Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research
  Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login  
  Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Users Online: 339       

   Table of Contents      
CORRESPONDENCE
Year : 2011  |  Volume : 133  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 343-345

High levels of antimicrobial resistance at a tertiary trauma care centre of India


Department of Laboratory Medicine, Jai Prakash Narayan Apex Trauma Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110 029, India

Date of Web Publication6-Apr-2011

Correspondence Address:
Purva Mathur
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Jai Prakash Narayan Apex Trauma Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110 029
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 21441693

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Behera B, Mathur P. High levels of antimicrobial resistance at a tertiary trauma care centre of India. Indian J Med Res 2011;133:343-5

How to cite this URL:
Behera B, Mathur P. High levels of antimicrobial resistance at a tertiary trauma care centre of India. Indian J Med Res [serial online] 2011 [cited 2019 Nov 14];133:343-5. Available from: http://www.ijmr.org.in/text.asp?2011/133/3/343/78392

Sir,

Infections are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in severely traumatized patients. The rates of infection in trauma patients are much higher than those affecting other surgical patients [1],[2] . Since the initiation of antimicrobial therapy is often empirical, it is important to know the antimicrobial susceptibility profile of pathogens in order to select the appropriate antibiotics. We, therefore, conducted this retrospective study with the aim to review the profile of nosocomial infections and antimicrobial susceptibility of pathogens at a newly commissioned level-1 trauma care centre of India. The study was conducted at the Microbiology laboratory of Jai Prakash Narayan Apex Trauma Centre of All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) hospital at New Delhi. The Centre has 190 beds with neurosurgery, polytrauma, general surgery and orthopaedics wards and intensive care units (ICUs) (36 bedded).

All the samples received in the Microbiology laboratory of the Trauma Centre between April 1, 2007 to March 31, 2008 were included in the study. The samples were processed according to standard microbiological techniques [3] . Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of the bacterial isolates was performed by the disk diffusion method on Mueller Hinton agar (BBL Difco, USA) according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines [4] . Gram-negative bacterial isolates exhibiting resistance to all available major classes of antimicrobial agents (aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, third generation cephalosporins, β lactams-β lactamase inhibitor combinations and carbapenems) were tested for susceptibility to polymyxin B (300 units; BBLTM , BD, USA) and tigecycline (15 μg Oxoid, Basingstoke, Hants, UK; except in Pseudomonas and Proteus spp.) by the disc diffusion method. The interpretation of zone diameters was done according to the CLSI guidelines for polymyxin [5] and US FDA approved breakpoints for tigecycline [6] . Extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) screening was done in all Gram negative pathogens by the double disk potentiation test using ceftazidime (Caz) (30μg) and ceftazidime + clavulanic acid (30/10 μg) (Caz+clav) disc (BBLTM , BD, USA) according to the CLSI guidelines [4] . Screening for metallo β-lactamase (MBL) production was done in carbapenem resistant isolates by the imipenem- EDTA combined disc test [7] . Methicillin resistance was determined in Staphylococcus0 spp. by using oxacillin (1 μg) disc and cefoxitin (30 μg) disc methods as recommended by the CLSI[4] . The S. aureus strains ATCC 25923 and 43300 and Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212 strains were used as controls for sensitivity testing of Gram-positive bacteria. Extensive drug resistance was defined as an isolate resistant to all antimicrobials except one or two [8] . These included isolates resistant to carbapenems, β lactam- β lactamase inhibitor combinations, aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones and third generation cephalosporins.

Species identification of yeast isolates was done by standard microbiological techniques [9] . For Candida isolates obtained from blood, antifungal susceptibility against amphotericin B and fluconazole was performed using a broth microdilution method (M27-A2) according to the CLSI guidelines [10] . Quality control was ensured by testing the CLSI recommended quality control strains Candida parapsilopsis ATCC 22019 (MIC range 2-8 μg/ ml) and C. krusei ATCC 6258 (MIC range 16-64 μg/ml). Antifungal susceptibility against amphotericin B, fluconazole, flucytosine and voriconazole was also performed by the Vitek 2 system using AST- Yst cards [11] .

