Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research Indan Journal of Medical Research
  Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login  
  Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Users Online: 710       

   Table of Contents      
CORRESPONDENCE
Year : 2011  |  Volume : 133  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 339-340

Strengthening ethics in clinical research


Clinical Trials Registry, National Institute of Medical Statistics ICMR, New Delhi 110 029, India

Date of Web Publication6-Apr-2011

Correspondence Address:
Arvind Pandey
Clinical Trials Registry, National Institute of Medical Statistics ICMR, New Delhi 110 029
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 21441691

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Pandey A, Aggarwal A, Seth S D, Maulik M, Juneja A. Strengthening ethics in clinical research. Indian J Med Res 2011;133:339-40

How to cite this URL:
Pandey A, Aggarwal A, Seth S D, Maulik M, Juneja A. Strengthening ethics in clinical research. Indian J Med Res [serial online] 2011 [cited 2019 Oct 23];133:339-40. Available from: http://www.ijmr.org.in/text.asp?2011/133/3/339/78381

Sir,

Of late, a number of news articles have appeared in leading newspapers of the country with regard to irregularities in the conduct of clinical trials in India. Notable among these are dubious consent taking procedures [1] and allegations of drug trials on the poor [2] . According to a report published in the Bulletin of the World Health Organization, fewer than 40 Ethics Committees in India are properly constituted and functioning. It is also a matter of concern that there is no legal requirement for investigators or members of the Ethics Committees to declare a conflict of interest [3] . These issues continue to highlight the importance of transparency, accountability and accessibility of clinical trials and their results. The Clinical Trials Registry - India (CTRI) ( http://www.ctri.nic.in ), an online system for registration of clinical trials, not only establishes an unbiased, scientific public record of clinical trials but has also ushered in an era of transparency accountability and accessibility of clinical trials being conducted in the country [4],[5],[6] .

The experiences gained through the process of clinical trial registration on CTRI have highlighted the issues which could be addressed for strengthening or augmenting ethics in clinical research.

First and foremost among these is the need for ensuring that guidelines for constitution and functioning of Ethics Committee (EC) are implemented. As part of the routine verification and validation process of trials submitted to the CTRI, trial registrants are required to submit the relevant Ethics Committee approval documents. Review of these documents reveals the extent of improper functioning of several ECs, e.g., it has been noticed that in some of the cases, the trial's PI or contact person for scientific and public query, is also the member secretary of the EC and signing authority of the EC approval possibly because of the ignorance of the composition of EC.

On the other hand, many academic institutions might not have a proper Ethics Committee for reviewing and approving clinical trials that are being conducted as a part of the postgraduate medical courses not realizing the fact that principles of ethics remain the same for the global trial or for just a dissertation for academic purpose.

Another case in need of attention is the functioning of Independent Ethics Committees (IEC). The mechanism and credibility of a central Independent Ethics Committee granting ethical approval for clearing trials to be conducted at far off distant cities must be re-visited as the EC may not be conversant with the field situation.

The conflict of interest is an important issue which needs attention. It may be made mandatory to declare the conflict of interest- needless to mention an issue difficult to evaluate.

It has been noted that many PIs are involved in multiple trials, e.g. , a particular PI is involved in as many as 25 clinical trials. There is a need to be concerned about the workload on PI- the number of trials an investigator is able to handle to do justice with the research.

There is justifiable concern among Indian regulatory authorities that "global multicentre trials" are just a front and actually a majority of patients, are intended to be recruited from India, raising ethical concerns. Global trials registered in the CTRI, are required to declare the number of patients proposed to be recruited from India. Based on the information through CTRI, there have been certain instances where there has been a bias in allocation of recruitment of subjects for the Indian arm in global clinical trials. In these instances it was observed that more than 80 per cent of the recruitment took place from India as against the planned equal allocation.

 
   References Top

1.Gupta S. Bhopal gas victims used as guinea pigs: NGO. Times of India 2010; Jun 17. Available from: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Bhopal-gas-victims-used-as-guinea-pigs-NGO/articleshow/6056791.cms   Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Naveen P. 100 docs under scanner for drug trials on poor. Hindustan Times 2010; July 25. Available from: http://www.hindustantimes.com/100-docs-under-scanner-for-drug-trials-on-poor/Article1-577252.aspx   Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Clinical trials in India: ethical concerns. Bull World Health Organ 2008; 86 : 581-2.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Pandey A, Aggarwal AR, Seth SD, Maulik, M. Clinical Trials Registry - India: Raising the veil. Natl Med J India 2010; 23 : 187-8.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Pandey A, Aggarwal AR, Maulik, M, Seth SD. Clinical trial registration gains momentum in India. Indian J Med Res 2009; 130 : 85-6.   Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Pandey A, Aggarwal AR, Seth SD, Maulik M, Bano R, Juneja A. Clinical Trials Registry - India: Redefining the conduct of clinical trials. Indian J Cancer 2008; 45 : 79-82.  Back to cited text no. 6
    




 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed809    
    Printed43    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded150    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal