaction between coumarin drugs and DNA gyrase. Mol Microbiol 1993; 9 : 681-6. |
|107.||Shokeen P, Bala M, Singh M, Tandon V. In vitro activity of Eugenol, an active component from Ocimum sanctum against multiresistant and susceptible strains of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2008; 32 : 174-9. |
|108.||Shokeen P, Bala M, Tandon V. Evaluation of activity of sixteen medicinal plants against Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2009; 33 : 86-91. |
|109.||Shokeen P, Bala M Ray K, Tandon V. Preliminary studies on activity of Ocimum sanctum, Drynaria quercifolia and Annona squamosa against Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Sex Transm Dis 2005; 32 : 106-11. |
|110.||Johnson SR, Morse SA. Antibiotic resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae: genetics and mechanisms of resistance. Sex Transm Dis 1988; 15 : 217-24. |
|111.||Sparling PF. Antibiotic resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Med Clin North Am 1972; 56 : 1133-44. |
|112.||Holmes KK, Johnson DW, Floyd TM. Studies on venereal disease I: Probenecid-procaine penicillin G combination and tetracycline hydrochloride in the treatment of "penicillin-resistant" gonorrhea in men. JAMA 1967; 202 : 125-30. |
|113.||Sparling PF, Sarubbi FA Jr, Blackman E. Inheritance of low-level resistance to penicillin, tetracycline and chloramphenicol in Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J Bacteriol 1975; 124 : 740-9. |
|114.||Guymon LF, Sparling PF. Altered crystal violet permeability and lytic behaviour in antibiotic-resistant and -sensitive mutants of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J Bacteriol 1975; 124 : 757-63. |
|115.||Hagman KE, Pan W, Spratt BG, Balthazar JT, Judd RC, Shafer WM. Resistance of Neisseria gonorrhoeae to antimicrobial hydrophobic agents is modulated by the mtrCDE efflux system. Microbiology 1995; 141 : 611-22. |
|116.||Gill MJ, Simjee S, Al-Hattawi K, Robertson BD, Easmon CS, Ison CA. Gonococcal resistance to â-lactams and tetracycline involves mutation in loop 3 of the porin encoded at the penB locus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1998; 42 : 2799-803. |
|117.||Feavers IM, Maiden MC. A gonococcal porA pseudogene: implications for understanding the evolution and pathogenicity of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Mol Microbiol 1998; 30 : 647-56. |
|118.||Ison CA, Bindayna KM, Woodford N, Gill MJ, Easmon CS. Penicillin and cephalosporin resistance in gonococci. Genitourin Med 1990; 66 : 351-6. |
|119.||Bygdeman SM, Mardh P-A, Sandstrom EG. Susceptibility of Neisseria gonorrhoeae to rifampicin and thiamphenicol: correlation with protein 1 antigenic determinants. Sex Transm Dis 1984; 11 (Suppl): 366-70. |
|120.||van Embden JD, van Klingeren B, Dessens-Kroon M, van Wijngaarden LJ. Emergence in the Netherlands of penicillinase-producing gonococci carrying "Africa" plasmid in combination with transfer plasmid. Lancet 1981; 1 : 938. |
|121.||Lawrence AG, Shanson DC. Single dose oral amoxycillin 3 g with either 125 mg or 250 mg clavulanic acid to treat uncomplicated anogenital gonorrhoea. Genitourin Med 1985; 61 : 168-71. |
|122.||Tapsall JW, Phillips EA, Morris LM. Chromosomally mediated intrinsic resistance to penicillin of penicillinase producing strains of Neisseria gonorrhoea isolated in Sydney: guide to treatment with Augmentin. Genitourin Med 1987; 63 : 305-8. |
|123.||Wiedmann B, Heisig P. Mechanisms of quinolone resistance. Infection 1994; 22 : S73-9. |
|124.||Trees DL, Sandul AL, Whittington WL, Knapp JS. Identification of novel mutation patterns in the parC gene of ciprofloxacin-resistant isolates of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Antimicrob Agents Chemotherapy 1998; 42 : 2103-5. |
|125.||Mavroidi A, Tzouvelekis LS, Tassios PT, Flemetakis A, Daniilidou M, Tzelepi E. Characterization of Neisseria gonorrhoeae strains with decreased susceptibility to fluoroquinolones isolated in Greece from 1996-1999. J Clin Microbiol 2000; 38 : 3489-91. |
|126.||Rice RJ, Biddle JW, JeanLouis YA, DeWitt WE, Blount JH, Morse SA. Chromosomally mediated resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae in the United States: results of surveillance and reporting, 1983-1984. J Infect Dis 1986; 153 : 340-5. |
|127.||Tapsall JW. Neisseria gonorrhoeae and emerging resistance to extended spectrum cephalosporins. Curr Opin Dis 2009; 22 : 87-91. |
|128.||Otero Guerra L, Lepe Jiménez JA, Blanco Galán MA, Aznar Martín J, Vázquez Valdés F. Utility of molecular biology techniques in the diagnosis of sexually transmitted diseases and genital infections. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 2008; 26 (Suppl 9): 42-9. |
|129.||Bala M, Tapsall JW, Limnios A, Sood S, Ray K. Experience with an external quality assurance scheme for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in India, 2001-2007. Epidemiol Infect 2010; 138 : 69-75. |