During the study period, a total of 3,984 clinical specimens were received in the Microbiology laboratory. Of these, 1083 (27%) were urine samples, 890 (22%) were pus and exudates, 817 (21%) were respiratory tract specimens, 660 (17%) were blood samples, 260 (6.5%) were CVP tips/drain tube tips, 246 (6%) were body fluids from sterile sites and 28 (0.7%) were soft tissue or bone specimens. Of the 1083 urine specimens, 399 (37%) yielded growth of one/ more organisms. Similarly, 297 (36%) respiratory tract samples, 223 (34%) blood samples, 60 (24%), body fluids from sterile sites 194 (22%) pus/exudates and 36 (14%) of tips were culture positive for one or more organisms. Thus, a total of 1209 (30%) samples were culture positive.

A total of 1459 organisms were isolated from these samples. P. aeruginosa (321; 22%) was the most common isolate, followed by Candida spp. (303; 21%). Overall, Gram-negative bacilli, Gram-positive cocci and Candida spp. accounted for 989 (68%), 167 (11%) and 303 (21%) of the total isolates. Of the 989 Gram-negative bacteria, members of five genera (Pseudomonas spp., Acinetobacter spp., Klebsiella spp., E. coli and Enterobacter spp) accounted for 922 (93%) of these. ESBL production was confirmed in 802 (87%; 802/922) isolates (Pseudomonas spp., 292/321; 91%, Acinetobacter spp., 226/242; 93%, Klebsiella spp., 212/249; 85%, E coli 42/75; 56%, and Enterobacter spp., 30/35; 86%). P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii are the predominant nosocomial pathogens in many other hospitals across the world [12] . These are notorious nosocomial pathogens, which can survive in the hospital environment, are intrinsically resistant to many antimicrobials and commonly cause infections in the ICUs [12] . The antimicrobial susceptibility of the five most common genera in our study (Pseudomonas spp., Acinetobacter spp., Klebsiella spp., E. coli and Enterobacter spp.) against the five classes of antimicrobials (carbapenems, aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, 3 rd generation cephalosporins and β lactam- β lactamase inhibitor combinations) is shown in the [Table 1]. A total of 246 (27%) isolates were resistant to all these classes of drugs (extremely drug resistant). All the 246 isolates resistant to the five major classes of antimicrobials were sensitive to polymyxin. Of the 465 isolates in the five genera, which were resistant to carbapenems, MBL production was confirmed in 242 (52%) (Pseudomonas spp. 123, Acinetobacter spp. 98, Klebsiella spp. 18, E. coli 2, Enterobacter 1). Further, all the isolates of E. coli, Klebsiella spp., and Enterobacter spp. were sensitive to tigecycline. However, 18 (26%) of the 69 isolates of Acinetobacter spp., which were resistant to the five major classes of antimicrobials were also resistant to tigecycline. This is a cause for concern since tigecycline and polymyxin are being used as last resort antimicrobials in life threatening infections. A high prevalence of tigecycline resistance amongst Acinetobacter spp. in our study is especially worrisome since the organism is not only totally unexposed to tigecycline but also to the tetracycline group of antibiotics in our hospital.
Table 1: Resistance of Gram-negative microorganisms against five major classes of antimicrobials


Click here to view


Gram-positive microorganisms such as S. aureus and coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CoNS) were most commonly isolated from bloodstream or soft tissues. Of the 89 S. aureus isolates, 52 (58%) were methicillin-resistant whereas 53 (85%) of CoNS were methicillin resistant. All the 15 isolates of Enterococcus spp. displayed high level aminoglycoside resistance. However, only 2 (13%) were vancomycin resistant (MIC> 256 μg/ml).

Amongst Candida spp., C. tropicalis was the most common species (160, 53%), followed by C. albicans (57; 19%). Antifungal susceptibility test, performed for blood isolates, revealed all except one isolate of C. rugosa (which had a fluconazole MIC >32 μg/ml) to be sensitive for all the antifungals tested. The most common source of Candida spp. in our study was urine samples. Development of an ICU acquired urinary tract infection (UTI) is common in critically ill, catheterized patients. This is also seen in our ICU, where most of the traumatized patients are catheterized for long periods, especially those with spinal and head injuries. Worldwide, Candida Spp. are amongst the most important causes of UTI in ICUs [13] . Therefore, laboratories must optimize their means of isolating Candida spp. from urine specimens [13] .

An alarmingly high rate of multi-resistance in the Gram-negative bacteria was found. This is especially true for carbapenems, which are being saved for resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections. Carbapenem resistance has risen steadily over last five years at our institute [14],[15],[16] .

To conclude, multi drug resistant Gram-negative bacteria predominated at our centre. The high prevalence of Candida spp. and emerging resistance to last resort antimicrobials requires a review of empiric antimicrobial prescribing policies and strict implementation of infection control procedures.

 
   References Top

1.Lazarus HM, Fox J, Lloyd JF, Evans RS, Abouzelof R, Taylor C, et al. A six-year descriptive study of hospital-associated infection in trauma patients: demographics, injury features, and infection patterns. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2007; 4 : 463-73.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Papia G, McLellan BA, El-Helou P, Louie M, Rachlis A, Szalai JP, et al. Infection in hospitalized trauma patients: incidence, risk factors, and complications. J Trauma 1999; 47 : 923-7.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Collee JG, Miles RS, Wan B. Tests for the identification of bacteria. In: Collee JG, Fraser AG, Marmion BP, Simmons A, editors. Mackie and McCartney practical medical microbiology, 14 th ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1996. p. 131-50.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Clinical and Laboratory s0 tandards Institute (CLSI). Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 16 th informational supplements. CLSI Document M2-A9. Wayne PA: CLSI; 2006.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing: 17 th informational supplement M100-S17. Wayne, Pennsylvania, USA: CLSI; 2007.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Jones RN, Ferraro MJ, Reller LB, Schreckenberger PC, Swenson JM, Sader HS. Multicenter studies of tigecycline disk diffusion susceptibility results for Acinetobacter spp. J Clin Microbiol 2007; 45 : 227-30.   Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Yong D, Lee K, Yum JH, Shin HB, Rossolini GM, Chong Y. Imipenem-EDTA disk method for differentiation of metallo- â-lactamases producing clinical isolates of Pseudomonas spp. and Acinetobcter spp. J Clin Microbiol 2002; 40 : 3798-801.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Falagas ME, Drosos EK. Pandrug resistance (PDR), extensive drug resistance (XDR), and multidrug resistance (MDR) among Gram-negative bacilli: Need for international harmonization in terminology. Clin Infect Dis 2008; 46 : 1121-2.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Segal E, Elad D. Candida species and Blastoschizomycescapitatus. In: Collier L, Balows A, Sussman M, editors. Topley & Wilson's microbiology and microbial infections, vol. IV, 9 th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc; 1998. p. 423-60.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts. Approved standard M27-A2, 2 nd ed. Wayne, PA: CLSI; 2002.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ, Procop GW, Rinaldi MG. Multicenter comparison of the VITEK 2 yeast susceptibility test with the CLSI broth microdilution reference method for testing fluconazole against Candida spp. J Clin Microbiol 2007; 45 : 796-802.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance System. National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance (NNIS) System Report, data summary from January 1992 through June 2004, issued October 2004. A report from the NNIS System. Am J Infect Control 2004; 32 : 470-85.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.Laupland KB, Bagshaw SM, Gregson DB, Kirkpatrick AW, Ross T, Church DL. Intensive care unit-acquired urinary tract infections in a regional critical care system. Crit Care 2005; 2 : R60-5.   Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Gupta E, Mohanty S, Sood S, Dhawan B, Das BK, Kapil A. Emerging resistance to carbapenems in a tertiary care hospital in north India. Indian J Med Res 2006; 124 : 95-8.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.Behera B, Das A, Mathur P, Kapil A. High prevalence of carbapenem resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa at a tertiary care centre of north India. Are we under-reporting? Indian J Med Res 2008; 128 : 324-5.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.Behera B, Mathur P, Das A, Kapil A, Sharma V. An evaluation of four different phenotypic techniques for detection of metallo-beta-lactamase producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Indian J Med Microbiol 2008; 26 : 233-7.  Back to cited text no. 16
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed983    
    Printed44    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded251    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal